Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Loudness — where it appears

The strength a sound is heard to have, which depends on its frequency and its spectrum as well as on its pressure. Because the equal-loudness contours are not parallel, a change of level is also a change of balance.

Named by 36 essays across 6 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Every point on one curve sounds equally loud. The equal-loudness contours of ISO 226:2003, evaluated from the standard's own parameters. The lowest curve is the threshold of hearing. Because the curves are not parallel — they crowd together in the bass and spread apart in the middle — the same change in decibels is a different change in loudness at every frequency, and a spectrum that was balanced at one level is not balanced at another.

The quietest thing audible, and why the volume knob is a tone control

A decibel is a fact about air. A phon is a fact about a listener, and the two do not line up — the map between them bends with frequency, and it bends differently at every level. One consequence is that turning a piece of music down does not turn all of it down equally, and the amount by which it does not is a number.

perception · Loudness The most a 6 cm cone can make of a low note. The maximum sound pressure level at one metre from a circular radiator of effective radius 3.2 cm, moving 1.5 mm at its limit, in a system resonating at 250 Hz. Below resonance the cone is already at that limit and the pressure a piston makes goes as the square of frequency, so the curve falls at twelve decibels an octave: 66 dB at 40 Hz, 78 dB at 80 Hz, 94 dB at 200 Hz. The 40 Hz figure is 28 decibels below the 200 Hz one, and that gap is arithmetic about a radius and a displacement rather than a property of any particular loudspeaker. The dots are the harmonics of a 41.2 Hz note with a one-over-n source spectrum; the loudest of them is the 6th.

The bass a small loudspeaker does not make

A three-inch cone at its excursion limit produces sixty-six decibels at forty hertz, which the ear converts to seventeen phons — barely above nothing. The note is heard anyway, because its harmonics are radiated and its fundamental is supplied by the listener. Computing what arrives turns the residue from a curiosity into a design decision, and finds that the fundamental of a low note is not the loudest part of it on any system a listener is likely to own.

instruments · Missing fundamental Roughness and loudness of one interval against level. A minor third on C4 evaluated at every level from 20 to 100 dB SPL per note, with both quantities drawn relative to their own value at 60 dB. Roughness is the Plomp–Levelt sum over the partials that are above ISO 226's threshold at that level; loudness is the same partials in sones. Between 50 and 95 dB the interval grows 3.2 × 10⁴ times rougher and 24.9 times louder, so roughness grows like loudness raised to the power 3.2.

The same chord is harsher when it is louder

Every roughness number so far was computed at a level nobody stated. Roughness is the product of two partial amplitudes, so it is quadratic in pressure, while loudness is compressive — which makes a minor third at middle C thirty-two thousand times rougher at fortissimo than at pianissimo and only twenty-five times louder. A chord has no single consonance to report.

intervals · Consonance A dynamic mark is an instruction about the spectrum. Six dynamic markings, given a hammer velocity each in a stated sequence of factors of two, with what the string then does. The level rises 35.1 decibels from pp to ff, which is the part everybody means. The contact time falls from 2.26 to 0.95 milliseconds, so the first null of the hammer's own pulse moves from partial 2.5 to partial 6.0 and the spectral centroid rises by 56 per cent. The partials between those two nulls are not quieter at pp; they are not there.

The mark that is not a level

There are six of them, they carry no units, and a performer has to turn one into a number before it means anything. What they instruct is not loudness. On a struck string a harder blow shortens the hammer's contact from 2.26 milliseconds to 0.95, which moves the first null of its own pulse from the third partial to the sixth: the partials between those are not quieter at pianissimo, they are gone. A fortissimo is a different sound, and the page has one word for both things it changes.

timbre · Notation 3 tones, one power, and the interval between them. 3 tones of fixed total power, spread symmetrically about 440 hertz, drawn against the interval between neighbours. Piled on one pitch they are one sound of that power; separated by more than a critical band — 4.5 semitones here — they are 3 sounds whose loudnesses add, and the same power reaches 2.08 times the loudness at 5 semitones. The two lines are two models of the same rule and they disagree about how abrupt the change is, not about where it goes.

A chord is not as loud as its notes

The first essay on loudness said what a tone's loudness is and recorded that it had said nothing about a chord's. Here is the missing rule, and it has a musical consequence nobody would predict from it: the same three notes, at the same power, are twice as loud in the treble as in the bass — because the critical band that makes a low triad five times rougher also makes it one sound instead of three.

perception · Loudness Crescendo, and what the impression does. A crescendo of 20 dB over 8 seconds, drawn as three loudnesses in sones. The pale line is what is physically sounding, the middle line is the short-term loudness of the moment and the heavy line is the long-term loudness, which is the passage's loudness as a listener would report it. The gap between the last two is the whole of the effect: at its widest the moment is 1.02 times the running impression, and the impression takes 2 seconds to come down against 99 milliseconds to go up.

Loud is relative, and it comes down slowly

The account of loudness had a model of a moment and the account of closure asked it for a model of a form. The published one exists and its content is a pair of numbers that are not the same: a listener's running impression of how loud the music is rises to meet a step in a fifth of a second and takes seven seconds to come back down. A twenty-decibel crescendo spread over eight seconds therefore buys almost no contrast at all, and the same twenty decibels taken as a step buys a factor of two.

form · Loudness Adding parts adds power, and very little loudness. Each part is played at the same level, and the chord is realised every way its parts allow and averaged over them, so the quantity is a property of the texture rather than of one arrangement. Going from 3 parts to 8 adds 4.3 decibels of power and 0.1 decibels of loudness, because the extra parts land in bands that are already occupied — the count of occupied critical bands FALLS from 6.0 to 3.9 as the parts crowd into the same register.

The dynamics are in the score already

Count the parts in each bar, realise them in their ranges, put every partial in its critical band, sum the loudnesses and run the result through the two smoothers built earlier. What comes out is a dynamic curve for a piece with no performance in it anywhere — and it says that doubling the number of parts inside a fixed register adds three decibels of power and about one of loudness, because the extra parts land in bands that were already occupied. Let the register widen with the parts and the same arithmetic gives eight phon, which is what a tutti actually is.

form · Loudness Four endings, and the loudness each produces from the page alone. Short-term loudness through the closing 6 bars of a thirty-two bar scheme, computed from the part count of each bar with no performance data of any kind — the parts are realised every way their ranges allow, every partial is placed in its critical band, and the sum is run through the two loudness smoothers. thins to one arrives at 0.764 of the running impression; full final chord arrives at 0.952 of the running impression; unchanged arrives at 1.000 of the running impression; thins then full arrives at 0.929 of the running impression. The result worth the figure is that full final chord is not the loudest: adding parts to a final chord adds power and almost no loudness, because the extra parts land in critical bands the chord already occupies. An ending is made loud by contrast with what preceded it, not by thickness.

A final chord is not made loud by adding to it

An earlier essay on closure said the loudest cue an ending has needs a corpus rather than an arithmetic. The arithmetic was built one essay ago, so it does not. Run four ending textures through it and two things come out backwards: a final chord three parts thicker than the rest arrives *quieter* against the running impression than the passage it ends, and a texture that drops a part a bar does not get quieter at all until the bar where there is one part left.

form · Closure Every assignment, at equal levels and at its own best balance. The 6 ways of putting 3 players on a chord, each drawn twice: hollow at equal levels, which is what an assignment ranking sees, and filled at the levels that balance the parts and then minimise roughness. Every scoring here is at the same total loudness, 23.3 sones, so two points are comparable. Solving the discrete problem first picks violin · clarinet · oboe; solving both at once picks violin · oboe · clarinet, and the two-stage answer costs 9.0 per cent more roughness. The orderings do not keep their places between the two columns, which is the whole of the argument: a ranking taken at equal levels is not a ranking.

Who plays what and how loud is one question

Two lines of argument, one about spectrum and one about loudness, each stopped at the same wall and each said so. One of them can choose who plays which note and has every player at the same level; the other can choose how loud each part is and has nobody assigned to anything. Put together they are a single problem with two kinds of variable, and solving it in stages picks a different answer from solving it at once — nine per cent rougher, at the same loudness, on an ordinary triad.

form · Orchestration Roughness and loudness do not rise together. One four-note chord, played at levels from 35 to 95 decibels, with both quantities drawn as multiples of what they are at the quietest. Roughness is quadratic in pressure, so 60 decibels multiply it by 1.0e+6. Loudness is compressive — about ten phons to a doubling of sones — so the same range multiplies it by 96. The gap between the two lines is the quantity: roughness per sone rises by a factor of 1.0e+4 between a pianissimo and a fortissimo of the same chord.

The ranking survives the dynamic and the chord does not

Roughness is quadratic in pressure and loudness is compressive, so sixty decibels multiply a chord's roughness by a million and its loudness by ninety-six. Roughness per sone therefore rises ten thousandfold between a pianissimo and a fortissimo of the same four notes — and yet the ranking of which doubling is smoothest, over four hundred and eighty voicings, does not move by a single place.

harmony · Orchestration The tempo turns, and almost nothing moves. The earlier arrival reading — what is sounding at the final chord over what the listener has been hearing — swept over bar lengths from 0.5 to 5 seconds, which is 480 down to 48 beats a minute, at 3 closing lengths. Every curve is nearly flat. Across a tenfold change of tempo one gesture's reading moves by a factor of 1.201 and the other's by 1.098, while the gap between the two gestures — which is what that essay was measuring — is 1.228. The expectation was that the tempo would decide the answer, on the grounds that a two-second bar against a two-second release is a comparable pair. The premise is wrong in a way the sweep makes obvious: the thing being compared with the release is not a bar, it is the WHOLE ENDING, which is 2 to 8 bars long and is therefore far longer than the release at every tempo anybody plays. The running impression has caught up with the closing texture before the final chord arrives, at 0.5 seconds a bar and at 5, and what is left is the last bar's own jump.

The parameter that did not decide the answer

An earlier essay on closure ended by naming the tempo as the thing every number in it was resting on, and said it was the kind of parameter that had caused trouble before by turning out to decide the answer. Turned across a tenfold range at a closing gesture of fixed length it moves the reading by four per cent, against a twenty-three per cent gap between the gestures it is distinguishing. The parameter beside it in the same figure — how many bars the gesture occupies — moves it by twenty, and nobody had named that one at all.

form · Closure A ritardando does not spend the diminuendo. The arrival reading under a deceleration into the ending, from no ritardando at all to a final tempo 30 per cent of the starting one — which stretches the closing bars from 12.0 seconds to 20.2. The expectation was that it would matter: a ritardando lengthens exactly the bars the gesture is happening in, so a diminuendo that would have been absorbed at a steady tempo gets more of the smoother's own time to be absorbed in. It moves the reading by 0.00 per cent. Every line here is flat to within the thickness of the line, which is the second time a tempo parameter has been swept here and found to do nothing.

The reading was a step response

Sweeping the tempo found it did not decide the answer. This one sweeps the deceleration across a factor of three and finds a null to five figures, and then sweeps the length of the closing gesture across a factor of forty-eight and finds it moves the reading by eight per cent — but not as a function of seconds. Sorted by seconds the twelve runs scatter; sorted by how many bars the instruction covers they fall into three tight groups. One sentence explains the null and the not-null together.

form · Closure A written dynamic is an instruction to the listener's impression. Every earlier scoring holds one chord still. A passage is a succession, and the running impression of loudness carries a chord into the one after it, so what a marking asks for and what playing the marking produces are different things. Here is a five-chord passage with a written shape. Playing each chord at its own written loudness gives the running impression 2.4, 3.0, 4.2, 5.6, 4.0 sones against the 2.4, 3.0, 4.2, 5.6, 2.0 that were asked for — right until the last chord, where it misses by 2.0. Solving for levels that make the impression arrive at the marking does not fix it: the last chord's target is I, two parts, and it is unreachable — the correction runs to silence and the impression still sits 1.1 sones above. A subito piano after a full chord is not a level a player can produce. It is a rate of change, and the smoother's two-second release is what refuses it.

A subito piano is a rate, not a level

All three earlier essays score one chord held still. An orchestration is a succession, and the running impression carries a chord into the one after it — so a written dynamic is an instruction to the listener's impression rather than to the instantaneous sound, and there are markings that cannot be produced at all. The correction runs to silence and the impression still sits above the target.

form · Orchestration One contrast survives every tempo anybody plays and the other does not. How much of each quantity's contrast between chords a listener still has at the end of each chord, against how long a chord lasts. The roughness curve is flat at one down to 45 milliseconds a chord and then falls off a cliff, because its window is 37 milliseconds and a boxcar either fits inside a chord or does not. The loudness curve is already losing at a second a chord and keeps 83 per cent at the slowest pace here, 39 at the fastest. Nothing in music is faster than the roughness window and a great deal of music is faster than the loudness one, so a passage delivers its dissonance and averages its dynamics.

The dissonance arrives and the dynamic does not

A scoring decides two things at once and both of them have to be integrated by a listener before they exist. The loudness smoother's release is two seconds and the roughness window is thirty-seven milliseconds, and that ratio of fifty decides which of the two survives at the pace music is actually played. Nothing anybody performs is fast enough to blur a dissonance, and a great deal of it is fast enough to average a dynamic.

form · Orchestration A page has two decibels and a player has sixty. Across, parts added to a final chord one at a time, each at the same level; up, the loudness that results, on a logarithmic scale. Going from one part to eight moves the total by 1.8 decibels and does not move it monotonically — four parts are louder than five and than eight. The faint line is what a naive power sum would give: 9.0 decibels. The band down the right is the same chord played by people, from forty to a hundred decibels, which spans 62. So a texture that thins from eight parts to one is not a diminuendo. It is a change of colour at constant loudness, and everything the closure figures call a dynamic belongs to the performance.

A page has two decibels

The account of closure called its dynamic component a corpus debt: it had no model of dynamics in a form. Loudness supplies one, and applying it answers the debt by refusing it. Adding parts to a final chord one at a time, each at the same level, moves the loudness by under two decibels and not monotonically — while a player has sixty. A texture that thins is not a diminuendo.

perception · Loudness A rest is a diminuendo, and a long one. How far a listener's running impression of loudness falls during a silence, converted into the diminuendo that would have taken it the same distance. Half a second of nothing is worth 3.2 decibels, a second and a bit is worth 8.1, and two and a half seconds is worth 17. The marked line is three and a half seconds, which is where a gap starts to be heard as an ending rather than as a pause: at that length the reference has fallen by 24 decibels, which is more than a fortissimo to a pianissimo. A tempo swept over a factor of ten, a deceleration over a factor of three and a gesture length over a factor of forty-eight all returned the same reading to four significant figures. This one moves it by twenty-four decibels.

A rest is a diminuendo

Three parameters swept over factors of ten, three and forty-eight returned the same reading to four significant figures. The one manipulation left unswept moves it by twenty-four decibels: a silence. A listener's running impression decays at the loudness smoother's two-second release, so a general pause is a diminuendo nobody wrote, and at the length that makes a gap an ending it is worth more than any marking a composer has.

form · Closure An entering part is worth 0.9 phons, in the middle of its range. A texture of 5 parts at 62 decibels each, with one more part added at the same level, tried at every semitone from C2 to C7. The vertical axis is what the addition is worth in phons, and a phon is a decibel here; the shaded strip is the difference limen for loudness, so an entry inside it is not heard as a change of level. The median entry is 0.89 phons and only 29 of 61 clear the limen — the lowest of them at A♭4, 415 hertz. The best available, at B♭6, is worth 4.2. The two lines are the two loudness models to hand: they agree everywhere above the tenor register and part company below it, where the greedy critical-band grouping reports 24 entries that make the texture quieter and the excitation pattern reports none.

A part entering is not a change of level

Five earlier essays measure a sonority that is already sounding. The one thing an orchestrator actually controls is the entry, and priced at every semitone it comes to 0.89 phons — under the difference limen — with only 29 of 61 available entries clearing it and none below A♭4. What an entry is instead is an object arriving, and the reason is that its own rise time is faster than the listener's.

perception · Loudness Articulation is worth 2.6 phons, and nobody counts it. A passage of notes at 80 decibels, 2 to the beat, at 7 tempi and 3 articulations, scored against the same level held continuously. The variable is the fraction of each inter-onset interval that is sounding — 0.95 is a legato, 0.4 a staccato — and the vertical axis is what that costs the passage's running loudness in phons. Nothing here is anybody playing harder or softer. At 40 to the beat the span from legato to staccato is 1.47 phons; at 200 it is 2.61, because a staccato note there lasts 60 milliseconds and no longer reaches its own loudness either.

A staccato is a dynamic mark

Every loudness figure in this collection is of a sound that has been going on long enough, and no note in music has. Run the running-loudness model on notes with lengths in them and an articulation turns out to command 1.5 phons at a slow tempo and 8.1 at a fast one — more than the 1.8 decibels a whole texture commands, on the same page, written down in the same ink, and counted by nobody.

perception · Loudness What the chord before takes out of the chord after. Five chords at 1.2 seconds each, with the roughness each one has on its own — its simultaneous masking and the threshold of hearing already applied — and the roughness it actually has once the chord in front of it has raised the threshold. Four of the five are untouched. The fifth, i, two parts, follows the only step in this passage that falls more than fifteen decibels, and it arrives into a hole: it is entirely below threshold for its first 13 milliseconds and takes 240 to get all of itself back. Masking can only remove partials, so it can only lower a roughness — and the chords it can reach are the ones a written dynamic has just made quiet, which are already the smooth ones. Across the passage the dissonance contrast goes from 3021 to 3113: the mask widens it by 3.0 per cent rather than eating it.

A soft chord has to fade in

Forward masking sits between the two integration times already in play — two hundred milliseconds against a thirty-seven millisecond roughness window and a two-second loudness release — and it was owed as the term that might eat the dissonance contrast. It does not. It widens it, by three per cent at a chorale's pace and fifty-nine at four chords a second, because it can only ever remove partials and it can only reach the chord a dynamic has already made quiet. What it does instead is stranger: one chord in the passage is entirely inaudible for its first twelve milliseconds and takes a quarter of a second to arrive whole.

form · Orchestration A general pause of a bar is worth 4.9 decibels in a hall and 8.1 in silence. What a rest is worth as a diminuendo, in rooms with different reverberation times. The upper curve is the earlier figure, which assumed the sound stops when the players do; each curve below it lets the hall go on sounding, falling sixty decibels in its own reverberation time until it reaches the background. At the bar of silence a general pause usually is — about 1.2 seconds — the dry value is 8.1 decibels, shoebox concert hall keeps 60 per cent of it and gothic cathedral keeps 22. At 3.5 seconds, where a gap stops being a pause and becomes an ending, the same hall keeps 86 per cent. A long silence outlives any hall's tail and a short one does not, which is why the room costs the device most at exactly the length a composer writes it.

A rest needs a dry room

The twenty-four decibels a general pause is worth assume the sound stops when the players do. Put a hall under it and a bar of silence keeps 60 per cent of its value in a shoebox concert hall and 22 per cent in a cathedral, while a three-and-a-half-second one keeps 86 and 45 — because a hall's tail has a length and a rest either outlives it or does not. A written bar of silence is worth half its dry value at 2.76 seconds of reverberation, which falls between the concert hall and the stone church.

form · Closure A 20-decibel crescendo is 27 phons on a bass note and 20 on a high one. The same change of level, from 60 to 80 decibels, converted to loudness at each register through ISO 226's equal-loudness contours rather than at one kilohertz. The heavy curve gives each note a string spectrum, so its partials are converted in their own bands and summed; the pale one is the fundamental alone. On the spectrum-aware curve the crescendo is worth 27.3 phons at C1 and 20.3 at C7. On the fundamental alone it is 77 at C1, which is not a finding but an artefact: a 60-decibel tone at 33 hertz sits 1.8 decibels above the threshold of hearing and is very nearly nothing. The honest correction is the smaller one, and it is still a difference of 7.1 phons across the compass for a mark written in the same ink.

A subito piano is four seconds longer in the bass

Every loudness figure with time in it converts level to loudness at one kilohertz, and the equal-loudness contours say that no other frequency works that way. Joining the two sorts the published numbers into those that were about the treble and those that were not. Three move a great deal — a twenty-decibel crescendo is worth 27 phons on a bass note and 20 on a high one, and the seven seconds a subito piano takes becomes eleven and a third. Three do not move at all, and the reason they do not is the same reason in every case.

perception · Loudness A bar of silence is worth 13.1 decibels written last and 6.0 written first. Four closing gestures, drawn against how many seconds of silence each contains. All four hold the same 12-part texture, write the same 6.0-decibel diminuendo over 4 seconds, and differ only in what order the diminuendo and the silence are written in. The quantity is how far the listener's running impression has fallen when the final chord arrives, in decibels of equivalent diminuendo. Written with the silence last, a general pause of a bar is worth 13.06 decibels and one of three and a half seconds is worth 28.3. Written with the silence first, both are worth 6.00 — exactly the diminuendo's own depth, because the music resuming after the silence puts the reference back at its own level. The silence written first is worth less than the silence written with no diminuendo at all, which reads 8.12 at a bar: a diminuendo placed after a general pause takes 2.12 decibels away and adds nothing.

A general pause is spent by the note after it

Whether a composer should write the pause before the diminuendo or after it looks like a question about how big the ensemble is. It is not. Forty decibels of ensemble are worth one decibel of silence, and the order is worth seven — because a running impression rises twenty times faster than it falls, so half a general pause is spent by ninety-seven milliseconds of sound.

form · Closure An entrance stops being a loudness event and never stops being a colour one. The same oboe entering on the same note at the same level, against how many players were already sounding. Its contribution to the loudness falls from 15.5 phons to 0.32 — a factor of 48 — and crosses the one-phon difference limen at 5 players already playing. Its contribution to the roughness rises by a factor of 12.3 over the same range, because roughness is a sum over pairs and the entrant makes one new pair with everybody. Both curves are drawn as a share of their own largest value, since a phon and a squared pascal have no exchange rate. The claim is the two directions, not the crossing point of two units.

An entrance is a change of colour

Eight essays on orchestration move the assignment and hold the ensemble still, and a score does the opposite: it brings players in and takes them out. Loudness is a sum over parts and roughness is a sum over pairs, so the player who joins adds one term to the first and one to the second for everybody already there. What the entrance is worth in phons falls by a factor of forty-eight across the range an ensemble spans and crosses the difference limen at five players; what it is worth in roughness rises by twelve, and by a further factor of ten for every ten decibels the passage is played at.

form · Orchestration Three clocks receive one entrance, and they do not agree about when. An oboe joining 5 players already sounding, at time zero, with each of the listener's three readings drawn as its own share of the change it eventually makes. The roughness window is 49 milliseconds wide and has half the change at 25; the short-term loudness smoother has half at 15; the long-term one, whose release is the two seconds an earlier essay is about, has half at 90. The two-second release is on the wrong side of the smoother to hide an entrance. Its attack is 99 milliseconds, so an entrance is received promptly and it is a departure that is not.

The release is on the wrong side

Whether the loudness model's two-second release makes an entrance inaudible has the answer no, for a reason the question did not anticipate. The smoother is asymmetric — ninety-nine milliseconds going up and two seconds coming down — so a rise is tracked twenty times faster than a fall, and an entrance is received promptly by every one of a listener's three readings. The colour of it arrives first, at twenty-five milliseconds against ninety, and the reading that moves with the ensemble is the one nobody would have picked.

form · Orchestration The same player, arriving and leaving, read as a share of the change. One oboe joining 5 players and the same oboe leaving them again, with both loudness readings drawn as the share of their own change that has arrived. The entrance is half received in 90 milliseconds and the exit in 1.43 seconds, a factor of 15.9. The roughness readings, drawn faintly, are 25 and 25 milliseconds and lie on top of each other. A score that writes a diminuendo under a departing part is not softening the exit. It is doing the smoother's release for it, on a clock the smoother would otherwise take two seconds over.

A part that leaves is not a part that arrives

The same player, the same note, the same level, and the only difference is which way round it happens. A listener's loudness reading takes 1.43 seconds to receive half of a departure and 90 milliseconds to receive half of an arrival — a factor of sixteen with nothing asymmetric in the sound at all, since both readings integrate the same two states in the same order. The colour reading receives the two identically, because a window has no direction, so a departure is a change whose grain arrives at once and whose level takes most of two seconds.

form · Orchestration A final chord stands above the impression for a fraction of a second. How far a final chord at the tutti's own level stands above the listener's running impression at the instant it is released, against how long it lasts, for four ways of arriving at it. Straight out of the tutti it stands above nothing at any length; after 1.2 s of silence the impression is 8.1 dB down, and the chord stands highest, 5.14 dB, when it lasts 54 ms; after 3.5 s of silence the impression is 23.7 dB down, and the chord stands highest, 14.42 dB, when it lasts 28 ms; after a 6 dB diminuendo the impression is 5.0 dB down, and the chord stands highest, 3.18 dB, when it lasts 42 ms. Every curve is level again by half a second, because the impression's attack of 99 ms catches the note's attack of 22 ms, so a held chord is released at the impression's level whatever preceded it.

A final chord stands out for a twentieth of a second

A general pause drives a listener's running impression down, and the final chord that follows is supposed to cash the fall in. It cashes in at most two thirds of it. The note's own loudness rises with a 22-millisecond constant and the impression with a 99-millisecond one, so after a bar of silence the chord stands furthest above the impression 54 milliseconds in, by 5.1 of the 8.1 decibels the silence bought, and after 206 milliseconds the two are within a phon of each other. A short stamp spends most of its life standing out; a chord held a second and a half spends a seventh of it.

form · Closure Level does not dilute the register's roughness, it multiplies it. The mean roughness of the I – vi – IV – V – I arrivals at 4 registers, each relative to the register as written, read three ways. Level-free, the bass is 8.6 times rougher than the treble. With every note at 70 dB it is 8.6 times, the same factor, because one level rescales every pair alike. With each chord played at the level that makes it as loud as the written register's chords — 82.8 dB −2 octaves, 75.5 dB −1 octave, 70.0 dB as written, 66.8 dB +1 octave — the bass is 343 times rougher than the treble, because roughness grows with the square of the pressure and the bass needs more of it to be heard at the same loudness.

A rough arrival is rough because of its spacing

The pair the expectation essays report for every chord — how surprising it was, how rough its voicing is — has no level in it. Putting level back in answers the question it left open, and not the way it was framed. At one written dynamic the arrivals keep their order from 40 to 90 dB at three registers of four, and the bass stays 8.6 times rougher than the treble. Made equally loud, the bass has to be played 12.8 dB harder, and it is 343 times rougher: level does not explain the register's roughness away, it multiplies it.

harmony · Tonal-expectation A louder final chord stands higher and still stands for a fraction of a second. How far a final chord stands above the listener's running impression at the instant it is released, against how long it lasts. The chord is a struck six-note tonic; "a step louder" is the hammer velocity doubled, which raises its loudness 7.12 phons above the tutti's. At the tutti's level, after 1.2 s of silence, the impression is 8.09 dB below the chord and the chord stands highest, 5.14 dB, at 54 ms; a step louder, straight out of the tutti, the impression is 7.12 dB below the chord and the chord stands highest, 4.51 dB, at 36 ms; a step louder, after 1.2 s of silence, the impression is 15.21 dB below the chord and the chord stands highest, 9.46 dB, at 38 ms. Every curve returns to zero by half a second: the impression climbs to whatever level the chord is played at, so a louder mark is not a stand that lasts but a deeper fall to climb out of, and a silence and a mark add as depths.

A louder final chord is a deeper silence and a brighter sound

A final chord marked a step louder than the passage was supposed to stand above a listener's running impression for as long as it sounded, since the impression can climb no higher than the chord. It climbs exactly that high, and the stand closes in half a second as it always did. What a louder mark actually buys is depth — about seven phons, the same depth a second of silence buys — and a spectrum whose balance point sits most of a whole tone higher, which, unlike the stand, lasts for the whole chord.

form · Closure Counted over what arrives, the balanced bass is not the roughest register. The mean roughness of the I – vi – IV – V – I arrivals with each chord played as loud as the written register's, relative to the written register, counted over every partial and over the partials that stand above what the rest of the chord masks. Every partial: 70 −2 octaves, 7.48 −1 octave, 1.00 as written, 0.20 +1 octave. Delivered partials only: 6e-9 −2 octaves, 2.83 −1 octave, 1.00 as written, 0.19 +1 octave. Over every partial the lowest register is 343 times rougher than the highest; over what arrives it is the smoothest of the four, and the roughest is −1 octave, 2.8 times the written register.

A bass chord low enough to balance has already hidden its tenor

Played as loud as the written register, a progression two octaves down is 343 times rougher than the same progression an octave up — if every partial on the page is counted. Count only the partials that stand above what the rest of the chord masks and that register is the smoothest of the four, with nothing left that beats. The balance is not what does it: the extra thirteen decibels move no voice by more than two partials. The register had already buried the tenor at the written dynamic.

perception · Tonal-expectation A rest can balance a louder stamp only if the stamp is shorter than a ninth of a second. The level a final chord a step louder than the tutti, 7.12 phons, leaves the running impression at, in phons over the tutti, against the length of the rest before it, for stamps of 50 ms, 70 ms, 100 ms, 120 ms, 200 ms. 50 ms: 0 s +2.21, 0.25 s +0.16, 0.5 s -0.92, 0.75 s -1.91, 1 s -2.83, 1.5 s -4.46, 2 s -5.84, 2.5 s -7.00, 3 s -7.95, 4 s -9.38, 5 s -10.30, 6 s -10.89, balanced by a rest of 0.29 s; 70 ms: 0 s +3.16, 0.25 s +1.47, 0.5 s +0.67, 0.75 s -0.05, 1 s -0.71, 1.5 s -1.84, 2 s -2.76, 2.5 s -3.51, 3 s -4.12, 4 s -5.00, 5 s -5.55, 6 s -5.89, balanced by a rest of 0.73 s; 100 ms: 0 s +4.27, 0.25 s +3.07, 0.5 s +2.55, 0.75 s +2.08, 1 s +1.67, 1.5 s +0.97, 2 s +0.42, 2.5 s -0.02, 3 s -0.37, 4 s -0.87, 5 s -1.17, 6 s -1.35, balanced by a rest of 2.47 s; 120 ms: 0 s +4.83, 0.25 s +3.88, 0.5 s +3.48, 0.75 s +3.12, 1 s +2.81, 1.5 s +2.29, 2 s +1.87, 2.5 s +1.55, 3 s +1.30, 4 s +0.94, 5 s +0.72, 6 s +0.59, and no rest brings it to the tutti; 200 ms: 0 s +6.14, 0.25 s +5.76, 0.5 s +5.60, 0.75 s +5.47, 1 s +5.35, 1.5 s +5.16, 2 s +5.01, 2.5 s +4.89, 3 s +4.80, 4 s +4.68, 5 s +4.60, 6 s +4.56, and no rest brings it to the tutti. Past a stamp of 115 ms no rest is long enough: the stamp lifts even a fully fallen impression past the tutti.

No rest balances a louder chord held past a ninth of a second

A rest before a final chord leaves the passage quieter than the tutti and a louder mark on the chord leaves it louder, so the two together can leave it exactly where it was, while the chord stands out by both at once. They can — but only for a stamp. A chord a step louder and longer than 115 milliseconds lifts even a listener's fully fallen impression past the tutti, so no rest of any length balances it; two steps louder, the limit is 67 milliseconds, and three, 45. The balanced ending exists, and it is decided by the release, not by the rest.

form · Closure Re-struck under a chord that has been decaying, a buried tenor gets its partials back. How many of the tenor's eight partials stand above the masking of the other three voices, for the first chord of I–vi–IV–V–I balanced for loudness in four registers, on a struck instrument whose held voices decay while the tenor is re-struck a step away at a stated time after the chord; beside it, the same tenor held from the start. Two octaves down: 0.25 s 1 moving, 0 held; 0.5 s 3 moving, 0 held; 1 s 6 moving, 0 held; 2 s 8 moving, 0 held; 4 s 8 moving, 0 held. An octave down: 0.25 s 6 moving, 1 held; 0.5 s 8 moving, 1 held; 1 s 8 moving, 1 held; 2 s 8 moving, 1 held; 4 s 8 moving, 0 held. As written: 0.25 s 8 moving, 4 held; 0.5 s 8 moving, 5 held; 1 s 8 moving, 5 held; 2 s 8 moving, 2 held; 4 s 8 moving, 1 held. An octave up: 0.25 s 8 moving, 3 held; 0.5 s 8 moving, 4 held; 1 s 8 moving, 3 held; 2 s 8 moving, 1 held; 4 s 8 moving, 0 held. Two octaves down, where the held tenor keeps nothing at any time, the moving one has six partials back by a second and all eight by two.

A moving tenor is heard because it is struck again

A bass-heavy chord balanced for loudness hides its tenor under the bass's upper skirt, and arrangers keep inner voices moving in the low register as though motion were the cure. Counted as masking, motion alone is worth nothing: the note the tenor leaves stops masking the new one within ten milliseconds, and on a sustained instrument the moving tenor keeps exactly what the held one keeps. On a struck instrument everything changes, and for a reason that is not the motion. The held voices have been decaying since they were struck and the tenor's new note is struck now, so an octave down a tenor re-struck half a second into the chord has all eight of its partials back where the held tenor has one.

perception · Tonal-expectation In a hall the balanced ending is a louder chord, and the hall sets how much louder. The gain over the tutti, in phons, that a final chord held after no rest needs for the listener's running impression to finish exactly at the tutti's weight when the chord's tail has died into the silence, against the hall's reverberation time, for chords held half a second, one second and two. 0.5 s: 0.2 s 0.7, 0.3 s 1.2, 0.45 s 1.9, 0.6 s 2.7, 0.8 s 3.9, 1 s 5.0, 1.25 s 6.6, 1.5 s 8.2, 1.75 s 9.9, 2 s 11.7, 2.25 s 13.7, 2.5 s 15.8, 3 s 20.4. 1 s: 0.2 s 0.7, 0.3 s 1.1, 0.45 s 1.9, 0.6 s 2.7, 0.8 s 3.8, 1 s 5.0, 1.25 s 6.5, 1.5 s 8.1, 1.75 s 9.9, 2 s 11.7, 2.25 s 13.6, 2.5 s 15.7, 3 s 20.4. 2 s: 0.2 s 0.7, 0.3 s 1.1, 0.45 s 1.9, 0.6 s 2.7, 0.8 s 3.8, 1 s 5.0, 1.25 s 6.5, 1.5 s 8.1, 1.75 s 9.9, 2 s 11.7, 2.25 s 13.6, 2.5 s 15.7, 3 s 20.4. The dashed lines are one dynamic step, 7.12 phons, and two; a one-second chord a step louder balances in a hall of about 1.34 s and two steps louder in one of about 2.32 s.

In a hall the balanced ending is a louder chord

In a dry room a rest before a final stamp a step louder can leave a passage finishing exactly at its tutti's weight, but only for a stamp shorter than a ninth of a second. The prediction was that a hall would make it impossible: its tail fills the rest and lengthens the stamp. That is right for a small room and wrong for a hall. Read when the chord's tail has died, a live hall pulls every ending below its tutti, and the ending that finishes at its own weight there is a held chord marked louder than the passage — five phons louder at a second of reverberation, a whole step at about 1.3 seconds, two at 2.3.

form · Closure An ending built up part by part, counted two ways. A final chord built up one part at a time from middle C to eight parts, every part a string tone at 62 decibels, with the loudness of each stage as a loudness level: the level of a 1 kHz tone judged equally loud. Grouped into critical bands one after another, as the earlier essays counted it, the chord runs 76.2, 80.9, 79.4, 81.9, 76.4, 77.9, 74.2, 74.5 phons — a span of -1.8, and not monotone. Integrated as an excitation pattern it runs 73.2, 77.9, 79.5, 81.6, 82.5, 83.9, 84.5, 85.6 — a span of 12.4, rising at every step. The dashed line is the power sum, 9.0 decibels from one part to eight; spread across the compass, the parts are louder than their power.

A page has twelve phons, and its entries always said so

An ending built up one part at a time was found to move its loudness by under two decibels, and five essays have leaned on that number since. It came from a way of grouping partials into critical bands that sorts an eight-part chord's sixty-four partials into two bands. Counted along the ear instead, the same ending gains twelve phons at every step, which is what the collection's own price for a single entry always implied.

perception · Loudness From the page alone, a thinning ending is a diminuendo and a fuller final chord is barely louder. Short-term loudness through the closing bars of a thirty-two-bar scheme whose texture is 6 parts until the ending, computed from each bar's part count with no performance in it: the parts realised every way their ranges allow, each bar's partials summed as an excitation pattern, and the result passed through the two loudness smoothers. The dashed line is the running impression under the thinning ending. thins to one: final bar 73.2 phons, arriving at 0.690 of the running impression (-4.46 phons); full final chord: final bar 84.7 phons, arriving at 1.004 of the running impression (+0.05 phons); unchanged: final bar 83.3 phons, arriving at 1.000 of the running impression (+0.00 phons); thins then full: final bar 84.2 phons, arriving at 1.014 of the running impression (+0.17 phons).

The page can write a diminuendo and not a climax

Counted on the excitation pattern rather than in grouped bands, the four ending textures the closure essays compare come out the right way round at last: a thinning ending is a ten-phon diminuendo written into the score, and an ending that adds parts arrives louder than what came before rather than quieter. But the gain is tiny. Three more parts on a six-part final chord buy under a phon and arrive a twentieth of a phon above the listener's running impression; only a full chord straight after a thinning stands out, and only at a quick tempo. A page can take loudness away. It cannot make a climax.

perception · Loudness A hall fills the gaps a thinning ending leaves only slowly, so the written diminuendo reaches the seats nearly whole. Short-term loudness through the closing bars of a thirty-two-bar scheme of six parts, computed from each bar's part count on the excitation pattern, with a hall of 2 seconds' reverberation under it, its reverberant field in power six decibels over the direct sound in the steady state; the dashed line is the thinning ending with no room. thins to one: arriving -3.83 phons against the running impression; full final chord: arriving +0.13 phons against the running impression; unchanged: arriving +0.00 phons against the running impression; thins then full: arriving +0.43 phons against the running impression. With no room the thinning arrives at -4.46.

A hall leaves a thinning ending most of its diminuendo

A written diminuendo made by dropping parts arrives about four and a half phons under the listener's impression in a dry room. A hall's tail sounds under every bar and holds the level up as parts leave, and the obvious worry is that it fills the gaps a thinning leaves, as it fills a rest. It barely does. A concert hall leaves the thinning 86 to 100 per cent of its contrast and a stone church about three quarters, where the same rooms leave a two-second general pause three quarters and a half. A thinning steps down a decibel or two a bar, and a hall's tail falls nine decibels in the time a listener takes to register the arrival; only a cathedral is slow enough to blunt the last step, and it takes half.

perception · Loudness Three orders of leaving, one passage: the part left sounding sets the drop, and the room lifts it behind them all. Short-term loudness on the excitation pattern of six string parts, G3 C4 E4 G4 C5 E5 at 62 dB each, dropping one a bar in three orders, with a hall of 2 s in the middle bands, longer in the bass and shorter in the treble. top down: -9.39 phons from the steady texture to the last bar; bass up: -7.40 phons from the steady texture to the last bar; inner first: -8.05 phons from the steady texture to the last bar.

A hall forgets almost everything but the last part to leave

A hall's bass outlasts its treble, so a thinning ending ought to care which parts it drops first: top down should leave the tail's darkness to fill the gap, and bass up should remove what the tail holds longest. Searched over all 720 orders, it barely does. Give the tail a spectrum and the drop moves by under half a phon, in the direction that helps the order expected to suffer. What sets the ending is two notes: the one left sounding, and the one that went just before it. Everything earlier has gone.

perception · Loudness

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DynamicsOrchestrationCritical bandwidthIntegration windowClosureTextureRoughnessEqual-loudness contourMaskingSoneTemporal integrationPhon

All concepts