Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Maqam — where it appears

A modal framework of Arabic and Turkish practice, carrying characteristic degrees, an ascent and a descent rather than only a pitch set. Its degrees are specified in units finer than a semitone, and two codifications of one maqam can differ by a third of one.

Named by 10 essays across 3 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

Maqam Rast, Arabic theory. Maqam Rast, Arabic theory: its degrees in cents above the tonic, drawn against the twelve equal steps of a keyboard. the third and the seventh sit halfway between major and minor — by convention, exactly halfway. Source: the quarter-tone convention fixed at the Cairo congress of 1932.

A scale is not a set of pitches

Two ragas can have identical pitch sets and be different ragas. Two national theories of one maqam put its third degree thirty-five cents apart. Both facts are fatal to the idea that a mode is a collection of notes, and both are ordinary in the traditions concerned.

scales · Beyond twelve Which traditions make the requirements that produce a comma. Four requirements and five tuning traditions. A comma is what is left over when a scale is generated by fifths, the octave is kept pure, and the chain has to close so that any degree can be a tonic — so a tradition that declines any one of them has no comma to hide. The best fifth each system actually contains is printed beside it, because declining a requirement has its own price.

Where the chain was never closed

Eleven earlier essays treat the comma as a fact about music. It is a fact about three requirements — that the scale is built from fifths, that the octave stays pure, and that the chain closes so any degree can be a tonic — and most of the world's tuning traditions decline at least one of them. What they pay instead is computable, and it is paid somewhere else entirely.

scales · The comma Roughness across an octave. Sensory dissonance between two complex tones as the upper one is swept through an octave, computed by summing the roughness between every pair of their partials. Nothing here is placed by hand. The wells this spectrum produces sit on 4/3, on 3/2, on 5/3, found by scanning the curve rather than by marking them. And the tempered minor third sits 198 cents below the nearest well, and the tempered major third sits 98 cents below the nearest well, which is a real feature of this model and not a defect of the drawing.

The third the model has no opinion about

A neutral third — halfway between major and minor, and a scale degree in most of the music between Morocco and Iran — is nothing at all on an ordinary roughness curve. It becomes a well at 347 cents, which is exactly 11:9, only for a spectrum whose ninth and eleventh partials are at least three times their natural strength. No instrument has that spectrum.

intervals · Beyond twelve 3 ways to fill the same fourth. Each row is a tetrachord: a span of 498 cents — a pure fourth — with two notes inside it, drawn in cents from the lower bound. The bounding notes never move, which is what makes the tetrachord a unit; everything that varies is interior. diatonic (ditonic) puts them at 90 and 294 cents, giving steps of 90, 204, 204; intense chromatic puts them at 81 and 231 cents, giving steps of 81, 151, 267; enharmonic puts them at 63 and 112 cents, giving steps of 63, 49, 386. Against the twelve equal steps below, 1 of 3 land within twenty-five cents of a semitone at every degree; the worst miss is 37 cents, which is a quarter of a semitone and has no name on a keyboard. Nothing in this construction is a subset of an equal division, so nothing the census here does applies to any of it.

A scale built downward from a fourth

A tetrachord is a bounded span with two free notes inside it, which is a different generator from a chain of fifths and a different object from a subset of an equal division. At the maqam tradition's own quarter-tone resolution the construction admits thirty-six fillings of the fourth and 1,296 octaves built from them; the census here can see six of the first and 2.8 per cent of the second, and one of the octaves it cannot see is an ordinary mode of a living tradition.

scales · Beyond twelve How many notes an octave can hold, asked twice. The share of trials on which a category is named correctly, against how many equal categories the octave is cut into, for a listener whose internal estimate carries 11 cents of noise — the logistic scale this site's identification figures already use, which is the thirty-cent transition the studies report. At 95 per cent accuracy the ceiling is 6 categories, and seven scores 94.9 per cent — on the line. The other ceiling is resolution: 151 to 356 difference limens fit in an octave depending on register, which is a factor of forty larger. Every system marked below sits between the two, and the marks separate: the number of degrees a mode uses clears the criterion, and the size of the gamut it chooses them from does not.

How many boxes an octave holds

An identification model of pitch is usually handed twelve categories, and nothing ever asked how many an octave can hold. There are two answers and they are a factor of forty apart. Resolution allows between 151 and 356 — a listener can tell that many pitches apart in a direct comparison. Naming one of them without a comparison is a different faculty and it runs out at six or seven, which is where every mode in every tradition compared here sits. Turkish theory names fifty-three commas to the octave and a makam uses seven of them, and the gap between those two numbers is the whole of the argument.

intervals · Categorical-hearing Three ways a category boundary could move, and how far each moves it. The predicted shift of one boundary against how strong the context is, for three mechanisms. Expectation alone — a listener who thinks one category 20 times more likely than the other — moves the optimal boundary by σ²·ln(odds)/Δ, which with the eleven-cent noise used here is 2.8 cents at ten to one and 3.6 at 20. Re-learning the centres from a context 30 cents away moves it by half of that, 15 cents. Selective adaptation moves it the OTHER way. The two directions are what an experiment would separate, and no absolute calibration is needed to do it.

The boundary that barely moves

Every identification figure here has fixed category centres, and the essay before this one ended by admitting that real boundaries are supposed to move with context. Three mechanisms could move one, and their predictions are an order of magnitude apart and in two different directions. Expectation on its own — a listener who thinks one interval twenty times more likely than the other — is worth three and a half cents.

perception · Categorical-hearing one measured slendro is the scale least committed to a spectrum. Each scale drawn, placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of the same size, under 4 spectra. Low is smooth. Every one of them lands in the smoothest third under every spectrum, so the account that a spectrum chooses a scale survives as a statement about levels. What separates them is the length of each row's line, which is how much the answer moves when the instrument changes: one measured slendro spans 2.9 percentile points and Rast, Turkish theory spans 17.6, a factor of 6.0. The scale usually offered as the case for spectral matching is the one whose standing barely depends on the spectrum, and Rast, Turkish theory is the one that depends on it most.

The scale least committed to its own instrument

The essays on scales beyond twelve draw scales without spectra and spectra without scales, and none of them had put a tradition's own degrees through the roughness model. Doing it for six scales and five spectra says the account survives — every tradition lands between the eighth and the twenty-sixth percentile of random scales of its size, and under a pure tone not one of them does. But the scale whose standing moves least when the instrument changes is the gamelan's, at 2.9 percentile points, and the one that moves most is the five-limit diatonic at 17.4. The scale the argument is usually made about is the one it explains least.

scales · Beyond twelve 6 step patterns, 2 category counts, and only the count matters. Each scale drawn as its own steps across the octave, with the share of trials a listener whose internal noise is 11 cents names correctly — and, beside it, the same figure for a scale of equally spaced degrees of the same size. The two agree to three decimal places on every row, though the narrowest step here is 100 cents on the diatonic major, tempered and the widest is 300. Naming is lost at boundaries, an n-degree scale has n of them wherever they are put, and each costs the same as long as no category is narrow enough for the noise to carry an estimate clean across it — 9.1 standard deviations, at the worst here.

A boundary costs the same wherever it is put

Every capacity figure drawn until now cuts the octave into equal categories, and no scale in the world is equal. Putting the real step patterns through the same model returns exactly the same accuracy to four decimal places — because naming is lost at boundaries, an n-degree scale has n of them wherever they are, and each costs the mean absolute value of the noise. That turns the most-quoted result about hearing from a search into one line: 1504 times one minus the criterion, over sigma.

scales · Categorical-hearing Each tradition's own steps against the equal division of the same size. Six scales, each drawn against the equal division into the same number of degrees, under both models of how securely an interval is held. On the harmonicity model the tempered diatonic is 11 per cent better than seven equal steps; on the profile model the same comparison is 0.9 per cent, which is nothing. The two models disagree about the one comparison anybody would want the measure for, and only one of them is free of circularity: the probe-tone profile was measured on listeners raised inside the diatonic tradition, so using it to explain why the diatonic is well chosen assumes the answer. The harmonicity model assumes only that a simple ratio is easier to hold than a complicated one.

The unequal scale that is easier to name

The whole of the earlier result was that a scale's step pattern cannot matter, and every tradition it drew agreed with the equal division of its own size to three decimal places. With one noise per boundary the comparison is live again, and the tempered diatonic beats seven equal steps by eleven per cent — while the pentatonics gain nothing and the maqam scales gain two tenths of one per cent. Only one of the two security models produces the effect, and it is the one that was not measured on listeners raised inside the tradition it is being used to explain.

scales · Categorical-hearing Weighted by the pairs a melody sounds next to each other, every seven-note scale is rougher than most. Each scale placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of the same size, under 4 spectra, with each pair of its degrees weighted by how often the plainest melody its ascent and descent permit sounds the two — here the pairs a melody sounds next to each other. Low is smooth. Raga Bhupali: 40.3 to 56.8, spread 16.5; Raga Deshkar: 25.1 to 37.5, spread 12.4; one measured slendro: 31.8 to 44.5, spread 12.7; Rast, Arabic theory: 92.0 to 98.6, spread 6.6; Rast, Turkish theory: 91.8 to 97.8, spread 6.0; the diatonic major, tempered: 90.7 to 97.0, spread 6.3; the diatonic major, five-limit just: 91.8 to 97.8, spread 6.0.

The smoothness is in the skips

Traditional scales come out smoother than random scales of their size because every pair of their degrees is counted once. Count only the pairs a melody on the scale actually sounds next to each other, and every seven-note scale here is rougher than ninety per cent of random ones, under every spectrum, and under a pure tone as well. The smoothness is carried by the pairs a melody reaches by skipping — its thirds and above all its fifths, which are smoother than all but two random scales in two thousand. Counted by their own ascents and descents, the two ragas that share one set of notes stand in different places at last: Deshkar's skipped Re buys a smoother ascent and costs it the fifths.

scales · Beyond twelve

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

MicrotonalityCentsCategorical perceptionEqual divisionJust intonationRagaSensory dissonanceCategory boundaryIdentificationJust-noticeable differenceModal practicePentatonic

All concepts