Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Generator

How sharp each partial of a real string is

The departure of each partial from the whole-number multiple it is supposed to be, in cents, for three strings — an ideal string, middle of a small upright, top octave of the same piano. The coefficient of each is computed from the stiffness of a steel wire of a stated length and gauge; nothing is fitted. The sharpest of them is 497 cents sharp by the eighth partial.
How sharp each partial of a real string is. The departure of each partial from the whole-number multiple it is supposed to be, in cents, for three strings — an ideal string, middle of a small upright, top octave of the same piano. The coefficient of each is computed from the stiffness of a steel wire of a stated length and gauge; nothing is fitted. The sharpest of them is 497 cents sharp by the eighth partial.

Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.

It makes a noise. 9 of its 9 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: a concert grand at A4 — all 12 partials, a small upright at A4 — all 12 partials, a small upright at middle C — all 12 partials, a spinet at A4 — all 12 partials, an ideal string at middle C — all 12 partials, an ideal string — all 10 partials, an ideal string — all 12 partials, an ideal string — all 14 partials and 8 more.

Called by 5 essays

the blast radius of changing it

Where a tuned piano actually sits. The departure from equal temperament of every key of a small upright, computed from the stiffness of its strings and the fact that a tuner sets octaves without beats rather than at a ratio of two to one. The treble ends up 52 cents sharp and the bass 18 cents flat, and neither is an error.

The piano is tuned wrong on purpose

Every well-tuned piano has a sharp treble and a flat bass, by up to a third of a semitone at the extremes. It is not an error, it is not a compromise about keys, and it follows from one property of a steel wire that can be computed from its diameter and its length.

timbre · Harmonic series How near the node a hammer has to land. The level of partial 7, relative to the loudest partial of the same note, against how far the hammer is from that partial's node — for a contact 2.6 per cent of the speaking length wide, which is 16 mm on a 620 mm string. At the node exactly the partial is absent whatever the width, because a mode shape is odd about its own node and integrating an odd function symmetrically gives zero. Twenty decibels of suppression needs the hammer within 2.82 mm, and thirty needs 0.89 mm. The width itself barely matters in the musical range: its sinc reaches its first zero only at partial 77.

The hammer is not a point either

The comb of missing partials is computed throughout for a contact of no width, and a piano hammer is sixteen millimetres of felt on a string of six hundred. Integrating the mode shape across the felt turns out not to fill the null in: a mode is odd about its own node, so a symmetric contact centred on it gives an exact zero however wide it is. What destroys the null is being in the wrong place, and the tolerance is 2.8 millimetres for twenty decibels of suppression and 0.89 for thirty. The design decision found at the outset is a manufacturing tolerance.

instruments · Excitation point How much of each spectrum a listener can assemble into one note. Each partial of each spectrum at the harmonic number it is nearest, against the whole-number series that fuses the most of them, with anything more than 1 per cent out marked as heard separately. an ideal string keeps 10 of 10; a piano string keeps 9 of 10; a bell keeps 7 of 8; a bar keeps 2 of 6; a kettledrum keeps 3 of 5. The fundamental is capped at a tenth of the top partial, and the cap is load-bearing rather than tidy: a bell's ratios are all whole multiples of a tenth, so an unconstrained search finds a fundamental twenty-five harmonics down, calls every partial exact, and reports that a bell fuses perfectly. Nothing that high is resolved and the low harmonics of it are not there.

The spectrum that will not fuse

A partial about one per cent off its harmonic is heard as a sound of its own rather than as part of a note. Apply that criterion to a whole spectrum instead of to one mistuned component and it becomes a count: a piano string keeps nine of its ten partials, a bell keeps seven of eight, a bar keeps two of six. The physics of inharmonicity has had an essay here for a long time. This is what it sounds like.

perception · Auditory scene What a competition decides when the two cues do not agree. Each spectrum with its two cue readings and the grouping the competition chooses. Harmonicity asks whether a partial is near enough a whole multiple to belong; common fate asks whether it decays at the same rate as the rest. Where they disagree there is no rule in this collection, so the published apparatus is used instead: every way of splitting the partials into one stream or two is scored for the partials each cue says it has wrongly grouped and wrongly separated, and the cheapest wins. an ideal string — harmonicity 100 per cent, common fate 20, and the competition says one stream; a piano string — harmonicity 90 per cent, common fate 20, and the competition says a cut after partial 2; a bell — harmonicity 88 per cent, common fate 13, and the competition says a cut after partial 1; a bar — harmonicity 33 per cent, common fate 67, and the competition says a cut after partial 4; a kettledrum — harmonicity 60 per cent, common fate 100, and the competition says one stream. The exchange rate between the two cues is the number nobody here can supply, so what is reported beside each is how many decades of it leave the answer unchanged.

The exchange rate nobody has

There are now two cues that disagree about how a spectrum divides, and every figure so far reports them separately because there is no principled way here to weigh one against the other. The published apparatus is a competition between grouping hypotheses with a cost per cue — and the useful thing it produces is not the winner but how much of the exchange rate the winner survives.

perception · Auditory scene A mistuned 2:1 makes 8 beats, not one. Every pair of partials that coincides in a 2:1 mistuned by 6 cents, with the rate each one beats at. On a perfectly flexible string the rates are 1.5, 3.1, 4.6, 6.1 and so on — an exact harmonic series of the slowest, because partial 2k is exactly twice partial k. On a stiff one they are 1.3, 0.9, 2.7, 11.1, and the 8th member is at 122 hertz. The family grows as the cube of the member number rather than linearly, so 4 of the 8 are slow enough to be beats at all and the rest are roughness.

A beat is never one beat

Every beat counted until now has come from one pair of partials. A real spectrum has many, so a mistuned octave produces eight beats at once — and on a perfectly flexible string those eight are an exact harmonic series of the slowest. On a real piano string they are a cubic, half of them are not beats at all, and no single width of octave silences more than one. That is where the tuner's five octaves come from.

intervals · Beating

All figures · What can be heard