Voicing — where it appears
Named by 39 essays across 8 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The inversion that cannot end a phrase
Three positions of one triad, three measurements, and the practice contradicted at every turn. The second inversion is the smoothest of the three by roughness, the best explained of the three by a virtual-pitch model, and the one that three centuries of practice will not let a phrase end on. What forbids it is a rule about a two-voice skeleton.
A chord is a register
The same three pitch classes are five times rougher at the bottom of a piano than in the middle, and the arrangement that minimises the roughness over a low bass turns out to be the bass's own fifth and sixth partials. The orchestration rule about low thirds is not a convention. It falls out of the width of a critical band, exactly.
A stack that is not thirds
Build every chord that repeats a single interval and score them all. Eight of the eleven three-note stacks are smoother than the major triad; the four-note stack of fourths is smoother than a dominant seventh by a third and has no fundamental any matcher can find. Two absences, both computable, and both are exactly what the chord was adopted for.
Three notations, one progression
A figured bass, a Roman numeral and a chord symbol are three professional notations for the same four chords, and the number of four-part realisations each of them admits can be counted exactly rather than argued about. With no parallel fifths or octaves the counts are sixteen billion, fifty-nine million and two million: a factor of eight thousand between the loosest and the tightest. What each one collapses is what its tradition thought a chord was, and the three do not agree.
The chord that is not played at once
Every chord until now starts its notes at the same instant, and no figure ever set the asynchrony to anything else. A spread chord is not a defective simultaneity: at forty milliseconds a triad of half-second notes is still eighty-seven per cent simultaneous, so it carries almost all its roughness, and it stops being a chord at all only when the last note arrives after the first has finished. What none of this can explain is the one thing every keyboard player knows — that a chord is rolled upward. The masking asymmetry that ought to explain it is 2.4 decibels at a close voicing, which is not enough.
The note that sounds twice
A triad has three notes and a four-part texture has four voices, so one note is doubled — and the voicing model used here leaves the choice free because the rules have an opinion about it. Asked properly, the arithmetic agrees with the treatises for the first time in nine essays: root, then fifth, then third. For a minor triad it does not agree, and for a symmetric chord it correctly has nothing to say.
Which player on which note
An interval's roughness depends on which instrument is underneath, so the pair does not commute. Three players over three notes is the smallest thing that asymmetry has anywhere to go: six assignments, all of them the same chord, and across 450 of them the roughest averages half again the smoothest and reaches six times it. It is orchestration in the only form that can be computed here — not which chord, and not which voicing, but who is on which note.
The dynamics are in the score already
Count the parts in each bar, realise them in their ranges, put every partial in its critical band, sum the loudnesses and run the result through the two smoothers built earlier. What comes out is a dynamic curve for a piece with no performance in it anywhere — and it says that doubling the number of parts inside a fixed register adds three decibels of power and about one of loudness, because the extra parts land in bands that were already occupied. Let the register widen with the parts and the same arithmetic gives eight phon, which is what a tutti actually is.
Who plays what and how loud is one question
Two lines of argument, one about spectrum and one about loudness, each stopped at the same wall and each said so. One of them can choose who plays which note and has every player at the same level; the other can choose how loud each part is and has nobody assigned to anything. Put together they are a single problem with two kinds of variable, and solving it in stages picks a different answer from solving it at once — nine per cent rougher, at the same loudness, on an ordinary triad.
The ranking survives the dynamic and the chord does not
Roughness is quadratic in pressure and loudness is compressive, so sixty decibels multiply a chord's roughness by a million and its loudness by ninety-six. Roughness per sone therefore rises ten thousandfold between a pianissimo and a fortissimo of the same four notes — and yet the ranking of which doubling is smoothest, over four hundred and eighty voicings, does not move by a single place.
A loud chord is a smaller chord
Two earlier essays hold the level fixed, and the level decides how much of a chord a listener is given. At thirty decibels twenty of a triad's twenty-four partials stand above what the rest of it masks; at a hundred, nine do. Every roughness figure until now counts partials that are in the score, and a partial the chord masks is not a partial the listener has.
The listener is given the top voice, and the bass as a sine
Four earlier essays put the masker and the probe in the same voice. Put them in different voices — a four-part texture at one level — and the soprano arrives with all eight of its partials, the alto with five, the tenor with two and the bass with one. Balancing the loudness, which is the constraint a scoring is solved under, changes none of that: equal loudness is not equal spectrum and cannot be made so.
A low chord stops being rough by stopping being a chord
Every count of audible partials until now is of a chord at middle C, and the three registers it did compare span C3 to C5 — a third of the range a chord is written in. Move the same triad down and the count collapses: 79 per cent of its partials arrive at E3 and 4 per cent at C1. So the roughest chord on the page is the lowest one and the roughest chord a listener receives is at G2, and where that maximum sits moves nearly two octaves with the dynamic.
A section has a loudest member, not a colour
Two players on one note have a balance at which the composite belongs to neither, and that is what blending means. Three should have three such balances and no reason for them to agree — a trio with a rock-paper-scissors ownership would have no strongest member at all. Twenty trios, sixty pairwise comparisons, and not one disagreement: the possibility is real, arbitrary spectra do it once in twenty, and instruments never do.
The fourth player is a spectrum, not a decision
Six earlier essays put exactly one instrument on each note, which makes an arrangement a permutation — and the commonest operation in orchestration is a doubling, which does not. Four players on three notes give thirty-six arrangements instead of six, and the extra choice turns out to be the smallest thing on the page: which note carries the pair explains three per cent of the spread and which players sit on the bass explains eighty-nine. A doubled note can be priced as one player, and which one is not the one a spectral account would have named.
Eighty-one chords, one number
A dominant seventh has eighty-one arrangements inside three octaves and their roughness spans a factor of five and a half. The tonal-expectation model gives every one of them the same 3.51 bits, because its states are scale degrees and there is no register anywhere in them. Conditioning the surprise on the voicing costs no corpus — and the arithmetic says the conditioning belongs beside the probability rather than inside it, for three reasons that can each be computed.
The chord that has room for an entrance
Three essays have made the ensemble something a score can change and none of them has asked when. The ensemble already sounding puts a masked threshold over whatever register an entering part takes, and that threshold is set by the voicing rather than by the dynamic — so the five chords of one passage differ by 8.7 decibels in how much of an entering oboe survives them, and the quietest chord of the five is the worst place in the passage to bring somebody in. Swept over the entrant's own pitch, the choice of moment is worth as much as the choice of register.
A bass line is not a list of roots
Every bass note the key-finder has been given was its chord's root, and under that line a bass cue reads 89 per cent of scheme bars on the right degree. Give the same chords an economical bass that moves to the nearest chord tone, as a keyboard reduction would, and nearly half of them are inverted. The cue that rewards the triad rooted on the bass then reads 68 per cent at best and worse as it is trusted more; the cue that rewards any triad containing the bass cannot be fooled and stops at 61. The same inverted line does one thing the roots never did: it puts the leading note of each new key at the bottom, and finds the rondo's modulations.
A rough arrival is rough because of its spacing
The pair the expectation essays report for every chord — how surprising it was, how rough its voicing is — has no level in it. Putting level back in answers the question it left open, and not the way it was framed. At one written dynamic the arrivals keep their order from 40 to 90 dB at three registers of four, and the bass stays 8.6 times rougher than the treble. Made equally loud, the bass has to be played 12.8 dB harder, and it is 343 times rougher: level does not explain the register's roughness away, it multiplies it.
An open triad lasts as long as its tenth
Close, every triad's weakest link is a third or a sixth. Raise its middle note an octave and the link becomes a compound interval, and compound intervals do not last alike: a major tenth, 5:2, lives as long as a major sixth, while a minor tenth, 12:5, needs the twelfth partial and lives 0.47 seconds. So the spacing orchestration manuals recommend for a major chord in the bass is the longest-lived voicing a struck triad has, and the same spacing halves the life of a minor chord — and the six-four's advantage reverses.
A minor triad can be spaced to last
Two spacings of each triad, drawn side by side, say that opening lengthens a major chord and halves a minor one. Drawn over every arrangement of the three pitch classes within two octaves of a fixed bass, the asymmetry disappears: a minor triad reaches 1.26 seconds over C3 and so does a major one, with two spacings of each tied at the top. The short-lived chords were never the minor ones. They were the ones with a minor tenth on the outside, and a minor triad has three spacings that avoid it.
The chord a tuning gives up is a fingering
A guitar piece's best tuning makes two of its chords exactly just and abandons the third by thirteen cents, and no way of counting error — cents, beats, squared cents, or only the beats slow enough to hear — brings the third chord back. Fingered as a barre chord in the shape the other two already use, it comes back completely, and the whole piece is exactly just. The conflict was never between chords. It was between hands.
A seventh chord cannot be spaced to last like a triad
A struck triad keeps the partial coincidences of all its intervals for at most 1.26 seconds, whichever way it is spaced. Run the same census over every inversion and spacing of five kinds of seventh chord and none gets near: the dominant, minor and half-diminished sevenths top out at about two thirds of a second, the major seventh at 0.42. The diminished seventh, which theory calls the least stable of them, lasts longest at 0.86 — because it is the only one with no tone or semitone among its pitch-class distances, and the worst distance a chord contains sets a ceiling no spacing can lift.
A bass chord low enough to balance has already hidden its tenor
Played as loud as the written register, a progression two octaves down is 343 times rougher than the same progression an octave up — if every partial on the page is counted. Count only the partials that stand above what the rest of the chord masks and that register is the smoothest of the four, with nothing left that beats. The balance is not what does it: the extra thirteen decibels move no voice by more than two partials. The register had already buried the tenor at the written dynamic.
The leap at the barline is a fact about register
A bass leaps to a root at the barline and steps inside the bar, and no reading of pitch classes can see it — so the essay that named it recorded it as a limit. Given octaves and the size of every motion, it is worth nothing: realised at least motion the reading tracks whether the bass moved at all and ends 0.87 semitones on the wrong side of zero, because a line that always takes the nearest octave has no leaps to take. Play a stated root at the bottom of the compass instead, and the same sixteen notes in the same order turn a margin of minus 1.67 semitones into plus 1.67 and hold at 90 per cent where the move reading has fallen to 20. The barline is not where the bass moves furthest. It is where the bass goes back down.
The seventh has two places to be
Tune a dominant seventh's seventh as the seventh partial and its coincidences last 0.87 seconds instead of 0.66 — exactly the diminished seventh's figure, which is the highest any four-note chord in this census reaches. It gets there by levelling rather than by improving: the root's pair with the seventh gains a third of a second and the fifth's loses one, and all three pairs that contain the seventh arrive at the same number. The route is a valley. A seventh tuned six cents flat has lost the ninth-partial coincidence and not yet found the seventh, and lasts 0.46 seconds, which is worse than leaving it alone. And the same retuning halves the minor and half-diminished sevenths.
Tuned for one shape, a cent is worth five frets
A guitar can be tuned so that one chord shape is exactly just wherever it is moved on the neck, and every other shape is then between twelve and fifteen cents out — worse than on the frets. So a player of such a tuning chooses, chord by chord, between intonation and the distance the hand travels. Searched exactly over every fingering of a I–IV–V ground, the route that keeps every chord in the one shape is the cheapest as soon as a cent of the piece's mean error is worth 4.8 frets of movement. On equal-tempered frets the same route needs a cent to be worth fifty-seven.
Tune a guitar for the shape of its key's open chord
A guitar can be tuned for any of five moveable chord shapes, and a player who then keeps every chord in that shape plays exactly in tune while the hand travels. Which shape should the tuning serve? Searched over seven keys and all five shapes, in every key whose tonic is an open chord the answer is that chord's own shape — C for C, D for D, G for G, A for A, and a tie between the E and A shapes in E. The reason is not the key and not the progression. It is that an open chord needs no barre: its hand sits one or two frets above the nut, and that saving is the whole of the difference.
A tuned guitar has no minor chord in tune
A guitar tuned to make one major chord shape exactly just can play every major chord in tune by moving that shape. It cannot play a minor chord in tune anywhere: every minor shape disagrees with every major shape about some pair of strings by eleven cents or more, and on any of the five tunings the least-bad minor chord — the A minor shape on a guitar tuned for the E shape — is 8.60 cents out, worse than on the frets. Put one minor chord into a I–vi–IV–V ground and the most-in-tune tuning in every key becomes the E shape's, because it is the one that hosts that chord least badly.
A moving tenor is heard because it is struck again
A bass-heavy chord balanced for loudness hides its tenor under the bass's upper skirt, and arrangers keep inner voices moving in the low register as though motion were the cure. Counted as masking, motion alone is worth nothing: the note the tenor leaves stops masking the new one within ten milliseconds, and on a sustained instrument the moving tenor keeps exactly what the held one keeps. On a struck instrument everything changes, and for a reason that is not the motion. The held voices have been decaying since they were struck and the tenor's new note is struck now, so an octave down a tenor re-struck half a second into the chord has all eight of its partials back where the held tenor has one.
Four notes cannot get below the seventh partial
Tune a dominant seventh as 4 : 5 : 6 : 7 — every note moved, not only the seventh — and its coincidences last 0.868 seconds, which is the one-note retuning's figure to the millisecond. Tuning the third and fifth buys nothing at the top and costs seven voicings a fifth of their life. Every other chord of four notes a harmonic series holds does worse, and the reason is not temperament: no four pitch classes avoid a semitone, a tone and a tritone together, and none of those three can be tuned to coincide below the seventh partial. The half-diminished seventh, which the one-note retuning ruined, reaches the same ceiling read down the series.
A silent string tunes the minor chord
A continuous search over a guitar's six strings, run on a piece with one minor chord in it, never settles between two chord shapes: at any share of the piece, the best tuning is exact for one chord and makes the other pay. But the tunings the earlier essays called exact for a shape were exact only on the strings that shape sounds. The C shape never sounds its low E string, and tuned to the C chord's own E it hosts an E minor chord at 6.26 cents — not the 8.60 that was said to be the best any tuned guitar could do. The pop ground's most in-tune tuning is then the C shape's, in every key, at 1.57 cents.
An onset can only hand over what the chord leaves
On an organ, a tenor that moves while the chord holds keeps exactly the partials a held tenor keeps, so the masking count cannot tell them apart. What can is the onset: a component that starts thirty milliseconds after the sound around it is heard out as something new. A moving tenor starts hundreds of milliseconds after the chord and gets that for every partial it has left — and what it has left, an octave down, is one partial on a string and three on an organ, which still name the tenor's own pitch. Two octaves down there is nothing to hand over. And a tenor that moves at the chord change, with the other voices, gets nothing, which is why the motion that carries an inner voice is the motion between the harmony's changes.
A guitar tuned for a still hand is tuned for nothing
Tune a guitar for a whole route through a ground rather than for one chord shape — routing, retuning and routing again until neither changes — and the answer depends on how much the player is willing to move. Valuing intonation highly, the best tuning is one major shape with its silent string placed, as before. In the middle it can be exact for a minor shape instead, because the route that keeps the hand near the nut plays its minor chords open. And for a player who will not move at all, the best tuning is exact for no chord whatever: every string within two cents of its fret, beating equal temperament by a few tenths of a cent. It is the compromise the earlier search went looking for, and it lives where nobody looked.
A guitar tuned for a set is tuned for the D shape
Tune a guitar once for an evening of songs in five keys rather than once per song, and the tuning the set wants is not the compromise the single-song search predicted. At the valuation a typical player puts on a cent, it is exact for the D shape — the one fingering every key's route uses for some chord — with that shape's two silent strings placed for the set rather than for any song. Not retuning between songs costs a fifth of a cent. Only a set that mixes two grounds, played by a player who will not move, wants a tuning exact for nothing.
One guitar tuning serves every key, and it is the D shape's
A guitar tuned once for a set of pop songs in five keys is tuned exact for the D shape. The open question was the converse: which songs a given tuning serves, and how many keys a set can span before its best tuning stops being any shape's. Grown one key at a time round the circle of fifths, the set never stops sharing a shape: up to three keys it is the C shape's tuning, and from four keys to all twelve it is the D shape's, with the same offsets to a fifth of a cent. The five-key tuning serves the seven keys outside the set better than the two open keys inside it, and not retuning between songs costs less the more keys the evening spans.
Two minor songs retune a guitar set for their dominant
A guitar tuned once for an evening of pop songs in every key is tuned exact for the D shape, because every key's route through the ground passes through it. Add songs that are not that ground and the tuning holds or breaks by a rule nobody would guess. Rock songs on I, ♭VII and IV never move it off the D shape, however many are added: they retune only the two strings the D shape leaves silent. One minor-key song leaves it alone too. Two move it to the C shape's tuning, and the chord they move it for is not one of their minor chords but their one major chord — the dominant, fingered in the C shape. Twelve move it again, to the E-minor shape's.
A guitar set keeps its tuning until the third minor song
Two minor-key songs were found to move a pop set's guitar tuning from the D shape to the C shape. Priced as a vote — what the move costs the twelve ground songs, against what it saves each minor song — two songs do not pay for it and three do. The earlier search had never tried keeping the tuning the set already had. And the key a minor song is in matters only at the nut: ten keys vote alike, and G minor, whose dominant is the open D chord, hardly votes at all.
A guitar set tunes for its minor chords only when nearly half its songs are minor
Add a third candidate to the vote — the tuning that makes the minor songs' own tonic chord exact — and a pop set's guitar passes through three tunings as minor songs are added: the ground's to the second, the dominant's from the third, and the tonic's only from the tenth, when ten songs in twenty-two are minor. Nothing in between is ever chosen: the two minor-song tunings differ on two strings, and every compromise between them costs the ground more than either end. Two keys break the pattern at the nut, and one earlier figure turns out to be wrong by a song.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
RoughnessJust intonationOptimisationCritical bandwidthOpen stringEqual temperamentIntonationMaskingOrchestrationRegisterInversionPartial