Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Stiffness — where it appears

A string's resistance to being bent, which adds a restoring force the ideal wave equation has no term for. It makes the partials sharp of whole multiples, spreads a travelling corner as it goes, and is the reason a piano is tuned to stretched octaves.

Named by 5 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The partial above which the returning corner has lost its phase. Up a piano, the lowest partial whose extra travel after one round trip to the near end exceeds a quarter of a cycle — above it, the component comes home somewhere other than where a corner needs it. The curve follows the inharmonicity coefficient, which is smallest in the tenor and rises both ways, so the corner survives best at A2 — to the 24th partial — and worst at A7, where only 5 partials are still in step. The earlier coupled model assumes a clean corner at every partial it uses.

The corner does not come back a corner

Stepping a hammer forward against the string's own returning wave showed that the coupling matters most in the bass. It assumed the wave that came back was the shape that left. On a stiff string it is not: partials travel at different speeds, and by the top octave of a piano the sixth partial is the first to arrive out of place. But a periodic wave can only see phase modulo a cycle, and counted that way twenty-one of forty-eight partials are still in step — which is why the returning wave is degraded rather than destroyed.

timbre · Excitation point Where each exciter's contact corner sits against its comb. The merger's four corners, drawn for three exciters. The comb is the strike point and is a horizontal line, because it is a fraction of the string and has no pitch in it. The contact corner is the exciter's, and it falls up the compass because the contact time is a fixed number of milliseconds against a shrinking period. Where they cross, the binding term changes. piano hammer crosses at E3; harpsichord plectrum crosses nowhere in the compass; dulcimer beater crosses at A5. So the crossing found earlier is not a fact about pianos. It is a fact about compliance: a felt hammer stays on the string for about 1.6 milliseconds and a plectrum for 0.05, and a difference of that size is a corner in a different place.

The crossing belongs to the felt

On a piano the strike point decides the top of the spectrum below E3 and the hammer's contact decides it above. The merger's own bookkeeping asked whether that crossing is a fact about pianos or about hammers. A plectrum never crosses at all and a hard beater crosses two octaves higher, and the boundary is a contact time of about an eighth of a millisecond — ten times shorter than felt.

timbre · Excitation point Three instruments, three wires, and an order of magnitude between them. The inharmonicity coefficient of each instrument's own string design, across its own compass. At middle-of-the-keyboard C a piano's wire is 315 millimetres long and 1.02 thick and gives B = 1.5e-3; a harpsichord's at the same pitch is 355 millimetres and 0.30, and gives 8.1e-5 — a factor of 19. The harpsichord's line is nearly flat across four octaves because its scaling is Pythagorean: the length doubles for every octave down, exactly, until the case runs out. The piano's is a V, because its case runs out two octaves earlier and everything below the break is a compromise. Every column before now used the top line for all three instruments.

Three exciters and three wires

Every column drawn so far has run a plectrum and a beater on a piano's string, because a piano's was the only scaling to hand. A harpsichord's wire is an order of magnitude less stiff, for a reason that turns out to be the tensile strength of iron — and with all nine combinations computed, the crossing found before stays exactly where it was, on every wire.

instruments · Excitation point Second order and fourth order, from the same sequence of wavenumbers. Frequency against wavenumber for a string and for a bar, with each object's own wavenumbers marked on the axis. A string's equation is second order in space, so frequency goes as wavenumber and the straight line carries its modes at 1, 2, 3, 4. A bar's is fourth order, so frequency goes as the SQUARE of wavenumber and the parabola carries the same kind of sequence to 1, 2.757, 5.404, 8.933. Both sequences of wavenumbers are arithmetic — a string's are the even multiples of π/2L and a bar's the odd ones, except that the first is 3.011 rather than 3 — and squaring an arithmetic sequence is the whole of why one object has a fundamental and the other has none. Every number is derived from the boundary condition; none is measured.

A bar's partials are the odd numbers, squared

A string's wave equation is second order in space and a bar's is fourth, so a string's frequencies go as its wavenumbers and a bar's go as their squares. Both objects fit a nearly arithmetic sequence of wavenumbers between their ends; squaring one is the whole of why a marimba key has no note in it. The ratios are 1 : 2.756 : 5.404 : 8.933, which are the odd squares over nine, uniformly 12.9 cents flat, and the 12.9 cents is one root that refused to be 3π/2.

instruments · Struck bar Where one arch can put a bar's second and third partials. The plane of the second and third partials, with the path a single arch traces through it as it is cut deeper, for 4 arch lengths from 50 to 100 per cent of the bar. Every path starts at the plain bar's 2.756 and 5.404 and runs up and to the right. The xylophone's target of 3 and 6 lies on them: reach the second partial and the third is there. The marimba's target of 4 and 10 lies above every one of them — the best any of these arches manages while holding the second partial at 4 is 9.176, which is 149 cents short. A marimba's third partial is not something one cut can place, and that is a statement about the shape of the cut rather than about the maker.

One cut cannot place two partials

An arch cut into a bar's underside is one knob, and a maker aims it at two targets. Swept across every arch length, the path it traces through the plane of the second and third partials passes through the xylophone's 3 and 6 — dead through it, within a tenth of a cent at the natural arch length — and under the marimba's 4 and 10 by between 149 and 326 cents. Hitting one target means missing the other, and that is why a marimba bar's underside is not a simple arch.

instruments · Struck bar

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

InharmonicityDispersionExcitation pointHammerPartialPianoHarpsichordStruck barBoundary conditionCentsContact timeHarmonic series

All concepts