Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Timing deviation — where it appears

The signed distance in milliseconds between where a note falls and where an even grid would put it. Deviations of this size are systematic rather than random and are what a groove consists of.

Named by 12 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Two kinds of systematic timing, which share a word. Each measured profile split into a constant offset from the grid and a pattern that varies by position in the bar. Viennese waltz, second beat is −10.0 ms of offset and 33.4 ms of pattern; jazz soloist against the ride is 28.8 ms of offset and 1.9 ms of pattern; quantised is 0.0 ms of offset and 0.0 ms of pattern. A motor deviation anywhere in the 8 to 20 ms range published for skilled performers leaves 74–95% of Viennese waltz, second beat's variation systematic, 1–5% of jazz soloist against the ride's variation systematic. The two quantities are independent and no single deviation figure distinguishes them.

The deviations are not noise

Two published timing profiles, split into the quantities they actually carry. A jazz soloist thirty milliseconds behind the ride is almost pure offset and has no pattern at all. A Viennese second beat is almost pure pattern and has no offset. They are different things, they are reported under one word, and no figure of total deviation tells them apart.

rhythm · Microtiming Two players, and the correction that keeps them together. The spread of the asynchrony between two players, in milliseconds, against beat number, for 3 correction gains, averaged over 120 seeded runs each. It reaches 120 ms after 64 beats at a gain of 0, 27 ms after 64 beats at a gain of 0.1, 20 ms after 64 beats at a gain of 0.3. With no correction at all the asynchrony is a random walk and grows without bound; with any correction it settles at a fixed spread within a few beats and stays there. Two people cannot share a timekeeper, so the fact that ensembles do not come apart is itself the evidence that they are correcting.

Two players and no clock

Two people cannot share a timekeeper, and two independent ones drift a hundred and twenty milliseconds apart inside a minute. Ensembles do not, so something is correcting — and the measurement everybody reaches for recovers the pair's total responsiveness exactly and cannot tell which of the two is doing it. Four tenths from one player and two tenths each give the identical number.

instruments · Microtiming The swing ratio, against the categories it passes through. The same swing curve read against the boundaries between duration categories rather than against notated values. A category's centre is a simple ratio — 1:1, 2:1, 3:1 — and the boundary between two of them is the midpoint, which is arithmetic. The curve crosses 2 of them: out of 2:1 and into 1:1 at 240 beats a minute, out of 3:1 and into 2:1 at 171 beats a minute. So the same notated figure is, by the categorical criterion, a different rhythm at each end of an ordinary tempo range, and the notation says triplet feel throughout.

How late is a different note

A deviation of thirty milliseconds is expression and a deviation of two hundred is a wrong note, so there is an edge. The edges in time are arithmetic — the midpoints between the simple ratios — and the swing ratio crosses two of them as the tempo rises, at 171 and at 240 beats a minute, while the notation says triplet feel throughout.

perception · Microtiming One envelope, and the three places a listener might be said to hear it. The amplitude envelope of a note with a 90 millisecond exponential attack, with the three criteria the literature offers drawn across it. The heard moment is 8.0 ms at the detection criterion, 28 ms at the perceptual-onset criterion and 94 ms at the perceptual-attack criterion. The physical onset is at zero on this axis and no criterion puts the heard moment there. The buttons play this attack against a two-millisecond one, started at the same instant.

A note is heard after it starts

Every rhythm essay until now has treated a note's onset as the moment it happens. It is not: the instant a listener aligns a note with a beat is later than its physical start by an amount the note's own attack decides, and for a sung or bowed note that amount is about thirty milliseconds — the size of the whole quantity six essays on microtiming set out to measure.

rhythm · Perceptual-centre Which ensembles have this problem and which do not. The width of the heard-moment spread built into 7 standard instrumentations, before any player does anything. An ensemble drawn from one attack family has a spread of zero — every note is heard the same distance after it is started, so a common onset is a common heard moment, and this is true of a string quartet and of a gamelan for the same reason and in the same amount. A mixed ensemble carries between 11 and 33 milliseconds of it.

The players who have to be early

Ensembles have been measured for fifty years and found to be about forty milliseconds out of alignment, which has always been reported as the limit of human precision. Part of it is not: an ensemble that mixes attack families carries a heard-moment spread of ten to thirty-three milliseconds before anybody plays a note, and an ensemble drawn from one family carries none at all — which is true of a string quartet and of a gamelan for the same reason.

instruments · Perceptual-centre How much earlier an accent is heard, by mechanism. An accented note on an instrument with a 90 millisecond attack, drawn against how many decibels louder it is, with the three ways it can arrive early separated. A criterion tied to the note's own peak on an unchanging envelope gives exactly nothing. The same criterion on the shorter rise a harder-driven instrument has gives 5.3 milliseconds at 12 decibels. A criterion at a fixed level gives 23.0. Both together give 24.0, and the rise at that dynamic is 73 milliseconds rather than 90. The rise-shortening exponent is stipulated at 0.15 rather than measured, and the two upper curves would separate further if it were smaller.

Playing louder is playing earlier

An accent has two effects on when its note is heard and neither is a timing decision. A harder-driven instrument has a shorter attack, and a criterion set by the surrounding music is crossed sooner by a bigger rise — so a twelve-decibel accent on a bowed note is heard twenty-four milliseconds early with no change whatever in when the bow was put down. It is also the measurement that tells the two competing models apart.

perception · Perceptual-centre The distribution that can be measured is not the one the player has. A player aiming at a short note of 100 milliseconds with a standard deviation of 15, against a floor at 100. The pale curve is what the player is doing and the heavy one is what can be recorded, because the 50 per cent of the parent below the floor arrives at the floor instead. The measured mean is 112.0 milliseconds rather than 100 and the measured standard deviation is 9.0 rather than 15. At 160 beats per minute that turns an intended swing ratio of 2.75 into a measured 2.35.

A quantity resting against a wall

The short note of a swung pair was found sitting exactly on the fast edge of the tempo window. If that edge is a floor rather than a fitted number, then every swing statistic computed until now was computed on a censored sample — and a censored sample has a mean that is 0.80 standard deviations too high, a spread that is 40 per cent too low, and a correction gain that can come out twice what the players actually have.

rhythm · Microtiming The heard moment against the pitch, on an instrument whose own attack is 8 ms. A note cannot establish an amplitude in less than 4 of its own cycles, so the attack has a floor of 4 periods — 145 milliseconds at A0 and 1.9 at C7. Below A4 the floor is longer than the instrument's own attack and the pitch decides the heard moment; above it the instrument does. The lag runs from 46.0 milliseconds at the bottom to 2.5 at the top, a spread of 44 milliseconds that no player can play their way out of.

A low note cannot start on time

Three earlier essays have held the pitch at one value. A note cannot establish an amplitude in less than a few of its own cycles, so the attack has a floor that rises as the pitch falls — 146 milliseconds at the bottom of a piano and three at the top. On an instrument whose action takes eight milliseconds everywhere, that is a forty-three millisecond spread across the keyboard from the period alone, and no player can do anything about it.

rhythm · Perceptual-centre How far a wall moves the mean, in spreads. The bias a floor puts into an observed mean, in units of the parent's own spread, against how far the parent sits above the floor. With the mean exactly on the wall the truncated bias is 0.797 spreads and the censored bias is 0.399 — half of it, exactly, because half the mass sits at one point and the other half is an upper half-normal. The earlier essay used the upper figure for a process that produces the lower one, so every bias it quoted is twice what a floor on execution actually causes.

The shape a wall leaves behind

A floor on execution biases every statistic computed on swing timing, and the bias was priced with Pearson's truncated-normal formulas. Those are the formulas for a sample with everything below the wall thrown away. A player who cannot execute a short gap does not throw the attempt away — it comes out at the floor. That is a censored sample, its bias is exactly half, and its skew is two thirds larger.

rhythm · Microtiming How far the detector looks, note by note. The number of notes that fit inside a 3.5-second present at each point of the tune, once the performance has lengthened its phrase-final notes by 30 per cent. It runs from 5 to 10 notes against a constant 7 for the unperformed version, and it dips exactly where a boundary is, because a boundary is where the performance slows. Reading the boundary-strength curve with that width at every point instead of one width everywhere gives an agreement of 0.55 with the notated phrasing, against 0.36 for the fixed width the present dictates and 0.71 for a fixed width fitted to this tune. The dips are marked, and the notated boundaries are the vertical lines: the detector narrows itself at the places it is supposed to find, which is the circularity this figure has to be honest about — the lengthening was put there by the notation.

A detector whose resolution the performance sets

The boundary detector lost its free parameter when the psychological present became a number of notes at a stated tempo, and what that held still was named at the time: a performance slows into a phrase end, so the number of notes inside the present is not the same everywhere in a tune — it falls exactly where a boundary is. Making the width follow the performance recovers half of what removing the parameter cost, and honestly leaves the other half.

form · Phrase Which notes of a scored chord have to be played early. Four parts of one chord, each with its own instrument, its own pitch and its own dynamic, and the perceptual centre that comes out of all three. piano, sforzando on E1: an attack family of 8 milliseconds against a pitch floor of 97, so the pitch is what limits it, shortened by the dynamic to 65, heard 20.5 after it starts and needing to be played 12.0 early; flute, quiet on A5: an attack family of 60 milliseconds against a pitch floor of 5, so the instrument is, shortened by the dynamic to 69, heard 21.8 after it starts and needing to be played 13.2 early; violin, mezzo forte on E4: an attack family of 90 milliseconds against a pitch floor of 12, so the instrument is, shortened by the dynamic to 90, heard 28.5 after it starts and needing to be played 19.9 early; trumpet, forte on A3: an attack family of 30 milliseconds against a pitch floor of 18, so the instrument is, shortened by the dynamic to 27, heard 8.6 after it starts and needing to be played 0.0 early. The spread is 19.9 milliseconds, which is well above the two or three a listener resolves, so a conductor asking for these four to sound together is asking for four different physical onsets.

Which notes have to be played early

There are three separate contributions to one quantity — the instrument's attack family, the dynamic it is played at, and the note's own period — and every figure so far varies one and holds the others. Added together for a real scoring they do not add: a sforzando low piano note is pitch-limited to a hundred-millisecond attack and the sforzando shortens it back to sixty-five, so flattening the dynamics makes the ensemble's spread larger rather than smaller.

rhythm · Perceptual-centre The bias a wall puts in a mean, against the parent it came from. The bias a wall puts into an observed mean, in spreads, for each of eight standardised parents, with the wall exactly on the parent's mean. The censored values run from 0.354 to 0.433, a range of 0.079; the truncated from 0.582 to 1.000, a range of 0.418. The formula now used is the one that hardly depends on a distribution nobody has measured, and the formula it replaced is the one that depends on it a great deal.

The parent nobody measured

Every figure drawn behind a wall so far assumed a normal parent, and the assumption turns out to matter in exactly the wrong place. The censored bias is half the parent's mean absolute deviation — a theorem, not a coincidence — so it lands between 0.35 and 0.43 spreads for every distribution tried, and the truncated one runs from 0.58 to 1.00. But the third moment proposed as the test moves 2.9 across parents against 0.65 between the two rules, and a censored sample from a slightly left-skewed parent has a skew of 1.007 where a truncated normal has 0.995. The statistic that does work is a count of ties.

rhythm · Microtiming

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

MicrotimingTempoAttack transientOnsetPerceptual-centreSwingEnsemble asynchronyMotor delayCensoringGrooveDynamicsEntrainment

All concepts