Octave ambiguity — where it appears
Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Two pipes for a note neither makes
The resultant stop sounds a sixteen-foot pipe and a ten-and-two-thirds-foot pipe and asks the listener for a thirty-two-foot note. It is the missing fundamental built on purpose from the fewest partials that can imply anything — and counting how many fundamentals two partials actually imply is the arithmetic behind three centuries of builders disagreeing about whether it works.
The pitch that moves the wrong distance
Take three partials two hundred hertz apart and move every one of them up by forty. The spacing has not changed, so anything reading the pitch off how often the waveform repeats must give the same answer as before. The pitch moves to 204 — the shift divided by the harmonic number — which is what a harmonic template predicts and what listeners report. Push the shift to a hundred and a second reading overtakes the first, so there are two pitches and neither is the spacing. This is the measurement that closes the question, and it closes it by ruling out one mechanism rather than by choosing between the two that are left.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Residue pitchResolvabilityAutocorrelationBeatingBoreCritical bandwidthEnd correctionHarmonicityMissing fundamentalPeriodicityTemporal codingVirtual-pitch