Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Series

Onset time — the series

6 essays on one idea, from the one that introduces it to the one that assumes the rest.
  1. Three ways a note starts, on one pair of axes. Every instrument in this collection, with how long its note takes to speak measured twice: across, in periods of the note itself; up, in milliseconds. The three clusters are three different pieces of physics. A wind instrument accumulates energy in a resonance, so its wait is the resonance's Q — 27, 26, 26, 19, 37 periods here. A bowed string is at full amplitude the moment Helmholtz motion begins and what takes time is the bow reaching a force inside Schelleng's window, which is 3.0, 3.8, 5.1, 7.6 periods. A plucked or struck string is at full amplitude at once and the only duration in it is the exciter's own contact, under a tenth of a period. The two axes do not agree: the slowest instrument in milliseconds is an alto saxophone at 159, and in periods it is an alto saxophone at 37.

    A note takes a number of periods to speak

    Two separate accounts stopped at the same object and said so. A wind instrument's note takes as long to arrive as its resonance takes to build, and that time is the resonance's Q divided by its frequency — so the number of periods is the Q and has no pitch in it, while the number of milliseconds does. The two readings order the instruments differently, and both orderings are wanted.

    part 1 · instruments
  2. Up a trumpet, the two clocks disagree. Every impedance peak of a trumpet, with the settling time each implies. The Q rises up the ladder and so does the frequency, and the settling time is their ratio — so in milliseconds the wait falls from 153 at the C♯2 to 24 at the B5, while in periods it rises from 11 to 24. Both curves are monotone and they point opposite ways, which means a player going up the instrument gets notes that arrive sooner and take longer in their own terms. Nothing here is a measurement of an instrument: it is the transmission-line solve of a trumpet-shaped bore, whose peak Qs are sensitive to how finely the sweep is sampled at about five per cent.

    The higher note speaks sooner and takes longer

    Up a brass instrument the settling time in milliseconds falls by a factor of seven and the settling time in periods rises by a factor of three. Both curves are read off the same impedance sweep, both are monotone over most of the compass, and they point in opposite directions — so the slowest note of the instrument depends entirely on which clock is used to time it.

    part 2 · tuning
  3. The violin's attack times, string by string. Every playable cell of the earlier map, with its bow-force window turned into a time. A player aiming at the geometric centre of the window has to wait until the accelerating bow's maximum force rises to that value, which is a fraction one over the square root of the window width of the way through the bow's ramp — so a narrow window is a late note and the exponent is a half. The latest cell is C♯4 on the G3 string at 21.9 milliseconds, against 4.1 at C6 on the A4: a factor of 5.3 in time out of a factor of 29 in window width. The darkest cell is the same hardest place, unchanged — the map is the same map under a monotone change of units, and what is new is that the units are milliseconds, which a player and a listener both have access to.

    The hardest place is also the latest

    A bow-force window is a ratio of forces, which nobody can hear. An attack time is milliseconds, which a player and a listener both have. The map of the violin's windows becomes a map of its attack times under a change of units, and the exponent turns out to be a half — so a window twenty-nine times narrower is only five times later.

    part 3 · rhythm
  4. Settling and being heard are not the same quantity. Across, how long the instrument takes to reach its steady amplitude, computed from its own physics — a resonance's Q, a bow's capture, an exciter's contact. Up, how long after its physical onset a listener places the note, computed from the measured shape of its envelope. Five instruments both accounts hold. The diagonal is where they would agree and nothing is on it. The ratio between them runs from 0.10 to 6.6, a factor of 69, and it sorts perfectly by mechanism: about 6.6 for a struck or plucked string, 2.2 for a bowed one, and about 0.15 for a wind. Ordering the five by each measure changes the place of 3 of them, and the one that moves furthest is the violin — third slowest to settle and the last to be heard.

    A note starts twice

    One account computes how long an instrument takes to settle, from its own physics. Another computes how long after its onset a listener places a note, from the shape of its envelope. Both come out in milliseconds and neither has ever been shown the other. Paired on the five instruments they share, the ratio between them spans a factor of sixty-nine and sorts perfectly by mechanism — and the violin is third slowest to settle and the last to be heard.

    part 4 · rhythm
  5. What a slow start costs a trumpet, in its own settling time. The amplitude of a trumpet's A4 resonance — the 4th impedance peak, of Q 37, time constant 27.1 milliseconds — driven from rest by a pressure that rises over 10, 40, 80, 140 milliseconds, against the step every earlier figure has assumed. The step reaches 90 per cent of its final amplitude in 62.5 milliseconds. A ramp of 140 takes 157.8, which is 95.3 more — and that excess is 68 per cent of the ramp's own length. Across the whole range a player works in the excess is a little over half the ramp: 0.52, 0.56, 0.61, 0.68 at 10, 40, 80, 140 milliseconds. So the tongued attack is not something added to the note. It is the step, which is what has been computed all along, and what has a price is its absence.

    What the tongue actually removes

    The question this essay was written against asked for an impulse: a tongued attack, a martelé stroke and a struck key all deliver one before the steady drive begins. The arithmetic refuses the framing. A tongue release does carry energy at the note's own frequency, and it is worth 0.17 milliseconds on a trumpet against a settling time of 62 — capped at about 1.13 over the resonance's Q. What articulation is worth is the ramp it removes, and that is about half the ramp's own length: 44 milliseconds, and very nearly the same 44 on every wind instrument in the collection.

    part 5 · rhythm
  6. The census with the criterion moved under it. Every instrument's speaking time in milliseconds, against the fraction of the steady amplitude counted as speaking. The criterion is in the wind instruments alone: a resonance takes −ln(1−p)·Q/(πf) to reach a fraction p, so those lines rise across the whole picture, while a bow's capture and an exciter's contact contain no criterion at all and are flat. Every earlier figure sits at 0.9, where the wind instruments are the slowest things in the collection by a factor of 20.5. At 0.05 they are the fastest: a violin's G3 string is the slowest at 15.5 milliseconds and a trumpet takes 1.4. The three clusters cross at a criterion between 0.18 and 0.39, which is inside the range the perceptual measurements work in — their three named criteria are 15 decibels below peak, 6 decibels below peak, and ninety per cent — and the settling figures have only ever used the third of them.

    Read at two different heights

    Ten placements of these figures, one value: the settling criterion is nine tenths in every one of them, and nothing is measured behind it. It is a multiplicative constant only inside the mechanism that has it — a bow's capture and an exciter's contact contain no criterion at all — so moving it rescales one of three clusters against two that stand still. The most-quoted number here, a factor of sixty-nine between the instrument's account and the listener's, is 5.9 at the criterion the listener's own measurements use, and the ordering an earlier essay was written about does not exist below a fifth.

    part 6 · perception

All series