Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Generator

Every voicing of a major triad, least rough first

All 27 arrangements of the same three pitch classes within 3 octaves from 131 Hz, scored for roughness. The best is spaced 19 then 9 semitones — wide below, close above — and the worst is the chord in close position at the bottom of the range, 6.6 times rougher with exactly the same notes in it.
Every voicing of a major triad, least rough first. All 27 arrangements of the same three pitch classes within 3 octaves from 131 Hz, scored for roughness. The best is spaced 19 then 9 semitones — wide below, close above — and the worst is the chord in close position at the bottom of the range, 6.6 times rougher with exactly the same notes in it.

Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.

It makes a noise. 27 of its 27 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: C3 and F3, D3 G3 C4 F4 A4, E3 G3 C4, G3 C4 E4, G3 and C4 alone, The least rough voicing, The roughest voicing.

Called by 11 essays

the blast radius of changing it

Every voicing of a major triad, least rough first. All 27 arrangements of the same three pitch classes within 3 octaves from 131 Hz, scored for roughness. The best is spaced 19 then 9 semitones — wide below, close above — and the worst is the chord in close position at the bottom of the range, 6.6 times rougher with exactly the same notes in it.

Where to put the third

Take three pitch classes, four octaves to put them in, and score all twenty-seven arrangements. The smoothest is root, fifth an octave up, third two octaves up — which is partials one, three and five of the harmonic series — and the roughest, at every register tried, is the chord in close root position at the bottom of the range. Every orchestration manual states that rule and none of them derives it.

harmony · Consonance The thirteen intervals at C4, ordered by roughness, against Fux's species, 1725. Every interval within an octave above 262 Hz, ordered by the Plomp–Levelt roughness of a string spectrum — from 0.0029 for the unison to 0.2635 for the minor second — beside whether Fux's species, 1725 counts it a consonance and how many of the thirteen may follow it under that rule set. The best single threshold on roughness misclassifies 2 of the thirteen, among them the major third and the minor third, and the gap it falls in is 4.2 per cent of the roughness either side of it.

A dissonance is what has to be resolved

The perfect fourth is a consonance between two upper voices and a dissonance against the bass, and the same three notes are involved either way. Score both arrangements with the roughness model and the one the rules call a dissonance comes out thirty per cent smoother. Whatever the rule is tracking, it is not the sound.

harmony · Consonance Every voicing of a second-inversion major triad, least rough first. All 27 arrangements of the same three pitch classes within 3 octaves from 131 Hz, scored for roughness. The best is spaced 19 then 9 semitones — wide below, close above — and the worst is the chord in close position at the bottom of the range, 7.6 times rougher with exactly the same notes in it.

The inversion that cannot end a phrase

Three positions of one triad, three measurements, and the practice contradicted at every turn. The second inversion is the smoothest of the three by roughness, the best explained of the three by a virtual-pitch model, and the one that three centuries of practice will not let a phrase end on. What forbids it is a rule about a two-voice skeleton.

intervals · The triad The same intervals, played higher and higher. Sensory roughness for four fixed intervals as the pair is transposed up five octaves, computed from the same Plomp–Levelt model as the dissonance curve. Every one of them falls as it rises, and the small intervals fall furthest — so how consonant an interval is depends on where it is played, not only on what it is.

A chord is a register

The same three pitch classes are five times rougher at the bottom of a piano than in the middle, and the arrangement that minimises the roughness over a low bass turns out to be the bass's own fifth and sixth partials. The orchestration rule about low thirds is not a convention. It falls out of the width of a critical band, exactly.

intervals · The triad Every 3-note stack of one interval. Each chord built by repeating a single interval 2 times from the root, scored for summed roughness on a string spectrum and asked whether one low fundamental accounts for all its notes within 30 cents. 8 of the 11 are smoother than the major triad, which scores 0.288: stacked major thirds (an augmented triad) at 0.279, stacked fourths at 0.218, stacked tritones at 0.144, stacked fifths at 0.140. And 3 of them have no fundamental at all — stacked minor sixths, stacked major sixths, stacked major sevenths — meaning no series of harmonics up to the 16th accounts for their notes to within a 30-cent tolerance.

A stack that is not thirds

Build every chord that repeats a single interval and score them all. Eight of the eleven three-note stacks are smoother than the major triad; the four-note stack of fourths is smoother than a dominant seventh by a third and has no fundamental any matcher can find. Two absences, both computable, and both are exactly what the chord was adopted for.

harmony · The triad 3 tones, one power, and the interval between them. 3 tones of fixed total power, spread symmetrically about 440 hertz, drawn against the interval between neighbours. Piled on one pitch they are one sound of that power; separated by more than a critical band — 4.5 semitones here — they are 3 sounds whose loudnesses add, and the same power reaches 2.08 times the loudness at 5 semitones. The two lines are two models of the same rule and they disagree about how abrupt the change is, not about where it goes.

A chord is not as loud as its notes

The first essay on loudness said what a tone's loudness is and recorded that it had said nothing about a chord's. Here is the missing rule, and it has a musical consequence nobody would predict from it: the same three notes, at the same power, are twice as loud in the treble as in the bass — because the critical band that makes a low triad five times rougher also makes it one sound instead of three.

perception · Loudness Six ways to put three players on three notes. The same chord — G3, B♭3, D4 — played by clarinet, oboe, voice in all 6 possible assignments, scored by the roughness each produces. Every bar is the same pitches and the same instruments; only who is on which note changes. The worst is 1.42 times the best, which is a factor a score can control and a chord symbol cannot express at all. Each row is labelled from the bottom note upward.

Which player on which note

An interval's roughness depends on which instrument is underneath, so the pair does not commute. Three players over three notes is the smallest thing that asymmetry has anywhere to go: six assignments, all of them the same chord, and across 450 of them the roughest averages half again the smoothest and reaches six times it. It is orchestration in the only form that can be computed here — not which chord, and not which voicing, but who is on which note.

timbre · Spectrum Intonation is a unison problem and nothing else. The roughness between two instruments on one note, against how far apart they are in cents, drawn for a unison and for the intervals beside it. A perfect unison is 0.0007 — the partials coincide and there is nothing to beat. Five cents apart it is 0.0465, 65 times as rough, and ten cents apart it is rougher than a major third played exactly. The mechanism is that partial n of a note mistuned by c cents is mistuned by c cents as well, which is n times as many hertz — so the top of the spectrum enters the critical band long before the fundamental does. The other curves are flat, because a third's roughness is set by which partials nearly coincide and a few cents does not change which.

Two players on one note

Six essays have put one instrument on each note of a chord, and the commonest thing an orchestrator actually does is put two on the same note. Two independent sources add in power, so the composite is neither of them — except that it nearly always is one of them, because the level at which ownership changes hands is rarely at zero. And a unison ten cents out is rougher than a major third dead in tune.

timbre · Spectrum One contrast survives every tempo anybody plays and the other does not. How much of each quantity's contrast between chords a listener still has at the end of each chord, against how long a chord lasts. The roughness curve is flat at one down to 45 milliseconds a chord and then falls off a cliff, because its window is 37 milliseconds and a boxcar either fits inside a chord or does not. The loudness curve is already losing at a second a chord and keeps 83 per cent at the slowest pace here, 39 at the fastest. Nothing in music is faster than the roughness window and a great deal of music is faster than the loudness one, so a passage delivers its dissonance and averages its dynamics.

The dissonance arrives and the dynamic does not

A scoring decides two things at once and both of them have to be integrated by a listener before they exist. The loudness smoother's release is two seconds and the roughness window is thirty-seven milliseconds, and that ratio of fifty decides which of the two survives at the pace music is actually played. Nothing anybody performs is fast enough to blur a dissonance, and a great deal of it is fast enough to average a dynamic.

form · Orchestration Who owns clarinet, oboe, voice at every balance. The composite of three players at 392 hertz belongs to whichever of them it is nearest in log-spectral distance, and here that is drawn over the whole plane of balances a conductor could set — the second and third players from 24 decibels below the first to 24 above. voice owns 79 per cent of the square. The three regions meet where all three distances are equal, which is the only balance at which the composite belongs to nobody: it is at -0.3 and -19.1 decibels, inside the square and therefore a balance an ensemble could actually be asked for. A trio has a colour of its own at one point, not over a region.

A section has a loudest member, not a colour

Two players on one note have a balance at which the composite belongs to neither, and that is what blending means. Three should have three such balances and no reason for them to agree — a trio with a rock-paper-scissors ownership would have no strongest member at all. Twenty trios, sixty pairwise comparisons, and not one disagreement: the possibility is real, arbitrary spectra do it once in twenty, and instruments never do.

timbre · Spectrum Eighty-one chords the expectation model cannot tell apart. Every voicing of a dominant seventh on G inside the three octaves above its own root, placed by how rough it is and how far its outer voices are apart, and coloured by which member of the chord is at the bottom. The roughness runs from 0.269 to 1.449, a factor of 5.4, computed from each voicing's own spectrum under Plomp and Levelt's roughness model. The identity surprise the expectation model assigns is 3.51 bits for every one of the 81, because it is a function of a scale degree and its predecessor and there is no register anywhere in it. What separates them is spacing rather than inversion: roughness falls as the outer voices spread apart, correlating -0.42 with the span, and is indifferent to which member of the chord is at the bottom at 0.02. The seventh in the bass is not what makes a chord rough; a fourth and a third packed together at the bottom of the range is.

Eighty-one chords, one number

A dominant seventh has eighty-one arrangements inside three octaves and their roughness spans a factor of five and a half. The tonal-expectation model gives every one of them the same 3.51 bits, because its states are scale degrees and there is no register anywhere in them. Conditioning the surprise on the voicing costs no corpus — and the arithmetic says the conditioning belongs beside the probability rather than inside it, for three reasons that can each be computed.

harmony · Tonal-expectation

All figures · What can be heard