Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Interval — where it appears

The distance between two pitches, given as a ratio, as a number of cents, or by a name counting scale degrees. The three descriptions are not equivalent: a name records a position on the chain of fifths that a cents value has already discarded.

Named by 9 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two tones in the ratio 3 to 2. Two sine tones whose frequencies are in the ratio 3 to 2, and their sum. The combined pattern repeats every time both waves return to the start together, which for a simple ratio is soon — here after 2 cycles of the lower tone and 3 of the upper.

Two notes and a ratio, which is the whole of consonance

Sound two tones together and the pair either settles or does not. What decides it is the ratio of their frequencies, and the rule is that simpler ratios settle — which is two and a half thousand years old and still not quite an explanation.

intervals · Consonance Where one interval stops being itself. Identification as a function of interval size: the probability that a listener names each category, modelled as a logistic with the boundary positions and sharpness a study reports. One category's share falls from three-quarters to one-quarter over 24 cents, against the 100 that separate adjacent categories — so the change of mind happens in 24% of the gap and the rest of it is not in doubt at all. That is what makes a mistuned third a third that is out, rather than a different interval.

The ear sorts into boxes, and the boxes are the theory

Slide one note slowly upward against another and the interval between them changes continuously. What a listener reports does not. It stays a minor third, stays a minor third, and then in the space of about twenty cents becomes a major third — and nothing in the sound corresponds to the moment of the change.

intervals · Categorical-hearing The worst interval in each open chord, before and after the best possible compensation. For each shape, the largest departure of any interval from the just interval its name implies, in cents. Before compensation the worst is 15.6 cents; after a search over per-string saddle compensation it is 15.6. The search has six numbers to fix eight shapes with, and on this measure it finds nothing worth changing — because what is being measured is almost entirely equal temperament's own thirds, and a saddle moves a length rather than a temperament.

A guitar cannot be in tune

Three errors land on the same instrument — equal temperament's own thirds, the sharpening that comes from pressing a string down to a fret, and the fact that the only correction available is one length per string. Searching over every setting a luthier could choose leaves a worst-case error of about fifteen cents, and most of what is left is the temperament, which no saddle can reach.

tuning · The comma Two modes, one set, and every measure of a set that cannot tell them apart. Raga Bhupali and Raga Deshkar drawn as the moves each allows: an arrow from one degree to another means the tradition's ascent or descent goes that way. Raga Deshkar's ascent omits Re, so the two graphs differ by an edge. Below, every standard measure of a scale, evaluated on both — and they are identical in every row, which the drawing checks before it is made. An ascent and a descent that between them use all 5 degrees can be chosen in 63 ways, 62 of them asymmetric. That is how many modes collapse onto one pitch set under the simplest order model there is, and a census over subsets counts the set once.

A degree is where it goes next

The first essay on scales beyond twelve said a mode is not a set and listed four things a set cannot record. This one makes the sharpest of them arithmetic. Specify a mode as an ascent and a descent — which is how a living tradition specifies one — and it becomes a directed graph on its degrees; sixty-three such graphs collapse onto a single pentatonic set, sixty-two of them with an ascent that is not the descent reversed, and every standard measure of a scale returns the same value for all of them.

scales · Beyond twelve The chain of fifths in quarter-comma meantone. The fifths laid end to end as the chain they are. The bar under each shows how far that fifth departs from a pure three-to-two, and one of them — G♯ to D♯, the 12th link, where the chain is forced to close — is the wolf, at 35.7 cents.

The same distance, under two names

Four hundred cents is a major third or a diminished fourth, and on a keyboard nothing in the sound distinguishes them. An earlier essay was about the boundary between two categories; this is about two categories at one acoustic value, and the surprise is where the ambiguity comes from. In quarter-comma meantone a major third is 386 cents and a diminished fourth is 427 — two names, two pitches, forty-one cents apart. Equal temperament collapsed them, and what a listener now supplies from context used to be in the sound.

intervals · Categorical-hearing The chain the page counts on. Every way of writing a pitch with up to one accidental, laid out along the chain of fifths and grouped by the pitch class each one sounds as. The vertical axis is what a keyboard has and the horizontal axis is what the page has: the spellings of one pitch class are seven steps of a fifth apart, which is exactly the distance a comma is measured over. Notation did not choose an arbitrary redundancy; it kept the coordinate a tuning system is built in, and equal temperament is the projection that loses it.

The stave is not a ruler

A hundred and eighty essays here draw pitch against an axis somebody computed. The one axis every reader already owns is the five lines, and it is not a pitch axis at all: it counts letters. Seven positions carry twelve pitches, so the same vertical distance is two intervals before an accidental is allowed and six after — and the accidental is not an extra symbol on a complete scale but the repair for a scale with five values missing.

scales · Notation What the notes in between do to the anchor the interval is measured against. How finely a 7-semitone interval can be judged when its two notes are separated by other notes rather than by silence, under the two published accounts. Confirming material restates the key and refreshes the shared reference, so the correlation climbs from 0.5 toward a ceiling and the limen falls to 4.81 cents. Overwriting material competes for the same memory, so the correlation decays to 0.04 and the limen rises to 9.28. By 8 notes the two accounts differ by 4.5 cents, which is 47 per cent of the limen with no anchor at all — and no experiment here distinguishes them.

The notes in between

Every figure until now is about two notes with nothing between them, and a melody is notes with other notes between them. Two published accounts of what the intervening material does predict opposite signs — one says the key is restated and the shared reference is refreshed, the other says each note competes for the same memory and it decays. By eight notes they differ by four and a half cents, which is nearly half the limen the interval would have with no anchor at all.

intervals · Pitch-acuity The same interval, started on each of the twelve. An interval of 7 semitones started on each pitch class of a major key, against how strongly the key specifies its two notes — the mean of the probe-tone profile at each. The interval account says the listener encodes a distance, so the key cannot enter and the prediction is a horizontal line at 5.4 cents. The degree account says the listener refers each note to the key, so its precision on a note falls as the key's specification of that note weakens; scaled to agree at the most stable start, it rises from 5.4 cents on C to 8.5 on E♭. Every earlier figure measures a quantity the second account says is not being formed at all.

The quantity a rival account says is not there

Two earlier essays measure how much two notes' errors are correlated through a shared anchor, and price what that correlation would be worth. There is a rival account in which a listener refers each note to a key and never forms the distance at all — under which the correlation is not small, it is a description of something that is not happening. The two accounts agree on almost everything and disagree on one manipulation, and the manipulation costs an afternoon.

intervals · Pitch-acuity How much of A4's pitch error a key could possibly remove. The largest correlation two notes' pitch errors can have at A4, against how long each note lasts. A note's error has two parts and only one of them is the listener's: the steady-tone limen of 4.04 cents, which context might reduce, and the bound a note of length T puts on its own frequency, which context cannot touch. Taking them in quadrature, the shareable fraction is the curve. At a quarter-second note it is 0.21, so the one-half priced earlier is not available at all until each note lasts 486 milliseconds — which is exactly the crossover found by a different route, because a correlation of a half is the two parts being equal. The step is the convention used here, which takes the larger of the two rather than their sum and therefore says the shareable fraction below the crossover is zero.

The part of the error a key cannot touch

Four earlier essays turn one dial — the correlation between two notes' pitch errors — and apply it to the whole of a note's limen. Half of that limen is not the listener's: a note of finite length does not carry its frequency more finely than 1/2T, and no context can put information into a signal that is not there. So the correlation has a ceiling, it is 0.21 at a quarter-second note at A4 and 0.07 at A2, and the figure that prices a correlation of one half is drawn where one half is unavailable.

intervals · Pitch-acuity

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Just-noticeable differenceScale degreeTonal hierarchyCategorical perceptionCentsDifference limenEnharmonicFrequency ratioLimenNotationPitch memoryAroha

All concepts