Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Scale degree — where it appears

A note's position within a scale, counted from the tonic, as distinct from its pitch. Outside keyboard traditions a degree is defined as much by where it goes next as by where it sits, which a pitch set cannot record.

Named by 27 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Ode to Joy as a path. Ode to Joy plotted as 30 notes against the 8 scale degrees it uses, one column per note. Its largest melodic interval is 2 semitones and it spans 7; the mean absolute step is 1.24 semitones. Beethoven, Ninth Symphony, finale, 1824 — the theme as first stated, eight bars.

A melody is a walk, not a set

Nine essays here are about which seven of the twelve a scale takes, and every one of them describes a set. A tune is not a set; it is a path across one, and the path is nearly all small steps. That is not a matter of taste. Above about eight notes a second the ear stops being able to hold a large interval and a small one in the same line, and at sixteen the choice disappears altogether — so a fast passage is scalar because a fast passage that leaps is two pieces of music.

scales · Melody Two modes, one set, and every measure of a set that cannot tell them apart. Raga Bhupali and Raga Deshkar drawn as the moves each allows: an arrow from one degree to another means the tradition's ascent or descent goes that way. Raga Deshkar's ascent omits Re, so the two graphs differ by an edge. Below, every standard measure of a scale, evaluated on both — and they are identical in every row, which the drawing checks before it is made. An ascent and a descent that between them use all 5 degrees can be chosen in 63 ways, 62 of them asymmetric. That is how many modes collapse onto one pitch set under the simplest order model there is, and a census over subsets counts the set once.

A degree is where it goes next

The first essay on scales beyond twelve said a mode is not a set and listed four things a set cannot record. This one makes the sharpest of them arithmetic. Specify a mode as an ascent and a descent — which is how a living tradition specifies one — and it becomes a directed graph on its degrees; sixty-three such graphs collapse onto a single pentatonic set, sixty-two of them with an ascent that is not the descent reversed, and every standard measure of a scale returns the same value for all of them.

scales · Beyond twelve The chain the page counts on. Every way of writing a pitch with up to one accidental, laid out along the chain of fifths and grouped by the pitch class each one sounds as. The vertical axis is what a keyboard has and the horizontal axis is what the page has: the spellings of one pitch class are seven steps of a fifth apart, which is exactly the distance a comma is measured over. Notation did not choose an arbitrary redundancy; it kept the coordinate a tuning system is built in, and equal temperament is the projection that loses it.

The stave is not a ruler

A hundred and eighty essays here draw pitch against an axis somebody computed. The one axis every reader already owns is the five lines, and it is not a pitch axis at all: it counts letters. Seven positions carry twelve pitches, so the same vertical distance is two intervals before an accidental is allowed and six after — and the accidental is not an extra symbol on a complete scale but the repair for a scale with five values missing.

scales · Notation The mode is its tritone. Every set of degrees that lies inside at least one of the seven modes — 510 of them — scored by how many modes it leaves standing, with the 15 minimal sets that decide printed in full. All 15 have two members and every one of them either is a tritone or contains the tritone above the tonic. The only degree every mode has is the tonic itself; there is no degree belonging to just one mode. Averaged over every order the degrees could arrive in, 5.67 of the seven have to have been heard before the mode is settled — most of the scale, because the deciding pair arrives when it arrives.

The one note that decides the mode

A key signature names the seven and not the rotation, so the mode has to be heard. Enumerate every set of degrees that lies inside at least one of the seven modes — 510 of them — and count how many modes each leaves standing. Fifteen minimal sets decide, every one has two members, and every one is the mode's own tritone. The only degree all seven share is the tonic; no degree belongs to a single mode; and averaged over the orders the degrees could arrive in, 5.67 of the seven have to have been heard first.

scales · Modes How near the breaking point each string already is. Frequency times length, as a fraction of what the material allows. The ceiling is half the square root of specific strength — sheep gut 240, music wire 276, nylon 114, brass 127 hertz metres — and it depends on nothing a maker can change: not the gauge, not the tension, not the workmanship. The guitar top E runs at 187 per cent of its own ceiling, which is why it is the string that breaks and why every complaint about rising pitch in the historical record is about that one string.

A standard is a specification

Choosing where to put A looks like a convention and is a mechanical decision. Tension goes as the square of frequency, so a piano built at 440 and tuned to 466 carries twelve per cent more load — a tonne and a half in this model's arithmetic. And there is a hard ceiling nobody can engineer round: frequency times length is capped by half the square root of a material's specific strength, which for gut is 240 hertz-metres. A violin E at A440 runs at 89 per cent of that. At A493 it is at a hundred, and every complaint in the historical record about rising pitch is about that one string.

tuning · Pitch standard How many notes an octave can hold, asked twice. The share of trials on which a category is named correctly, against how many equal categories the octave is cut into, for a listener whose internal estimate carries 11 cents of noise — the logistic scale this site's identification figures already use, which is the thirty-cent transition the studies report. At 95 per cent accuracy the ceiling is 6 categories, and seven scores 94.9 per cent — on the line. The other ceiling is resolution: 151 to 356 difference limens fit in an octave depending on register, which is a factor of forty larger. Every system marked below sits between the two, and the marks separate: the number of degrees a mode uses clears the criterion, and the size of the gamut it chooses them from does not.

How many boxes an octave holds

An identification model of pitch is usually handed twelve categories, and nothing ever asked how many an octave can hold. There are two answers and they are a factor of forty apart. Resolution allows between 151 and 356 — a listener can tell that many pitches apart in a direct comparison. Naming one of them without a comparison is a different faculty and it runs out at six or seven, which is where every mode in every tradition compared here sits. Turkish theory names fifty-three commas to the octave and a makam uses seven of them, and the gap between those two numbers is the whole of the argument.

intervals · Categorical-hearing How much correlation it would take to matter. The limen of a 7-semitone interval at a note length of 0.25 seconds, against the correlation between the two notes' errors. The independent model at the left gives 9.44 cents. Halving that needs a correlation of 0.75; a fifth off it needs 0.31. The curve is √(1 − ρ) and nothing else, so the correlation required for a stated improvement is arithmetic — which turns the question from “does a key help?” into “by how much, and here is the number it must reach”.

How much an anchor would have to be worth

Two pitch errors added in quadrature assume an independence nobody measured — a listener inside a key hears a note as a scale degree, and a shared reference is exactly a correlated error. Turning the dial is not evidence. What is evidence is that the dial is not free: a shared error cancels out of a difference completely, so a listener's single-note limen and their interval limen give the two components with nothing left over, and halving the interval limen needs a correlation of exactly 0.75.

intervals · Pitch-acuity The same interval, started on each of the twelve. An interval of 7 semitones started on each pitch class of a major key, against how strongly the key specifies its two notes — the mean of the probe-tone profile at each. The interval account says the listener encodes a distance, so the key cannot enter and the prediction is a horizontal line at 5.4 cents. The degree account says the listener refers each note to the key, so its precision on a note falls as the key's specification of that note weakens; scaled to agree at the most stable start, it rises from 5.4 cents on C to 8.5 on E♭. Every earlier figure measures a quantity the second account says is not being formed at all.

The quantity a rival account says is not there

Two earlier essays measure how much two notes' errors are correlated through a shared anchor, and price what that correlation would be worth. There is a rival account in which a listener refers each note to a key and never forms the distance at all — under which the correlation is not small, it is a description of something that is not happening. The two accounts agree on almost everything and disagree on one manipulation, and the manipulation costs an afternoon.

intervals · Pitch-acuity The twelve keys a key-finder has never had. Every scheme the key-finder reads, read twice: over the twelve major collections the model has always used, and over twenty-four with the harmonic minor added. The pale bar is the first and the dark one the second. On 5 of the 6 the extra twelve states change nothing a reader would see — the largest loss of certainty is 3.2 per cent, on the rondo — and no bar of any of them is renamed. The exception is the ostinato, every bar of which the twelve-collection model calls E♭ and the twenty-four-collection model calls C minor — the same seven notes, the right name. So the missing states were not costing the key-finder its answers. What they were costing is the ability to say which of a collection's seven degrees is home, and that is a different repair.

The key-finder with no tonic

Thirteen essays of key-finding have run over twelve major collections and not twenty-four keys, so a passage in A minor is read as C. Adding the missing twelve costs almost nothing and fixes almost nothing — because the model has no tonic in it at all, and below three raised sevenths in a passage the extra states are worth exactly zero.

harmony · Key-relations How much of A4's pitch error a key could possibly remove. The largest correlation two notes' pitch errors can have at A4, against how long each note lasts. A note's error has two parts and only one of them is the listener's: the steady-tone limen of 4.04 cents, which context might reduce, and the bound a note of length T puts on its own frequency, which context cannot touch. Taking them in quadrature, the shareable fraction is the curve. At a quarter-second note it is 0.21, so the one-half priced earlier is not available at all until each note lasts 486 milliseconds — which is exactly the crossover found by a different route, because a correlation of a half is the two parts being equal. The step is the convention used here, which takes the larger of the two rather than their sum and therefore says the shareable fraction below the crossover is zero.

The part of the error a key cannot touch

Four earlier essays turn one dial — the correlation between two notes' pitch errors — and apply it to the whole of a note's limen. Half of that limen is not the listener's: a note of finite length does not carry its frequency more finely than 1/2T, and no context can put information into a signal that is not there. So the correlation has a ceiling, it is 0.21 at a quarter-second note at A4 and 0.07 at A2, and the figure that prices a correlation of one half is drawn where one half is unavailable.

intervals · Pitch-acuity Thirty cents out of tune is heard as 8 on a 125 ms note and 25 on a 1 s one. How far out of tune a note sounds against how far out of tune it is, at 4 note lengths, at 440 hertz. The key is treated as a prior over pitch: a mixture of Gaussians on the twelve scale degrees, weighted by Krumhansl and Kessler's probe-tone profile and given the width the degree account already uses. The likelihood is the note's own effective limen, which for a short note is the Fourier bound 1/2T. The estimate is the posterior mean, and the shrinkage toward a prior is one line of arithmetic. At 1 s a thirty-cent mistuning is heard as 25.0 cents and at 125 ms as 7.8. Every curve turns back up near the middle of the semitone, because past there the nearest degree is the other one and the pull reverses. The buttons sound at A4, which is the pitch the figure is computed at, at the shortest note length it draws.

A short note is heard more in tune than it is

Four earlier essays treat a key as something that reduces the noise in a pitch judgement. Treat it instead as a prior and the prediction changes kind: not a smaller error but a systematic bias, pulling a short note toward the nearest scale degree by an amount the Fourier bound sets. Thirty cents out of tune on an eighth-of-a-second note is heard as eight. And the part the debt got wrong is the part that matters — the bias does not vanish on a long note. It stops at 17 per cent at A4 and at 48 per cent at A2, because the likelihood's width has a floor that no duration removes.

intervals · Pitch-acuity The mixture at which the chain acquires a tonic. Eight turns of i–iv–v–i in A minor, natural throughout, read at every mixture of the two emissions: nought is the original set overlap against the triad on each degree, one is the measured probe-tone profile rotated to each candidate key. The blocks along the top are the name the model gives, the line below is how far ahead of its best rival that name is. Below a mixture of 0.55 every bar is called C major, which is the collection and not the key; at and above it every bar is called A minor. The margin collapses to 0.33 bits at the crossing and recovers to 4.56 — higher than the 3.38 it started at, because a profile has an opinion about this passage and an overlap does not.

A tonic bought with the function

Putting the measured probe-tone profile inside the ordered key-finder is one term, and it does what was predicted: the natural-minor passage is named A minor at every bar instead of C major. It also does two things nobody predicted. It renames a scheme that has been read in the wrong key at every bar since the day it was written, and it destroys the chord's function while it is buying the key.

harmony · Key-relations The same interval, mistuned by the same amount, at each of its two ends. A C to G in the major key, played 25 cents wrong, with the departure carried by the lower note, split between the two, and carried by the upper note. All three are the same interval size; what differs is which note is off the scale. The share of the departure that survives into what a listener hears is 32 per cent when the lower note carries it and 56 when the upper does. The middle bar is the mean of the other two to within a hundredth, so the averaging is linear and the asymmetry is the whole of the effect. Two things produce it: the prior is 9.0 cents wide at the C and 10.0 at the G, and the likelihood is 13.2 cents wide at the lower pitch and 8.8 at the higher.

An interval is two posteriors subtracted

Treating a key as a prior over one note predicts that an interval's pull is not the single-note pull doubled, because the two degrees are not equally weighted. Half of that is wrong: splitting a mistuning between the two notes gives exactly the mean of what each end gives alone, to a thousandth, at every one of the twenty-one intervals in the scale. What is not the mean is which end carries it — and the pull turns out to be largest not on the shortest notes but on notes of about an eighth of a second, where the likelihood is a quarter of a semitone wide.

intervals · Pitch-acuity Which intervals in a key can be mistuned invisibly, and from which end. Every interval between two degrees of the major scale, ranked by how differently its two ends treat a 25-cent departure on notes of 0.25 seconds. The C to B is the most lopsided, at 47 points: a mistuning on its upper note reaches the listener nearly 2.5 times as strongly as the same mistuning on its lower one. The D to E is the most even, at -0. A negative bar is an interval whose LOWER note is the one that carries a mistuning into the listener, which happens whenever the lower degree is the less specified of the two. No account of interval perception predicts a table like this, because an interval is usually treated as one quantity rather than as a difference of two estimates.

Which end the mistuning is on

Twenty-one intervals in the major scale, each with two ends, and the same twenty-five cents reaches a listener at anywhere between 32 and 79 per cent of its size depending on which of the two notes carries it. The most lopsided is the tonic to the leading note, where a departure on the upper note arrives two and a half times as strongly as the same departure on the lower. Two mechanisms produce it and they can be separated by one flag: two thirds of the asymmetry is register and one third is the key.

intervals · Pitch-acuity The setting a listener reports is not the interval they preferred. Five published preferences for an interval size, and the value a listener would have to play in a key context for that preference to be what they hear. The key pulls a heard interval back toward the scale, so a listener adjusting until it sounds right has to overshoot — and the reported setting, which is what they played, exaggerates the preference. The corrections run from 1.6 cents to 12.8 on notes of 0.25 seconds. The largest is nearly a syntonic comma, on a preference of thirteen cents, which is to say that the correction is bigger than the effect it is a correction to.

The setting is not the preference

Every published number for an interval listeners prefer — the pure third a quartet is said to find, the raised leading note, the harmonic seventh — is a value somebody adjusted until it sounded right. A listener adjusting inside a key is adjusting through the posterior computed just before, so the value they stopped at is not the one they preferred: it is the one whose heard size equals it. On quarter-second notes the correction for a pure major third is 12.8 cents, which is nearly a syntonic comma and is larger than the 13.7-cent preference it corrects.

intervals · Pitch-acuity One noise everywhere, and the noise each boundary actually gets. The seven boundaries of the tempered diatonic scale, with the noise the earlier model gives each of them — 11 cents, the same everywhere — and the noise the harmonicity model gives them instead, which runs from 11.0 cents to 35.6. The error rate is the sum of these over the octave rather than seven copies of one, so it rises from 5.1 per cent to 11.8. And the moment the boundaries differ, where they are put matters: a scale that moved its degrees would move its boundaries onto different intervals and would pay a different sum. That is the earlier null broken by the assumption its own last section named.

A boundary beside a fifth

A closed form established earlier says an n-category division costs n·σ·√(2/π) whatever the widths are, so a boundary costs the same wherever it is put and the step pattern cannot matter. Its own last section named the assumption that produces the null: one σ, applied to every boundary in the octave. Let σ follow how securely each interval is held and the formula becomes a sum over boundaries rather than n copies of one — the diatonic's error rises from 5.1 per cent to 11.8, and where the degrees are put matters again.

scales · Categorical-hearing The best seven of the twelve is a scale nobody has ever used. All 462 ways of choosing seven of the twelve semitones with the tonic fixed, ranked by the identification error the harmonicity model gives them. The best is C C♯ F♯ G A♭ B♭ B at 8.8 per cent and the worst is 13.4; the diatonic major sits at rank 376, in the worse fifth of the ranking, at 11.8. The optimum is a cluster of semitones around the tonic and around the fifth, and the reason is visible in the criterion rather than in music: a boundary next to the unison or the fifth is a boundary with very little noise on it, so the cheapest way to satisfy this measure is to crowd the degrees where the model says the ear is sharpest. A criterion whose optimum is a scale nobody plays is a criterion that is not what scales are chosen for, and the useful reading of this drawing is that rather than its winner.

The best seven of the twelve

Once the noise is allowed to differ from boundary to boundary, a scale can be chosen to minimise identification error — and the choice is a search over four hundred and sixty-two sets rather than an argument. Run, it returns a cluster of semitones around the tonic and around the fifth, and puts the diatonic major at rank 376 of 462, in the worse fifth of the ranking. A criterion whose optimum is a scale nobody has ever played is a criterion that is not what scales are chosen for, and the reason it fails is legible in the model rather than in the music.

scales · Categorical-hearing Each tradition's own steps against the equal division of the same size. Six scales, each drawn against the equal division into the same number of degrees, under both models of how securely an interval is held. On the harmonicity model the tempered diatonic is 11 per cent better than seven equal steps; on the profile model the same comparison is 0.9 per cent, which is nothing. The two models disagree about the one comparison anybody would want the measure for, and only one of them is free of circularity: the probe-tone profile was measured on listeners raised inside the diatonic tradition, so using it to explain why the diatonic is well chosen assumes the answer. The harmonicity model assumes only that a simple ratio is easier to hold than a complicated one.

The unequal scale that is easier to name

The whole of the earlier result was that a scale's step pattern cannot matter, and every tradition it drew agreed with the equal division of its own size to three decimal places. With one noise per boundary the comparison is live again, and the tempered diatonic beats seven equal steps by eleven per cent — while the pentatonics gain nothing and the maqam scales gain two tenths of one per cent. Only one of the two security models produces the effect, and it is the one that was not measured on listeners raised inside the tradition it is being used to explain.

scales · Categorical-hearing Every question is answered in a corner, not on a ridge. The degree share times the minor share, over the plane of two cues: how much of the emission is the probe-tone profile, across, and how much a bass note is worth, down, with every chord's root in the bass and a bass rule that rewards the triad rooted on the bass. It runs from 0% at a profile share of 0 and a bass weight of 0 to 87% at 0.6 and 1.5. Bass 0: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 41%, 32%, 46%. Bass 0.25: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 52%, 55%, 44%. Bass 0.5: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 68%, 62%, 51%. Bass 1: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 78%, 77%, 77%. Bass 1.5: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 87%, 80%, 86%. Bass 2: 0%, 0%, 0%, 0%, 87%, 87%, 87%.

Two cues meet in a corner

The profile finds a key's tonic and the bass finds a chord's degree, and until now each was swept with the other held at nothing. Swept together across 42 settings, the plane they make is not the ridge that was predicted. The tonic is a step in one direction, at a profile share of 0.55, and the bass cannot move it; the degree is a slope in the other, rising to 89 per cent as the bass is weighted, and the profile barely touches it. Every question is answered only in a corner of the plane — and the one place the two cues overlap is the one piece of music both can rescue.

scales · Key-relations The ninety per cent was a ceiling. The share of 188 scheme bars read right on both key and degree with a bass note worth 1.5, for three bass lines — every chord's root, a line moving to the nearest chord tone, every chord's fifth — and two ways of using the bass: rewarding the triad rooted on it, or any triad containing it. Wide bars are with no profile in the emission, narrow bars with the profile alone. root line, root rule: 89% and 86%; root line, member rule: 60% and 29%; smooth line, root rule: 68% and 46%; smooth line, member rule: 61% and 47%; sixfour line, root rule: 3% and 17%; sixfour line, member rule: 52% and 30%. The reading with no bass at all is 47%.

A bass line is not a list of roots

Every bass note the key-finder has been given was its chord's root, and under that line a bass cue reads 89 per cent of scheme bars on the right degree. Give the same chords an economical bass that moves to the nearest chord tone, as a keyboard reduction would, and nearly half of them are inverted. The cue that rewards the triad rooted on the bass then reads 68 per cent at best and worse as it is trusted more; the cue that rewards any triad containing the bass cannot be fooled and stops at 61. The same inverted line does one thing the roots never did: it puts the leading note of each new key at the bottom, and finds the rondo's modulations.

scales · Key-relations The tempo moves it further than the touch does. One measured slendro, scored among random scales of its size under a free bar, 4 s, at five tempi and under each touch. Left to ring it runs from 29 at 0.15 seconds a note to 83 at 2.4 — a span of 54 percentile points, where the two touches differ by at most 17. So the scale is smoother than most of its size when the music is fast and rougher than most when it is slow, and how the bar is damped is the smaller decision. The two touches converge at the slow end because a bar that has died before its successor is sounding against nothing whatever the player does.

The tempo moves a scale further than the touch

A gamelan is played two ways on the same bars: a saron's are damped as the next is struck and a gendèr's ring over their resonators. That decision moves a slendro's standing among random scales of its size by up to seventeen percentile points, which is real. Over the tempo levels a piece actually moves through it moves by fifty-four — from the twenty-ninth percentile at a fast elaboration to the eighty-third at a slow one. The same five pitches on the same bars are a smoother-than-average scale and a rougher-than-average one, and which depends on how fast they are played.

scales · Beyond twelve The scale's standing belongs to the ringing instrument. Where a measured slendro sits among random five-note scales, at three density ratios, scored three ways: the two instruments together, the fast ringing part on its own, and the slow damped part on its own. At one slow note to 2 fast ones the ensemble is at the 7th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 6th, and the damped part alone at the 95th; At one slow note to 4 fast ones the ensemble is at the 5th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 7th, and the damped part alone at the 95th; At one slow note to 8 fast ones the ensemble is at the 5th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 5th, and the damped part alone at the 95th. A low percentile is a scale smoother than most of its size. The damped part on its own is rougher than nineteen random scales in twenty, because it has almost no simultaneity for its intervals to be smooth in; the ensemble is at the ringing part's figure throughout. And the cross pairs, which are a quarter of the roughness, do not make the ensemble worse than either part alone.

The scale belongs to the ringing instrument

A gamelan plays two instruments on one scale at once — a saron damped at every stroke and a gendèr several times faster with its bars left to ring — and a quarter of the roughness a listener receives falls on pairs that cross between them, which no figure had computed. The cross pairs turn out to be no worse than either stream's own. What decides the scale's standing is the fast part: the ensemble sits at the sixth percentile among random five-note scales and so does the ringing instrument alone, while the damped one alone sits at the ninety-sixth.

scales · Beyond twelve Given the bar in octaves, the cue gets the degree back. How often the reading names the right scale degree, against how much the bass cue is worth, under three rules for what a bass note rewards. the bass is the root: 68 per cent at best; the bass is some chord tone: 67 per cent at best; the bar in octaves: 92 per cent at best; the bass is the root, on a root line: 89 per cent at best. The published cue rewards the triad rooted on the bass, which is right only when the chord is in root position; rewarding any triad containing the bass is right always and rewards three chords a bar instead of one. The third rule is not a bass cue at all — given the bar voiced in octaves a listener knows which three pitch classes are sounding, and that names the chord outright. It reaches 92 per cent on a real line against the published cue's 68 on the same line, and the dashed curve is what that cue manages on a line made entirely of roots — 89 per cent.

Given the bar in octaves, the degree comes back

A bass note is a bare pitch class in the usual figure, and a register in any realisation anybody plays. Voice each bar in octaves and a listener knows which three pitch classes are sounding and which is at the bottom, which names the chord outright — and the rule that uses it reads the right scale degree in 92 per cent of bars on a real bass line, against 68 for the published cue on the same line and 89 for that cue on a line made entirely of roots. The question was whether the register recovers the 89. It recovers it and passes it.

scales · Key-relations A sharper cue is worth nothing to a reading that will follow it anywhere. How often the reading names the right scale degree, against how much it costs to change key, at a bass worth 1.5 on a real bass line. the bass is the root: 20 per cent at a key cost of 0.5 and 68 at 4; the bass is some chord tone: 47 per cent at a key cost of 0.5 and 59 at 4; the bar in octaves: 46 per cent at a key cost of 0.5 and 91 at 4; roots, and a line of roots: 49 per cent at a key cost of 0.5 and 91 at 4. Where a key change is cheap the rule that names the chord outright reads no better than the rule that names three — 46 against 47 per cent — because a reading that will move key for one bar's evidence follows a sharp cue wherever it points. The sharper cue's whole advantage appears only once the reading is reluctant enough to stay put, and by a key cost of 2.2 it is 31 points ahead.

A sharper cue is worth nothing to a reading that moves

The rule that names the chord outright reads 92 per cent of scale degrees right where the published bass cue reads 68 — at the key cost these readings have always been run at. Sweep that cost and the advantage is not a property of the cue. Where a change of key is cheap the sharp rule reads 46 per cent and the vaguest rule 47, because a reading that will move key on one bar's evidence follows a sharp cue wherever it points. The cue's whole value is borrowed from the model's reluctance to be moved.

scales · Key-relations The two parameters are not one, and the reason is a ceiling. The plane of the two parameters these readings have been swept one at a time: how much weight the bass cue carries, against what a change of key costs. Every cell is how often the reading names the right scale degree, and the lines are the contours of equal share. along the 50 per cent contour the product of the two coordinates runs from 0.10 to 0.50; along the 60 per cent contour the product of the two coordinates runs from 0.43 to 1.84; along the 70 per cent contour the product of the two coordinates runs from 0.66 to 2.56; along the 80 per cent contour the product of the two coordinates runs from 1.85 to 4.91; along the 90 per cent contour the product of the two coordinates runs from 2.71 to 15.20. If the two multiplied cleanly those products would be constant and the contours would be hyperbolae. They are not: every contour turns upward and then vertical, because past a bass weight of about 3 more of the cue buys nothing at all and only reluctance is left to buy anything with. The key cost has an interior best, at 3 on this grid, where the reading names 93 per cent of degrees — so a reading that will not change key at all is worse than one that will, which no sweep of a single parameter had found.

The two parameters turn out to have a ceiling between them

The essay before this one asked whether the bass cue's weight and the cost of changing key are one quantity with two names, and said the test was a contour: if they multiply, the curves of equal degree share are hyperbolae. They are not. Along the ninety per cent contour the product of the two runs from 2.7 to 15.2, because past a bass weight of about one and a half the reading saturates and more cue buys nothing. And the sweep finds something no single-parameter sweep here could: the key cost has a best value, and a reading that will never change key is worse than one that will.

scales · Key-relations The ceiling is thirteen bars, and every one of them has a name. Every bar of the six schemes read by the key-finder at a key cost of 3 and a bass weight of 3, with the chord in every bar given exactly — no segmentation is involved. 175 of 188 bars have both the key and the degree right, 93.1 per cent. The misses: 7 in the thirty-two-bar song's bridge, where the chain III7 is read in E major, III7 is read in E major, VI7 is read in E major, VI7 is read in D major, II7 is read in D major, II7 is read in D major, V7 is read in D major; 4 bars of the rondo's A minor episode read as C major; 2 next to a change of key; and 0 of any other kind.

The ceiling is thirteen bars with names

The key-finder's two cues stop buying anything at about 93 per cent of scheme bars read right, and the obvious suspect was the chord segmentation feeding it. The reading was never given a segmentation: every bar arrives with its true chord. What the ceiling is made of can be listed instead, and it is thirteen bars of 188 — seven in a bridge of secondary dominants, four in a minor episode whose chords C major also owns, and two at the edges of a modulation. No weight of any cue moves one of them.

scales · Key-relations A wrong bar costs the same whichever instrument it is on. What moving one degree of a measured slendro by 10 cents, flat or sharp, adds to the roughness per second of a two-instrument texture — a ringing part at 0.15 s a note over a damped one four times slower — on the ringing instrument and on the damped one. The ensemble in tune scores 7.47. Degree 1 (0¢): ringing 0.142 flat and 0.202 sharp, damped 0.163 and 0.185, of which beating 0.178; Degree 2 (231¢): ringing 0.119 flat and 0.068 sharp, damped 0.096 and 0.090, of which beating 0.093; Degree 3 (474¢): ringing 0.106 flat and 0.021 sharp, damped 0.069 and 0.057, of which beating 0.063; Degree 5 (717¢): ringing 0.079 flat and 0.072 sharp, damped 0.075 and 0.078, of which beating 0.077; Degree 6 (955¢): ringing 0.023 flat and 0.018 sharp, damped 0.019 and 0.022, of which beating 0.020. Over all ten errors the ringing instrument's cost 0.85 and the damped one's 0.85, and the wrong bar beating against the other instrument's right one comes to 0.86 on either — as much as the whole, because the intervals the error changes add as often as they save. One error costs about 1.1% of the texture's roughness.

A wrong bar beats the same on either instrument

The ringing instrument carries a gamelan scale's standing, so a tuning error on it was predicted to cost more than the same error on the damped instrument. Put in the beating the model lacked, and the prediction fails: moved ten cents, a degree costs the same 0.85 summed over the scale on either instrument, because almost all of the cost is the wrong bar beating against the right one on the other instrument, and a beat belongs to both of the bars that make it. Moving a whole instrument costs exactly what its five degrees cost separately, and it takes nothing from the scale's standing.

scales · Beyond twelve

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Difference limenKey-findingProbe-toneCentsCategorical perceptionIntonationModulationTonal hierarchyEnumerationIntervalJust intonationJust-noticeable difference

All concepts