3 against 2, from a rhythm to an interval
Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.
It makes a noise. 8 of its 8 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: 1080 events a minute — counted, 120 events a minute — counted, 160 Hz against 320 Hz — heard, 180 Hz against 225 Hz — heard, 20 Hz against 25 Hz — heard, 240 events a minute — counted, 30 Hz against 45 Hz — heard, 300 Hz against 450 Hz — heard and 13 more.
Called by 3 essays
the blast radius of changing it
A rhythm fast enough to be a chord
Three against two is a polyrhythm. Speed the same pattern up until the events arrive faster than about twenty a second and it is a perfect fifth. The ratio never changed, the figure never changed, and the only thing that moved is the rate — which makes rhythm and pitch one continuum with a perceptual boundary across the middle of it.
A sound hides what came before it
Masking does not stop when the masker does. A loud sound raises the threshold for about a fifth of a second after it ends, which is unremarkable, and for several milliseconds before it begins, which is not. The auditory present is a window rather than an instant, and inside the window the order of events is not the order they arrived.
Which of the two is the beat
A polyrhythm is notated as a bar of two with three laid across it. Run the metre rules used here over the composite and they choose the three — at every ratio tried, without exception. Add the one other rule the rules have, and the answer changes hands at a bar of 1,013 milliseconds, which is 118 to the minute.