Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Weber fraction — where it appears

The smallest detectable change in a quantity, expressed as a proportion of the quantity itself. It is roughly constant over a wide middle range for most sensory dimensions, which is why so many perceptual limits in this collection are ratios rather than differences.

Named by 8 essays across 4 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

The smallest audible difference, and what has to clear it. The difference limen for frequency, converted from Wier, Jesteadt and Green's 1977 fit into cents, against the intervals and commas the rest of these essays argue about. Anything drawn below the curve is a quantity nobody can hear as a change of pitch; anything well above it is a quantity a listener can be asked about. The limen is for pure tones, successive, with trained listeners — the most favourable case there is, and therefore the right one to test a claim against.

How small a difference is audible

Every essay here about tuning has assumed a listener who can hear the difference between two systems. The assumption has a number: about five cents in the middle of the range. It clears the two commas fourfold and it does not clear the schisma at all, which sorts the whole subject of tuning into the part that is about music and the part that is about arithmetic.

perception · Pitch-acuity How far out of tune an interval has to be before its beat is usable. An earlier essay produced a modulation index for every interval on a stated timbre; whether a fluctuation of that index at that rate can be detected is a published function of both. Running one against the other turns a table of decibels into a window in cents. The bar is the mistuning over which the beat is both deep enough to notice and at a rate a tuner can use — not so slow that a beat takes half a minute to complete, not so fast that it has stopped being a beat. the major third gives the widest window, 1.3 to 60.0 cents, and the minor sixth the narrowest, 0.8 to 38.9. The ordering is the opposite of the dip's: the octave has the shallowest dip on a string spectrum and the widest usable window, because its coincidence sits at a low partial and a given mistuning therefore produces a slower beat. Depth and rate pull opposite ways, and it is the rate that decides.

The beat a tuner can actually use

There is a modulation index for every interval on every timbre, and the published threshold for detecting a fluctuation is a function of exactly that and its rate. Running one against the other turns a table of decibels into a window in cents — and reverses the ordering, because the interval with the shallowest dip has the widest window.

intervals · Beating Six named proportions, as blurred as the durations that make them. Six proportions between two parts of a piece — 1 : 1, 4 : 3, 3 : 2, golden section, 2 : 1, 3 : 1 — placed on one axis by the logarithm of the ratio of the longer part to the shorter, and drawn as bars one criterion wide (d′ = 1) for a listener timing both parts with a Weber fraction of 7%, 15%, 35%. Bars that overlap are proportions that listener cannot tell apart. At 7%, 4 of 5 neighbouring pairs stay apart; at 15%, 3 of 5 neighbouring pairs stay apart; at 35%, 0 of 5 neighbouring pairs stay apart.

A proportion is only as fine as its two durations

Analyses of form measure proportions in bars and report them to three figures — a climax at 0.618, a section in the ratio 3 : 2. A listener has each part only as an estimate of how long it lasted, and a ratio of two estimates is blurred by both. Timed as well as anyone times a single second, eleven proportions fit between 1 : 1 and 3 : 1; timed from memory over minutes, two do. The golden section is told from 3 : 2 only below a Weber fraction of 5.4 per cent.

form · Proportion A count is least reliable at both ends and best in the middle. How precisely a listener knows the length of a section they are counting, against how many units long it is, at three kinds of timing judgement. A slip — one unit miscounted, at 2% a unit — accumulates as a random walk, so its relative cost FALLS as the section lengthens. A lapse — the count lost altogether, at 1% a unit — compounds, so the chance of still having the count falls geometrically and a long enough section is certain to lose it. A listener who has lost the count is back to timing, so the two failures mix into a floor. Against a Weber fraction of 7.5% the count is worth most at 21 units, where it is 1.7 times finer than timing, and falls back under a quarter better by 98 units; Against a Weber fraction of 15% the count is worth most at 10 units, where it is 2.4 times finer than timing, and falls back under a quarter better by 101 units; Against a Weber fraction of 38% the count is worth most at 4 units, where it is 3.7 times finer than timing, and falls back under a quarter better by 102 units. The length at which it stops being worth much is nearly the same in all three, because it is set by the lapse rate alone.

A count is not an estimate

Both established routes to a proportion are estimates — a duration timed, blurred by a Weber fraction, and a duration stored, biased by what was new. A listener who has induced a hypermetre has a third, and it is exact until it fails. It fails two ways that pull opposite: a slip miscounts one unit and its relative cost falls as the section lengthens, while a lapse loses the count entirely and its chance compounds. The mixture has a floor at about four units, where counting is 3.7 times finer than timing, and it is worth almost nothing past a hundred.

form · Proportion Timing blurs a whole form evenly; counting sharpens it downward. A piece of 480 seconds divided 7 times, each level half the length of the one above, with how many proportions between 1 : 1 and 3 : 1 a listener can tell apart at each. Timed, the answer is 2.1 at the top and 5.2 at the bottom, a spread of 2.4 — because a timing judgement's Weber fraction is a step function of duration and almost every level of a piece falls in one step of it. Counted, in units of 2 seconds, the answer runs 2.2 to 10.3, a spread of 5.5. At no level does timing separate 3 : 2 from the golden section.

A form is sharp at the bottom and vague at the top

A movement is divided into sections, each into phrases, each into bars, and every level is a ratio of two estimates. Timed, the hierarchy is almost uniformly blunt — 2.1 distinguishable proportions at the top and 5.2 at the bottom, because a Weber fraction is a step function of duration and six of a piece's seven levels fall in one step of it. Counted, the same hierarchy runs from 2.2 to 12.2 and sharpens monotonically downward. At no level of either does timing separate 3 : 2 from the golden section.

form · Proportion The golden section and an equal division are one judgement. Where a boundary falls in a piece, as a share of its length, with the band a listener cannot tell from the golden section shaded. A stretch of minutes is judged with a Weber fraction of about 38%, so one criterion's worth of ratio spread around 0.618 covers everything between 0.492 and 0.730 — a quarter of the piece wide, and containing the halfway point. 1 : 1 and 4 : 3 and 3 : 2 and golden section and 2 : 1 are inside it. A claim that a climax falls at the golden section rather than at the middle is, at this resolution, not a claim about anything a listener could hear.

A golden section is a coin toss with six coins

An analysis that reports a climax at 0.618 of a piece has not tested one prediction; it has looked at a piece with several defensible boundaries and reported whichever landed nearest. The rate at which that happens under no hypothesis is one line of arithmetic, and the tolerance it needs is not a number chosen on the page — it is the blur a listener's own timing puts on the judgement. Over a stretch of minutes that blur covers everything from 0.492 to 0.730 of the piece, which contains the halfway point, and six candidate boundaries produce a hit eighty per cent of the time.

form · Proportion Checkpoints sharpen the middle of a form and leave its top vague. A piece of 480 seconds divided 7 times, with how many proportions between 1 : 1 and 3 : 1 a listener tells apart at each level: timed, counted in 2-second units, and counted with a second count of 16-second phrases that can mend a lapse in the first. 480 s: 2.1 timed, 2.2 counted, 3.9 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 2.5 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 240 s: 2.1 timed, 2.5 counted, 7.1 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 3.1 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 120 s: 2.1 timed, 3.1 counted, 13.2 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 4.0 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 60 s: 2.1 timed, 4.1 counted, 19.4 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 5.4 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 30 s: 2.1 timed, 5.4 counted, 18.1 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 7.2 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 15 s: 5.2 timed, 12.2 counted, 12.2 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 12.2 with 50 per cent of lapses shared; 7.5 s: 5.2 timed, 10.3 counted, 10.3 with 0 per cent of lapses shared and 10.3 with 50 per cent of lapses shared. With the two counts failing independently, the level of 60 seconds goes from 4.1 to 19.4, and the whole piece only from 2.2 to 3.9.

Checkpoints sharpen the middle of a form, not its top

A listener who counts bars loses the count somewhere in a long section and is thrown back on timing the whole of it. A listener who also counts phrases can mend the lapse at the last phrase. If the two counts fail independently, the level a minute long goes from four distinguishable proportions to nineteen; the whole eight-minute piece goes only from two to four, because thirty phrases are long enough to lose a count as well. And if a fifth of lapses take both counts at once, three quarters of the gain is gone.

form · Proportion A timed expectation would erase a slow cycle's cost, and a listener cannot time a slow cycle that well. Bits of position a listener with a 3.5-second memory is still missing over the first cycle of son clave, against how long the cycle takes, for a newcomer with no expectation, a listener timing the cycle with the Weber fraction a duration that long is judged with, and a listener timing it to ten per cent. a newcomer, no expectation: 2 s 0.94, 8 s 0.97, 24 s 1.41, 40 s 2.02, 60 s 2.47; timing as well as listeners do: 2 s 0.68 (w 0.150), 8 s 0.69 (w 0.150), 24 s 0.85 (w 0.150), 40 s 1.90 (w 0.375), 60 s 2.38 (w 0.375); timing the cycle to ten per cent: 2 s 0.47, 8 s 0.48, 24 s 0.55, 40 s 0.73, 60 s 1.02. At ten per cent even a sixty-second cycle is placed about as well as a newcomer places a two-second one. At the precision a listener actually has for durations of half a minute or more, the expectation is worth a tenth of a bit.

An expectation cannot rescue a cycle too slow to time

A listener who knows a piece arrives with an expectation of where in the cycle they are, and the size of that expectation was the number the last essay said nobody had. It can be given one: a listener who has been timing the cycle carries a spread of their Weber fraction times the cycle, which is the same number of steps at any tempo. Timed to ten per cent, a forty-second cycle would be placed better than a newcomer places a two-second one. But forty seconds is judged in the band where the Weber fraction is nearer forty per cent, and there the expectation is worth a tenth of a bit.

rhythm · Cyclic rhythm

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

DurationMusical formProportionHypermetrePhraseMemory decayPerceptual presentBeatingCentsCommaCycleDetection

All concepts