Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Hammer — where it appears

The felt-covered mass that strikes a piano string, and the one part of the instrument the player never touches directly. Its mass, its width and the nonlinearity of its felt decide the spectrum of every note, which is why voicing an instrument means working on the felt rather than the wire.

Named by 8 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two clocks on one contact, and which of them runs out first. Two times that could end a hammer's contact with a string, across the compass. The flat line is the felt's own recoil, which this site models as a fixed 1.6 milliseconds at a stated force and which does not know what note is being played. The falling line is the string's: a mass m driving a string of impedance Z loses its momentum in m/2Z, which is 11.9 milliseconds at the bottom of the keyboard and 0.76 at the top. They cross at G3. Below the crossing the felt lets go first and above it the string gets there first, and over six octaves the two are within a factor of two of each other — so the contact time is a coupled quantity and not a property of the felt.

The hammer that is heavier than its string

Three earlier essays varied where the hammer lands, how long it stays and how wide it is, and the third named the fourth variable: the exciter's own mass. It inverts across one instrument — the hammer is lighter than the wire it hits at the bottom of a piano and thirteen times heavier at the top — and it turns the contact time into a quantity the string decides rather than the felt.

instruments · Excitation point C4: the pulse computed and the pulse assumed. Above, the force the hammer delivers to the string at C4, integrated forward against the felt's nonlinear force and the string's returning corner, drawn against the half-sine of 1.60 milliseconds that every earlier figure assumed. The computed contact lasts 2.21 milliseconds and the corner comes home 4.6 times inside it. Below, the excitation each pulse gives to each partial. They agree at the bottom and part company higher up — worst at partial 6, by 34 decibels — because the assumed pulse has nulls the computed one does not.

The pulse that was assumed

Every figure until now low-passes the string's excitation with the spectrum of a half-sine, which is what a hammer would deliver against a rigid wall. An earlier essay said so and declined to do better. Doing better takes forty lines and refuses the prediction that came with it: the corner's round trips govern the spectrum as expected, and the contact time is governed by something else entirely — the mass ratio discovered one essay earlier.

timbre · Excitation point The partial above which the returning corner has lost its phase. Up a piano, the lowest partial whose extra travel after one round trip to the near end exceeds a quarter of a cycle — above it, the component comes home somewhere other than where a corner needs it. The curve follows the inharmonicity coefficient, which is smallest in the tenor and rises both ways, so the corner survives best at A2 — to the 24th partial — and worst at A7, where only 5 partials are still in step. The earlier coupled model assumes a clean corner at every partial it uses.

The corner does not come back a corner

Stepping a hammer forward against the string's own returning wave showed that the coupling matters most in the bass. It assumed the wave that came back was the shape that left. On a stiff string it is not: partials travel at different speeds, and by the top octave of a piano the sixth partial is the first to arrive out of place. But a periodic wave can only see phase modulo a cycle, and counted that way twenty-one of forty-eight partials are still in step — which is why the returning wave is degraded rather than destroyed.

timbre · Excitation point Which of the four terms is doing the removing, note by note. Each of three terms has a corner — a partial number above which it is the one taking the energy away — and the lowest corner at each pitch is the term that binds. The comb is flat at 8, because where the hammer lands is a fraction of the length and does not change with the note. The contact time's corner falls from 34 at A0 to 0.5 at A7. They cross at about E3, 165 hertz: below it the strike point decides the spectrum and above it the contact time does. The dispersion's corner is above both at every pitch on the instrument — 5.8 at the top against a contact corner of 0.5 — so that earlier term is real and is nowhere the binding one. That is a statement no one of them could make on its own.

Four terms, and only one of them binds

Six earlier essays each computed one term of a piano's excitation spectrum and handed it to the next, and nobody had multiplied them. Multiplied, three of the four have a corner — a partial above which they are the term doing the removing — and putting the three corners on one axis says which is in charge at each pitch. Below E3 the strike point decides; above it the contact time does; and the dispersion, which is the newest and most laborious term, is nowhere the binding one.

timbre · Excitation point Three ways a note starts, on one pair of axes. Every instrument in this collection, with how long its note takes to speak measured twice: across, in periods of the note itself; up, in milliseconds. The three clusters are three different pieces of physics. A wind instrument accumulates energy in a resonance, so its wait is the resonance's Q — 27, 26, 26, 19, 37 periods here. A bowed string is at full amplitude the moment Helmholtz motion begins and what takes time is the bow reaching a force inside Schelleng's window, which is 3.0, 3.8, 5.1, 7.6 periods. A plucked or struck string is at full amplitude at once and the only duration in it is the exciter's own contact, under a tenth of a period. The two axes do not agree: the slowest instrument in milliseconds is an alto saxophone at 159, and in periods it is an alto saxophone at 37.

A note takes a number of periods to speak

Two separate accounts stopped at the same object and said so. A wind instrument's note takes as long to arrive as its resonance takes to build, and that time is the resonance's Q divided by its frequency — so the number of periods is the Q and has no pitch in it, while the number of milliseconds does. The two readings order the instruments differently, and both orderings are wanted.

instruments · Onset time Where each exciter's contact corner sits against its comb. The merger's four corners, drawn for three exciters. The comb is the strike point and is a horizontal line, because it is a fraction of the string and has no pitch in it. The contact corner is the exciter's, and it falls up the compass because the contact time is a fixed number of milliseconds against a shrinking period. Where they cross, the binding term changes. piano hammer crosses at E3; harpsichord plectrum crosses nowhere in the compass; dulcimer beater crosses at A5. So the crossing found earlier is not a fact about pianos. It is a fact about compliance: a felt hammer stays on the string for about 1.6 milliseconds and a plectrum for 0.05, and a difference of that size is a corner in a different place.

The crossing belongs to the felt

On a piano the strike point decides the top of the spectrum below E3 and the hammer's contact decides it above. The merger's own bookkeeping asked whether that crossing is a fact about pianos or about hammers. A plectrum never crosses at all and a hard beater crosses two octaves higher, and the boundary is a contact time of about an eighth of a millisecond — ten times shorter than felt.

timbre · Excitation point Three instruments, three wires, and an order of magnitude between them. The inharmonicity coefficient of each instrument's own string design, across its own compass. At middle-of-the-keyboard C a piano's wire is 315 millimetres long and 1.02 thick and gives B = 1.5e-3; a harpsichord's at the same pitch is 355 millimetres and 0.30, and gives 8.1e-5 — a factor of 19. The harpsichord's line is nearly flat across four octaves because its scaling is Pythagorean: the length doubles for every octave down, exactly, until the case runs out. The piano's is a V, because its case runs out two octaves earlier and everything below the break is a compromise. Every column before now used the top line for all three instruments.

Three exciters and three wires

Every column drawn so far has run a plectrum and a beater on a piano's string, because a piano's was the only scaling to hand. A harpsichord's wire is an order of magnitude less stiff, for a reason that turns out to be the tensile strength of iron — and with all nine combinations computed, the crossing found before stays exactly where it was, on every wire.

instruments · Excitation point A harder strike buys beats only if the drop does not deepen with it. The beats a mistuned octave on A3 delivers on a string that decays in two stages, against how hard both notes are struck, with the aftersound's drop below the strike 20 dB at 80 dB and changing by a stated number of decibels for each decibel of strike. -0.5 dB per dB: 70 dB 2.5, 75 dB 5.7, 80 dB 8.9, 85 dB 11.9, 90 dB 12.2, 95 dB 11.6, 100 dB 10.9; 0 dB per dB: 70 dB 4.7, 75 dB 6.9, 80 dB 8.9, 85 dB 11.0, 90 dB 12.3, 95 dB 12.2, 100 dB 11.8; +0.5 dB per dB: 70 dB 7.2, 75 dB 8.1, 80 dB 8.9, 85 dB 9.8, 90 dB 10.7, 95 dB 11.2, 100 dB 11.9; +1 dB per dB: 70 dB 9.6, 75 dB 9.2, 80 dB 8.9, 85 dB 8.4, 90 dB 8.1, 95 dB 7.8, 100 dB 7.5. Where the drop stays put, a harder strike keeps buying beats to about 90 dB; where it deepens by a decibel per decibel, every strike past 70 dB costs beats.

A firm touch buys beats until the aftersound sinks with it

A piano string decays twice, and a mistuned octave's countable beats were found to rise with how hard the note is struck — on the assumption that the aftersound always starts twenty decibels below the strike. It need not. The moment the count shuts is set by the level the aftersound starts at and nothing else, so a harder strike buys beats only if its aftersound does not sink with it. If the drop deepens by more than 0.85 decibels for each decibel of strike, the firm touch costs beats instead.

intervals · Beating

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

PianoInharmonicityExcitation pointContact timeDispersionImpedancePartialStiffnessAttack transientHarpsichordSpectral centroidTransient

All concepts