Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Generator

Which partials two notes have in common

The first 12 partials of a note and of the note an interval above it, on a logarithmic frequency axis, with every partial of the upper tone that lands on one of the lower marked. octave: 12 of 12, fifth: 6 of 12, fourth: 4 of 12, major third: 3 of 12, minor third: 2 of 12, major seventh: 1 of 12. Sharing partials is what fusion is: two voices whose spectra mostly coincide stop being heard as two voices, which is a measurable property of the interval rather than a matter of taste.
Which partials two notes have in common. The first 12 partials of a note and of the note an interval above it, on a logarithmic frequency axis, with every partial of the upper tone that lands on one of the lower marked. octave: 12 of 12, fifth: 6 of 12, fourth: 4 of 12, major third: 3 of 12, minor third: 2 of 12, major seventh: 1 of 12. Sharing partials is what fusion is: two voices whose spectra mostly coincide stop being heard as two voices, which is a measurable property of the interval rather than a matter of taste.

Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.

It makes a noise. 9 of its 9 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: fifth — 6 of 12 partials shared, fifth — 8 of 16 partials shared, fourth — 4 of 12 partials shared, fourth — 5 of 16 partials shared, major sixth — 5 of 16 partials shared, major third — 3 of 12 partials shared, octave — 12 of 12 partials shared, twelfth — 8 of 12 partials shared.

Called by 8 essays

the blast radius of changing it

All 55 chords of 3 notes, on both counts. Every 3-note subset of the twelve pitch classes containing the root — 55 of them — with summed Plomp–Levelt roughness on a string spectrum across, and the largest whole number needed to write the chord in just intonation up. The smoothest is 0–5–10, 15:20:27, which is stacked fourths. The simplest is 0–5–9, 3:4:5, which is the major triad. Exactly one chord is in the best 18% on both axes: 3:4:5, the major triad.

Three is the largest agreeable number

Take every chord of every size that can be built from the twelve, score each one for roughness and for the size of the whole numbers it needs, and ask how many are good on both counts. At two notes the answer is one. At three notes it is still one. At four it is eight, and the question stops having an answer.

intervals · The triad Which partials two notes have in common. The first 12 partials of a note and of the note an interval above it, on a logarithmic frequency axis, with every partial of the upper tone that lands on one of the lower marked. octave: 12 of 12, fifth: 6 of 12, fourth: 4 of 12, major third: 3 of 12, minor third: 2 of 12, minor second: 0 of 12. Sharing partials is what fusion is: two voices whose spectra mostly coincide stop being heard as two voices, which is a measurable property of the interval rather than a matter of taste.

Two voices that stop being two

The ban on parallel fifths is the most famous rule in Western music and it is usually taught as taste. It is not taste. At an octave the upper voice contributes no frequency the lower one did not already have, at a fifth it contributes half of them, and the number can be counted — which turns a prohibition into a measurement.

harmony · Voice-leading Partial 3, mistuned by 3%. A 10-partial tone on 220 Hz with one partial treated differently from the rest. Mistuning it moves it off the harmonic grid by 3.0 per cent, which is 19.8 Hz — slow enough to be heard as a beat rather than as a separate pitch, and enough for the partial to be heard out of the note as a whistle of its own. An onset difference does the same to a partial that is exactly in tune.

What makes two partials one note

A note is a stack of ten or twenty simultaneous tones and is heard as one thing. The obvious explanation is that they are whole-number multiples of a fundamental — and the obvious explanation is not sufficient. Mistune one partial by three per cent and it leaves the note; give a perfectly harmonic partial a thirty-millisecond head start and it leaves too. Shared behaviour beats arithmetic.

timbre · Auditory scene Two models of consonance, and where they disagree. Every chord scored twice: horizontally by summed Plomp–Levelt roughness, vertically by the largest integer needed to write it as members of one harmonic series. Both are supposed to be measuring consonance and both are computed here from the chord itself. They correlate, but not tightly enough to be the same claim, and the chords furthest from the diagonal are the ones any experiment has to be run on.

Consonance is half learned, and this is the half

This site's founding claim is that consonance is small whole numbers. Two computable models say so and they disagree about which chords — which is already awkward. The cross-cultural evidence is worse: listeners with little exposure to Western music discriminate roughness exactly as anyone does, match octaves exactly as anyone does, and rate consonant and dissonant chords as equally pleasant.

perception · Consonance Every voicing of a major triad, least rough first. All 27 arrangements of the same three pitch classes within 3 octaves from 131 Hz, scored for roughness. The best is spaced 19 then 9 semitones — wide below, close above — and the worst is the chord in close position at the bottom of the range, 6.6 times rougher with exactly the same notes in it.

Where to put the third

Take three pitch classes, four octaves to put them in, and score all twenty-seven arrangements. The smoothest is root, fifth an octave up, third two octaves up — which is partials one, three and five of the harmonic series — and the roughest, at every register tried, is the chord in close root position at the bottom of the range. Every orchestration manual states that rule and none of them derives it.

harmony · Consonance Roughness across an octave. Sensory dissonance between two complex tones as the upper one is swept through an octave, computed by summing the roughness between every pair of their partials. Nothing here is placed by hand. The wells this spectrum produces sit on 4/3, on 3/2, on 5/3, found by scanning the curve rather than by marking them. And the tempered minor third sits 198 cents below the nearest well, and the tempered major third sits 98 cents below the nearest well, which is a real feature of this model and not a defect of the drawing.

The third the model has no opinion about

A neutral third — halfway between major and minor, and a scale degree in most of the music between Morocco and Iran — is nothing at all on an ordinary roughness curve. It becomes a well at 347 cents, which is exactly 11:9, only for a spectrum whose ninth and eleventh partials are at least three times their natural strength. No instrument has that spectrum.

intervals · Beyond twelve Where to stop, and what stopping there gives. Each prefix of the harmonic series sounded as a chord of pure tones, with its roughness per pair and the pitch classes it contains. The smoothest prefix is the first 4, which is a bare fifth and an octave; roughness rises monotonically from there, so no roughness argument selects six. The prefixes that contain a major triad and nothing else are 5 and 6. One partial further and it is a dominant seventh; four further and there are five pitch classes. Six is the last stopping point that gives the answer the derivation wants, and nothing else in the arithmetic picks it out.

The series is not a chord

The major triad is derived from the first six partials of the harmonic series in every textbook that derives it from anything, and the derivation works: the first six contain a major triad and nothing else. Take the first four instead and there is no third at all; take seven and there is a dominant seventh with a flat seventh thirty-one cents below any keyboard note; take sixteen and there are eight pitch classes. Six is the last stopping point that gives the answer, roughness prefers three, four or ten depending on the register, and no criterion in the arithmetic selects six over any of them.

intervals · Harmonic series one measured slendro is the scale least committed to a spectrum. Each scale drawn, placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of the same size, under 4 spectra. Low is smooth. Every one of them lands in the smoothest third under every spectrum, so the account that a spectrum chooses a scale survives as a statement about levels. What separates them is the length of each row's line, which is how much the answer moves when the instrument changes: one measured slendro spans 2.9 percentile points and Rast, Turkish theory spans 17.6, a factor of 6.0. The scale usually offered as the case for spectral matching is the one whose standing barely depends on the spectrum, and Rast, Turkish theory is the one that depends on it most.

The scale least committed to its own instrument

The essays on scales beyond twelve draw scales without spectra and spectra without scales, and none of them had put a tradition's own degrees through the roughness model. Doing it for six scales and five spectra says the account survives — every tradition lands between the eighth and the twenty-sixth percentile of random scales of its size, and under a pure tone not one of them does. But the scale whose standing moves least when the instrument changes is the gamelan's, at 2.9 percentile points, and the one that moves most is the five-limit diatonic at 17.4. The scale the argument is usually made about is the one it explains least.

scales · Beyond twelve

All figures · What can be heard