Spectral envelope — where it appears
Named by 11 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.
The sound a listener knows best
A voice is recognisable across every vowel it says, across two octaves of pitch, down a bad telephone line and in a whisper where there is no pitch at all. Nothing that survives all of that can be a frequency. What survives is a ratio: the resonances of a vocal tract are set by its length, so a shorter tract multiplies every formant by the same factor, and identity is a scale on the spectral envelope rather than a position within it. Between an adult man and a child the whole pattern moves by a fifth, and the vowel does not change at all.
The mark that is not a level
There are six of them, they carry no units, and a performer has to turn one into a number before it means anything. What they instruct is not loudness. On a struck string a harder blow shortens the hammer's contact from 2.26 milliseconds to 0.95, which moves the first null of its own pulse from the third partial to the sixth: the partials between those are not quieter at pianissimo, they are gone. A fortissimo is a different sound, and the page has one word for both things it changes.
An instrument is not one timbre
Every roughness verdict so far uses one partial list per instrument, and a violin does not have one. Its body's resonances stay where they are while the fundamental moves, so the radiated spectrum is different at every pitch: the power-weighted centroid runs from 1.02 to 1.64 across the compass, and it is not monotonic. Which means the result that a spectrum chooses its own scale gives a different scale at every note on the same instrument — three minima in the dissonance curve at the bottom of a violin's range, two in the middle and four at the top.
Which instrument is underneath
Every roughness curve so far compares two tones of the same timbre, which is a duet nobody plays. Give the two notes different instruments and the sum stops being symmetric: the same written interval, on the same two players, is up to five times rougher depending on which of them takes the lower note. From G3 upward the fifth is a well in all twenty-five pairings and no other interval is; below it, three pairings lose even that, and all three have a clarinet on top.
Which player on which note
An interval's roughness depends on which instrument is underneath, so the pair does not commute. Three players over three notes is the smallest thing that asymmetry has anywhere to go: six assignments, all of them the same chord, and across 450 of them the roughest averages half again the smoothest and reaches six times it. It is orchestration in the only form that can be computed here — not which chord, and not which voicing, but who is on which note.
The pulse that was assumed
Every figure until now low-passes the string's excitation with the spectrum of a half-sine, which is what a hammer would deliver against a rigid wall. An earlier essay said so and declined to do better. Doing better takes forty lines and refuses the prediction that came with it: the corner's round trips govern the spectrum as expected, and the contact time is governed by something else entirely — the mass ratio discovered one essay earlier.
What the climb was a search for
The four-hundred-year rise in the pitch standard is usually explained as a search for brilliance, and an earlier essay ended by asking whether that was even coherent: does raising a string's tension change its spectrum as well as its pitch? Mostly it does not. What changes the timbre is something else entirely, and it is a mechanism that applies to instruments with no strings at all — every filter in the chain is fixed in absolute frequency while the notes move against it, so raising the standard is not a brightening but a reshuffling, and some notes lose.
The middle nobody could have guessed
A struck note has no steady state, only a slide from one spectrum to another — so the question is what the middle carries that the ends do not. The answer is exact rather than statistical: every loss law in the family leaves the strike with the same spectrum and ends in the same silence, so both endpoints carry precisely nothing about which of them it is. The whole difference is 41.3 decibels, and it peaks 0.38 seconds in, seven per cent of the way through the note.
A section of violins fills in the note one violin gives away
A pizzicato violin doubled by a held clarinet has one note — the note whose fundamental sits on its own lower corpus resonance — at which the pluck never owns the sound, and real violins put that resonance a semitone or two either way. A section plucks with a dozen different bodies at once. Summed, their resonances smear into a broad shelf, and the section's worst note over the clarinet rises from 2.2 decibels below zero to about zero: the note one violin gives away, twelve nearly keep. Over an oboe the section owns every note. And if every member shares the same air resonance, that shared resonance becomes the section's worst note instead — a section is weakest where its instruments agree, not where any one of them is extreme.
In a hall a section of violins loses the notes it saved
Dry, twelve violins with different bodies fill in the note one violin's pizzicato gives away to a held clarinet, leaving a shallow shelf a few tenths of a decibel above zero. In a hall that shelf goes under all at once. The room takes the same few decibels from each note whether it comes from one violin or twelve, so a section's smoothing survives only to the front of the hall — about two metres over a clarinet, six over an oboe — and from ten metres back a section loses exactly as many notes as one violin does.
A section keeps its pizzicato only inside a cone
In a hall a section's pizzicato loses its corpus notes to a held clarinet within two metres, on the assumption that a violin radiates equally in every direction. It does not, and twelve players sharing a beam cannot average it away. Directly on the players' axis, the same section keeps every note for twenty-five metres. Thirty degrees off, with the beam's upper partials thrown elsewhere, it is worse than if it had never pointed. A question about how far back a pizzicato carries turns out to be a question about which way the listener's seat faces.
Named alongside it
The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.
TimbreBrightnessOrchestrationResonanceSource-filterFormantRoughnessCritical bandwidthDoublingReverberationSpectrumTransient