Concept

Motor noise — where it appears

The variability in when a player's intended onset actually happens, as against the variability in when they intend it. Separating the two is the whole difficulty of measuring ensemble timing, because only their sum is observable in a performance.

Named by 3 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

How far a wall moves the mean, in spreads. The bias a floor puts into an observed mean, in units of the parent's own spread, against how far the parent sits above the floor. With the mean exactly on the wall the truncated bias is 0.797 spreads and the censored bias is 0.399 — half of it, exactly, because half the mass sits at one point and the other half is an upper half-normal. The earlier essay used the upper figure for a process that produces the lower one, so every bias it quoted is twice what a floor on execution actually causes.

The shape a wall leaves behind

A floor on execution biases every statistic computed on swing timing, and the bias was priced with Pearson's truncated-normal formulas. Those are the formulas for a sample with everything below the wall thrown away. A player who cannot execute a short gap does not throw the attempt away — it comes out at the floor. That is a censored sample, its bias is exactly half, and its skew is two thirds larger.

rhythm · Microtiming

An ensemble finding an asynchrony nobody told it about. An earlier essay produced a map of required leads — which notes of a scoring have to be played early, and by how much — and nothing tells the players those numbers, because they are a property of the instruments' attacks rather than of the music. So an ensemble has to find them, and the mechanism is already here: each player hears sounds rather than onsets and moves their next onset toward the mean of the others'. The spread of arrival times starts at 20 milliseconds and settles at 4, crossing 5 milliseconds after 5 beats — about 1.3 bars of four. The leads it converges on match that map to within 0.2 milliseconds, which is what makes this a convergence rather than a coincidence: the fixed point of players listening to each other is every player leading by their own attack.

How many bars an ensemble needs

The map of required leads is something nobody tells the players, because the leads are a property of the instruments' attacks. So an ensemble has to find them, and the mechanism is the one the microtiming essays describe: each player hears sounds rather than onsets and moves toward the others. It converges on the map to within a fifth of a millisecond, in five beats, and there is a best correction gain.

rhythm · Perceptual-centre

The bias a wall puts in a mean, against the parent it came from. The bias a wall puts into an observed mean, in spreads, for each of eight standardised parents, with the wall exactly on the parent's mean. The censored values run from 0.354 to 0.433, a range of 0.079; the truncated from 0.582 to 1.000, a range of 0.418. The formula now used is the one that hardly depends on a distribution nobody has measured, and the formula it replaced is the one that depends on it a great deal.

The parent nobody measured

Every figure drawn behind a wall so far assumed a normal parent, and the assumption turns out to matter in exactly the wrong place. The censored bias is half the parent's mean absolute deviation — a theorem, not a coincidence — so it lands between 0.35 and 0.43 spreads for every distribution tried, and the truncated one runs from 0.58 to 1.00. But the third moment proposed as the test moves 2.9 across parents against 0.65 between the two rules, and a censored sample from a slightly left-skewed parent has a skew of 1.007 where a truncated normal has 0.995. The statistic that does work is a count of ties.

rhythm · Microtiming

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

Censoring Groove Microtiming Statistics Swing Tempo Timing deviation Asynchrony Attack transient Correction gain Ensemble asynchrony Entrainment

All concepts