Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Residue pitch — where it appears

The pitch heard at a fundamental that is not present in the sound, inferred from the spacing of the partials that are. Shifting every partial by a constant moves the heard pitch while leaving the spacing alone, which rules out a difference-tone account.

Named by 18 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

A note with its first partial removed. The spectrum of a 220 Hz tone with the lowest partial deleted, and the wave that remains. The wave still repeats 220 times a second, because the repeat rate of a sum of harmonics is fixed by the spacing between them and the spacing has not changed. The pitch heard is the one that is no longer in the sound.

The note that is not there

A telephone reproduces nothing below about three hundred hertz, and a bass line down at eighty comes through it perfectly. The pitch that is heard is not a frequency present in the sound, and one nineteenth-century experiment settles what it is instead.

intervals · Missing fundamental 1000 and 1200 hertz, and what the ear adds. Two tones presented to a listener, and the frequencies a nonlinear ear generates from them. Nothing in the air is at any of the marked positions: they are products of the pair, at f₂ − f₁ = 200 Hz, 2f₁ − f₂ = 800 Hz, 3f₁ − 2f₂ = 600 Hz, 2f₂ − f₁ = 1400 Hz. The cubic difference tone sits just below the lower primary and is audible at modest levels; the quadratic one is far below both and needs a loud pair.

The ear makes its own sound, and it is not the missing fundamental

Play two loud tones and a third pitch appears that is in neither of them. The ear is not a passive analyser: it is nonlinear, it generates frequencies of its own, and it emits sound back out of the ear canal. None of which explains the missing fundamental — the products land in the wrong place, and finding out where they land is the experiment that made the residue theory necessary.

intervals · Missing fundamental A bell tuned to 294 Hz, and the note it is heard at. The partials of a well-tuned church bell, as ratios to the prime, with the three that imply the strike note marked. The nominal, twelfth and double octave sit at 2, 3 and 4, which is a harmonic series on 1 — so they imply a fundamental at 294 Hz, an octave below the loudest partial the bell has. The tierce at 1.2 is a MINOR third above the prime, which is why a bell has a minor quality by construction rather than by choice.

A bell has no fundamental

The note a listener names when a church bell is struck is not any partial the bell has. Its nominal, twelfth and double octave sit at 2, 3 and 4 times the prime, which is a harmonic series on a pitch an octave below the loudest thing in the sound — and that pitch is supplied by the listener. Founders have been tuning it by ear since the fifteenth century.

instruments · Missing fundamental What is struck, and where its partials land. Partial ratios for an ideal string, an ideal membrane, a kettledrum, drawn on a logarithmic axis so that a whole-number ratio is a fixed distance from the last. An ideal string: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. An ideal membrane: 1, 1.59, 2.14, 2.29, 2.65, 2.92. A kettledrum: 1, 1.50, 1.99, 2.44, 2.89. The membrane's are Bessel zeros — a derivation, and they land nowhere near the whole numbers. The kettledrum's have been pulled toward 2 : 3 : 4 : 5 by the enclosed air, on a fundamental an octave below the lowest partial present.

What a drum is doing instead

An ideal membrane's modes are zeros of Bessel functions — 1, 1.59, 2.14, 2.30 — which support no common fundamental, so a drum rings without a note. A timpani is that problem solved — the kettle's air and the radiation load drag four modes onto 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, and the pitch a timpanist tunes is the fundamental those four imply and none of them is.

instruments · Missing fundamental Which harmonics of a 200 Hz note arrive one to a filter. One row per harmonic of a 200.0 Hz tone. The bar is the ear's analysis band at that harmonic on the equivalent rectangular bandwidth model, and the two small marks either side are the neighbouring harmonics. A harmonic is counted as resolved when the spacing to its neighbours, 200.0 Hz, exceeds that bandwidth, and 8 of 12 are. The third to fifth harmonics are picked out because published measurements put the pitch's dominance region there; nothing in this drawing derives that.

Which harmonics carry the pitch

A missing fundamental is inferred from a pattern, and a pattern has to be legible before it can be matched. Counting how many harmonics of a note land in separate auditory filters prices the inference — and the answer at the bottom of a bass guitar's range is none of them.

intervals · Missing fundamental What 2 partials imply, and how many answers there are. The partials are at 32.7, 49.0 Hz. Each row is a harmonic series they are consistent with to within 30 cents: the filled dots are the partials in their assigned slots and the open dots are slots the series predicts that nothing occupies. There are 5 such series with harmonic numbers up to 16, the best fitting them to 1.4 cents with a fundamental of 16.34 Hz and no unoccupied slot. The rest sit at one half, one third, one quarter, one fifth of it and their arithmetic is exactly as exact; what separates them is the count of empty slots, which is why a residue pitch built from few partials is reported an octave out by a minority of listeners and not by the rest.

Two pipes for a note neither makes

The resultant stop sounds a sixteen-foot pipe and a ten-and-two-thirds-foot pipe and asks the listener for a thirty-two-foot note. It is the missing fundamental built on purpose from the fewest partials that can imply anything — and counting how many fundamentals two partials actually imply is the arithmetic behind three centuries of builders disagreeing about whether it works.

instruments · Missing fundamental A 200-a-second click train, correlated with itself. The autocorrelation of a click train at 200 a second, smoothed by the ring of an auditory filter centred at 4000 Hz — an equivalent rectangular bandwidth of 456 Hz, so a ring of 2.2 ms. The regular train peaks at 5.0 ms, one period. With each click displaced by a standard deviation of 20 per cent of the period — 1.00 ms — the peak's contrast against the surrounding lags falls from 0.41 to 0.12. The average rate and the long-term spectrum are unchanged by the jitter; only the timing is.

A pitch with nothing to match

Filter a click train into a band where no partial is separable from its neighbours and it still has a pitch at its repetition rate. Displace each click by a fraction of a millisecond, leaving the average rate and the long-term spectrum exactly where they were, and the pitch goes. The mechanism is reading the timing — which bounds the account endorsed here from the start.

perception · Missing fundamental The most a 6 cm cone can make of a low note. The maximum sound pressure level at one metre from a circular radiator of effective radius 3.2 cm, moving 1.5 mm at its limit, in a system resonating at 250 Hz. Below resonance the cone is already at that limit and the pressure a piston makes goes as the square of frequency, so the curve falls at twelve decibels an octave: 66 dB at 40 Hz, 78 dB at 80 Hz, 94 dB at 200 Hz. The 40 Hz figure is 28 decibels below the 200 Hz one, and that gap is arithmetic about a radius and a displacement rather than a property of any particular loudspeaker. The dots are the harmonics of a 41.2 Hz note with a one-over-n source spectrum; the loudest of them is the 6th.

The bass a small loudspeaker does not make

A three-inch cone at its excursion limit produces sixty-six decibels at forty hertz, which the ear converts to seventeen phons — barely above nothing. The note is heard anyway, because its harmonics are radiated and its fundamental is supplied by the listener. Computing what arrives turns the residue from a curiosity into a design decision, and finds that the fundamental of a low note is not the loudest part of it on any system a listener is likely to own.

instruments · Missing fundamental Every voicing of a second-inversion major triad, least rough first. All 27 arrangements of the same three pitch classes within 3 octaves from 131 Hz, scored for roughness. The best is spaced 19 then 9 semitones — wide below, close above — and the worst is the chord in close position at the bottom of the range, 7.6 times rougher with exactly the same notes in it.

The inversion that cannot end a phrase

Three positions of one triad, three measurements, and the practice contradicted at every turn. The second inversion is the smoothest of the three by roughness, the best explained of the three by a virtual-pitch model, and the one that three centuries of practice will not let a phrase end on. What forbids it is a rule about a two-voice skeleton.

intervals · The triad a major triad, C–E–G. The partials are at 261.6, 329.6, 392.0 Hz. Each row is a harmonic series they are consistent with to within 30 cents: the filled dots are the partials in their assigned slots and the open dots are slots the series predicts that nothing occupies. There are 2 such series with harmonic numbers up to 16, the best fitting them to 10.1 cents with a fundamental of 65.54 Hz and no unoccupied slot. The rest sit at one half of it and their arithmetic is exactly as exact; what separates them is the count of empty slots, which is why a residue pitch built from few partials is reported an octave out by a minority of listeners and not by the rest.

The root an ear supplies

A major triad's notes fit 4:5:6 with nothing missing and a fundamental two octaves below the bass. A minor triad's fit two different series with two different answers a major sixth apart, and the model cannot choose between them. The ambiguity theorists argued about for two centuries is a computable quantity, and the spectrum invented to remove it is one no object produces.

intervals · The triad The pitch moves and the repetition rate does not. Three partials around harmonic 10 of 200 hertz, shifted together by up to 200 hertz, with three curves. The flat line is the envelope repetition rate, which the shift cannot move at all. The rising line is the shift divided by the harmonic number — 200 hertz becoming 220.0 — which is what a harmonic template predicts and is what listeners report. The third curve is the next-best template, which overtakes the first partway along: the pitch is ambiguous, and it drops back rather than rising indefinitely.

The pitch that moves the wrong distance

Take three partials two hundred hertz apart and move every one of them up by forty. The spacing has not changed, so anything reading the pitch off how often the waveform repeats must give the same answer as before. The pitch moves to 204 — the shift divided by the harmonic number — which is what a harmonic template predicts and what listeners report. Push the shift to a hundred and a second reading overtakes the first, so there are two pitches and neither is the spacing. This is the measurement that closes the question, and it closes it by ruling out one mechanism rather than by choosing between the two that are left.

perception · Missing fundamental Roughness and loudness do not rise together. One four-note chord, played at levels from 35 to 95 decibels, with both quantities drawn as multiples of what they are at the quietest. Roughness is quadratic in pressure, so 60 decibels multiply it by 1.0e+6. Loudness is compressive — about ten phons to a doubling of sones — so the same range multiplies it by 96. The gap between the two lines is the quantity: roughness per sone rises by a factor of 1.0e+4 between a pianissimo and a fortissimo of the same chord.

The ranking survives the dynamic and the chord does not

Roughness is quadratic in pressure and loudness is compressive, so sixty decibels multiply a chord's roughness by a million and its loudness by ninety-six. Roughness per sone therefore rises ten thousandfold between a pianissimo and a fortissimo of the same four notes — and yet the ranking of which doubling is smoothest, over four hundred and eighty voicings, does not move by a single place.

harmony · Orchestration The period is still there, and it is wider. The autocorrelation of a 12-partial complex on 220 hertz, drawn twice: steady, and averaged over one cycle of a 71-cent vibrato. A vibrato moves every partial by the same number of cents, so the complex is exactly harmonic at every instant and nothing is mistuned — what moves is the period the extractor is looking for. The peak survives. It loses 6 per cent of its height above the surrounding lags and gains 11 per cent in width, because the vibrato swings the period by 0.37 milliseconds against a peak 0.90 wide. Its maximum also moves, to 2.4 cents sharp of the still tone's, which is a prediction with a sign in it.

The pitch that does not wobble

Three earlier essays have treated a vibrato as a modulation of roughness. The reason singers use one is what it does to the note, and there is an extractor here that turns a set of partials into a pitch and has never been asked what it does with partials that will not hold still. The period survives, at a cost that rises with the extent — and the practice stops within a hair of where the cost becomes total.

instruments · The voice A mistuned 2:1 makes 8 beats, not one. Every pair of partials that coincides in a 2:1 mistuned by 6 cents, with the rate each one beats at. On a perfectly flexible string the rates are 1.5, 3.1, 4.6, 6.1 and so on — an exact harmonic series of the slowest, because partial 2k is exactly twice partial k. On a stiff one they are 1.3, 0.9, 2.7, 11.1, and the 8th member is at 122 hertz. The family grows as the cube of the member number rather than linearly, so 4 of the 8 are slow enough to be beats at all and the rest are roughness.

A beat is never one beat

Every beat counted until now has come from one pair of partials. A real spectrum has many, so a mistuned octave produces eight beats at once — and on a perfectly flexible string those eight are an exact harmonic series of the slowest. On a real piano string they are a cubic, half of them are not beats at all, and no single width of octave silences more than one. That is where the tuner's five octaves come from.

intervals · Beating Every product of a just interval is a harmonic of the note it implies. Each interval drawn as two harmonics of a fundamental it does not contain — the lower note is harmonic q and the upper harmonic p — with its three combination tones placed on the same numbering: the difference tone at p − q, the cubic product below the pair at 2q − p, and the one above at 2p − q. minor second 16:15: 1, 14, 17; major second 9:8: 1, 7, 10; minor third 6:5: 1, 4, 7; major third 5:4: 1, 3, 6; fourth 4:3: 1, 2, 5; fifth 3:2: 1, 1, 4; minor sixth 8:5: 3, 2, 11; major sixth 5:3: 2, 1, 7; minor seventh 9:5: 4, 1, 13; major seventh 15:8: 7, 1, 22. The shaded column is the fundamental itself. The difference tone sits on it for every interval up to the fifth, the cubic product for the fifth and every interval above except the minor sixth, whose products are its fundamental's octave and twelfth.

The tone on the root changes hands at the fifth

Every combination tone of a just interval is a harmonic of a fundamental neither note contains, and which harmonic is fixed by the ratio. The difference tone lands on that fundamental for every interval up to the fifth; the cubic product lands on it for the fifth and every interval above except the minor sixth. So the loud product names the root of a narrow interval and the quiet one names the root of a wide one — and a just major seventh's difference tone is a note seven harmonics up that no keyboard has.

intervals · Combination tone Every product of every pair of partials is a harmonic of one absent note. A 4 : 5 interval on 261.6 and 327.0 hertz, just, each note carrying 6 partials at one over n, with the fundamental at 80 decibels. Every pair of partials makes its own difference tone, and there are 19 distinct frequencies among them. All of them are exact multiples of 65.41 hertz — the note neither instrument is playing — because partial j of a p·f₀ note and partial k of a q·f₀ note differ by (kq − jp)·f₀ whatever j and k are. The heavy line is what each product has to clear — the threshold of hearing at its own frequency, or the masked threshold the two primaries cast there, whichever is higher. 11 of the 19 get through.

Three harmonics of the bass arrive before the bass

Every product priced until now was between two pure tones, and nothing that plays thirds is pure. Give each note a spectrum and the ear receives every pair of partials — and for a just interval p:q every one of their products is an exact multiple of the same absent fundamental. That crowd lands where the threshold of hearing is tens of decibels cheaper, so it names the bass at 71 decibels where the component at the bass's own frequency needs 74, and at 75 against 85 an octave lower. Tempered, the crowd still forms and names a note seventy cents flat.

intervals · Combination tone The ghost bass drops when the passage gets louder. The note the whole crowd of products names, as a multiple of the fundamental the interval implies, against how loudly the interval is played. a major third: 2.9999999999999996 times the fundamental below 70 decibels and 1 times above it, a drop of 19 semitones; a minor third: 4 times the fundamental below 62 decibels and 2 times above it, a drop of 12 semitones; a fourth: 2 times the fundamental below 72 decibels and 1 times above it, a drop of 12 semitones. Softly, only the cubic products clear their thresholds, and they are an exact series on (2p − q) times the fundamental with no gaps in it. Loudly, the difference tones fill in the low harmonics, no template on the higher note can explain them, and the fit falls. Nothing about the interval has changed; the listener is simply being given a different subset of the same harmonic series.

The ghost bass drops a twelfth at a forte

Both crowds arrive at once and every member of both is a multiple of the same absent fundamental, so a listener is never given a choice between them — only a different subset of one harmonic series at every dynamic. Softly, the subset is an exact gapless series on three times the fundamental. Loudly, the difference tones fill in the low harmonics and no template on the higher note survives them. Between 62 and 72 decibels, depending on the interval, the note the crowd names falls by an octave or a twelfth, and the two qualities of third cross at different levels.

intervals · Combination tone Put back beside its notes, the crowd names the bass at every dynamic. A just major third on complex tones, drawn on one axis of harmonic numbers of the fundamental its ratio implies: the partials of the two played notes, and the products of those partials that clear threshold, at 55 and 80 dB. At 55 dB the products alone name 3 times the fundamental with 0 empty slots; the products and the notes together name 1 times it with 4 empty slots, and the notes alone name it with 9. At 80 dB the products alone name 1 times the fundamental with 0 empty slots; the products and the notes together name 1 times it with 0 empty slots, and the notes alone name it with 9. The soft reading on a higher note exists only when the loud notes are set aside. Taken together, the products do not decide which fundamental is named; they decide how many holes its template has.

The played notes already name the ghost bass

The products of a just third's partials, fitted on their own, name a note a twelfth above the bass when the interval is soft and drop to the bass when it is loud. Put the two played notes back beside them and the drop disappears: the notes and their products name the bass at every dynamic, because the notes' own partials are harmonics of it already. What the dynamic changes is not which note is implied but how complete its harmonic series is — nine holes from the notes alone, four when soft, none when loud.

intervals · Combination tone

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Harmonic seriesMissing fundamentalCombination toneResolvabilityCritical bandwidthDifference toneJust intonationPartialPeriodicityAutocorrelationInharmonicityBeating

All concepts