Pentatonic — where it appears
Named by 6 essays across one field — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
Five notes, and no semitones
The five black keys sound acceptable in any combination, in any order, over almost any bass note. That is not mysticism and not luck — five is the longest a chain of fifths can run before it produces a semitone, and the number is derived rather than chosen.
Why seven
Four properties, each shared with some other set. Run all four over every subset of the twelve, at every size from two notes to eleven — three hundred and forty-nine shapes in all — and exactly one has all four at once. It is the diatonic set, and it is the only survivor in the whole twelve-note universe.
The only sizes a fifth will make
Stack pure fifths and fold them into an octave, and at almost every number of notes the result has three or more different step sizes. At 2, 3, 5, 7, 12, 17 and 29 it has exactly two — and at no other size below thirty. The pentatonic and the diatonic set are not two discoveries. They are neighbours in one series, and it is the comma's series.
The scale least committed to its own instrument
The essays on scales beyond twelve draw scales without spectra and spectra without scales, and none of them had put a tradition's own degrees through the roughness model. Doing it for six scales and five spectra says the account survives — every tradition lands between the eighth and the twenty-sixth percentile of random scales of its size, and under a pure tone not one of them does. But the scale whose standing moves least when the instrument changes is the gamelan's, at 2.9 percentile points, and the one that moves most is the five-limit diatonic at 17.4. The scale the argument is usually made about is the one it explains least.
The smoothness is in the skips
Traditional scales come out smoother than random scales of their size because every pair of their degrees is counted once. Count only the pairs a melody on the scale actually sounds next to each other, and every seven-note scale here is rougher than ninety per cent of random ones, under every spectrum, and under a pure tone as well. The smoothness is carried by the pairs a melody reaches by skipping — its thirds and above all its fifths, which are smoother than all but two random scales in two thousand. Counted by their own ascents and descents, the two ragas that share one set of notes stand in different places at last: Deshkar's skipped Re buys a smoother ascent and costs it the fifths.
A scale is committed to how long its instrument rings
A traditional scale's standing on the roughness model moves when the instrument changes, and that movement was read as a commitment to the instrument's spectrum. Weight every pair of notes a melody sounds by how much of the earlier note is still ringing when the later one begins, and the movement grows — the tempered diatonic's by 37 percentile points at a note every 0.6 seconds — but almost none of it is the spectrum. Put four instruments' rings on one spectrum and the scale moves 38.6 points; put four spectra under one ring and it moves 9.4. And the partials that make a fifth smooth are the first to stop sounding.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
Chain of fifthsPlomp–Levelt curveRagaSensory dissonanceCritical bandwidthDiatonic scaleInterval contentMaqamMaximal evennessMelodic intervalNull modelStep pattern