Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Periodicity — where it appears

The repetition of a waveform at a fixed interval of time, which is what gives a sound a pitch at all. A signal can have a strong periodicity at a frequency where it has no energy, which is what a missing fundamental is.

Named by 10 essays across 5 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two tones in the ratio 3 to 2. Two sine tones whose frequencies are in the ratio 3 to 2, and their sum. The combined pattern repeats every time both waves return to the start together, which for a simple ratio is soon — here after 2 cycles of the lower tone and 3 of the upper.

Two notes and a ratio, which is the whole of consonance

Sound two tones together and the pair either settles or does not. What decides it is the ratio of their frequencies, and the rule is that simpler ratios settle — which is two and a half thousand years old and still not quite an explanation.

intervals · Consonance A note with its first partial removed. The spectrum of a 220 Hz tone with the lowest partial deleted, and the wave that remains. The wave still repeats 220 times a second, because the repeat rate of a sum of harmonics is fixed by the spacing between them and the spacing has not changed. The pitch heard is the one that is no longer in the sound.

The note that is not there

A telephone reproduces nothing below about three hundred hertz, and a bass line down at eighty comes through it perfectly. The pitch that is heard is not a frequency present in the sound, and one nineteenth-century experiment settles what it is instead.

intervals · Missing fundamental 3 against 2, from a rhythm to an interval. The same 3:2 pattern at 6 rates, an event rate from 1.5 to 300 per second, on a logarithmic axis. Below about 20 events a second the two streams are counted; above about 40 they are heard as two pitches a 3:2 apart, which for 3:2 is 702 cents. Nothing in the pattern changes across that boundary. The slowest rate drawn is a tempo of 90 events a minute; the fastest is a pitch of 300 Hz against 450 Hz.

A rhythm fast enough to be a chord

Three against two is a polyrhythm. Speed the same pattern up until the events arrive faster than about twenty a second and it is a perfect fifth. The ratio never changed, the figure never changed, and the only thing that moved is the rate — which makes rhythm and pitch one continuum with a perceptual boundary across the middle of it.

rhythm · Polyrhythm A bell tuned to 294 Hz, and the note it is heard at. The partials of a well-tuned church bell, as ratios to the prime, with the three that imply the strike note marked. The nominal, twelfth and double octave sit at 2, 3 and 4, which is a harmonic series on 1 — so they imply a fundamental at 294 Hz, an octave below the loudest partial the bell has. The tierce at 1.2 is a MINOR third above the prime, which is why a bell has a minor quality by construction rather than by choice.

A bell has no fundamental

The note a listener names when a church bell is struck is not any partial the bell has. Its nominal, twelfth and double octave sit at 2, 3 and 4 times the prime, which is a harmonic series on a pitch an octave below the loudest thing in the sound — and that pitch is supplied by the listener. Founders have been tuning it by ear since the fifteenth century.

instruments · Missing fundamental How long until it comes back. Mean similarity along each diagonal of the self-similarity matrix, minus the matrix's own mean off-diagonal similarity, against lag in bars, for 1 case. Lags run to half the length of each scheme, because a longer diagonal holds too few pairs to average. All rows share one vertical scale and the spread of each is printed beside it; the largest is 0.427 and the smallest 0.427. 1 of 1 cases with any spread at all put their strongest lag at the scheme's own repeat unit or a multiple of it.

How long until it comes back

A self-similarity matrix has a second reading that nobody looks for. Add up each diagonal instead of walking along one, and out falls repetition as a function of how long ago — a period, in bars, with no segmentation, no kernel width and no bar numbers anywhere in the answer. Five of the six schemes here report the length a listener would have named. The sixth reports something better.

form · Repetition The period, as the piece goes by. The strongest lag of thirty-two-bar AABA computed on only the bars heard so far, against how many bars that is. The final answer is 4 bars; it is revised 6 times on the way, and is not reached for the last time until bar 29 of 32, which is 91 per cent of the way through and 64 seconds at 108 beats a minute. Nothing about the boundary operator is involved: this is the global statistic, and it is the half of the form that a first hearing cannot have.

The form a first hearing cannot have

Every figure so far was computed with the whole piece in hand. Run the same methods over only the bars already heard and one of the two methods survives intact — the boundary operator turns out to be causal at a fixed delay of a few bars — while the other collapses. The period of a piece is not knowable until the piece is nearly over, and in two of the six schemes here not until its last bar.

form · Repetition The ranking is settled either side of one narrow band. Remembered repetition — each bar's best match to an earlier bar, discounted by exp(−Δt/τ) with Δt in seconds — for 6 schemes at 108 beats a minute, against the decay constant τ on a logarithmic axis. The order of the schemes changes only between 8 and 13 seconds; outside that band it is fixed, so an estimate of τ wrong by any amount that stays outside it leaves the ranking alone.

A return has to be remembered

A stripe four bars off the diagonal and a stripe twenty-four bars off it are the same ink and are not the same experience. Convert the lag axis to seconds, discount every comparison by how long ago it was, and the ranking of these six schemes by how repetitive they are changes — and the decay constant and the tempo turn out to enter the arithmetic as one number rather than two.

perception · Repetition A 200-a-second click train, correlated with itself. The autocorrelation of a click train at 200 a second, smoothed by the ring of an auditory filter centred at 4000 Hz — an equivalent rectangular bandwidth of 456 Hz, so a ring of 2.2 ms. The regular train peaks at 5.0 ms, one period. With each click displaced by a standard deviation of 20 per cent of the period — 1.00 ms — the peak's contrast against the surrounding lags falls from 0.41 to 0.12. The average rate and the long-term spectrum are unchanged by the jitter; only the timing is.

A pitch with nothing to match

Filter a click train into a band where no partial is separable from its neighbours and it still has a pitch at its repetition rate. Displace each click by a fraction of a millisecond, leaving the average rate and the long-term spectrum exactly where they were, and the pitch goes. The mechanism is reading the timing — which bounds the account endorsed here from the start.

perception · Missing fundamental The pitch moves and the repetition rate does not. Three partials around harmonic 10 of 200 hertz, shifted together by up to 200 hertz, with three curves. The flat line is the envelope repetition rate, which the shift cannot move at all. The rising line is the shift divided by the harmonic number — 200 hertz becoming 220.0 — which is what a harmonic template predicts and is what listeners report. The third curve is the next-best template, which overtakes the first partway along: the pitch is ambiguous, and it drops back rather than rising indefinitely.

The pitch that moves the wrong distance

Take three partials two hundred hertz apart and move every one of them up by forty. The spacing has not changed, so anything reading the pitch off how often the waveform repeats must give the same answer as before. The pitch moves to 204 — the shift divided by the harmonic number — which is what a harmonic template predicts and what listeners report. Push the shift to a hundred and a second reading overtakes the first, so there are two pitches and neither is the spacing. This is the measurement that closes the question, and it closes it by ruling out one mechanism rather than by choosing between the two that are left.

perception · Missing fundamental 500 Hz in one ear, 504 in the other. Two tones 4 hertz apart, one to each ear. They never meet in the air, so neither eardrum sees any modulation at all and there is no acoustic beat to hear. What changes is the phase between the ears, which advances a whole cycle every 250 milliseconds — and the direction that phase implies sweeps with it, drawn here as azimuth against time. The sweep is clipped at the edges, because the implied delay leaves the range a head can produce. A head 17.5 cm across gives at most 656 microseconds, so the phase stops naming a direction above 762 Hz.

The beat that is not in the air

Every sound this site synthesises reaches both ears identically, and that is the assumption none of its figures ever varied. Put 500 hertz in one ear and 504 in the other and nothing sums anywhere: each eardrum sees a steady sinusoid with no modulation on it at all. A listener still hears a four-per-second beat, which means the arithmetic is being done behind the ears rather than in the room. And it stops working above about a kilohertz — not where phase locking gives out at five, but where a head 17.5 centimetres across stops being able to name a direction, which is 762 hertz.

perception · Localisation

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Residue pitchRepetitionSelf-similarityTemporal codingAutocorrelationExpectationFrequency ratioHarmonic seriesMissing fundamentalOstinatoPerceptual presentResolvability

All concepts