Recently added

What's new

Essays arrive in groups rather than one at a time. The most recent group is below in full, and every earlier one after it, newest first.

Essays arrive in groups rather than one at a time, and a group usually opens up a subject not covered before. Between one group and the next nothing changes, so a reader who has seen the most recent group has seen everything.

17 September 2026

18 essays on pitch and tuning, form and structure, harmony and voice leading, intervals and chords, timbre and acoustics, scales and modes, perception and the listener and rhythm and metre

Counted in beats, the abandoned chord comes back sooner and by steps. The piece in standard tuning with its G major, open chord given more and more of the piece, searched twice: once minimising the mean departure from just in cents, once minimising the mean beat rate. The vertical axis is how far that chord sits from just at each optimum. Counted in cents it stays at 13.29 cents until it holds exactly 44 beats — the same as the rest of the piece — and then drops to zero in one step. Counted in beats it drops at 30.4 beats to 4.96, then at 47.4 beats to 3.91, then at 73.1 beats to 0.00 cents. At the piece's own 8 beats the two counts agree exactly: the corner does not move, and what the beats change is where the steps are. Pitch and tuning

Counting beats moves the price of a chord, not the tuning

The search that found a guitar piece's best tuning counted every cent of error alike, and the obvious objection is that a cent of a third beats faster than a cent of an octave. Counted in beats instead, every piece gets exactly the same tuning back. What changes is how much of the piece the abandoned chord has to hold before it is rescued — thirty beats instead of forty-four, arriving in three steps instead of one.

6 figures
Two shapes asking fifteen pairs of strings for different things. Every pair of the six strings, and the difference in cents between the two strings' offsets that would make the interval each shape puts on that pair exactly just. The piece's chords fall into two families that never disagree with themselves: E major, open and A major barred at 5 (44 beats), and G major, open (8 beats). They disagree on 13 of the 15 pairs: E2–A2 is asked for 1.96 and -13.69; E2–D3 is asked for 0.00 and 1.96; E2–G3 is asked for -13.69 and 0.00; E2–B3 is asked for 1.96 and -13.69; A2–D3 is asked for -1.96 and 15.64; A2–G3 is asked for -15.64 and 13.69; A2–E4 is asked for -1.96 and 13.69; D3–G3 is asked for -13.69 and -1.96; D3–B3 is asked for 1.96 and -15.64; D3–E4 is asked for 0.00 and -1.96; G3–B3 is asked for 15.64 and -13.69; G3–E4 is asked for 13.69 and 0.00; B3–E4 is asked for -1.96 and 13.69. The ring on each row is where the piece's cheapest tuning actually puts the pair. It sits on the first family's demand every time, which is what abandoning the other chord means: no weighting of the error can put a ring on two different places. Pitch and tuning

The chord a tuning gives up is a fingering

A guitar piece's best tuning makes two of its chords exactly just and abandons the third by thirteen cents, and no way of counting error — cents, beats, squared cents, or only the beats slow enough to hear — brings the third chord back. Fingered as a barre chord in the shape the other two already use, it comes back completely, and the whole piece is exactly just. The conflict was never between chords. It was between hands.

5 figures
A louder final chord stands higher and still stands for a fraction of a second. How far a final chord stands above the listener's running impression at the instant it is released, against how long it lasts. The chord is a struck six-note tonic; "a step louder" is the hammer velocity doubled, which raises its loudness 7.12 phons above the tutti's. At the tutti's level, after 1.2 s of silence, the impression is 8.09 dB below the chord and the chord stands highest, 5.14 dB, at 54 ms; a step louder, straight out of the tutti, the impression is 7.12 dB below the chord and the chord stands highest, 4.51 dB, at 36 ms; a step louder, after 1.2 s of silence, the impression is 15.21 dB below the chord and the chord stands highest, 9.46 dB, at 38 ms. Every curve returns to zero by half a second: the impression climbs to whatever level the chord is played at, so a louder mark is not a stand that lasts but a deeper fall to climb out of, and a silence and a mark add as depths. Form and structure

A louder final chord is a deeper silence and a brighter sound

A final chord marked a step louder than the passage was supposed to stand above a listener's running impression for as long as it sounded, since the impression can climb no higher than the chord. It climbs exactly that high, and the stand closes in half a second as it always did. What a louder mark actually buys is depth — about seven phons, the same depth a second of silence buys — and a spectrum whose balance point sits most of a whole tone higher, which, unlike the stand, lasts for the whole chord.

5 figures
With 4 of six required at the end, the best schedule hands parts over. Six parts entering, leaving and re-entering a five-chord passage over four sounding players, in the walk through all 64 sets of sounding parts that makes the least audible entrance as audible as possible, with no memory of the chord before and at least 4 of the six sounding at the last chord. I, open: clarinet on G4 enters at 0.6 dB; vi, close below: oboe on E4 enters at 0.3 dB, and clarinet leaves; IV, close above: brass on E3 enters at -0.7 dB, voice on C5 enters at 2.2 dB, and oboe leaves; V, bracketing: violin on G5 enters at 7.2 dB; I, hollow: flue pipe on C6 enters at 4.0 dB. The least audible entrance is -0.72 dB against -2.65 for the best schedule in which nobody leaves; the walk has 2 exits and 6 entrances. Form and structure

An exit is worth nothing until the tutti is given up

Six parts entering a five-chord passage have a best schedule when each enters once and stays, and letting parts leave and come back was supposed to improve it. Searched over every set of sounding parts at every chord, it improves it by exactly nothing, with or without the chord before still masking — as long as all six must be playing at the end. Let one part be missing from the final chord and the weakest entrance gains 1.4 decibels; let two be missing and it gains 1.9, by a relay in which the parts with least room come in, are heard for one chord, and give way.

5 figures
Checkpoints sharpen the middle of a form and leave its top vague. A piece of 480 seconds divided 7 times, with how many proportions between 1 : 1 and 3 : 1 a listener tells apart at each level: timed, counted in 2-second units, and counted with a second count of 16-second phrases that can mend a lapse in the first. 480 s: 2.1 timed, 2.2 counted, 3.9 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 2.5 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 240 s: 2.1 timed, 2.5 counted, 7.1 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 3.1 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 120 s: 2.1 timed, 3.1 counted, 13.2 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 4.0 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 60 s: 2.1 timed, 4.1 counted, 19.4 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 5.4 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 30 s: 2.1 timed, 5.4 counted, 18.1 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 7.2 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 15 s: 5.2 timed, 12.2 counted, 12.2 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 12.2 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 7.5 s: 5.2 timed, 10.3 counted, 10.3 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 10.3 with 50 per cent of lapses shared. With the two counts failing independently, the level of 60 seconds goes from 4.1 to 19.4, and the whole piece only from 2.2 to 3.9. Form and structure

Checkpoints sharpen the middle of a form, not its top

A listener who counts bars loses the count somewhere in a long section and is thrown back on timing the whole of it. A listener who also counts phrases can mend the lapse at the last phrase. If the two counts fail independently, the level a minute long goes from four distinguishable proportions to nineteen; the whole eight-minute piece goes only from two to four, because thirty phrases are long enough to lose a count as well. And if a fifth of lapses take both counts at once, three quarters of the gain is gone.

5 figures
The content errs slow and the bass errs fast. Passages of eight bars built at three harmonic rhythms, each with a bass that states every new chord's root and moves to another chord tone on a beat 50 per cent of the time. Two readings are asked the chord rate: one from how much the pitch-class content changes across a grid, one from how completely the bass's moves land on it. At two chords a bar the content reading names the rate 63 per cent of the time, too fast 0 and too slow 37; the bass reading 100, 0 and 0. At one chord a bar the content reading names the rate 67 per cent of the time, too fast 0 and too slow 33; the bass reading 18, 80 and 2. At a chord every two bars the content reading names the rate 98 per cent of the time, too fast 2 and too slow 0; the bass reading 0, 100 and 0. The two readings miss in opposite directions and at opposite ends of the tempo range: the content reading at fast harmonic rhythms, by naming a multiple, and the bass reading at slow ones, by naming its own arpeggiation. Harmony and voice leading

The bass errs fast where the content errs slow

Asked how often the chords change, a reading built on pitch-class content names a slower multiple and never a faster rate. Give the passage a bass that states each new root and moves between chord tones inside a chord, and a reading built on the bass's moves errs the other way: it names a faster grid and never a slower one. At two chords a bar the bass is right every time; at a chord every two bars it is never right. Six ways of combining the two readings each trade one end of the range for the other.

5 figures
Put back beside its notes, the crowd names the bass at every dynamic. A just major third on complex tones, drawn on one axis of harmonic numbers of the fundamental its ratio implies: the partials of the two played notes, and the products of those partials that clear threshold, at 55 and 80 dB. At 55 dB the products alone name 3 times the fundamental with 0 empty slots; the products and the notes together name 1 times it with 4 empty slots, and the notes alone name it with 9. At 80 dB the products alone name 1 times the fundamental with 0 empty slots; the products and the notes together name 1 times it with 0 empty slots, and the notes alone name it with 9. The soft reading on a higher note exists only when the loud notes are set aside. Taken together, the products do not decide which fundamental is named; they decide how many holes its template has. Intervals and chords

The played notes already name the ghost bass

The products of a just third's partials, fitted on their own, name a note a twelfth above the bass when the interval is soft and drop to the bass when it is loud. Put the two played notes back beside them and the drop disappears: the notes and their products name the bass at every dynamic, because the notes' own partials are harmonics of it already. What the dynamic changes is not which note is implied but how complete its harmonic series is — nine holes from the notes alone, four when soft, none when loud.

5 figures
A harder strike buys beats only if the drop does not deepen with it. The beats a mistuned octave on A3 delivers on a string that decays in two stages, against how hard both notes are struck, with the aftersound's drop below the strike 20 dB at 80 dB and changing by a stated number of decibels for each decibel of strike. -0.5 dB per dB: 70 dB 2.5, 75 dB 5.7, 80 dB 8.9, 85 dB 11.9, 90 dB 12.2, 95 dB 11.6, 100 dB 10.9; 0 dB per dB: 70 dB 4.7, 75 dB 6.9, 80 dB 8.9, 85 dB 11.0, 90 dB 12.3, 95 dB 12.2, 100 dB 11.8; +0.5 dB per dB: 70 dB 7.2, 75 dB 8.1, 80 dB 8.9, 85 dB 9.8, 90 dB 10.7, 95 dB 11.2, 100 dB 11.9; +1 dB per dB: 70 dB 9.6, 75 dB 9.2, 80 dB 8.9, 85 dB 8.4, 90 dB 8.1, 95 dB 7.8, 100 dB 7.5. Where the drop stays put, a harder strike keeps buying beats to about 90 dB; where it deepens by a decibel per decibel, every strike past 70 dB costs beats. Intervals and chords

A firm touch buys beats until the aftersound sinks with it

A piano string decays twice, and a mistuned octave's countable beats were found to rise with how hard the note is struck — on the assumption that the aftersound always starts twenty decibels below the strike. It need not. The moment the count shuts is set by the level the aftersound starts at and nothing else, so a harder strike buys beats only if its aftersound does not sink with it. If the drop deepens by more than 0.85 decibels for each decibel of strike, the firm touch costs beats instead.

6 figures
No seventh chord can be spaced to last as long as a triad. Every inversion and spacing within 2 octaves over C3, struck at 80 dB, for two triads and five seventh chords: the bar is the longest any spacing keeps every pair's partial coincidence, and the tick is the bound set by the chord's worst pitch-class distance — the longest any presentation of that distance lasts. major triad: 1.26 s over 12 voicings, bound 1.26 set by the minor third; minor triad: 1.26 s over 12 voicings, bound 1.26 set by the minor third; dominant seventh: 0.66 s over 32 voicings, bound 0.64 set by the tone; major seventh: 0.42 s over 32 voicings, bound 0.38 set by the semitone; minor seventh: 0.69 s over 32 voicings, bound 0.64 set by the tone; half-diminished seventh: 0.69 s over 32 voicings, bound 0.64 set by the tone; diminished seventh: 0.86 s over 32 voicings, bound 0.87 set by the tritone. Every seventh chord contains a distance worse than any a triad contains, except the diminished seventh, whose distances are only minor thirds and tritones. Timbre and acoustics

A seventh chord cannot be spaced to last like a triad

A struck triad keeps the partial coincidences of all its intervals for at most 1.26 seconds, whichever way it is spaced. Run the same census over every inversion and spacing of five kinds of seventh chord and none gets near: the dominant, minor and half-diminished sevenths top out at about two thirds of a second, the major seventh at 0.42. The diminished seventh, which theory calls the least stable of them, lasts longest at 0.86 — because it is the only one with no tone or semitone among its pitch-class distances, and the worst distance a chord contains sets a ceiling no spacing can lift.

5 figures
The ceiling is thirteen bars, and every one of them has a name. Every bar of the six schemes read by the key-finder at a key cost of 3 and a bass weight of 3, with the chord in every bar given exactly — no segmentation is involved. 175 of 188 bars have both the key and the degree right, 93.1 per cent. The misses: 7 in the thirty-two-bar song's bridge, where the chain III7 is read in E major, III7 is read in E major, VI7 is read in E major, VI7 is read in D major, II7 is read in D major, II7 is read in D major, V7 is read in D major; 4 bars of the rondo's A minor episode read as C major; 2 next to a change of key; and 0 of any other kind. Scales and modes

The ceiling is thirteen bars with names

The key-finder's two cues stop buying anything at about 93 per cent of scheme bars read right, and the obvious suspect was the chord segmentation feeding it. The reading was never given a segmentation: every bar arrives with its true chord. What the ceiling is made of can be listed instead, and it is thirteen bars of 188 — seven in a bridge of secondary dominants, four in a minor episode whose chords C major also owns, and two at the edges of a modulation. No weight of any cue moves one of them.

5 figures
A staccato is the direct sound's, and the room takes it within a fifth of the critical distance. A note on 130.8 Hz held 0.4 s and damped, in a room of 2 s reverberation, heard at distances from 0.02 to 5 times the critical distance: how long after the release the note takes to fall 10 dB and 20 dB. To fall 10 dB: 24 ms at the source, 333 ms far away; 0.02: 24 ms, 0.05: 25 ms, 0.1: 25 ms, 0.15: 26 ms, 0.2: 28 ms, 0.3: 35 ms, 0.5: 103 ms, 0.75: 187 ms, 1: 234 ms, 1.5: 281 ms, 2: 302 ms, 3: 318 ms, 5: 328 ms; doubled by 0.38 of the critical distance. To fall 20 dB: 49 ms at the source, 667 ms far away; 0.02: 49 ms, 0.05: 51 ms, 0.1: 60 ms, 0.15: 117 ms, 0.2: 198 ms, 0.3: 308 ms, 0.5: 436 ms, 0.75: 520 ms, 1: 568 ms, 1.5: 614 ms, 2: 635 ms, 3: 652 ms, 5: 661 ms; doubled by 0.14 of the critical distance. Where the direct sound and the room are equal, the damper's work is already hidden: the room's copy is only 20 dB below the direct sound at a tenth of the critical distance, and a 20 dB fall reaches it there. Timbre and acoustics

Only the player hears a staccato end

A damper stops a string in a seventh of a second, and in a hall the room goes on for two. A listener hears both, mixed in proportion to how close they sit, and the question was at what distance the short part stops mattering. The answer is closer than any seat. A damped note's twenty-decibel fall has doubled in length by a seventh of a hall's critical distance — 77 centimetres in a two-second concert hall — and by a quarter of it in a jazz club. The end of a staccato is something the pianist hears and the front row does not.

5 figures
The arch belongs to hearing, and the spacing only moves it. The share of a close major triad's twenty-four components that stand above what the rest of the chord masks, at 70 dB, with the root from C1 to C7, for three spectra given the same amplitude law and different frequencies: the harmonic series, a founder's bell, and a stiff string with B = 0.01. harmonic series: 0.04 at C1, peaking at 0.79 on E3, 0.42 at C7; a founder's bell: 0.04 at C1, peaking at 0.75 on C4, 0.38 at C7; a stiff string: 0.04 at C1, peaking at 0.71 on E3, 0.46 at C7. Only one of the three is a harmonic series, and all three rise out of the bass, peak in the middle of the compass and fall in the treble. Perception and the listener

The arch belongs to hearing, not to the series

A chord delivers most of its partials in the middle of the compass and loses them in the bass and the treble, and every spectrum that showed that arch was built on whole multiples of a fundamental. Give the same amplitudes to a bell's eight modes and to a stiff string's stretched partials and the arch is still there, peaking within a major third of where the harmonic series peaks. What the spacing changes is the detail: a bell crowds its tierce and quint into a quarter of a critical band in the bass and loses them, and a stiff string's stretch buys the bass back.

5 figures
A listener who hears only the landmarks recognises the metre sooner. The share of metres recognised within the 16 steps of a 3.5-second present after coming in at a random step, against how many metres the listener knows, for five listeners: every onset with nothing marked, every onset with the long beats accented, only the downbeats and long beats with nothing marked, every onset with the downbeat accented, and only the downbeats and long beats with the downbeat marked. Every onset, nothing marked: 5 known, 49% within the present, 3% never; 10 known, 19% within the present, 8% never; 30 known, 1% within the present, 17% never; 100 known, 0% within the present, 34% never. Every onset, long beats accented: 5 known, 68% within the present, 3% never; 10 known, 39% within the present, 8% never; 30 known, 6% within the present, 17% never; 100 known, 0% within the present, 34% never. Landmarks only, nothing marked: 5 known, 69% within the present, 0% never; 10 known, 61% within the present, 3% never; 30 known, 26% within the present, 3% never; 100 known, 9% within the present, 9% never. Every onset, downbeat accented: 5 known, 88% within the present, 0% never; 10 known, 74% within the present, 0% never; 30 known, 54% within the present, 0% never; 100 known, 14% within the present, 0% never. Landmarks only, downbeat marked: 5 known, 91% within the present, 0% never; 10 known, 82% within the present, 0% never; 30 known, 56% within the present, 0% never; 100 known, 23% within the present, 0% never. Rhythm and metre

A late dancer needs the landmarks, not the rhythm

A listener who joins an additive-metre dance part-way recognises it far more reliably with the downbeat accented. Strip the stream down to its landmarks — the onsets that begin a bar or a long beat, with every other onset removed — and the listener does as well or better: knowing a hundred metres, 23 per cent are recognised within the present against 14 with every onset. Unmarked, the landmarks still beat every onset with the long beats accented. Neither half does it alone; what identifies a metre from a late entry is where its long beats sit relative to its bar.

5 figures
Against a pulse, the bell pattern is the quickest of its orders to place. The bits of position a listener is still missing, averaged over the first cycle heard, for each cyclic order of the gaps 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 in 12 steps, heard alone, against a pulse every three steps and against a pulse every four, at perfect memory, half-life 3 steps, half-life 1.5 steps. 2 2 2 1 2 1 2: alone 1.08, 1.23, 1.73; against a pulse every 3 steps 0.69, 0.75, 0.96; against a pulse every 4 steps 0.63, 0.67, 0.85. 2 2 2 2 1 1 2: alone 1.22, 1.63, 2.02; against a pulse every 3 steps 0.60, 0.73, 0.92; against a pulse every 4 steps 0.83, 1.07, 1.36. 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 (the standard bell pattern): alone 1.25, 1.45, 1.82; against a pulse every 3 steps 0.54, 0.56, 0.67; against a pulse every 4 steps 0.55, 0.57, 0.68. Alone, the bell pattern is not the quickest order to place at any memory. Against either pulse it is the quickest at every memory. Rhythm and metre

Against a pulse the bell pattern is the easiest to place

Heard alone, the standard bell pattern is not the quickest order of its own gaps to place in its cycle, for a listener with any memory. Heard against a pulse every three steps or every four — which is how anyone hears it — it is the quickest, at every memory and at every alignment of pulse and bell, and by a wide margin: at a memory of a quarter of the cycle, 0.56 bits unplaced over the first cycle against 0.73 for either rival against a pulse in threes. Six of eight named timelines do the same. A timeline's order of gaps looks chosen for how it sits against the beat, not for how it sounds alone.

5 figures
A timed expectation would erase a slow cycle's cost, and a listener cannot time a slow cycle that well. Bits of position a listener with a 3.5-second memory is still missing over the first cycle of son clave, against how long the cycle takes, for a newcomer with no expectation, a listener timing the cycle with the Weber fraction a duration that long is judged with, and a listener timing it to ten per cent. a newcomer, no expectation: 2 s 0.94, 8 s 0.97, 24 s 1.41, 40 s 2.02, 60 s 2.47; timing as well as listeners do: 2 s 0.68 (w 0.150), 8 s 0.69 (w 0.150), 24 s 0.85 (w 0.150), 40 s 1.90 (w 0.375), 60 s 2.38 (w 0.375); timing the cycle to ten per cent: 2 s 0.47, 8 s 0.48, 24 s 0.55, 40 s 0.73, 60 s 1.02. At ten per cent even a sixty-second cycle is placed about as well as a newcomer places a two-second one. At the precision a listener actually has for durations of half a minute or more, the expectation is worth a tenth of a bit. Rhythm and metre

An expectation cannot rescue a cycle too slow to time

A listener who knows a piece arrives with an expectation of where in the cycle they are, and the size of that expectation was the number the last essay said nobody had. It can be given one: a listener who has been timing the cycle carries a spread of their Weber fraction times the cycle, which is the same number of steps at any tempo. Timed to ten per cent, a forty-second cycle would be placed better than a newcomer places a two-second one. But forty seconds is judged in the band where the Weber fraction is nearer forty per cent, and there the expectation is worth a tenth of a bit.

5 figures
Counted over what arrives, the balanced bass is not the roughest register. The mean roughness of the I – vi – IV – V – I arrivals with each chord played as loud as the written register's, relative to the written register, counted over every partial and over the partials that stand above what the rest of the chord masks. Every partial: 70 −2 octaves, 7.48 −1 octave, 1.00 as written, 0.20 +1 octave. Delivered partials only: 6e-9 −2 octaves, 2.83 −1 octave, 1.00 as written, 0.19 +1 octave. Over every partial the lowest register is 343 times rougher than the highest; over what arrives it is the smoothest of the four, and the roughest is −1 octave, 2.8 times the written register. Perception and the listener

A bass chord low enough to balance has already hidden its tenor

Played as loud as the written register, a progression two octaves down is 343 times rougher than the same progression an octave up — if every partial on the page is counted. Count only the partials that stand above what the rest of the chord masks and that register is the smoothest of the four, with nothing left that beats. The balance is not what does it: the extra thirteen decibels move no voice by more than two partials. The register had already buried the tenor at the written dynamic.

6 figures
A wrong bar costs the same whichever instrument it is on. What moving one degree of a measured slendro by 10 cents, flat or sharp, adds to the roughness per second of a two-instrument texture — a ringing part at 0.15 s a note over a damped one four times slower — on the ringing instrument and on the damped one. The ensemble in tune scores 7.47. Degree 1 (0¢): ringing 0.142 flat and 0.202 sharp, damped 0.163 and 0.185, of which beating 0.178; Degree 2 (231¢): ringing 0.119 flat and 0.068 sharp, damped 0.096 and 0.090, of which beating 0.093; Degree 3 (474¢): ringing 0.106 flat and 0.021 sharp, damped 0.069 and 0.057, of which beating 0.063; Degree 5 (717¢): ringing 0.079 flat and 0.072 sharp, damped 0.075 and 0.078, of which beating 0.077; Degree 6 (955¢): ringing 0.023 flat and 0.018 sharp, damped 0.019 and 0.022, of which beating 0.020. Over all ten errors the ringing instrument's cost 0.85 and the damped one's 0.85, and the wrong bar beating against the other instrument's right one comes to 0.86 on either — as much as the whole, because the intervals the error changes add as often as they save. One error costs about 1.1% of the texture's roughness. Scales and modes

A wrong bar beats the same on either instrument

The ringing instrument carries a gamelan scale's standing, so a tuning error on it was predicted to cost more than the same error on the damped instrument. Put in the beating the model lacked, and the prediction fails: moved ten cents, a degree costs the same 0.85 summed over the scale on either instrument, because almost all of the cost is the wrong bar beating against the right one on the other instrument, and a beat belongs to both of the bars that make it. Moving a whole instrument costs exactly what its five degrees cost separately, and it takes nothing from the scale's standing.

6 figures
Holding the bass through one mid-bar change in six finds the barline five times in six. Passages of eight bars at two chords a bar, with the bass arpeggiating on 50 per cent of its beats, and each barline reading's share of passages it places correctly, against the share of mid-bar chord changes voiced over the bass already sounding. 0% held (convention strength 0): metre then bass 50%, bass alone 13%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 10%; 4% held (convention strength 0.1): metre then bass 62%, bass alone 34%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 10%; 6% held (convention strength 0.2): metre then bass 68%, bass alone 44%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 15%; 9% held (convention strength 0.3): metre then bass 75%, bass alone 57%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 18%; 15% held (convention strength 0.4): metre then bass 82%, bass alone 68%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 13%; 16% held (convention strength 0.5): metre then bass 85%, bass alone 74%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 14%; 20% held (convention strength 0.6): metre then bass 88%, bass alone 79%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 11%; 26% held (convention strength 0.7): metre then bass 92%, bass alone 86%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 13%; 27% held (convention strength 0.8): metre then bass 92%, bass alone 86%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 13%; 28% held (convention strength 0.9): metre then bass 95%, bass alone 92%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 10%; 33% held (convention strength 1): metre then bass 96%, bass alone 93%, metre alone 50%, chord changes alone 10%. The metre ties the barline with the half-bar and the chord changes are at chance, since the chords change at both; the bass's holds are the only evidence that separates them. Harmony and voice leading

A bass that holds through a change marks the barline

At two chords a bar the chords change on the barline and on the half-bar alike, so a reading of where they change is at chance, and the metre ties the two. The bass has one more piece of evidence: a change inside the bar can be voiced over the note already sounding, and a change on the barline is voiced over its root. Hold the bass through one mid-bar change in six and the metre and bass together place the barline in 85 per cent of eight-bar passages; one in three, 97. The convention cannot be stronger than that, and the chord changes, asked first, only get in the way.

6 figures

Before that

Everything published earlier, newest first. Titles only — the cards are on the full listing.

16 September 2026

4 essays on pitch and tuning, timbre and acoustics, perception and the listener and scales and modes

15 September 2026

20 essays on timbre and acoustics, intervals and chords, form and structure, pitch and tuning, rhythm and metre, harmony and voice leading and scales and modes

13 September 2026

15 essays on form and structure, harmony and voice leading, intervals and chords, pitch and tuning, rhythm and metre, scales and modes and timbre and acoustics

12 September 2026

17 essays on pitch and tuning, intervals and chords, timbre and acoustics, scales and modes, harmony and voice leading, rhythm and metre and form and structure

9 September 2026

20 essays on form and structure, intervals and chords, pitch and tuning and scales and modes

8 September 2026

20 essays on instruments and their design, perception and the listener, intervals and chords, harmony and voice leading, timbre and acoustics, rhythm and metre and form and structure

5 September 2026

50 essays on instruments and their design, perception and the listener, rhythm and metre, timbre and acoustics, form and structure, harmony and voice leading, intervals and chords, scales and modes and pitch and tuning

3 September 2026

20 essays on instruments and their design, timbre and acoustics, rhythm and metre, pitch and tuning, form and structure, intervals and chords, perception and the listener, harmony and voice leading and scales and modes

1 September 2026

20 essays on instruments and their design, pitch and tuning, rhythm and metre, timbre and acoustics, intervals and chords, perception and the listener, harmony and voice leading, form and structure and scales and modes

30 August 2026

40 essays on instruments and their design, timbre and acoustics, pitch and tuning, intervals and chords, perception and the listener, rhythm and metre, form and structure, scales and modes and harmony and voice leading

28 August 2026

20 essays on rhythm and metre, instruments and their design, perception and the listener, form and structure, timbre and acoustics, pitch and tuning, intervals and chords, scales and modes and harmony and voice leading

27 August 2026

15 essays on perception and the listener, timbre and acoustics, intervals and chords, pitch and tuning, instruments and their design, harmony and voice leading, rhythm and metre, scales and modes and form and structure

26 August 2026

15 essays on harmony and voice leading, scales and modes, form and structure, intervals and chords, instruments and their design, perception and the listener, timbre and acoustics, rhythm and metre and pitch and tuning

24 August 2026

15 essays on scales and modes, pitch and tuning, rhythm and metre, timbre and acoustics, instruments and their design, harmony and voice leading, perception and the listener, form and structure and intervals and chords

22 August 2026

15 essays on scales and modes, form and structure, instruments and their design, pitch and tuning, timbre and acoustics, rhythm and metre, intervals and chords and harmony and voice leading

21 August 2026

15 essays on instruments and their design, timbre and acoustics, pitch and tuning, intervals and chords, harmony and voice leading, form and structure and scales and modes

20 August 2026

15 essays on scales and modes, pitch and tuning, perception and the listener, intervals and chords, harmony and voice leading and timbre and acoustics

19 August 2026

15 essays on rhythm and metre, pitch and tuning, perception and the listener, form and structure, instruments and their design and timbre and acoustics

17 August 2026

15 essays on form and structure, perception and the listener, harmony and voice leading, intervals and chords and instruments and their design

16 August 2026

15 essays on pitch and tuning, harmony and voice leading, scales and modes, intervals and chords, timbre and acoustics and perception and the listener

14 August 2026

15 essays on form and structure, harmony and voice leading, timbre and acoustics and rhythm and metre

13 August 2026

15 essays on instruments and their design, timbre and acoustics and pitch and tuning

11 August 2026

15 essays on perception and the listener, timbre and acoustics, pitch and tuning, intervals and chords and rhythm and metre

10 August 2026

12 essays on pitch and tuning, intervals and chords, scales and modes, harmony and voice leading, rhythm and metre and timbre and acoustics

3–7 August 2026

34 essays on pitch and tuning, intervals and chords, scales and modes, harmony and voice leading, rhythm and metre and timbre and acoustics

Every essay, by subject · by subject · by thread · search