Beyond twelve — the series · Acoustics & Music Theory

Maqam Rast, Arabic theory. Maqam Rast, Arabic theory: its degrees in cents above the tonic, drawn against the twelve equal steps of a keyboard. the third and the seventh sit halfway between major and minor — by convention, exactly halfway. Source: the quarter-tone convention fixed at the Cairo congress of 1932.

A scale is not a set of pitches

Two ragas can have identical pitch sets and be different ragas. Two national theories of one maqam put its third degree thirty-five cents apart. Both facts are fatal to the idea that a mode is a collection of notes, and both are ordinary in the traditions concerned.

part 1 · scales

Roughness across an octave. Sensory dissonance between two complex tones as the upper one is swept through 19.02 semitones, computed by summing the roughness between every pair of their partials. Nothing here is placed by hand. The wells this spectrum produces sit on 7/5, on 11/7, on 5/3, on 9/5, on 11/5, on 7/3, on 13/5, found by scanning the curve rather than by marking them. The wells are where this spectrum's partials coincide, and for a spectrum with no even partials they are not where an octave-based scale would put them.

A scale without an octave, and the spectrum that asks for it

Every scale so far repeats at the 2:1. That looks like a law and it is a consequence — the octave fuses because every partial of the upper note lands on one of the lower. Take a spectrum with no even partials and the 2:1 stops doing that, while the 3:1 starts.

part 2 · scales

Roughness across an octave. Sensory dissonance between two complex tones as the upper one is swept through an octave, computed by summing the roughness between every pair of their partials. Nothing here is placed by hand. The wells this spectrum produces sit on 4/3, on 3/2, on 5/3, found by scanning the curve rather than by marking them. And the tempered minor third sits 198 cents below the nearest well, and the tempered major third sits 98 cents below the nearest well, which is a real feature of this model and not a defect of the drawing.

The third the model has no opinion about

A neutral third — halfway between major and minor, and a scale degree in most of the music between Morocco and Iran — is nothing at all on an ordinary roughness curve. It becomes a well at 347 cents, which is exactly 11:9, only for a spectrum whose ninth and eleventh partials are at least three times their natural strength. No instrument has that spectrum.

part 3 · intervals

Three answers to how finely a pitch can be heard

Two notes one after the other are told apart at about four cents at A440. Whether a melodic interval is in tune is a judgement an order of magnitude coarser. And two notes held together are heard to beat at a third of a cent, because the question is answered by counting rather than by hearing pitch at all. Every equal division ever built sits between the coarsest and the finest.

part 4 · perception

The roughness curve for ideal bar. The partials are at 1 : 2.756 : 5.404 : 8.933 : 13.340 times the fundamental, which is not a harmonic series, so nothing about where the wells fall can be read off the small whole numbers. Sensory dissonance between two complex tones as the upper one is swept through 13.00 semitones, computed by summing the roughness between every pair of their partials. Nothing here is placed by hand. The wells this spectrum produces sit 7 cents below 3/2, 14 cents below 5/3, 13 cents above 7/4, found by scanning the curve rather than by marking them. The wells are where this spectrum's partials coincide, and for a spectrum with no even partials they are not where an octave-based scale would put them.

The spectrum that was supposed to explain the gamelan

Run the model that designed the Bohlen–Pierce scale on a bar's partials and it asks for a compressed pseudo-octave at 1166 cents and wells at 694 and 870. A measured slendro's degrees are at 231, 474, 717 and 955, and only one of the four is near anything the model wants. Sweep the partials and a spectrum wanting a 240-cent step can be found — sitting sixty per cent of the way up its own roughness curve, which is what a scale-level test says about the whole comparison.

part 5 · timbre

Two ways to detune a pair, and they disagree by an octave. A pair of instruments tuned deliberately apart, drawn across 4 octaves. Holding the detuning at 10 cents gives a beat rate that rises from 0.64 to 10.20 beats a second — a factor of 16, one doubling per octave, because a fixed ratio is a growing number of hertz. Holding it at 3 beats a second instead gives a flat rate and an interval that shrinks from 46.6 cents at the bottom to 2.9 at the top. A tuner has to choose, the choice is audible across the range, and a table of cents can only write down the first of the two.

A tuning is not a table of cents

Two instruments of a pair are tuned deliberately apart, and the tuner has to choose between a fixed number of cents and a fixed number of beats — which differ by a factor of sixteen across four octaves and cannot both be held. A list of pitches records the first, cannot record the second, and cannot record at all that there are two instruments.

part 6 · tuning

3 ways to fill the same fourth. Each row is a tetrachord: a span of 498 cents — a pure fourth — with two notes inside it, drawn in cents from the lower bound. The bounding notes never move, which is what makes the tetrachord a unit; everything that varies is interior. diatonic (ditonic) puts them at 90 and 294 cents, giving steps of 90, 204, 204; intense chromatic puts them at 81 and 231 cents, giving steps of 81, 151, 267; enharmonic puts them at 63 and 112 cents, giving steps of 63, 49, 386. Against the twelve equal steps below, 1 of 3 land within twenty-five cents of a semitone at every degree; the worst miss is 37 cents, which is a quarter of a semitone and has no name on a keyboard. Nothing in this construction is a subset of an equal division, so nothing the census here does applies to any of it.

A scale built downward from a fourth

A tetrachord is a bounded span with two free notes inside it, which is a different generator from a chain of fifths and a different object from a subset of an equal division. At the maqam tradition's own quarter-tone resolution the construction admits thirty-six fillings of the fourth and 1,296 octaves built from them; the census here can see six of the first and 2.8 per cent of the second, and one of the octaves it cannot see is an ordinary mode of a living tradition.

part 7 · scales

A degree is where it goes next

The first essay on scales beyond twelve said a mode is not a set and listed four things a set cannot record. This one makes the sharpest of them arithmetic. Specify a mode as an ascent and a descent — which is how a living tradition specifies one — and it becomes a directed graph on its degrees; sixty-three such graphs collapse onto a single pentatonic set, sixty-two of them with an ascent that is not the descent reversed, and every standard measure of a scale returns the same value for all of them.

part 8 · scales

one measured slendro is the scale least committed to a spectrum. Each scale drawn, placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of the same size, under 4 spectra. Low is smooth. Every one of them lands in the smoothest third under every spectrum, so the account that a spectrum chooses a scale survives as a statement about levels. What separates them is the length of each row's line, which is how much the answer moves when the instrument changes: one measured slendro spans 2.9 percentile points and Rast, Turkish theory spans 17.6, a factor of 6.0. The scale usually offered as the case for spectral matching is the one whose standing barely depends on the spectrum, and Rast, Turkish theory is the one that depends on it most.

The scale least committed to its own instrument

The essays on scales beyond twelve draw scales without spectra and spectra without scales, and none of them had put a tradition's own degrees through the roughness model. Doing it for six scales and five spectra says the account survives — every tradition lands between the eighth and the twenty-sixth percentile of random scales of its size, and under a pure tone not one of them does. But the scale whose standing moves least when the instrument changes is the gamelan's, at 2.9 percentile points, and the one that moves most is the five-limit diatonic at 17.4. The scale the argument is usually made about is the one it explains least.

part 9 · scales

Weighted by the pairs a melody sounds next to each other, every seven-note scale is rougher than most. Each scale placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of the same size, under 4 spectra, with each pair of its degrees weighted by how often the plainest melody its ascent and descent permit sounds the two — here the pairs a melody sounds next to each other. Low is smooth. Raga Bhupali: 40.3 to 56.8, spread 16.5; Raga Deshkar: 25.1 to 37.5, spread 12.4; one measured slendro: 31.8 to 44.5, spread 12.7; Rast, Arabic theory: 92.0 to 98.6, spread 6.6; Rast, Turkish theory: 91.8 to 97.8, spread 6.0; the diatonic major, tempered: 90.7 to 97.0, spread 6.3; the diatonic major, five-limit just: 91.8 to 97.8, spread 6.0.

The smoothness is in the skips

Traditional scales come out smoother than random scales of their size because every pair of their degrees is counted once. Count only the pairs a melody on the scale actually sounds next to each other, and every seven-note scale here is rougher than ninety per cent of random ones, under every spectrum, and under a pure tone as well. The smoothness is carried by the pairs a melody reaches by skipping — its thirds and above all its fifths, which are smoother than all but two random scales in two thousand. Counted by their own ascents and descents, the two ragas that share one set of notes stand in different places at last: Deshkar's skipped Re buys a smoother ascent and costs it the fifths.

part 10 · scales

Weighted by the ring of the note before, a note every 0.6 seconds, Raga Deshkar moves least. Each scale placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of its size under 4 instruments, each with its own spectrum and its own ring, with every pair of notes its plainest melody sounds weighted by how much of the earlier note is still sounding when the later one begins, a note every 0.6 seconds. Low is smooth. Raga Bhupali: plucked string, 6 s 53.6, long-ringing string, 12 s 35.8, blown note, 2 s hall 41.3, free bar, 4 s 58.5; spread 22.8; Raga Deshkar: plucked string, 6 s 39.0, long-ringing string, 12 s 25.9, blown note, 2 s hall 26.1, free bar, 4 s 42.0; spread 16.1; one measured slendro: plucked string, 6 s 42.9, long-ringing string, 12 s 27.8, blown note, 2 s hall 32.6, free bar, 4 s 46.4; spread 18.6; Rast, Arabic theory: plucked string, 6 s 92.0, long-ringing string, 12 s 65.2, blown note, 2 s hall 92.3, free bar, 4 s 96.1; spread 30.9; Rast, Turkish theory: plucked string, 6 s 88.0, long-ringing string, 12 s 58.1, blown note, 2 s hall 90.8, free bar, 4 s 93.6; spread 35.5; the diatonic major, tempered: plucked string, 6 s 84.8, long-ringing string, 12 s 54.2, blown note, 2 s hall 89.5, free bar, 4 s 91.3; spread 37.0; the diatonic major, five-limit just: plucked string, 6 s 87.7, long-ringing string, 12 s 56.7, blown note, 2 s hall 90.3, free bar, 4 s 92.9; spread 36.2.

A scale is committed to how long its instrument rings

A traditional scale's standing on the roughness model moves when the instrument changes, and that movement was read as a commitment to the instrument's spectrum. Weight every pair of notes a melody sounds by how much of the earlier note is still ringing when the later one begins, and the movement grows — the tempered diatonic's by 37 percentile points at a note every 0.6 seconds — but almost none of it is the spectrum. Put four instruments' rings on one spectrum and the scale moves 38.6 points; put four spectra under one ring and it moves 9.4. And the partials that make a fifth smooth are the first to stop sounding.

part 11 · scales

The tempo moves it further than the touch does. One measured slendro, scored among random scales of its size under a free bar, 4 s, at five tempi and under each touch. Left to ring it runs from 29 at 0.15 seconds a note to 83 at 2.4 — a span of 54 percentile points, where the two touches differ by at most 17. So the scale is smoother than most of its size when the music is fast and rougher than most when it is slow, and how the bar is damped is the smaller decision. The two touches converge at the slow end because a bar that has died before its successor is sounding against nothing whatever the player does.

The tempo moves a scale further than the touch

A gamelan is played two ways on the same bars: a saron's are damped as the next is struck and a gendèr's ring over their resonators. That decision moves a slendro's standing among random scales of its size by up to seventeen percentile points, which is real. Over the tempo levels a piece actually moves through it moves by fifty-four — from the twenty-ninth percentile at a fast elaboration to the eighty-third at a slow one. The same five pitches on the same bars are a smoother-than-average scale and a rougher-than-average one, and which depends on how fast they are played.

part 12 · scales

The scale's standing belongs to the ringing instrument. Where a measured slendro sits among random five-note scales, at three density ratios, scored three ways: the two instruments together, the fast ringing part on its own, and the slow damped part on its own. At one slow note to 2 fast ones the ensemble is at the 7th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 6th, and the damped part alone at the 95th; At one slow note to 4 fast ones the ensemble is at the 5th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 7th, and the damped part alone at the 95th; At one slow note to 8 fast ones the ensemble is at the 5th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 5th, and the damped part alone at the 95th. A low percentile is a scale smoother than most of its size. The damped part on its own is rougher than nineteen random scales in twenty, because it has almost no simultaneity for its intervals to be smooth in; the ensemble is at the ringing part's figure throughout. And the cross pairs, which are a quarter of the roughness, do not make the ensemble worse than either part alone.

The scale belongs to the ringing instrument

A gamelan plays two instruments on one scale at once — a saron damped at every stroke and a gendèr several times faster with its bars left to ring — and a quarter of the roughness a listener receives falls on pairs that cross between them, which no figure had computed. The cross pairs turn out to be no worse than either stream's own. What decides the scale's standing is the fast part: the ensemble sits at the sixth percentile among random five-note scales and so does the ringing instrument alone, while the damped one alone sits at the ninety-sixth.

part 13 · scales

A wrong bar costs the same whichever instrument it is on. What moving one degree of a measured slendro by 10 cents, flat or sharp, adds to the roughness per second of a two-instrument texture — a ringing part at 0.15 s a note over a damped one four times slower — on the ringing instrument and on the damped one. The ensemble in tune scores 7.47. Degree 1 (0¢): ringing 0.142 flat and 0.202 sharp, damped 0.163 and 0.185, of which beating 0.178; Degree 2 (231¢): ringing 0.119 flat and 0.068 sharp, damped 0.096 and 0.090, of which beating 0.093; Degree 3 (474¢): ringing 0.106 flat and 0.021 sharp, damped 0.069 and 0.057, of which beating 0.063; Degree 5 (717¢): ringing 0.079 flat and 0.072 sharp, damped 0.075 and 0.078, of which beating 0.077; Degree 6 (955¢): ringing 0.023 flat and 0.018 sharp, damped 0.019 and 0.022, of which beating 0.020. Over all ten errors the ringing instrument's cost 0.85 and the damped one's 0.85, and the wrong bar beating against the other instrument's right one comes to 0.86 on either — as much as the whole, because the intervals the error changes add as often as they save. One error costs about 1.1% of the texture's roughness.

A wrong bar beats the same on either instrument

The ringing instrument carries a gamelan scale's standing, so a tuning error on it was predicted to cost more than the same error on the damped instrument. Put in the beating the model lacked, and the prediction fails: moved ten cents, a degree costs the same 0.85 summed over the scale on either instrument, because almost all of the cost is the wrong bar beating against the right one on the other instrument, and a beat belongs to both of the bars that make it. Moving a whole instrument costs exactly what its five degrees cost separately, and it takes nothing from the scale's standing.

part 14 · scales