Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Theme

Time is a circle

Rhythm drawn as a line looks arbitrary. Drawn as a cycle, the patterns that recur across continents turn out to be the same few shapes.
E(3, 8) as a cycle. A rhythm drawn round a circle, one equal arc per step, with the struck steps filled. On a circle the pattern has no beginning, which is why the same necklace of onsets is several different named rhythms depending on where a listener decides bar one is. Rhythm and metre

Rhythm is a circle, and the bar line is a choice

Draw a rhythm as a line and it looks like a sequence of decisions. Draw it as a cycle and the same pattern turns out to be shared across continents, differing only in where somebody decided to start counting.

 Six rhythms, all from the same construction. Euclidean rhythms generated by Bjorklund's algorithm, which spreads a number of onsets as evenly as a number of steps allows. The patterns were not transcribed from recordings; they are what the algorithm produces, and the names beside them are where each one is already in use. Rhythm and metre

As evenly as possible, which turns out to be a famous rhythm

Ask an algorithm to space five strikes over eight beats as evenly as it can. It produces the cinquillo. Ask for three over eight and it produces the tresillo. Nobody told it about Cuba.

 3 against 2. Two evenly spaced pulses over the same span, one in 3 and one in 2. They agree only where both grids land together, and the gap between agreements is the least common multiple — which is what makes one polyrhythm sound like a shape and another like two unrelated things. Rhythm and metre

Two clocks at once, and where they agree

Three against two repeats every six subdivisions and feels like a figure. Seven against five repeats every thirty-five and feels like weather. The difference is one number.

 How much swing there is, against how fast the music goes. The ratio of the long note to the short note of a swung pair, as a function of tempo, derived from the finding that the short note holds a roughly constant hundred milliseconds. The notated readings are horizontal lines, and each is correct at exactly one tempo. Above about three hundred beats a minute the ratio reaches one and the swing has gone. Rhythm and metre

Swing is a ratio, and it is not two to one

Swung quavers are notated as a triplet figure, which is a ratio of two to one. Measurements of what drummers actually play give anything from three and a half to one down to one to one, and which of those it is depends almost entirely on the tempo.

 Three metres as trees. Three metres — 4/4, 2 + 2 + 2 + 2; 6/8, 3 + 3; 5/8, 3 + 2 — each drawn as the bar dividing into beats and the beats dividing again. Simple and compound metres have the same number of beats and differ in the second division; an additive metre has beats of unequal length, which no single division produces. Rhythm and metre

Beats of unequal length

A bar of nine in Balkan practice is not nine of anything. It is four beats, three short and one long, and the inequality is at the beat level rather than inside it — which is a thing no single division of a bar can produce.

 3 against 2, from a rhythm to an interval. The same 3:2 pattern at 6 rates, an event rate from 1.5 to 300 per second, on a logarithmic axis. Below about 20 events a second the two streams are counted; above about 40 they are heard as two pitches a 3:2 apart, which for 3:2 is 702 cents. Nothing in the pattern changes across that boundary. The slowest rate drawn is a tempo of 90 events a minute; the fastest is a pitch of 300 Hz against 450 Hz. Rhythm and metre

A rhythm fast enough to be a chord

Three against two is a polyrhythm. Speed the same pattern up until the events arrive faster than about twenty a second and it is a perfect fifth. The ratio never changed, the figure never changed, and the only thing that moved is the rate — which makes rhythm and pitch one continuum with a perceptual boundary across the middle of it.

 One pattern, four metres. The same 12-step onset pattern read under 4 candidate metres, each scored by a preference rule set: 3 for a strong position that carries an onset, -2 for one that does not, -1 for an onset that lands off every strong position. The scores are 4/4 -4, 3/4 12, 6/8 12, 12/8 as 3+3+3+3 12, so 3/4 and 6/8 and 12/8 as 3+3+3+3 tie and the model does not choose. Nothing about the sound differs between these readings; the bar line is supplied by the listener. Rhythm and metre

The beat is inferred, and sometimes wrongly

A bar line is not in the sound. One sequence of onsets supports a reading in four, in three and in six, and which one a listener settles on comes from a small set of preference rules rather than from anything in the signal — which is why the same recording can be heard two ways and why nobody can be talked out of either.

 The metrical levels of 120 bpm, against the window. The range of inter-onset intervals that can be heard as a beat at all, from about 100 to 2000 milliseconds, with the preferred rate near 550. Each mark is one metrical level of a piece at 120 beats a minute. Which of them a listener taps is decided by which falls nearest the preferred rate, not by which one the notation calls the beat. Rhythm and metre

The beat has a preferred rate, and it is not the notation's

Metre is a hierarchy of levels and only one of them is tapped. Which one is decided by the listener's own clock rather than by the time signature: the window in which a series of events can be a beat at all runs from about a tenth of a second to two seconds, with a marked preference near half a second — so at the extremes of tempo the notated beat and the felt one part company, predictably.

 How often the chord changes, and what a room allows. Chord changes a second implied by each style's stated rate and tempo, on a logarithmic axis, with the rate above which a room leaves more than one earlier chord above 20 dB marked for six rooms. The style rates are conventions rather than corpus measurements and the figure says so; the room rates are arithmetic from the reverberation time. Harmony and voice leading

How often the chord changes

Two pieces can use the same chords in the same order and be nothing alike, because a progression says which chords and not how fast. Harmonic rhythm is the second variable, it runs over a factor of thirty between the styles that use it, and both of its limits are set by things that are not harmony — a listener's memory at the slow end and a building at the fast one.

 A cycle has no ending to compute, so it uses density instead. 5 layers over 32 cycles of a 12-step pattern, with each layer's entry and exit marked, and the onsets per step summed underneath. No chord changes and no cadence occurs; the closure vector is zero throughout, and every change a listener hears is a change in how many things are playing. Form and structure

A cycle cannot cadence

Every component of closure is defined by a first time and a last time. Music built on a repeating cycle has neither, so the whole apparatus returns zero on it — not a small value, zero, at every setting. What such music uses instead is how many things are playing, and that is a curve which can be computed from the onsets and nothing else.

 Twelve stages, and the composer chose the rule. Every rotation of a 12-step pattern with 8 onsets against the unrotated original. Each row is one stage of a phase piece: the filled cells are what is heard when the two parts sound together, and the count beside it is how many of the two parts' onsets coincide. The number of stages is the length of the pattern, so the length of the piece is arithmetic. Rhythm and metre

A process that enumerates its own form

Take a twelve-step pattern, play it against itself, and move one copy along by one step at a time. The piece is over when the copy returns to where it started, so its length is twelve — arithmetic, not a decision. What is heard at each stage is the union of the two parts, and nobody composed any of it.

 One construction, a scale on one side and a rhythm on the other. Both rings are the same computation: k things placed as evenly as possible in n positions. On the left it is 7 notes in 12 semitones, which is the major scale; on the right 5 strikes in 8 steps, which is the cinquillo. The filled positions come from the J-function and the open marks from Bjorklund's algorithm, and they are the same set of positions turned by 9 and 6. Scales and modes

The same algorithm made a Cuban rhythm

Ask Bjorklund's algorithm for seven onsets in twelve steps and it returns 101101011010, which read as pitch classes is the natural minor scale. That function has been producing the tresillo and the cinquillo here from the beginning, and nobody has said that the scale field's central object comes out of it unchanged.

 How long until it comes back. Mean similarity along each diagonal of the self-similarity matrix, minus the matrix's own mean off-diagonal similarity, against lag in bars, for 1 case. Lags run to half the length of each scheme, because a longer diagonal holds too few pairs to average. All rows share one vertical scale and the spread of each is printed beside it; the largest is 0.427 and the smallest 0.427. 1 of 1 cases with any spread at all put their strongest lag at the scheme's own repeat unit or a multiple of it. Form and structure

How long until it comes back

A self-similarity matrix has a second reading that nobody looks for. Add up each diagonal instead of walking along one, and out falls repetition as a function of how long ago — a period, in bars, with no segmentation, no kernel width and no bar numbers anywhere in the answer. Five of the six schemes here report the length a listener would have named. The sixth reports something better.

 3 against 2, and the line it adds up to. Two pulse trains over one bar, 3 against 2, and beneath them their union on the common grid of 6 steps. The composite has 4 onsets — 3 + 2 − 1, because the two layers share the downbeat — and its gaps run 2, 1, 1, 2 steps, which uses 2 distinct lengths and reads the same in both directions. No single division of the bar produces that sequence. Rhythm and metre

The third pattern nobody played

Two players play two even pulses and a third rhythm arrives that neither of them played. It has a + b − 1 onsets, its gaps read the same forwards and backwards, and it uses exactly min(a, b) different lengths — which is a better account of why 3:2 is a figure and 7:5 is weather than the number used for the last three essays.

 One pattern, four metres. The same 6-step onset pattern read under 3 candidate metres, each scored by a preference rule set: 3 for a strong position that carries an onset, -2 for one that does not, -1 for an onset that lands off every strong position. The scores are the 3 is the beat 8, the 2 is the beat 4, every step is a beat 8, so the 3 is the beat and every step is a beat tie and the model does not choose. Nothing about the sound differs between these readings; the bar line is supplied by the listener. Rhythm and metre

Which of the two is the beat

A polyrhythm is notated as a bar of two with three laid across it. Run the metre rules used here over the composite and they choose the three — at every ratio tried, without exception. Add the one other rule the rules have, and the answer changes hands at a bar of 1,013 milliseconds, which is 118 to the minute.

 The bell against every division of its cycle. A 12-step pattern of 7 onsets drawn round a circle, with 4 equal divisions of the same cycle as inner rings. Each ring's beats are filled where the pattern strikes them: 1 of the 2, 2 of the 3, 2 of the 4, 3 of the 6. No division has all of its beats struck and none has none of them, so the pattern belongs to no one of them and can be played against any of them. That is what a cross-rhythm is here: one pattern against the beat, and against more than one beat at once, rather than two patterns against each other. Rhythm and metre

The bell is not a polyrhythm

Five earlier essays have set one pattern against another. In the practice the word cross-rhythm was borrowed from, there is one pattern and it is played against the beat — against several beats at once. Counted against the four divisions of a twelve-cycle, the Ewe bell marks half of the two, two-thirds of the three, half of the four and half of the six, and all of none of them.

 One pattern, four metres. The same 8-step onset pattern read under 4 candidate metres, each scored by a preference rule set: 3 for a strong position that carries an onset, -2 for one that does not, -1 for an onset that lands off every strong position. The scores are downbeat on step 1 -1, downbeat on step 2 -7, downbeat on step 3 -1, downbeat on step 4 -1, so downbeat on step 1 and downbeat on step 3 and downbeat on step 4 tie and the model does not choose. Nothing about the sound differs between these readings; the bar line is supplied by the listener. Rhythm and metre

The right period at the wrong phase

Finding the beat is two problems, not one. How far apart the beats are, and where the first one is. This site's rule set answers the first confidently on a tresillo and returns a three-way tie on the second — the same score for the downbeat on step one, step four and step seven — which is not a near miss but no answer at all.

 The gap that decides whether two clocks are two. The closest approach of the two streams in each ratio, at 100 to the minute in 4-time — a bar of 2.4 seconds. It is the bar divided by the product of the two numbers, which is an identity and is checked here against the measured minimum. 9:5 is the last ratio whose onsets are securely separate at this tempo; past it the two streams' events fall inside the window in which the ear cannot put two onsets in order, and what is heard is one irregular pattern rather than two clocks. The bound has a product in it, which is why 3:2 and 4:3 are everywhere and 11:7 is a notation. Rhythm and metre

The ratio that stops being two

Eight earlier essays have taken two clocks at a rational ratio to be a thing a listener can hold. There is a ratio past which it is not, and the bound is not where anyone would look for it: the cycle is exactly one bar long at every ratio, so the length of the pattern separates nothing. What separates them is the closest the two streams ever come, which is one part in their least common multiple — 400 milliseconds for three against two, and seventeen for thirteen against eleven, which is not two events at all.

 Euclidean up to the one thing a timeline is for. Five named timelines, each drawn above the Euclidean pattern with the same number of onsets in the same number of steps, with the rotation between them found by search. 3 of 5 are rotations of the Euclidean pattern and 2 are not Euclidean at any rotation — son clave, 3–2 and rumba clave, 3–2, whose gap sequences are 3·3·4·2·4 and 3·4·3·2·4 against the algorithm's 3·3·3·3·4. Where the match holds it holds only up to rotation, and a rotation is not a small difference: the algorithm has no way to produce a starting position, and a starting position is what a timeline is. Rhythm and metre

The rotation the necklace cannot see

Ask Bjorklund's algorithm for the world's timelines and the usual answer is that it produces them. Search every rotation of each Euclidean pattern for a match and the answer is more interesting: the tresillo is E(3,8) exactly, the bossa-nova and the standard bell pattern are rotations of theirs, and the son and rumba claves — the two best-known timelines in the world — are not Euclidean at any rotation whatever. Where the match does hold it holds up to a starting position, and a starting position is the one thing a timeline is.

 The same eight notes, read three ways. The scale, eight quavers, scored against every triad and seventh at every root. Barred as written the best reading is C major7 at 0.850; with the barline one quaver later it is D minor7 at 0.850. With no metre — every note weighted the same — 4 readings tie at 0.625 and the passage has no best analysis at all. The notes are identical in all three. What changed is where the bar starts, which is not a fact about harmony. Harmony and voice leading

Which notes are the chord

A progression is a list of chords, and before there is a list something has to decide which of the notes sounding are chord tones and which are passing. Take the eight notes of a scale as eight quavers and score every triad and seventh at every root: barred as written the best reading is C major seventh, with the barline moved by one quaver it is D minor seventh, and with no metre at all three readings tie exactly and the passage has no best analysis. Same eight notes in all three. Harmonic analysis is a function of a variable that is not harmony.

 One pattern, four metres. The same 12-step onset pattern read under 3 candidate metres, each scored by a preference rule set: 3 for a strong position that carries an onset, -2 for one that does not, -1 for an onset that lands off every strong position. The scores are 3/4 -4, 6/8 12, 2/4 -4, so 6/8 wins. The page prints 3/4, which the model does not prefer — it ranks 6/8 above it. Nothing about the sound differs between these readings; the bar line is supplied by the listener. Rhythm and metre

The time signature is a claim

A bar line is not a measurement. It is a claim about where the accents are, made before the sound exists, and there is a metre-induction model here that can be handed the same onsets and asked whether it agrees. On a hemiola it does not: the page says three and the model says six, by a margin of twelve against minus four. And on a bar of seven the signature is not even a candidate — what decides the reading is the beaming, which the signature does not contain.

 The same steps, counted by the clock. The step distribution of Ode to Joy and Twinkle, twinkle counted two ways: once per interval, which is what every earlier figure did, and once weighted by how long the note it leaves is held. The two disagree because a tune's long notes are not distributed evenly over its interval sizes — in Ode to Joy the 2-semitone step is 55.2 per cent of the moves and 60.0 per cent of the time. Which of the two a claim about melodic motion means has never been stated here, and the answer matters most exactly where a tune slows down, which is at the ends of its phrases. Rhythm and metre

The note that has a length

Every melodic figure so far reads a table where each note is a pair — a pitch and a duration — and throws the second number away. A step between two minims and a step between two quavers have been one event in every histogram it has drawn. Weighting the same statistics by time moves the step distribution by up to seven points, changes forty-four of a hundred and one contour signs, and turns up an off-by-one in the one figure that did use the durations: it took the length of the note arrived at where the time between two onsets is the length of the note left.

 How unequal a beat is allowed to be. Five bars — 2+3, 2+2+3, 2+2+2+3, 2+5, 3+4 — with the range of subdivision durations at which every one of the bar's beats stays inside the window where a series of events can be a beat — a tenth of a second to two seconds. The metres made of twos and threes have the widest bands, and they have them for a reason that is not about the window: a group of four subdivisions decomposes into two twos and a group of five into a two and a three, so neither is a beat at all. The only indivisible lengths are two and three, which fixes the ratio between an aksak metre's long and short beats at 3:2 by arithmetic. Rhythm and metre

How unequal a beat is allowed to be

A Balkan bar of nine is four beats, three short and one long, and the long one is always three subdivisions against two. Never four against two, never five against three. The usual explanation is that this is what the tradition does; there is a better one and it needs no perceptual measurement at all. A group of four subdivisions decomposes into two twos and a group of five into a two and a three, so neither is a beat — it is two. The only indivisible lengths are two and three, which fixes the ratio at three to two before anybody listens, and leaves the tempo window to decide only how fast the bar can go.

 5 onsets in 16, by evenness against locatability. Every one of the 273 rotation classes of 5 onsets in 16 steps, placed by how uneven its gaps are against how much of the cycle has to be heard on average before its position is known. The two objectives are opposed — the perfectly even pattern is the hardest to locate and the most clustered ones are the easiest — so there is no best pattern, only a frontier, and 22 of the 273 are on it. son clave and the bossa-nova pattern are among them. The named timelines are marked. Rhythm and metre

What the clave buys with its unevenness

The essay before this one found that the two best-known timelines in the world are not Euclidean at any rotation, and asked whether they maximise something else. They do: how quickly a fragment of the cycle says where in the cycle it is. The son clave locates itself in nine of its sixteen steps where the even pattern needs fifteen — and of two hundred and seventy-three patterns, twenty-two are on the frontier between the two objectives and the son clave is one of them.

 A duration category has a tempo range of its own. Each simple ratio's short note is the beat divided by one more than the ratio, so at a high enough tempo it falls under the fastest interval that can be a beat at all — 100 milliseconds. Each bar here runs from the slowest tempo at which the ratio's long note still belongs to a beat to the fastest at which its short note is still a note: 1:1 ends at 300 bpm, 2:1 ends at 200 bpm, 3:1 ends at 150 bpm, 4:1 ends at 120 bpm. The line is this site's swing curve, and where it crosses a category boundary the category it is leaving has already ceased to exist. Rhythm and metre

The short note is sitting on the floor

Swing is modelled here as a short note of constant absolute length, which was measured from drummers and left as a fitted parameter. The tempo window's fast edge — the shortest interval a series of events can be a beat at — was measured from listeners tapping. Both are a hundred milliseconds, and if that is not a coincidence then the swing ratio has no free parameter in it at all: the short note is not held constant, it is resting on the floor.

 Twinkle, twinkle, phrased at the level each tempo selects. The number of boundaries the model finds when its smoothing scale is set by the psychological present rather than chosen, against the tempo the tune is taken at. The scale in notes is the present's 3.5 seconds divided by the mean note length, so a fast tempo puts more notes inside the present and smooths harder. The page's own phrasing has 5 boundaries, drawn as the flat line; the model matches it best at 160 beats per minute, where the present holds 8.2 notes. The same tune at two tempos is read at two levels, which is the prediction and is not a free parameter. Form and structure

The level the tempo chooses

The boundary detector has a scale parameter and an earlier essay left it free, ending with the sentence that names this one: the scale is in notes and the psychological present is in seconds. The psychological present is two to eight seconds, a tempo converts one to the other, and the level a listener reads then stops being a parameter at all — which is a prediction with teeth, because the same tune at two tempos should be phrased differently at levels the arithmetic names in advance.

 A cycle whose position is in the instrumentation. 3 isochronous layers over a cycle of 16 steps, at periods 16, 8, 4. Every layer on its own is perfectly symmetric and tells a listener nothing about where they are; the combination gives 4 distinct signatures over 16 steps, and hearing one of them leaves 2.81 bits unknown. The information is in which instruments sound rather than in where the onsets fall, which is a different answer from the one a single timeline gives — and it needs no asymmetry anywhere. The cost is 7 strokes a cycle, 0.44 to the step, spread over 3 players. Rhythm and metre

A cycle that says where it is

Euclidean timelines were asked how quickly they tell a listener where in the cycle they are, and answered it with rotational asymmetry: a symmetric pattern never locates at all. A colotomic cycle answers the same question with nothing asymmetric in it. Several isochronous layers at nested periods — a gong every sixteen, a kempul every eight, a kenong every four — put the position in which instruments sound, and the position is legible from a single stroke.

 Where a cycle of 16 at 16, 8, 4 outruns the listener's memory. The residual uncertainty a listener is left with once the evidence has stopped accumulating, against how long one turn of a 16-step cycle takes. The listener's memory of a step halves after 3.5 seconds throughout; what changes is how many steps that is. At a cycle of 1.6 seconds it is 35 steps and every design reaches certainty, which is the regime a clave is played in. At 60 seconds it is 0.93 steps and none of them does: layers at 16, 8, 4 settles at 1.89 bits, son clave settles at 2.27 bits, the bossa-nova pattern settles at 2.38 bits, the best single line of 7 settles at 1.85 bits. That is the range a gong cycle occupies, and it is the design that wins there. Rhythm and metre

The cycle that outruns the memory

A timeline and a colotomy were compared at equal strokes and the comparison had no clock in it. A memory span is a number of seconds and a cycle is a number of steps, so the two only meet through a tempo — and at a clave's two seconds a listener's memory covers twenty-eight steps and forgets nothing, while at a gong cycle's forty it covers 1.4 and forgets almost everything. The single line is the better locator up to twenty-three seconds a cycle and the layered code is better after it, which is very close to where each is actually used.

 Five rulers on 5 onsets in 16, and what each frontier keeps. The same 273 rotation classes and the same locating cost, with the frontier recomputed against five different definitions of unevenness. The frontier's size varies from 7 to 22 of 273, so how exclusive membership is depends on the ruler. Of the named timelines of this size, son clave is on 4 of the five, rumba clave is on 0 of the five, the bossa-nova pattern is on 4 of the five. The four rulers that measure how large a pattern's departure from even is rank the whole census together, at no worse than 0.89 between any two of them; the one that counts how many distinct gap lengths a pattern uses rather than how large its departures are is anti-correlated with them at -0.26, and its frontier holds none of the named timelines and does not hold the perfectly even pattern. Rhythm and metre

The frontier and the ruler

A Pareto frontier is a claim about two quantities and only one of them was measured. The locating cost is exact; the unevenness it was traded against was one choice among several. Under four different rulers the son clave stays on the frontier and the frontier shrinks from twenty-two of 273 patterns to seven, so its membership means more rather than less — but the bembe stops being dominated, the two claves stop being equally uneven, and one plausible measure destroys the result entirely.

 A third of the timing surprise is paid for by nothing happening. Every beat of a bar of 4/4 at 1 chord change a bar, with what it costs a listener in expectation. The lower block is the arrival — the chance the chord changes here times what that change costs to be surprised by. The upper block is the hold, which is paid when the chord does not change and is charged at every beat rather than at every event. Over the bar the arrivals come to 2.61 bits and the non-arrivals to 1.29, so the term never spent before is 33 per cent of the total rather than most of it. The two together are exactly the binary entropy of each beat's own hazard, which is why the bar's whole timing bill is 3.90 bits and cannot be raised by rearranging where the changes fall. Harmony and voice leading

The surprise of nothing happening

A hazard charges a listener twice — once when the chord changes and once, quietly, at every beat it does not. The second term was expected to dominate, because there are more beats than changes. It is a third of the bill at one chord a bar and never reaches a half at any rate a metre survives, because the cost of a beat where nothing happens is second-order small.

 What a chord change costs where it actually lands. Every beat of a bar of 4/4 at 1 change a bar, priced as a listener meets it: the pale block is what has already been paid waiting through the beats the chord did not come on, and the dark block is the arrival itself. Their sum is what it costs to be surprised by a change here. The last column is the remaining case, never priced before: no change in the bar at all, at 1.61 bits and a probability of 0.33. The 9 costs are a proper distribution — 1.000 — which is the check that this is one model rather than two. And the spread is the finding: the arrival term alone puts a factor of 6.7 between the best and worst beat, and counting the waiting makes it 19. Harmony and voice leading

Where the chord actually lands

Every timing surprise so far is evaluated on a downbeat: the curve spans a factor of 6.7 and every number is read at its peak. Charge the waiting as well as the arrival and the costs over a bar become a proper distribution, the spread between the best and worst beat rises to a factor of 19.5, and a third of the probability sits on a bar in which nothing changes at all.

 The longest silence against the spread of the gaps. Every one of the 273 rotation classes of 5 onsets in 16 steps, placed by how uneven its gaps are against how long its longest gap is. The two rank the census together at a Spearman correlation of 0.94, so the longest silence is not a second thing to know about a timeline; it is the same thing measured more crudely. Against the other axis on the frontier — how much of the cycle has to be heard before a listener knows where in it they are — it correlates at -0.02, which is nothing. The named timelines are marked, and all of them sit at 4, the shortest longest-gap any pattern of this size can have. Rhythm and metre

The longest silence is not a third axis

The frontier between evenness and locatability was drawn twice and both times against two quantities, with the third job a timeline does left uncomputed. Computed, neither candidate for it is a third quantity: the longest silence ranks the whole census with the spread of the gaps at 0.94, and syncopation is not a property of a cycle at all — every one of the 273 patterns changes its count when the bar line moves. What the request was actually asking for is a cap rather than an axis, and under the tightest one the census admits thirteen patterns and every named timeline is among them.

 5 censuses: the floor of the longest gap, the ceiling of the syncopation total, and how few patterns reach both. For each census of k onsets in n steps, counted by rotation class: 3 in 8: patterns 7, floor of longest gap 3, at the floor 1, ceiling of total 14, at the ceiling 2, at both 1; 5 in 8: patterns 7, floor of longest gap 2, at the floor 2, ceiling of total 12, at the ceiling 2, at both 2; 5 in 12: patterns 66, floor of longest gap 3, at the floor 6, ceiling of total 28, at the ceiling 6, at both 6; 7 in 12: patterns 66, floor of longest gap 2, at the floor 3, ceiling of total 20, at the ceiling 38, at both 3; 5 in 16: patterns 273, floor of longest gap 4, at the floor 13, ceiling of total 79, at the ceiling 9, at both 9. The rotation-total of syncopation is taken against a metre of 2 × 2 × 2 for 8 steps, 2 × 2 × 3 for 12 steps, 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 for 16 steps. In every census drawn the evenly spaced pattern is at the floor and at the ceiling. Rhythm and metre

The other censuses keep evenness, not locating

Five onsets in sixteen suggested two rules: a named timeline's longest gap is the shortest its census allows, and its syncopation totalled over every rotation is the largest. Nine of ten named timelines across five censuses meet both — but so does the evenly spaced pattern, in all twenty-one censuses from two onsets in eight to eight in sixteen, and in four of those five censuses the named timeline is the evenly spaced pattern. What the rules describe is evenness. The quantity the frontier was built on points the other way: the evenly spaced pattern is the slowest of its census to locate in nineteen of twenty-one, the standard bell pattern is the slowest of all sixty-six patterns of seven in twelve, and among the orders of its own gaps a named timeline is usually both the most even and the slowest to locate. The son clave, whose most even order is also the fastest, is the exception the locating story was told about.

 A listener who knows every metre recognises none of them inside the present. For every bar length from nine units to twenty-five, the fewest and the most steps from the downbeat before every other one of the 1820 arrangements of twos and threes has been contradicted by the stream, on onsets alone, with the long beats accented and with the downbeat accented, against the 16 steps a present of 3.5 seconds holds. onsets alone: recognised within the present for 0 of 1820; long-beat accent: recognised within the present for 0 of 1820; downbeat accent: recognised within the present for 85 of 1820. The dashed line is the present. Rhythm and metre

Knowing every metre is slower than knowing none

A long aksak bar cannot be told from its shorter cuts by induction before one step into its last beat, and no accent carried by the notes moves that floor. The obvious escape is a listener who knows the repertoire and recognises the metre instead. Recognition among all 1,820 arrangements of twos and threes never beats the floor, is never quicker than induction, and is slower for half the metres: a nine induced in 9 steps is recognised in 27. What breaks the floor is a small repertoire that leaves out the metre's own longest cut — with the cut known, no repertoire of any size does.

 With a fading memory the slowest order of the gaps 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 is not the one a perfect memory finds. For each of the 3 cyclic orders of the gaps 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2 in 12 steps, the bits of position still unknown once listening has settled, against how many steps a listener's memory of a step takes to halve, with a mismatch costing 6. 2 2 2 1 2 1 2: 12 → 4e-9, 6 → 4e-5, 4 → 0.007, 3 → 0.070, 2 → 0.540, 1.5 → 1.130, 1 → 1.786; 2 2 2 2 1 1 2: 12 → 2e-5, 6 → 0.035, 4 → 0.335, 3 → 0.795, 2 → 1.405, 1.5 → 1.694, 1 → 2.005; 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 (the standard bell pattern): 12 → 2e-5, 6 → 0.027, 4 → 0.231, 3 → 0.535, 2 → 1.028, 1.5 → 1.368, 1 → 1.819. With perfect memory the slowest to locate is the standard bell pattern; at a half-life of 6 steps the highest floor is the order 2 2 2 2 1 1 2, and at 1 it is the order 2 2 2 2 1 1 2. Rhythm and metre

The bell pattern is slowest only to a perfect memory

Among the orders of its own gaps, a named timeline is usually both the most even and the slowest to locate — for a listener who never forgets. Give the listener a memory that halves and the result comes apart. Of six timelines slowest among their orders with perfect memory, only the fume-fume stays slowest for every forgetting listener, and the standard bell pattern, which is the fume-fume with onsets and rests exchanged and settles at exactly the same floors, is second of its three orders for every memory of half its cycle or less. The census ranking survives better, and in fourteen of twenty-one censuses it was the arithmetic of a pattern that repeats.

 Come in part-way with the downbeat accented, and no bar of sixteen units or more is recognised inside the present. For every bar length from nine units to twenty-five, the fewest and the most steps a listener who knows every arrangement of twos and threes needs to recognise the metre and where its bar begins, with the downbeat accented: coming in at a sample of steps inside the bar, against hearing it from its written downbeat. On onsets alone, or with the long beats accented, a metre entered part-way is never told from its rotations. 9: from inside the bar 10 to 17, 16 of 20 inside the present; from the downbeat 10 to 10; 10: from inside the bar 11 to 19, 12 of 20 inside the present; from the downbeat 11 to 11; 11: from inside the bar 12 to 21, 9 of 18 inside the present; from the downbeat 12 to 12; 12: from inside the bar 13 to 23, 8 of 24 inside the present; from the downbeat 13 to 13; 13: from inside the bar 14 to 25, 8 of 28 inside the present; from the downbeat 14 to 14; 14: from inside the bar 15 to 27, 4 of 28 inside the present; from the downbeat 15 to 15; 15: from inside the bar 16 to 29, 4 of 32 inside the present; from the downbeat 16 to 16; 16: from inside the bar 17 to 31, 0 of 32 inside the present; from the downbeat 17 to 17; 17: from inside the bar 18 to 32, 0 of 36 inside the present; from the downbeat 18 to 18; 18: from inside the bar 19 to 32, 0 of 36 inside the present; from the downbeat 19 to 19; 19: from inside the bar 20 to 37, 0 of 40 inside the present; from the downbeat 20 to 20; 20: from inside the bar 21 to 35, 0 of 40 inside the present; from the downbeat 21 to 21; 21: from inside the bar 22 to 40, 0 of 44 inside the present; from the downbeat 22 to 22; 22: from inside the bar 23 to 39, 0 of 44 inside the present; from the downbeat 23 to 23; 23: from inside the bar 24 to 44, 0 of 48 inside the present; from the downbeat 23 to 24; 24: from inside the bar 23 to 39, 0 of 48 inside the present; from the downbeat 23 to 25; 25: from inside the bar 22 to 44, 0 of 52 inside the present; from the downbeat 23 to 25. In all, 61 of 590 entries are recognised within the 16 steps of a 3.5-second present. Rhythm and metre

A dancer who comes in late needs the downbeat marked

Every window for recognising an aksak metre so far started at its written downbeat. A dancer joining a dance already going has not heard the downbeat, and the arithmetic of that is blunt: a metre entered part-way is, onset for onset, each of its own rotations heard from their downbeats, and the rotations are metres too — 2+2+3 and 3+2+2 are counted differently. So on onsets, and with the long beats accented, no metre is ever told from its rotations. Only an accented downbeat tells them apart, and with it a listener who knows thirty metres recognises 54 per cent of them inside the present from a random entry, against 1 per cent without.

 A cycle already known, against a cycle just arrived at. How many bits of uncertainty about position a listener has, against how long the cycle takes, for a single timeline and for a layered colotomy — each drawn twice, once as a listener arriving and once as a listener who has been hearing it long enough to settle. At 1.6 seconds a cycle the timeline goes 0.94 bits arriving and 0.00 settled, and the colotomy 0.71 and 0.00; At 16 seconds a cycle the timeline goes 1.10 bits arriving and 0.08 settled, and the colotomy 0.93 and 0.23; At 60 seconds a cycle the timeline goes 2.47 bits arriving and 2.27 settled, and the colotomy 2.14 and 1.89. The gap between each pair is what the repetitions are worth, and it narrows as the cycle slows. The two designs are drawn at their own step counts rather than at equal strokes, so the levels here are not the earlier ones and the gaps are. Rhythm and metre

Repetition buys least where it is needed most

Every locating figure so far is a listener arriving — the uncertainty averaged over the first cycle heard. Cyclic music comes round dozens of times, and the same model already carries the answer for a listener who has settled: a floor of uncertainty that nothing had read. At two seconds a cycle the repetitions close the whole gap. At sixty they close eight per cent for a single timeline and twelve for a layered code. A slow cycle is worse on the first hearing and gains less from the second, and the two disadvantages compound.

 A listener who hears only the landmarks recognises the metre sooner. The share of metres recognised within the 16 steps of a 3.5-second present after coming in at a random step, against how many metres the listener knows, for five listeners: every onset with nothing marked, every onset with the long beats accented, only the downbeats and long beats with nothing marked, every onset with the downbeat accented, and only the downbeats and long beats with the downbeat marked. Every onset, nothing marked: 5 known, 49% within the present, 3% never; 10 known, 19% within the present, 8% never; 30 known, 1% within the present, 17% never; 100 known, 0% within the present, 34% never. Every onset, long beats accented: 5 known, 68% within the present, 3% never; 10 known, 39% within the present, 8% never; 30 known, 6% within the present, 17% never; 100 known, 0% within the present, 34% never. Landmarks only, nothing marked: 5 known, 69% within the present, 0% never; 10 known, 61% within the present, 3% never; 30 known, 26% within the present, 3% never; 100 known, 9% within the present, 9% never. Every onset, downbeat accented: 5 known, 88% within the present, 0% never; 10 known, 74% within the present, 0% never; 30 known, 54% within the present, 0% never; 100 known, 14% within the present, 0% never. Landmarks only, downbeat marked: 5 known, 91% within the present, 0% never; 10 known, 82% within the present, 0% never; 30 known, 56% within the present, 0% never; 100 known, 23% within the present, 0% never. Rhythm and metre

A late dancer needs the landmarks, not the rhythm

A listener who joins an additive-metre dance part-way recognises it far more reliably with the downbeat accented. Strip the stream down to its landmarks — the onsets that begin a bar or a long beat, with every other onset removed — and the listener does as well or better: knowing a hundred metres, 23 per cent are recognised within the present against 14 with every onset. Unmarked, the landmarks still beat every onset with the long beats accented. Neither half does it alone; what identifies a metre from a late entry is where its long beats sit relative to its bar.

 Against a pulse, the bell pattern is the quickest of its orders to place. The bits of position a listener is still missing, averaged over the first cycle heard, for each cyclic order of the gaps 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 in 12 steps, heard alone, against a pulse every three steps and against a pulse every four, at perfect memory, half-life 3 steps, half-life 1.5 steps. 2 2 2 1 2 1 2: alone 1.08, 1.23, 1.73; against a pulse every 3 steps 0.69, 0.75, 0.96; against a pulse every 4 steps 0.63, 0.67, 0.85. 2 2 2 2 1 1 2: alone 1.22, 1.63, 2.02; against a pulse every 3 steps 0.60, 0.73, 0.92; against a pulse every 4 steps 0.83, 1.07, 1.36. 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 (the standard bell pattern): alone 1.25, 1.45, 1.82; against a pulse every 3 steps 0.54, 0.56, 0.67; against a pulse every 4 steps 0.55, 0.57, 0.68. Alone, the bell pattern is not the quickest order to place at any memory. Against either pulse it is the quickest at every memory. Rhythm and metre

Against a pulse the bell pattern is the easiest to place

Heard alone, the standard bell pattern is not the quickest order of its own gaps to place in its cycle, for a listener with any memory. Heard against a pulse every three steps or every four — which is how anyone hears it — it is the quickest, at every memory and at every alignment of pulse and bell, and by a wide margin: at a memory of a quarter of the cycle, 0.56 bits unplaced over the first cycle against 0.73 for either rival against a pulse in threes. Six of eight named timelines do the same. A timeline's order of gaps looks chosen for how it sits against the beat, not for how it sounds alone.

 A timed expectation would erase a slow cycle's cost, and a listener cannot time a slow cycle that well. Bits of position a listener with a 3.5-second memory is still missing over the first cycle of son clave, against how long the cycle takes, for a newcomer with no expectation, a listener timing the cycle with the Weber fraction a duration that long is judged with, and a listener timing it to ten per cent. a newcomer, no expectation: 2 s 0.94, 8 s 0.97, 24 s 1.41, 40 s 2.02, 60 s 2.47; timing as well as listeners do: 2 s 0.68 (w 0.150), 8 s 0.69 (w 0.150), 24 s 0.85 (w 0.150), 40 s 1.90 (w 0.375), 60 s 2.38 (w 0.375); timing the cycle to ten per cent: 2 s 0.47, 8 s 0.48, 24 s 0.55, 40 s 0.73, 60 s 1.02. At ten per cent even a sixty-second cycle is placed about as well as a newcomer places a two-second one. At the precision a listener actually has for durations of half a minute or more, the expectation is worth a tenth of a bit. Rhythm and metre

An expectation cannot rescue a cycle too slow to time

A listener who knows a piece arrives with an expectation of where in the cycle they are, and the size of that expectation was the number the last essay said nobody had. It can be given one: a listener who has been timing the cycle carries a spread of their Weber fraction times the cycle, which is the same number of steps at any tempo. Timed to ten per cent, a forty-second cycle would be placed better than a newcomer places a two-second one. But forty seconds is judged in the band where the Weber fraction is nearer forty per cent, and there the expectation is worth a tenth of a bit.

 Timed from every layer, a slow colotomic cycle is placed almost at once. Bits of position a listener with a 3.5-second memory is still missing over the first cycle, against how long the cycle takes, for a 16-step colotomy with layers every 16, 8, 4 steps: a newcomer, a listener timing from the last gong, a listener timing from the last stroke of every layer, and a listener timing from the gong to ten per cent; with son clave, timed from its own cycle, for comparison. a colotomy, newcomer: 1.6 s 0.71, 2 s 0.71, 3 s 0.72, 4 s 0.73, 6 s 0.75, 8 s 0.78, 12 s 0.85, 16 s 0.93, 24 s 1.14, 32 s 1.37, 40 s 1.60, 48 s 1.83, 60 s 2.14; a colotomy, timing a whole cycle: 1.6 s 0.27, 2 s 0.45, 3 s 0.45, 4 s 0.45, 6 s 0.46, 8 s 0.46, 12 s 0.47, 16 s 0.48, 24 s 0.54, 32 s 1.21, 40 s 1.45, 48 s 1.70, 60 s 2.02; a colotomy, timing from every layer: 1.6 s 0.00, 2 s 0.00, 3 s 0.00, 4 s 0.00, 6 s 0.00, 8 s 0.00, 12 s 0.01, 16 s 0.01, 24 s 0.01, 32 s 0.03, 40 s 0.11, 48 s 0.17, 60 s 0.20; a colotomy, from the gong to ten per cent: 1.6 s 0.34, 2 s 0.34, 3 s 0.34, 4 s 0.34, 6 s 0.34, 8 s 0.35, 12 s 0.35, 16 s 0.35, 24 s 0.37, 32 s 0.42, 40 s 0.49, 48 s 0.60, 60 s 0.80; son clave, timing the cycle: 1.6 s 0.32, 2 s 0.68, 3 s 0.68, 4 s 0.68, 6 s 0.68, 8 s 0.69, 12 s 0.70, 16 s 0.73, 24 s 0.85, 32 s 1.63, 40 s 1.90, 48 s 2.12, 60 s 2.38. At 40 seconds the clock leaves 0.11 bits, against 1.45 timing from the gong and 0.49 for a ten-per-cent timer. Rhythm and metre

The strokes between the gongs are a clock

An experienced listener arriving in a forty-second gong cycle was expected to be no better placed than a newcomer, because a whole cycle is timed in the band where a Weber fraction is near forty per cent. But nobody times a gong cycle as one interval. A listener who resets at the last gong, the last kempul and the last kenong times three short intervals instead of one long one, and arrives knowing their position to a tenth of a bit — better than a listener timing the whole cycle to ten per cent. A single timeline, whose strokes are all one instrument, offers nothing to reset on.

 At every number of strokes, the clock that halves at each level places a slow listener best. Bits of position unknown over the first cycle of a sixteen-step cycle at 40 seconds, for a listener timing from the last stroke of every layer, for every nesting of layers whose periods divide sixteen, grouped by how many strokes a cycle the layers make together. 1 stroke: 16 1.61; 2 strokes: 16 : 8 0.44; 4 strokes: 16 : 8 : 4 0.11, 16 : 4 0.39; 8 strokes: 16 : 8 : 4 : 2 0.10, 16 : 8 : 2 0.16, 16 : 4 : 2 0.37, 16 : 2 0.90. In every group the best nesting is the one in which each layer is twice as fast as the one above it. Rhythm and metre

The best gong cycle halves at every level

A colotomic cycle is a clock whose layers are its hands, and a clock can be built many ways from the same number of strokes. Searched over every nesting of a sixteen-step cycle, the one that places a slow listener best is, at every budget of strokes, the one in which each layer is exactly twice as fast as the layer above it. A gong with one other layer does best at a ratio of four, and three halving layers with the same four strokes beat it by a factor of three and a half. A layer finer than the one whose interval is already timed to half a step adds almost nothing.

 With both pulses sounding, the bell pattern's lead over the other orders of its gaps disappears. The bits of position a listener with a memory half-life of 3 steps is still missing over the first cycle, averaged over every way each order can sit against the pulses, for each order of the gaps 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 in 12 steps, heard alone, against a pulse every three steps, against a pulse every four and against both; the dashed line is the two pulses alone, with no bell, at 0.53. 2 2 2 1 2 1 2: alone 1.234, every 3 steps 0.738, every 4 steps 0.672, both pulses 0.437. 2 2 2 2 1 1 2: alone 1.630, every 3 steps 0.734, every 4 steps 1.037, both pulses 0.422. 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 (the standard bell pattern): alone 1.452, every 3 steps 0.560, every 4 steps 0.564, both pulses 0.425. The standard bell pattern leads its nearest rival by 0.174 bits against the pulse in threes and 0.107 against the pulse in fours; against both, the three orders are within 0.015 bits and its lead is -0.003. Rhythm and metre

Against both feels, the bell pattern's order stops mattering

Against a pulse in threes, or a pulse in fours, the standard bell pattern is placed a sixth or a tenth of a bit sooner than either other order of its own gaps. A twelve-step cycle in the ensembles that play it is heard against both feels at once, and the two pulses together are a position code of their own: they coincide once a cycle and place a listener within three steps. Heard against both, the three orders are within a seventieth of a bit of one another and the bell's lead is gone — the advantage its order was shaped for lives only where one feel is dropped.

 The landmark stream loses its lead when the listener allows for a lost landmark, before any is lost. The share of metres recognised within the 16-step present from a random entry, 10 metres known, against the rate at which played onsets go unheard, for the landmark stream with its downbeat marked and every onset with the downbeat accented. The listener asks for odds of 19 to one against every rival; a silence where a rival predicts an onset is worth 1/p, so one silence settles a rival below p = 0.053 and two are needed up to 0.229. landmarks, downbeat marked, onsets lost: 82% at 0, 77% at 0.05, 47% at 0.1, 15% at 0.4; landmarks, downbeat marked, caution only: 82% at 0, 82% at 0.05, 57% at 0.1, 46% at 0.4; every onset, downbeat accented, onsets lost: 74% at 0, 70% at 0.05, 58% at 0.1, 22% at 0.4; every onset, downbeat accented, caution only: 74% at 0, 74% at 0.05, 69% at 0.1, 69% at 0.4. Rhythm and metre

A crowd costs a late dancer the silences, not the steps

A dancer who hears only the landmarks of an aksak rhythm — the heads of bars and long beats — recognises it from a late entry better than one who hears every onset, as long as everything played is heard. Let a share of what is played be lost in a crowd and the lead goes, but not for the reason expected. Most of the cost arrives before a single landmark is missed: a listener who allows that one might be can no longer treat a silence as proof, and the landmark stream is built almost entirely of silences. At one lost onset in ten, the caution alone takes 25 points from the landmarks and 5 from the full stream.

 A melody finds the barline the harmony cannot, and only by preferring the downbeat for its long notes. At two chords a bar over a walking bass, eight bars, how often the length of the melody's notes breaks the metre's tie and places the barline, against the share of long notes that fall on the downbeat rather than the half-bar, for melodies with a long note in a quarter, a half and all of their bars. 25% of bars long: 46% at 50%, 53% at 60%, 61% at 70%, 71% at 80%, 78% at 90%, 85% at 100%; 50% of bars long: 48% at 50%, 61% at 60%, 76% at 70%, 91% at 80%, 95% at 90%, 97% at 100%; 100% of bars long: 47% at 50%, 74% at 60%, 85% at 70%, 97% at 80%, 100% at 90%, 100% at 100%. The bass's readings, whether it moves and whether it sounds the root, average 50% over the same passages. At even odds the melody is no better than the metre alone, whatever the number of long notes. Harmony and voice leading

A melody marks the barline by where it lingers

At two chords a bar over a walking bass, every harmonic witness stands at the metre's coin toss about where the bar begins. Give the passage a melody with a habit — long notes that prefer the downbeat — and the barline comes back: with a long note in half the bars and four in five of them on the downbeat, in 91 per cent of passages. The count of long notes barely matters; the preference is everything, and at even odds no number of long notes helps. A phrase end held through its bar is the strongest single cue. And a listener who adds the bass's readings to the melody's does worse than one who ignores the bass.

 A syncopated melody is heard against the bar only if its phrases land on it. At one chord a bar over a walking bass, a melody whose long notes all fall on the half-bar, with a long note in half its bars and in all of them: how often the melody and bass together place the barline (solid) and the melody alone (dashed), against the share of two-bar phrase ends held through their last bar from its downbeat. a long note in 50% of bars: 0% held, together 21%, melody 0%; 10% held, together 36%, melody 20%; 25% held, together 67%, melody 58%; 50% held, together 86%, melody 84%; 75% held, together 97%, melody 97%; 100% held, together 100%, melody 100%. a long note in 100% of bars: 0% held, together 21%, melody 0%; 10% held, together 23%, melody 4%; 25% held, together 45%, melody 29%; 50% held, together 77%, melody 70%; 75% held, together 96%, melody 95%; 100% held, together 100%, melody 100%. Harmony and voice leading

A syncopated melody needs its phrases to land

Put a melody whose long notes all fall on the half-bar over a harmony that changes once a bar and a walking bass, and a listener adding up the evidence hears the bar begin in the wrong place three times in four. The harmony knows where the bar is, but only through one witness: the bass's root votes for the barline in every passage, and the bass's motion never does — a walking bass lands on each new root by step, so it moves less at the barline than inside the bar. One syncopated voice ties the root, and the motion breaks the tie its way. What rescues the barline is not the harmony but the melody's own phrase ends: hold half of them from the downbeat and the reading finds the bar in 86 per cent of passages.

 The three orders of the bell's gaps with the pulse in fours heard 50 per cent of the time. Bits of position unknown over the first cycle, averaged over alignments, for each order of the gaps 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 against a pulse in threes heard in full and a pulse in fours of which 50 per cent of strokes are heard, by a listener who knows the share; memory half-life 3 steps. 2 2 2 1 2 1 2: 0.613; 2 2 2 2 1 1 2: 0.593; 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 (the standard bell pattern): 0.513. The bell pattern leads by 0.080 bits. The expectation over which strokes are lost is exact; drawn instead from 150 random patterns of loss it comes to 0.509 against 0.510 at one alignment. Rhythm and metre

A feel heard half the time gives the bell half its lead

Against one feel the standard bell pattern is the quickest order of its gaps to place; against both feels at once its lead is gone. An ensemble's texture is neither: each feel is heard some of the time. Given a listener who knows how often a pulse's strokes are lost, the lead comes back in proportion to the loss — half the strokes missing restores half of it, at every memory from a step and a half to a whole cycle. There is no threshold at either end, and a listener who treats every silence as proof comes out more certain and worse placed.

 With a drum in the introduction, 2 bars of ground are enough — for a listener who remembers. At one chord a bar over a walking bass, a melody whose long notes all fall on the half-bar (50 per cent of its bars hold one), preceded by a stated number of bars of the harmony and bass alone with a drum on every downbeat of the introduction: the share of the melody's eight bars that a listener reading bar by bar hears against the written barline, for five listeners who differ in how much confidence they can bank. no memory: 0 bars 47%, 1 bars 46%, 2 bars 46%, 3 bars 46%, 4 bars 45%, 6 bars 46%, 8 bars 45%, 12 bars 45%, 16 bars 46%. banks 2 votes: 0 bars 45%, 1 bars 57%, 2 bars 58%, 3 bars 57%, 4 bars 56%, 6 bars 56%, 8 bars 55%, 12 bars 56%, 16 bars 58%. banks 4 votes: 0 bars 44%, 1 bars 68%, 2 bars 79%, 3 bars 79%, 4 bars 76%, 6 bars 77%, 8 bars 77%, 12 bars 76%, 16 bars 79%. banks 8 votes: 0 bars 44%, 1 bars 71%, 2 bars 90%, 3 bars 95%, 4 bars 95%, 6 bars 95%, 8 bars 96%, 12 bars 95%, 16 bars 97%. never forgets: 0 bars 44%, 1 bars 71%, 2 bars 90%, 3 bars 96%, 4 bars 99%, 6 bars 100%, 8 bars 100%, 12 bars 100%, 16 bars 100%. A listener with no memory stays near 47 per cent however much ground is heard; one who never forgets goes from 44 with none to 90 after two bars and 100 after twelve. Harmony and voice leading

Two bars of drum hold the barline; a dozen bars of bass do not

A listener who settles where the bar begins and then holds it hears a syncopated tune against the bar only if the ground before it built enough confidence to spend. Read bar by bar, a walking bass under one chord a bar is worth less than half a vote a bar for the barline, and a syncopated bar takes an eighth of a vote back, so a tune needs about twelve bars of that ground to be heard against the bar nine times in ten. A drum on the downbeat makes each bar of ground worth a vote and a half, and two bars are then enough — but only for a listener who can bank more than four votes of confidence.

 At the same share of time lost, a crowd that hides stretches costs less than one that hides onsets. The share of metres recognised within the 16-step present from a random entry, 10 metres known, with a stated share of the time lost to noise, against the mean length of each stretch lost, in steps — "one by one" is every step lost independently, as in the essay on lost onsets. The listener asks for odds of 19 to one and allows for losses at the true rate. The dashed lines are the same listeners with nothing lost. landmarks, downbeat marked, 10 per cent lost: one by one 46%, 2 46%, 4 46%, 8 47%, 16 48%, 32 49%, 64 50%; nothing lost 56%. landmarks, downbeat marked, 25 per cent lost: one by one 27%, 2 27%, 4 28%, 8 30%, 16 32%, 32 34%, 64 35%; nothing lost 48%. every onset, downbeat accented, 10 per cent lost: one by one 61%, 2 60%, 4 61%, 8 62%, 16 64%, 32 65%, 64 66%; nothing lost 74%. every onset, downbeat accented, 25 per cent lost: one by one 40%, 2 39%, 4 41%, 8 44%, 16 48%, 32 51%, 64 53%; nothing lost 74%. Rhythm and metre

A crowd that hides bars is kinder than one that hides onsets

A dancer joining an additive-metre dance in a noisy room loses some of what is played, and the essay before this one lost it one onset at a time. A crowd does not. It hides stretches — a burst of laughter covers a bar. The prediction was that a stretch as long as a bar would hurt the stream of landmarks most, since it could remove every landmark in a cycle, and that long bars would survive best. Holding the share of time lost fixed, longer stretches help every stream, help the full stream more than the landmarks, and leave long bars as hard to place as ever.

 A listener who weights its witnesses by their record needs 8 bars of walking bass, not 12. A syncopated melody over one chord a bar and a walking bass, preceded by a stated number of bars of the harmony and bass alone: the share of the melody's eight bars heard against the written barline by a listener who never forgets, counting every witness's vote alike, and by one who weights each witness by how often it has agreed with the reading it held. Solid: a long note in half the melody's bars; dashed: in every bar. Half the bars, votes alike: 0 bars 40%, 1 bar 49%, 2 bars 57%, 3 bars 63%, 4 bars 71%, 6 bars 77%, 8 bars 83%, 12 bars 93%, 16 bars 97%. Weighted: 0 39%, 1 59%, 2 71%, 3 76%, 4 83%, 6 88%, 8 92%, 12 95%, 16 94%. Every bar, votes alike: 0 6%, 1 13%, 2 19%, 3 27%, 4 34%, 6 48%, 8 56%, 12 72%, 16 85%. Weighted: 0 6%, 1 38%, 2 54%, 3 66%, 4 74%, 6 85%, 8 90%, 12 93%, 16 98%. Nine bars in ten are reached after 12 bars of ground counting alike and 8 weighting; for the tune that syncopates every bar, after more than sixteen and 8. Reading a reliably wrong witness backwards instead of ignoring it changes no value by more than two points. Harmony and voice leading

A listener who weights its witnesses needs eight bars of bass, not twelve

A syncopated tune over a walking bass needed about twelve bars of ground before a listener with a memory heard it against the bar nine times in ten, with every witness given one vote a bar. Let the listener weight each witness by how often it has agreed with the reading it holds and the root earns a second vote, the bass's motion loses half of one, and the syncopation loses almost all of its. Eight bars are then enough, a tune that syncopates every bar becomes hearable against the bar at all, and reading the syncopation backwards buys nothing that ignoring it does not.

 An elaboration's most useful boundary is one the skeleton does not have. Bits of position unknown over the first cycle of a sixteen-step cycle with gong, kempul and kenong, timing from every layer, when an elaborating part adds a figure a whole cycle long whose one recognisable boundary falls at the step drawn, at 40, 80, 160 seconds a cycle. Dashed: the skeleton alone. Dotted: the skeleton with a kethuk every two steps. 40 s: skeleton 0.112, with a kethuk 0.104; boundary at 2 0.029, 4 0.004, 6 0.004, 8 0.006, 10 0.005, 12 0.004, 14 0.028. 80 s: skeleton 0.329, with a kethuk 0.301; boundary at 2 0.125, 4 0.094, 6 0.067, 8 0.087, 10 0.057, 12 0.072, 14 0.089. 160 s: skeleton 0.646, with a kethuk 0.457; boundary at 2 0.360, 4 0.340, 6 0.256, 8 0.323, 10 0.251, 12 0.295, 14 0.292. A boundary on the gong is the gong's own timer and adds nothing. Anywhere in the middle of the cycle it re-times the digit the gong reads worst, and does more than a whole layer of kethuk strokes. Rhythm and metre

An elaboration is a clock hand where the skeleton has none

A colotomic cycle is a clock whose hands are its punctuating layers, and the finest hand a slow cycle can use runs out as the cycle slows. The elaborating parts that fill the cycle were predicted to supply that finer hand. They can, and a two-step figure recognised at every boundary is a kethuk exactly. But the figure that does most is not a fine one. It is a long one with a single recognisable point in the middle of the cycle, where no skeleton stroke falls: at eighty seconds a cycle it leaves a listener a fifth as uncertain as the skeleton alone, where a kethuk takes off a tenth — and it still does more than a kethuk when a listener catches that point one time in ten.

 A listener who arrives knowing the style needs no introduction. A syncopated melody over one chord a bar and a walking bass, after a stated number of bars of the harmony and bass alone: the share of the melody's eight bars heard against the barline by a listener who never forgets and counts every vote alike, by one who learns each witness's reliability from nothing, and by one who arrives already crediting the bass's motion and the melody's long notes at a coin toss — the habits of a style in which the bass walks and the tune syncopates — and learns from there. every vote alike: 0 bars 40%, 1 bar 49%, 2 bars 57%, 3 bars 63%, 4 bars 71%, 6 bars 77%, 8 bars 83%, 12 bars 93%, 16 bars 97%. learning from no habits: 0 bars 39%, 1 bar 59%, 2 bars 71%, 3 bars 76%, 4 bars 83%, 6 bars 88%, 8 bars 92%, 12 bars 95%, 16 bars 94%. arriving with the style's habits: 0 bars 93%, 1 bar 97%, 2 bars 99%, 3 bars 99%, 4 bars 100%, 6 bars 100%, 8 bars 100%, 12 bars 100%, 16 bars 100%. Harmony and voice leading

A listener who knows the style needs no introduction

A listener who weights each witness to the barline by its record needed eight bars of walking bass before a syncopated tune was heard against the bar nine times in ten, and with no introduction at all it learned the syncopation's lesson instead. Finer records — one for each side a witness takes, one for each section — change nothing. What changes everything is arriving with the style's habits: a listener who already gives the bass's motion and the melody's long notes no vote hears the tune against the bar 93 per cent of the time from its first bar, and 94 per cent for a tune that syncopates every bar. The root need not be trusted more. The others need to be trusted less.

 A second recognisable point is worth a great deal if it can be told from the first. Bits of position unknown over the first cycle of a sixteen-step cycle with gong, kempul and kenong, when the elaborating parts add none, one, two or three recognisable points, each set at its best placement, read by a listener who can tell the points apart and by one who cannot, at 80 and 160 seconds a cycle. 80 s: none 0.329; 1 told apart 0.057 at 10, alike 0.057 at 10; 2 told apart 0.001 at 6/13, alike 0.005 at 6/12; 3 told apart 0.000 at 6/10/14, alike 0.007 at 4/9/14. 160 s: none 0.646; 1 told apart 0.242 at 11, alike 0.242 at 11; 2 told apart 0.094 at 6/13, alike 0.180 at 7/13; 3 told apart 0.038 at 5/11/15, alike 0.117 at 7/10/13. Points told apart add like checkpoints, each taking away most of what is left. Points alike add a little, and at eighty seconds a third alike point leaves the listener worse placed than two. Rhythm and metre

Two landmarks in a cycle help only if they can be told apart

One recognisable point inside a slow gong cycle, placed where the skeleton has no stroke, did more for a listener than a whole layer of kethuk strokes. A second point does as much again, a third nearly as much again — provided the listener can tell which point they have just heard. If the points sound alike, a second one is worth a fraction of that, seventy of the hundred and five ways of placing it leave the listener worse off than one point would, and two alike points half a cycle apart undo most of what the first one gave. Whether the listener keeps one timer or several turns out not to matter at all.

 A gamelan's goal-tone beating is a clock hand only if each goal beats at its own rate. Bits of position unknown over the first cycle of a sixteen-step cycle of gong, kempul and kenong, against the cycle's duration, when the elaborating parts arrive early on each goal tone — kenong and gong on degrees 2 3 2 6 — and a pair of instruments tuned apart beats on it for a step before the stroke: with the pairs tuned together (no swell), tuned apart at one beat rate for every degree, tuned apart by 25 cents so that each degree beats at its own rate (told apart when the rates differ by 15 per cent), and with every swell told apart. tuned together: no swell: 40 s 0.112, 60 s 0.203, 80 s 0.329, 120 s 0.417, 160 s 0.646, 240 s 0.870. tuned apart at one beat rate: 40 s 0.104, 60 s 0.192, 80 s 0.301, 120 s 0.376, 160 s 0.404, 240 s 0.576. tuned apart by 25 cents: 40 s 0.076, 60 s 0.114, 80 s 0.125, 120 s 0.137, 160 s 0.146, 240 s 0.285. every swell told apart: 40 s 0.000, 60 s 0.000, 80 s 0.000, 120 s 0.000, 160 s 0.003, 240 s 0.132. Scales and modes

A gamelan's beating names its goal only if each goal beats at its own rate

When a gamelan's elaborating parts reach a goal tone early, a pair of instruments tuned slightly apart beats on that degree for the strokes before the goal — a swell of shimmer just before each structural stroke, which is exactly where a recognisable event does a slow cycle's clock most good. Whether it does that good depends on whether one goal's swell can be told from another's. Tune every pair to the same beat rate, the practice that keeps a gamelan's shimmer even, and every swell is the same event: it buys a third of what it could. Tune every pair the same number of cents apart and each degree beats at its own rate, fifteen per cent faster than the degree below, and the swells start naming which goal is coming.

 The bell pattern's lead is for arriving. The standard bell pattern's lead over the nearest other order of its own gaps, in bits of surprise a step, cycle by cycle, with the pulse in threes heard in full and the pulse in fours half the time. A listener who told how reliable the feel is: 0.043, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000. A listener who learns it from the strokes: 0.063, 0.001, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000, 0.000. A listener who takes every silence as proof: 0.144, 0.006, 0.005, 0.005, 0.004, 0.004. The lead is all in the first cycle, for every listener; after it the three orders keep a listener placed equally well. The listener who has to learn the reliability gets more from the bell than one who is told it and less than one who never learns. Rhythm and metre

The bell pattern's order is for arriving

Against a feel that comes and goes, the standard bell pattern is the quickest order of its gaps to place, and the lead grows the less a listener knows about the drummer. Followed past the first cycle, the lead is gone, whether or not the listener ever learns how often strokes are lost. And when both feels thin, a different order keeps a listener placed better than the bell does, because its two short gaps make one figure where the bell's make two that look alike.

 Naming the goals costs no roughness: it saves a little. Pairs tuned apart so that each slendro degree's pair beats at a rate proportional to its pitch raised to a power — nought for one rate on every degree, one for a constant interval, more than one for a rate rising faster than the pitch — with the average rate held at 5.01 beats a second. Line: the roughness the detuned pairs add to the goal-tone passage, as a share of what one rate adds — 0 100.0%, 0.5 99.7%, 0.75 99.4%, 1 99.0%, 1.25 98.5%, 1.5 98.1%, 2 97.3%, 2.5 96.4%, 3 95.6%. Steps: the bits of position the swells leave unknown at 160 seconds a cycle, rates told apart at 15 per cent — 0 0.404 (AAAA), 0.5 0.404 (AAAA), 0.75 0.226 (AAAB), 1 0.146 (ABAC), 1.25 0.146 (ABAC), 1.5 0.146 (ABAC), 2 0.146 (ABAC), 2.5 0.146 (ABAC), 3 0.146 (ABAC). Every steeper rise costs less roughness, and from a constant interval upward the swells name three different goals. Scales and modes

A gamelan tuner can name the goals for nothing

A pair tuned so that each goal beats at its own rate lets the swells before a gamelan's structural strokes say which goal is coming, and the question left was what that costs in roughness. Held at the same average shimmer, nothing: a constant interval adds one per cent less roughness than an even beat rate, and a rate rising as the square of the pitch adds three per cent less while naming the goals for a far coarser ear. The even shimmer puts its widest pairs on the low degrees, where a cent of detuning costs most.

 A dancer who hears the crowd as noise buys back most of what caution cost. The landmark stream, downbeats marked, 10 metres known, 25 per cent of the time lost to noise in stretches of the stated mean length: the share of metres recognised within the 16-step present by a listener who cannot tell noise from silence and so allows for losses everywhere, and by one who hears the noise and counts a silence only where the room was quiet. Not hearing it: one by one 27%, 2 27%, 4 28%, 8 30%, 16 32%, 32 34%, 64 35%. Hearing the noise: one by one 51%, 2 50%, 4 50%, 8 52%, 16 54%, 32 57%, 64 59%. Nothing lost at all: 81%. Nothing lost but the same caution: 48%. A listener who loses a quarter of the music and knows where does better than one who loses nothing and must allow for losing it. Rhythm and metre

A dancer who hears the crowd can trust the quiet

A late dancer in a noisy room who cannot tell noise from silence has to treat every silence as weak evidence, and that caution was the largest cost in every figure before this one. A dancer who hears the laugh that covers a bar knows which silences to discount and can trust the rest. Losing a quarter of the music, that dancer recognises more metres than one who loses nothing but must allow for losses — and the landmarks, which a noisy room had made the worse stream to follow, lead again once the noise comes in bursts. The quiet has to be trusted to one onset in nineteen.

 Carried across three octaves, a rise as the pitch to the power 2 leaves 4 pairs no longer beating. Every degree's pair across three octaves of slendro, the geometric mean beat rate held at 5.0 a second, when the rate rises as the pitch to the power 2 across the whole compass, and when the middle octave's rates are repeated in every octave. Carried on: low octave 0.7, 0.9, 1.2, 1.7, 2.2; middle octave 2.9, 3.8, 5.0, 6.6, 8.7; high octave 11.6, 15.1, 20.0, 26.5, 34.9, 4 of fifteen pairs above fifteen a second. Repeated: every octave 2.9, 3.8, 5.0, 6.6, 8.7. The fifteen-hertz line is where these essays stop calling a fluctuation a beat. Scales and modes

A gamelan's shimmer has to start again at every octave

Within one octave, a gamelan tuner who lets each pair's beat rate rise faster than its pitch names the goal tones and pays nothing in roughness for it. Carried across a real instrument's three octaves, the same rise breaks twice. The steepest rise that keeps every pair beating falls from a power of four to a power of one, and the roughness saving turns into a cost: a rise as the square of the pitch is seven per cent rougher than one rate everywhere. A tuning that gives each degree its middle-octave rate in every octave keeps both the clock and the saving at any compass. The beat rate then names the degree, not the pitch.

 In a loud room the accent is worth more, if it is loud enough to get through. Ten metres known, entered at a random step, recognised within the 16-step present by a listener who hears the room's noise: how much marking the downbeat adds to the share recognised from the landmarks, when the noise covers a tenth, a quarter or half of the time in stretches of sixteen steps, every marked downbeat is heard through it, and a stated share of the unmarked strokes are. 10% noise: 0% 23.3, 25% 24.0, 50% 24.4, 75% 24.7, 100% 23.4 points; noise masking everything 21.4. 25% noise: 0% 22.9, 25% 24.6, 50% 25.9, 75% 26.7, 100% 23.4 points; noise masking everything 18.1. 50% noise: 0% 19.8, 25% 23.8, 50% 27.0, 75% 28.9, 100% 23.4 points; noise masking everything 11.3. In a quiet room the accent is worth 23.4 points. Rhythm and metre

In a loud room the accent has to be loud

A late dancer who hears the crowd as noise ignores everything played under it. Real noise is not that thorough. It hides the soft strokes and lets the loud ones through, and an accented downbeat is a loud one. Let the noise pass loud strokes and some soft ones, and marking the downbeat is worth more to the dancer than in a quiet room: with half the time under noise, 29 points of recognition against 23. Noise that swallows the accent halves its worth. In a quiet room no amount of loudness bought an accent anything extra; in a loud one, loudness is the whole of what the accent is for.

 Talk buries a melody's accent ten decibels before it buries a low drum. A band at 70 decibels marking its downbeats four ways, each mark at the band's level, under a crowd whose talk has the long-term spectrum of speech, at a stated level above the band: the chance the marked downbeat is heard, band by band at its clearest, with the crowd's level fluctuating three decibels either way. a louder melody note: -10 dB 100%, -5 dB 100%, 0 dB 100%, +5 dB 94%, +10 dB 47%, +15 dB 4%, +20 dB 0%; a bass note an octave below: -10 dB 100%, -5 dB 100%, 0 dB 100%, +5 dB 100%, +10 dB 100%, +15 dB 90%, +20 dB 34%; a low drum: -10 dB 100%, -5 dB 100%, 0 dB 100%, +5 dB 100%, +10 dB 100%, +15 dB 100%, +20 dB 82%; a high bell: -10 dB 100%, -5 dB 100%, 0 dB 100%, +5 dB 100%, +10 dB 100%, +15 dB 93%, +20 dB 43%; the melody's unmarked strokes, eight decibels under the accent: 100%, 99%, 72%, 14%, 0%, 0%, 0%. Talk is loudest from 250 to 400 hertz, where a melody's fundamentals are; it is fifteen decibels quieter at 63 hertz and twelve quieter at 3 kilohertz. Rhythm and metre

In a crowd the downbeat belongs to the drum

In a loud room a marked downbeat is worth more to a late dancer than in a quiet one, so long as the mark gets through. Whether it does depends on where its sound lies, because talk is not loud everywhere: it is loudest from 250 to 400 hertz, exactly where a melody's notes are, and fifteen decibels quieter at the bottom of a drum. A louder melody note is heard half the time through talk ten decibels over the band; a low drum survives a crowd twelve decibels louder than that. With the talk fifteen decibels over the band, a downbeat marked in the melody is worth two-fifths less to the dancer than one marked by the drum.

 To a listener who fuses a degree's swells, a rise carried across the compass is worth nothing to the clock. Bits of position left unknown just before each goal in a sixteen-step cycle of 160 seconds, goals on degrees 1, 2, 1 and 4 of slendro, each preceded by its degree's swell of beating struck in three octaves at once, against the power the pair's beat rate rises as. fuses agreeing swells, rise carried on: 0 0.40, 0.25 0.40, 0.5 0.40, 0.75 0.40, 1 0.40, 1.5 0.40, 2 0.40, 2.5 0.40, 3 0.40; fuses agreeing swells, rates repeated: 0 0.40, 0.25 0.40, 0.5 0.40, 0.75 0.23, 1 0.15, 1.5 0.15, 2 0.15, 2.5 0.15, 3 0.15; attends to one octave, either family: 0 0.40, 0.25 0.40, 0.5 0.40, 0.75 0.23, 1 0.15, 1.5 0.15, 2 0.15, 2.5 0.15, 3 0.15. The skeleton alone leaves 0.65 bits; swells that all sound alike leave 0.40. A listener who attends to one octave hears both families identically; a listener who fuses a degree's three swells only when they agree finds, under the rise carried on, that no degree's swells agree. Scales and modes

A degree's three swells are one landmark only if they agree

A gamelan's goal tone is struck in several octaves at once, so the swell of beating that warns of it is three swells. A tuning whose beat rate rises with pitch across the whole compass gives each octave its own rate, and a listener who hears a degree's swells as one event only when their rates agree finds that, at any useful rise, none of them do: every goal becomes a swell of no particular rate and the clock is left exactly where swells that all sound alike leave it. No rise can both name the goals and let their swells agree, since naming needs ten times the power agreeing allows. Repeating the middle octave's rates in every octave does both.

 A displaced stroke helps a listener keep its place only if it makes a figure the bell never makes. The standard bell pattern, 2 2 1 2 2 2 1, with both pulses heard half the time, a listener who learns how often strokes are lost: the surprise a step once placed, averaged over the second to sixth cycles, when every third cycle one stroke of the bell is moved one step into an empty step. Each bar is one of the 10 possible displacements, labelled by the varied cycle's gaps, on a logarithmic axis; the lines are the plain bell (0.0078) and the other order of the gaps, 2 2 2 1 2 1 2 (0.0016). 1 3 1 2 2 2 1 (a figure the bell never makes): 0.0055; 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 (a figure the bell never makes): 0.0056; 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 (a figure the bell never makes): 0.0062; 2 2 1 3 1 2 1 (a figure the bell never makes): 0.0066; 2 2 1 1 3 2 1 (a figure the bell never makes): 0.0077; 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 (a figure the bell never makes): 0.0080; 2 1 2 2 2 2 1 (the other order): 0.0107; 1 2 1 2 2 2 2 (the other order): 0.0107; 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 (the bell, shifted): 0.0252; 2 2 1 2 2 1 2 (the bell, shifted): 0.0253. Rhythm and metre

A varied bell can be a landmark or a false start

In a thin texture the standard bell pattern keeps a listener placed five times worse than another order of its gaps, because its two short gaps look alike. A lead drummer's variation — one stroke moved, once every few cycles — was predicted to give the bell back what it loses. The best single displacement every other cycle recovers seventy per cent of the gap; every third cycle, a third; every sixth, a seventh. Every variation makes the bell slower to arrive by. And the displacements that turn the varied cycle into the bell begun somewhere else make keeping one's place three times worse, because they sound exactly like having lost it.

 Slowing every pair by one factor smooths the shimmer steadily and leaves the goal-tone clock alone until a fifth of the promised speed. A gamelan's paired instruments with the middle octave's rates repeated in every octave, the rate rising as the square of the pitch across the degrees, and every rate multiplied by the factor on the axis; a cycle of 160 seconds, sixteen skeleton steps of 10.0 seconds, with a swell of beating in the step before each of four goal strokes. The roughness the pairs add, as a share of the promised shimmer's 3.06 (the falling line), and the share of the swells' value to the clock that survives (the other line): the skeleton alone leaves 0.646 bits of position unknown and the swells at the promised shimmer 0.146. 0.1: clock 49%, roughness 15%; 0.12: clock 84%, roughness 18%; 0.14: clock 84%, roughness 21%; 0.16: clock 84%, roughness 24%; 0.18: clock 84%, roughness 27%; 0.2: clock 84%, roughness 29%; 0.21: clock 100%, roughness 31%; 0.22: clock 100%, roughness 32%; 0.25: clock 100%, roughness 36%; 0.3: clock 100%, roughness 42%; 0.35: clock 100%, roughness 48%; 0.4: clock 100%, roughness 53%; 0.5: clock 100%, roughness 63%; 0.6: clock 100%, roughness 72%; 0.7: clock 100%, roughness 80%; 0.8: clock 100%, roughness 87%; 0.9: clock 100%, roughness 94%; 1: clock 100%, roughness 100%; 1.1: clock 100%, roughness 105%; 1.2: clock 100%, roughness 110%. The clock first loses at 0.20; the floor is 0.21. Scales and modes

A gamelan's shimmer can slow to a fifth before its clock notices

Roughness falls steadily as every pair's beating is slowed by one factor, and the listener who times a goal's swell does not object until the shimmer is a fifth of the promised speed. The limit is not how many beats a swell holds — a ten-second step holds eight even there — but the once-a-second boundary below which a beat is waited out rather than counted, and it bites when the second-slowest goal degree crosses it. At the quick tempi where a swell could hold too few beats, the skeleton already carries the clock alone.

 A goal degree that returns is better marked once than twice, and best told apart. A cycle of 160 seconds, sixteen skeleton steps, a swell of beating in the step before each of four goal strokes; two of the four goals share a slendro degree and so a beat rate, at every pair of positions. Bits of position left unknown with both of that degree's swells, with the first or the second silenced, with neither, and with the two told apart by some other mark. steps 3 and 7: both 0.034, first silenced 0.049, second 0.062, neither 0.143, told apart 0.003; steps 3 and 11: both 0.146, first silenced 0.049, second 0.082, neither 0.128, told apart 0.003; steps 3 and 15: both 0.046, first silenced 0.049, second 0.067, neither 0.126, told apart 0.003; steps 7 and 11: both 0.066, first silenced 0.062, second 0.082, neither 0.202, told apart 0.003; steps 7 and 15: both 0.101, first silenced 0.062, second 0.067, neither 0.127, told apart 0.003; steps 11 and 15: both 0.077, first silenced 0.082, second 0.067, neither 0.188, told apart 0.003. Scales and modes

A goal tone that returns should swell only once

When two of a gamelan cycle's four goal strokes land on the same degree, their swells of beating sound alike, and a listener who hears one cannot tell which goal is coming. Across all 625 ways five degrees can fill four goals, 365 are served better by an elaboration that anticipates fewer goals than four. The repeated pair costs most at slow cycles, can cost more than every swell is worth at moderate ones, and is spared only when its first swell comes straight after the gong.

 A newcomer to a slow cycle needs about four hearings to tell two marks apart, and the best pair is not the quickest to learn. A sixteen-step cycle of 160 seconds with two recognisable points that sound alike, and a listener who learns that they are two events by hearing them at different distances from the gong: the bits of position left unknown in each of the first ten cycles, for four pairs of points, with each pair's clock once fully learned dashed. steps 6 and 13 (d′ 1.30 a hearing, nine listeners in ten naming them after 3.7 cycles): 0.219, 0.147, 0.117, 0.103, 0.098, 0.095, 0.094, 0.094, 0.094, 0.094; learned 0.094; steps 7 and 13 (d′ 1.08 a hearing, nine listeners in ten naming them after 4.9 cycles): 0.180, 0.146, 0.126, 0.116, 0.110, 0.106, 0.105, 0.104, 0.103, 0.103; learned 0.102; steps 4 and 12 (d′ 1.69 a hearing, nine listeners in ten naming them after 2.6 cycles): 0.445, 0.252, 0.206, 0.195, 0.192, 0.191, 0.191, 0.191, 0.191, 0.191; learned 0.191; steps 1 and 15 (d′ 2.49 a hearing, nine listeners in ten naming them after 1.7 cycles): 0.301, 0.255, 0.253, 0.253, 0.253, 0.253, 0.253, 0.253, 0.253, 0.253; learned 0.253. Rhythm and metre

A newcomer learns a cycle's landmarks in four hearings

Two recognisable points in a slow gong cycle help a listener only if they can be told apart, and a newcomer at first cannot: two marks that differ only by where they fall in the cycle sound alike until the listener has heard enough cycles to notice. Timed from the gong, the best pair of points is learned by nine listeners in ten after about four cycles — the same four at any slow tempo, so ten minutes at 160 seconds a cycle. The pairs learned fastest sit right after the gong and are poor clocks once learned; for the first four cycles a newcomer is best served not by the best clock but by a pair whose confusion costs less while it lasts.

 With nothing but position to go on, four marks are worse than two for as long as a newcomer has patience, and a difference of sound turns that round. What is still unknown about the position in a 160-second cycle of sixteen steps, in bits, cycle by cycle, for the best two, three and four marks with a d′ of 0 between each mark's sound and the next. two marks: 1 0.219, 2 0.147, 3 0.117, 4 0.103, 5 0.098, 6 0.095, heard alike 0.219, told apart 0.094; three marks: 1 0.194, 2 0.180, 3 0.158, 4 0.138, 5 0.121, 6 0.108, heard alike 0.194, told apart 0.038; four marks: 1 0.290, 2 0.284, 3 0.262, 4 0.235, 5 0.208, 6 0.185, heard alike 0.290, told apart 0.000. Rhythm and metre

More marks are worse until they sound different

Two points in a slow gong cycle take a newcomer four hearings to tell apart, and the obvious way to shorten that is to make them sound unlike each other. For two marks it barely matters: the saving is a sixth, the first hearing is lost whatever they sound like, and the best pair stays the best pair. The surprise is what happens to more than two. Marks told apart by position alone are worse the more of them there are, for dozens of cycles. Past a very small difference of sound, four marks beat two inside the first four hearings.

All themes