The major scale as a cycle
Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.
It makes a noise. 21 of its 21 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: All at once, Up the scale.
Called by 8 essays
the blast radius of changing it
Seven of the twelve, chosen unevenly
A major scale is a selection of seven positions out of twelve, and the selection is lopsided on purpose. The two semitones sit where they do because an even choice would destroy the thing that makes a scale usable.
The same seven, started later
A mode is not a new scale. It is the same seven notes with a different one treated as home, and the entire change in character comes from reassigning which degree the semitones fall next to.
Five notes, and no semitones
The five black keys sound acceptable in any combination, in any order, over almost any bass note. That is not mysticism and not luck — five is the longest a chain of fifths can run before it produces a semitone, and the number is derived rather than chosen.
What a raised seventh is for
The harmonic minor is usually taught as a scale with an odd gap in it. It is better understood as a repair to a single chord — raising the seventh degree turns the dominant triad from minor to major, and everything else about the scale is the bill for that.
Nothing in the census knows which note is home
All four properties six earlier essays are about are invariant under rotation and transposition — one property tuple over all eighty-four rotations and transpositions of the diatonic set. So the census that separates 349 shapes cannot separate a major scale from its own Aeolian mode, and everything that makes one note a tonic is outside it.
What a tonic costs in seconds
The standard key-finding algorithm cannot be run on a pitch-class set at all — a flat histogram has no variance and the correlation is undefined. Give it durations and it answers with the parent key for all seven modes identically, and it takes between 15.8 and 30.0 per cent of the total time spent on one note before it names that note instead.
Parallel and relative are two different maps
Bring the seven modes to one tonic and order them by brightness, and each step lowers exactly one note by a semitone — and the notes it lowers, in order, are F♯, B, E, A, D, G, the chain of fifths read backwards. Do the same to harmonic minor's rotations and each step moves two, three or four notes at once. The famous chain belongs to the generator, not to rotation.
Two keys at once
Every key figure so far assumes one key is sounding, and the standard key-finder has no value it can return that means two. Play one progression in C and the same progression a major third away at the same time, and the model does not report uncertainty: it reports E minor, at a correlation of 0.886, against 0.959 for the same progression in one key. It is as confident as it ever is, and neither key it names is being played. Give it the missing hypothesis — pairs of key profiles rather than single ones — and it recovers both keys at every separation, all seven of seven.