The comma — the series · Acoustics & Music Theory

Twelve fifths do not make seven octaves. Pitch drawn as a spiral: one turn is one octave, so a note's angle is its pitch class and its radius is how high it has climbed. Twelve pure fifths wind round 7 times and a little further, finishing 23.46 cents past seven octaves — the Pythagorean comma. Nothing in the chain closes that gap; it is what a tuning has to absorb, hide or spread.

Twelve fifths and seven octaves, which are not the same thing

Stack twelve perfect fifths and the note that arrives should be the one seven octaves up. It is sharp by about a quarter of a semitone, and the whole history of tuning is a set of decisions about what to do with that.

part 1 · tuning

How far each system sits from equal temperament. Deviation from equal temperament, in cents, for each degree of the chromatic scale. Zero is equal temperament by definition; the just major third is about fourteen cents flat of it and the Pythagorean major third about eight cents sharp.

Where to hide the comma, which is the only real question

Four tuning systems, four different places to put an error that cannot be removed. Each one is coherent, each was standard somewhere, and the choice between them decided what music could be written.

part 2 · tuning

The wolf at the end of the chain

Put all the tuning error into one interval and eleven others become perfect. The twelfth becomes a howl, and for two centuries keyboards were built that way on purpose.

part 3 · tuning

The syntonic comma on the lattice. Pitch classes reached by multiplying by three — a fifth, one step east — and by five — a major third, one step north. Two routes to the same note name arrive at different pitches, and the syntonic comma is the size of that disagreement: 21.51 cents.

A second comma, arriving by a different road

Four pure fifths ought to land on a pure major third, two octaves up. They miss by 21.5 cents — a different gap from the one twelve fifths leave, produced by a different route, and the two are not the same size.

part 4 · tuning

Key character in Werckmeister III. The twelve major keys in circle-of-fifths order, each with a bar as long as its major third is sharp of a pure 5:4. The bars run from 3.9 to 21.5 cents, so the keys genuinely differ.

Keys that had characters, and could be measured

Eighteenth-century writers described E flat major as devotional and F sharp major as harsh, and modern readers file it under synaesthesia. On the instruments those writers used, the difference between the two keys was seventeen cents of third, and that is a quantity.

part 5 · tuning

Every equal division from 5 to 60, and how wrong it is. For each number of equal steps in the octave, how far its best fifth and its best major third fall from the pure ratios, in cents. The divisions people have actually used are the ones with small errors in both, and no other criterion was applied to pick them out.

Nineteen, thirty-one and fifty-three

Divide the octave into a different number of equal parts and different problems disappear. Which ones vanish is not a matter of taste — it can be computed from the prime factors of the intervals, and each division makes a different decision.

part 6 · tuning

A guitar cannot be in tune

Three errors land on the same instrument — equal temperament's own thirds, the sharpening that comes from pressing a string down to a fret, and the fact that the only correction available is one length per string. Searching over every setting a luthier could choose leaves a worst-case error of about fifteen cents, and most of what is left is the temperament, which no saddle can reach.

part 7 · tuning

Every keyboard temperament before 1800, on one line. The fifth's departure from pure against the major third's, for a temperament that narrows every fifth by the same amount. The relation is a straight line — a third is four fifths — so the systems that are usually presented as rival schemes are points on one continuum, and the parameter that indexes them is a single number.

A fraction of a comma

The tuning systems of three centuries are usually presented as rival schemes with names and dates. They are points on a line. Narrow every fifth by the same fraction of a comma and both errors that matter are linear in that fraction — and the system named as the break with the tradition turns out to be a member of it, at one part in eleven.

part 8 · tuning

The same total, distributed differently. The departure of each of the twelve major thirds from a pure 5:4, one row per temperament, keys ordered round the circle of fifths. The totals are equal — every closing temperament's twelve thirds add to 4800 cents — so what a temperament chooses is not how much error there is but which keys carry it.

What a temperament cannot do

Add up the twelve major thirds of any keyboard tuning whose chain of fifths closes and the answer is 4,800 cents. Every time, in every system, before a single fifth has been chosen. So no temperament has ever made the average third less wrong than any other one, and four hundred years of argument were about a distribution rather than about accuracy.

part 9 · tuning

The comma is conserved; only the place it is paid is chosen. Every policy available to a continuous-pitch ensemble on one line: drift per circuit along the bottom, worst mistuned interval up the side. The line is straight and its intercepts are fixed, because the 4 moves of the pump have to absorb 21.51 cents between them however they are shared. Spreading it evenly puts 5.377 cents on each interval — the same narrowing quarter-comma meantone applies to every fifth.

Somebody has to pay the comma

A choir has no frets and no keys, so it can tune every chord exactly — and a common progression sung that way arrives a comma flat, every circuit. The freedom a keyboard lacks turns out to be a freedom about where the error goes rather than whether there is one, and the two costs always add to the same number.

part 10 · harmony

Nine commas, and the line under which none of them matters. Each named comma at its true size in cents, against the difference limen of 3.87 cents at 500 Hz — the smallest change of frequency a listener can detect, computed from the same formula the perception essays use. One comma falls below it, and it is the only gap in the subject that no tuning system has to do anything about.

A comma under the threshold

Eight pure fifths taken downwards arrive at a major third 1.95 cents flat of a perfect 5:4. That gap has a name and a history, and it is the only one in the subject nobody has ever had to hide — it is under the smallest difference a listener can detect, which makes a chain of untempered fifths a source of almost-just thirds and makes one eighteenth-century tuning nearly free.

part 11 · tuning

Where the chain was never closed

Eleven earlier essays treat the comma as a fact about music. It is a fact about three requirements — that the scale is built from fifths, that the octave stays pure, and that the chain closes so any degree can be a tonic — and most of the world's tuning traditions decline at least one of them. What they pay instead is computable, and it is paid somewhere else entirely.

part 12 · scales