The played notes already name the ghost bass
Assumes: The ghost bass drops a twelfth at a forte · Three harmonics of the bass arrive before the bass
The ghost bass drops a twelfth at a forte put every product of every pair of partials of a just interval into one set and asked what pitch the set implies. For a major third, 5 : 4, the answer depended on the dynamic. Softly, only the cubic products clear their thresholds, and they are an exact harmonic series on three times the fundamental the ratio implies — a twelfth above the bass. Loudly, the difference tones fill in the low harmonics and the fit falls to the fundamental. The ghost’s pitch drops nineteen semitones as the passage gets louder.
That essay said plainly which simplification carried the result. The crowd was fitted on its own, with the two played notes’ partials set aside, and they are not set aside in an ear. As a major triad’s combination tones are its own notes found for pure tones, for a just p : q interval the partials of the lower note are multiples of p times the fundamental and those of the upper are multiples of q times it — the same fundamental every product is a multiple of. So the full evidence a listener receives is three sets of multiples of one number, and the played notes contribute exactly the low harmonics that the soft crowd lacks. The essay declined to run that fit because it depended on a decision it could not make: whether a pitch mechanism treats the loud notes and the faint products as one object or as a figure and a ground.
Both fits can be made on the same components, and the difference between them is the whole of the earlier result.
Two readings of one set of components
The interval is a major third, C4 against E4, with the fundamental its ratio implies at C2, 65.4 hertz. Each note has six partials falling as one over their number, and the products are the earlier essay’s: every difference tone and every cubic product of every pair of partials, kept when it clears its own threshold under the masking the primaries cast.
The ground reading fits a harmonic template to the lowest eight audible products and ignores the notes. That is exactly the earlier essay’s fit, and it reproduces its staircase.
The object reading fits the same template to the lowest eight members of the union of products and the notes’ own partials. Nothing else differs.
Both are the collection’s residue fit: it assigns rising harmonic numbers to the components, fits a fundamental by least squares, and among candidates that fit within thirty cents prefers the one that leaves the fewest harmonic slots unexplained inside its span. Since every component is a whole multiple of 65.4 hertz, every candidate is a whole multiple too, and the only question is which one.
The object reading never drops
Fitted with the notes, the crowd names the fundamental at every dynamic, for every interval tried.
For the major third the products alone name three times the fundamental at the softest dynamic that delivers any and once it above about seventy decibels. The minor third’s products name four times it softly — the note two octaves above the bass — and the fourth’s name twice it. With the notes added, all three name once the fundamental from the quietest level to the loudest. There is no switch.
The reason is visible on the axis at the top of the essay. The lower note of a major third is the fourth harmonic of the implied bass and the upper note the fifth, so the two played notes’ partials sit at harmonics 4, 5, 8, 10, 12, 15, 16 and 20. No template on three times the fundamental can explain a component at harmonic 4 or 5 — they are not multiples of three — so once the notes are in the set, the twelfth is not a candidate at all. The soft crowd’s perfect series on the twelfth was perfect only because the components that contradict it had been left out.
So the earlier essay’s drop is a property of the figure-and-ground reading specifically. It is not wrong; it is conditional, and the condition is now a sentence rather than an assumption. A listener who hears the played notes as the thing and the products as something else is offered a ghost that jumps a twelfth with the dynamic. A listener who hears all of it as one sound is offered the same bass at every dynamic.
What the products do instead
If the products do not decide which note is implied, they are not doing nothing, and the fit says what they do.
The two played notes alone already imply the bass — every one of their partials is one of its harmonics — but they imply it with gaps. Their lowest eight partials span harmonics 4 to 20 and fill eight of those seventeen slots, so a template on the fundamental has nine holes in it. That is a weak implication: a pitch mechanism asked to hear a fundamental beneath eight widely spaced harmonics with nine missing is being asked to do a great deal.
The soft products fill some of the holes. The cubic crowd at 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 lands between the notes’ partials, and the lowest eight members of the union — 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 12 and 15 — leave four holes from 44 decibels to 68. At about seventy the difference tones arrive at the low harmonics, and from 76 decibels the lowest eight components are harmonics 1 to 8 with nothing missing. The note named has not moved; its support has gone from a sketch to a complete series.
That reframes the thing three harmonics of the bass arrive before the bass found — that the crowd names the bass at a lower dynamic than the bass’s own component needs. Read with the notes in, the crowd was never the source of the bass. The notes were, and the crowd is what makes their implication complete enough to hear.
The consequence for a passage is direct. The bass line under a passage in thirds found that a scale harmonised in just thirds draws a diatonic bass line through its difference tones, and the essays after it found that line fading in and out with the dynamic and jumping a twelfth when soft. Read as one object, every step of that passage names its bass at every dynamic, so the line is there at piano as well as at forte — thinner, with more of its series missing, but on the same notes. What a crescendo does to it is fill it in, not move it.
Across five intervals
The same two readings for a set of just intervals, at a soft and a loud dynamic.
Every interval’s notes name its implied fundamental, and they do it with a number of holes set by the ratio. A fifth, 3 : 2, leaves only three: its notes are the second and third harmonics, and their partials crowd the low series. A fourth, 4 : 3, leaves six; a major sixth, 5 : 3, eight; a major third nine; a minor third, 6 : 5, twelve. The count grows with the size of the numbers in the ratio, which is a restatement of why the small ratios are the stable ones in the series is not a chord — a small ratio puts its notes low in a series, where the harmonics are close together.
The products help unequally. For the minor third they halve the holes when soft, from twelve to six, and leave one when loud. For the major sixth, eight becomes six and then two. For the fourth they do almost nothing softly and leave four even when loud, because the fourth’s products fall largely on harmonics its notes already supply. For the fifth, three becomes two at the loudest. The intervals whose notes imply their bass weakly are the ones whose products do the most filling, with the fourth as the exception, and the fifth barely needs them.
The products alone, beside each row, show where the earlier essay’s staircase came from, and why the tone on the root changes hands at the fifth. The major third’s soft crowd names three times the fundamental and the minor third’s four; the fourth’s names twice it softly; the fifth’s and the sixth’s name the fundamental whatever the dynamic. The intervals whose soft crowd names a higher note are exactly the ones for which 2p − q, the multiple the cubic products sit on, is greater than one.
How many components the fit is allowed
The one free choice in the object reading is how many of the lowest components the template is fitted to, and the result is only interesting if it survives changing it. So the soft major third, minor third and fourth were refitted with anything from three to twelve components.
The object reading names the fundamental at every size from three to ten, for all three intervals, soft and loud. What changes is the count of holes, and it changes in the direction the resolved-harmonics argument would want. Fitted to its three lowest components the soft major third is harmonics 4, 5 and 6 — a complete stretch of the series, no holes at all — and the fundamental is as well supported as a missing fundamental can be from three components. With four to six components the major third has one hole; with eight, four; with ten, five; with twelve, nine. The minor third runs from one hole at three components to ten at ten, and the fourth from one to eight.
That is the reverse of what a sceptic of the object reading might expect. The fewer components a pitch mechanism uses, the more completely the soft notes and their products imply the bass, because the lowest few components of a third and its crowd are consecutive harmonics — the played notes at 4 and 5 and the first cubic product at 6. The holes come from reaching up the series into the region where the notes’ partials are spaced out and the soft crowd is thin. The only size at which the fit fails is twelve components for the minor third, where the highest partial is past the twenty-fourth harmonic the fit allows, and that is a limit of the search rather than a change of answer.
The ground reading does not change with the size either: three, four and two times the fundamental for the three intervals at every size tried. The difference between the readings is not a matter of how much of the spectrum is listened to. It is entirely a matter of whether the notes are in the set.
This is also the version of the result that connects to what is known about pitch from harmonics. Which harmonics carry the pitch found the dominant region for a residue pitch low in the series, in the first few resolved harmonics, and the note that is not there began from the observation that a fundamental is heard beneath consecutive harmonics even when absent. A soft just third supplies exactly that: three consecutive harmonics of its implied bass, two from the notes and one from the ear.
Which computation produced the numbers
The notes are C4 and E4, or the corresponding just intervals over the same implied fundamental of 65.4 hertz, each with six partials at one over their number. The products and their thresholds are the earlier essay’s: each pair of partials’ difference tone and cubic product at levels set by the weaker partial, compared against the threshold of hearing and the masking the primaries cast. When a harmonic number is reached by several pairs the loudest is kept. The residue fit uses the lowest eight components, harmonic numbers up to 24 and a tolerance of thirty cents, and counts empty slots between the lowest and highest harmonic assigned.
The played notes’ partials are all taken as audible. At the levels here they are tens of decibels above threshold, and a partial that is part of a played note is not in doubt in the way a product is.
What the fit takes for granted
That a pitch mechanism fits a template to the lowest few components. Eight is the earlier essay’s choice, made because the resolved region of the cochlea holds only a few. Fit more and the played notes’ higher partials dominate the set even further; fit fewer and at some dynamic the soft crowd might again supply most of the lowest components. The object reading’s stability is robust to adding components and not guaranteed against removing them.
That empty slots are the right measure of support. A template with four holes and one with nine name the same note in this fit, and whether a listener hears the implied bass at all depends on more than the count — on which harmonics are present and how strong they are. The third sound magnifies cents, not hertz showed how sensitive the products’ positions are to tuning, and a tempered interval has no single fundamental for all three sets to share.
That the notes are steady. Real notes have attacks in which their partials arrive at different times, and the products of partials that have not yet arrived do not exist yet. The two readings may briefly disagree at the onset of a note and agree once it has settled.
What neither reading can settle
Which reading a listener uses. That is the question the earlier essay could not decide from arithmetic, and it still cannot. What has changed is that the two answers are now known and differ in a checkable way: one predicts a pitch that jumps with the dynamic and one predicts a pitch that does not.
Whether the implied bass is heard at all. A template with nine holes names a note for a least-squares fit. Whether a listener hears a low C under a soft major third in the middle register is a perception experiment; a missing fundamental is heard reliably only when enough low harmonics are present and resolved, and the counts above say how many are.
Whose thirds
Paired voices in thirds — two horns, two clarinets, two sopranos — are among the commonest textures in Western writing, and players and singers in close harmony have long reported hearing a low tone beneath a well-tuned third. The arithmetic here says that tone is implied by the two notes themselves and made more complete by the products, and that its pitch does not depend on the dynamic unless the listener is somehow separating the notes from the rest of the sound. That separation is exactly what a player attending to their own part might do and a listener attending to the whole might not, which would make the same third a different object to the player and to the audience.
Still open: the tempered third, where the three sets stop sharing a fundamental
Everything above depends on a just interval, for which the notes’ partials, the difference tones and the cubic products are all multiples of one frequency. In equal temperament that stops being true: the upper note is fourteen cents sharp of 5 : 4, its partials are no longer multiples of 65.4 hertz, and each product lands a different number of cents from any harmonic — the magnification the earlier essays measured.
The object fit then has to choose between a fundamental that explains the notes and one that explains the products, and the dynamic decides how many of each are in the lowest eight components. The prediction is that a tempered third behaves like the figure-and-ground reading after all, because its products and its notes disagree about the fundamental, and that the note named softly and loudly will differ by the tuning’s error multiplied up the series. Running the same two fits with the upper note detuned is one parameter in functions that already accept it, and what would come out is whether just intonation is what lets a third’s notes and its ghost be heard as one sound.
Part 8 of 8
One essay in the series on combination tone. The essays either side of this one:
The objects named here
The third way in, after the field and the series: the things themselves, and every essay that touches each one.
Combination toneDynamicsHarmonic seriesJust intonationMissing fundamentalResidue pitch
- A combination-tone bass needs a forte combination tone, dynamics, just intonation
- The root an ear supplies harmonic series, just intonation, residue pitch
- A bell has no fundamental harmonic series, residue pitch
- A pitch with nothing to match missing fundamental, residue pitch
- The bass a small loudspeaker does not make missing fundamental, residue pitch
- The ear makes its own sound, and it is not the missing fundamental combination tone, residue pitch