Texture — where it appears
Named by 21 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The dynamics are in the score already
Count the parts in each bar, realise them in their ranges, put every partial in its critical band, sum the loudnesses and run the result through the two smoothers built earlier. What comes out is a dynamic curve for a piece with no performance in it anywhere — and it says that doubling the number of parts inside a fixed register adds three decibels of power and about one of loudness, because the extra parts land in bands that were already occupied. Let the register widen with the parts and the same arithmetic gives eight phon, which is what a tutti actually is.
A final chord is not made loud by adding to it
An earlier essay on closure said the loudest cue an ending has needs a corpus rather than an arithmetic. The arithmetic was built one essay ago, so it does not. Run four ending textures through it and two things come out backwards: a final chord three parts thicker than the rest arrives *quieter* against the running impression than the passage it ends, and a texture that drops a part a bar does not get quieter at all until the bar where there is one part left.
The parameter that did not decide the answer
An earlier essay on closure ended by naming the tempo as the thing every number in it was resting on, and said it was the kind of parameter that had caused trouble before by turning out to decide the answer. Turned across a tenfold range at a closing gesture of fixed length it moves the reading by four per cent, against a twenty-three per cent gap between the gestures it is distinguishing. The parameter beside it in the same figure — how many bars the gesture occupies — moves it by twenty, and nobody had named that one at all.
A subito piano is a rate, not a level
All three earlier essays score one chord held still. An orchestration is a succession, and the running impression carries a chord into the one after it — so a written dynamic is an instruction to the listener's impression rather than to the instantaneous sound, and there are markings that cannot be produced at all. The correction runs to silence and the impression still sits above the target.
A page has two decibels
The account of closure called its dynamic component a corpus debt: it had no model of dynamics in a form. Loudness supplies one, and applying it answers the debt by refusing it. Adding parts to a final chord one at a time, each at the same level, moves the loudness by under two decibels and not monotonically — while a player has sixty. A texture that thins is not a diminuendo.
A part entering is not a change of level
Five earlier essays measure a sonority that is already sounding. The one thing an orchestrator actually controls is the entry, and priced at every semitone it comes to 0.89 phons — under the difference limen — with only 29 of 61 available entries clearing it and none below A♭4. What an entry is instead is an object arriving, and the reason is that its own rise time is faster than the listener's.
Four parts are easier to read than two
Twelve earlier essays read one line, and a score is several at once. Measured through the voice-leading model, a notehead of a four-part chorale asks a reader for 1.30 bits and a note of an independent line asks 1.89 — so twice the ink is less than three quarters of the load. The reason is a boundary those essays already established: a duet has no complete voicing of any triad at all, so two parts cannot be read from their harmony and have to be read as two melodies.
A general pause is spent by the note after it
Whether a composer should write the pause before the diminuendo or after it looks like a question about how big the ensemble is. It is not. Forty decibels of ensemble are worth one decibel of silence, and the order is worth seven — because a running impression rises twenty times faster than it falls, so half a general pause is spent by ninety-seven milliseconds of sound.
Room is used up by whoever enters first
The chord with the most room for a part entering alone is a fact about that chord. It stops being a fact the moment two parts want it, because each part that comes in raises the mask over everybody after it. Given six parts waiting to enter a five-chord passage, choosing each part's moment the way one part's moment is chosen puts three of them into the same chord and lands in the bottom fifth of all 15,625 schedules. Placing them one at a time does no better. The schedule under which the least audible entrance is heard best is unique, and it brings the low and middle parts in while the texture is thin and holds the three highest back for the last three chords — because a high part keeps its room over a full texture and a middle part does not.
An exit is worth nothing until the tutti is given up
Six parts entering a five-chord passage have a best schedule when each enters once and stays, and letting parts leave and come back was supposed to improve it. Searched over every set of sounding parts at every chord, it improves it by exactly nothing, with or without the chord before still masking — as long as all six must be playing at the end. Let one part be missing from the final chord and the weakest entrance gains 1.4 decibels; let two be missing and it gains 1.9, by a relay in which the parts with least room come in, are heard for one chord, and give way.
A part that must stay changes over in shifts
The best way to keep every entrance audible, when the passage need not end with everybody in, was a relay: a part enters, is heard for one chord, and gives way. Make every part stay at least two chords once it is in and the relay does not collapse into overlaps, as predicted. It changes over in shifts: two parts enter together, one chord passes in which nobody enters, and both leave on the chord their successors arrive. Half of what exits were worth survives a two-chord stay and nearly two fifths a three-chord one — and with the chord before still masking, the stay costs less, not more, because it was the one-chord handover that memory had already made leaky.
A pair entering as one hides the part that cannot be heard
Scored as two entrances, a pair of parts coming in together is charged for masking itself; scored as one arrival — a new colour against what was already sounding — it is not, and the best schedules change completely. Allowed two at a time, the weakest arrival rises from 0.6 dB above the mask to 10.9, and every pair the search chooses is a loud part carrying a quiet one: a violin 19.6 dB clear beside a clarinet 10.9 under. Allowed any number, the six parts enter at once. The staggered build-up of every earlier schedule exists only because each part was meant to be heard as itself.
A floor under each member is paid for in steps
Score parts entering together as one arrival and the best pairs are a loud part carrying one that cannot be heard. Put a floor under each member — no part more than so many decibels under its own mask — and the prediction was a schedule between the two, neither staggered nor buried. There is none. The arrival's margin climbs in three steps as the floor is loosened, each step bought with a passenger buried about as deep as the step is high, and below a floor of five decibels nothing beats bringing the parts in one at a time, because the clarinet can clear its mask only alone.
A page has twelve phons, and its entries always said so
An ending built up one part at a time was found to move its loudness by under two decibels, and five essays have leaned on that number since. It came from a way of grouping partials into critical bands that sorts an eight-part chord's sixty-four partials into two bands. Counted along the ear instead, the same ending gains twelve phons at every step, which is what the collection's own price for a single entry always implied.
A passenger under its mask is still heard in the arrival
The best way to bring parts in together was a loud part carrying a quiet one, and the quiet one was scored as buried — ten decibels under its mask, on average over its partials. An average is the wrong question. A masked threshold is the level at which a sound becomes a detectable change, and nearly every buried passenger has partials well clear of it. Scored as a change to the arrival rather than as a line of its own, every one of seventy-one passengers is heard, and the carriers' walk passes almost untouched.
A carrier gives up room, not partials
A passenger masks its carrier as the carrier masks it, so the arrival might be a new spectrum belonging to neither part. Across the seventy-one pairings of the passage it almost never is. Carriers lose nineteen partials in all to their passengers and passengers lose a hundred and thirty-five to their carriers; a voice beside a violin takes thirteen decibels of the violin's room and not one of its partials. The nine pairings that leave neither part a majority are mostly on one chord, and there the chord had already done it.
The page can write a diminuendo and not a climax
Counted on the excitation pattern rather than in grouped bands, the four ending textures the closure essays compare come out the right way round at last: a thinning ending is a ten-phon diminuendo written into the score, and an ending that adds parts arrives louder than what came before rather than quieter. But the gain is tiny. Three more parts on a six-part final chord buy under a phon and arrive a twentieth of a phon above the listener's running impression; only a full chord straight after a thinning stands out, and only at a quick tempo. A page can take loudness away. It cannot make a climax.
A third part takes what it would have taken alone
A passenger costs its carrier room rather than partials, and the obvious worry is that the room compounds: that a third part, entering beside a carrier already ten decibels nearer its limit, finds it fragile. Across 284 three-part arrivals it does not. Of the 438 carrier partials lost with three parts sounding, 21 are lost only to the combination; the rest are taken by one of the two parts alone. Masking adds in power, so a threshold the passenger has raised rises less when a third part adds to it. What decides the loss is which part enters third, and two parts — the flue and the violin — take five sixths of it.
A quieter third part gives back only as deep as it took
A high part entering third costs its carrier partials, and the masking rule suggests that marking it down should return them all at once. It does not. Each partial comes back when the third part has been lowered by about as far as it had pushed that partial under, so the return is as gradual as the depths are spread. The violin's are shallow: twelve decibels down it gives back nine-tenths and is still heard in two arrivals of three. The flue's run to thirty decibels, and there is no level at which it is both heard and harmless.
A hall leaves a thinning ending most of its diminuendo
A written diminuendo made by dropping parts arrives about four and a half phons under the listener's impression in a dry room. A hall's tail sounds under every bar and holds the level up as parts leave, and the obvious worry is that it fills the gaps a thinning leaves, as it fills a rest. It barely does. A concert hall leaves the thinning 86 to 100 per cent of its contrast and a stone church about three quarters, where the same rooms leave a two-second general pause three quarters and a half. A thinning steps down a decibel or two a bar, and a hall's tail falls nine decibels in the time a listener takes to register the arrival; only a cathedral is slow enough to blunt the last step, and it takes half.
A hall forgets almost everything but the last part to leave
A hall's bass outlasts its treble, so a thinning ending ought to care which parts it drops first: top down should leave the tail's darkness to fill the gap, and bass up should remove what the tail holds longest. Searched over all 720 orders, it barely does. Give the tail a spectrum and the drop moves by under half a phon, in the direction that helps the order expected to suffer. What sets the ending is two notes: the one left sounding, and the one that went just before it. Everything earlier has gone.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
OrchestrationDynamicsLoudnessMaskingRegisterCritical bandwidthOptimisationDoublingClosureNotationPhonSone