What 2 partials imply, and how many answers there are
Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.
It makes a noise. 15 of its 15 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: The best fit, played beneath them — one octave up, to reach a speaker, The best fit, played beneath them — three octaves up, to reach a speaker, The best fit, played beneath them — two octaves up, to reach a speaker, The partials as they are, The partials as they are — one octave up, to reach a speaker, The partials as they are — two octaves up, to reach a speaker, The runner-up, beneath them — four octaves up, to reach a speaker, The runner-up, beneath them — three octaves up, to reach a speaker and 1 more.
Called by 4 essays
the blast radius of changing it
Two pipes for a note neither makes
The resultant stop sounds a sixteen-foot pipe and a ten-and-two-thirds-foot pipe and asks the listener for a thirty-two-foot note. It is the missing fundamental built on purpose from the fewest partials that can imply anything — and counting how many fundamentals two partials actually imply is the arithmetic behind three centuries of builders disagreeing about whether it works.
The root an ear supplies
A major triad's notes fit 4:5:6 with nothing missing and a fundamental two octaves below the bass. A minor triad's fit two different series with two different answers a major sixth apart, and the model cannot choose between them. The ambiguity theorists argued about for two centuries is a computable quantity, and the spectrum invented to remove it is one no object produces.
The note that sounds twice
A triad has three notes and a four-part texture has four voices, so one note is doubled — and the voicing model used here leaves the choice free because the rules have an opinion about it. Asked properly, the arithmetic agrees with the treatises for the first time in nine essays: root, then fifth, then third. For a minor triad it does not agree, and for a symmetric chord it correctly has nothing to say.
The ranking survives the dynamic and the chord does not
Roughness is quadratic in pressure and loudness is compressive, so sixty decibels multiply a chord's roughness by a million and its loudness by ninety-six. Roughness per sone therefore rises ten thousandfold between a pianissimo and a fortissimo of the same four notes — and yet the ranking of which doubling is smoothest, over four hundred and eighty voicings, does not move by a single place.