A reed that shuts at 5000 pascals, and the air it lets through
Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.
It makes a noise. 22 of its 22 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: A reed note as it really starts: silence up to 1667 pascals, and then a note, A reed note as it really starts: silence up to 3000 pascals, and then a note, A reed note as it really starts: silence up to 833 pascals, and then a note, Blown hard, Blown softly, Partials 8 to 12, as the series gives them, The bore's own frequency, The same five, forced to the tempered notes and 1 more.
Called by 6 essays
the blast radius of changing it
The other instrument with a reed
The folds do not vibrate the way a string does. They open and shut across a steady stream of air, once per period, and what leaves the larynx is a train of flow pulses with a closed phase in it. Everything said about the voice's tone is a statement about the shape of that pulse — and the shape has two numbers in it.
The reed is a valve, not a vibrator
Three essays here have said that a clarinet's reed does not choose the note, and none of them said what it does instead. It chops a steady stream of air, and past a third of the pressure that closes it the flow falls as the player blows harder — a resistance with the wrong sign, which is the only thing in the instrument capable of putting energy into an oscillation that is otherwise losing it.
Blowing harder is playing sharper
Every frequency computed so far for an air column is a resonance of the tube, and no wind instrument plays at its bore's resonance. It plays between the bore and whatever is driving it, weighted by how sharply each is tuned — and a flute's driver is an air jet whose own preferred frequency goes as the square root of the blowing pressure. Across a tenfold pressure range the jet's preference rises by a factor of 3.16 and the bore holds it to 112 cents of that. A wind player's dynamics and their intonation are one control, and the size of the coupling between them is the valve's Q.
The partial the lips cannot reach
A wind instrument plays between its valve's preferred frequency and its bore's, which suggested that the natural trumpet's notorious eleventh partial would therefore turn out to be a statement about the lips. It is not. Run the same Q-weighted mean over the whole series and the lips can move that partial twenty-three cents, which is a quarter of what it needs — and the Q that would fix it is the Q at which the bore stops choosing the note.
What the mouthpiece is actually for
A cup and a throat look like a comfort fitting and are a component. Put a real one on the front of a real bore in the horn equation and the whole mode series slides sideways by about a seventh of its own spacing — which is exactly the distance between a series whose second resonance is 1.85 times the spacing and one whose second resonance is the second harmonic. The flare decides whether the modes are evenly spaced; the mouthpiece decides which harmonic each one is.
The partials the tube makes itself
Eleven earlier essays compute a passive linear resonator, and none of them ever says so. At a real fortissimo the air in a brass instrument is not linear: a compression outruns a rarefaction, the wave leans forward as it travels, and the fourth partial of a loud trumpet note is seventy decibels louder than a scaled-up quiet one — generated in the tube rather than at the lips. How much of it happens is an integral over the bore, and it is why a flugelhorn cannot be blown into being a trumpet.