Generator

The same note, hit at a middling dynamic

The spectrum of a struck string with the hammer's own contact time applied as a low-pass. Contact lasts 1.60 ms at this force, against 2.26 ms at the softest and 0.95 ms at the loudest drawn — felt is a nonlinear spring, so a harder blow is a shorter contact and a brighter note. The spectral centroid moves from partial 1.5 to partial 2.2, which is a change of timbre and not of loudness.

Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.

It makes a noise. 54 of its 54 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: A bass note, A bass note struck hard, A treble note, A treble note struck hard, A3 with the assumed excitation, A3 with the computed one, At this dynamic, C2 with the assumed excitation and 15 more.

Called by 14 essays

the blast radius of changing it

The same note, hit at a middling dynamic. The spectrum of a struck string with the hammer's own contact time applied as a low-pass. Contact lasts 1.60 ms at this force, against 2.26 ms at the softest and 0.95 ms at the loudest drawn — felt is a nonlinear spring, so a harder blow is a shorter contact and a brighter note. The spectral centroid moves from partial 1.5 to partial 2.2, which is a change of timbre and not of loudness.

A hammer is not an impulse

Contact lasts a couple of milliseconds, which low-passes the note — any partial whose half-period is shorter than the contact is barely excited. Piano felt is a spring that stiffens as it compresses, so a harder blow makes the contact shorter, the corner higher and the note brighter. A loud note is not a scaled-up quiet one, and no linear model gives that.

instruments · Excitation point

A dynamic mark is an instruction about the spectrum. Six dynamic markings, given a hammer velocity each in a stated sequence of factors of two, with what the string then does. The level rises 35.1 decibels from pp to ff, which is the part everybody means. The contact time falls from 2.26 to 0.95 milliseconds, so the first null of the hammer's own pulse moves from partial 2.5 to partial 6.0 and the spectral centroid rises by 56 per cent. The partials between those two nulls are not quieter at pp; they are not there.

The mark that is not a level

There are six of them, they carry no units, and a performer has to turn one into a number before it means anything. What they instruct is not loudness. On a struck string a harder blow shortens the hammer's contact from 2.26 milliseconds to 0.95, which moves the first null of its own pulse from the third partial to the sixth: the partials between those are not quieter at pianissimo, they are gone. A fortissimo is a different sound, and the page has one word for both things it changes.

timbre · Notation

How near the node a hammer has to land. The level of partial 7, relative to the loudest partial of the same note, against how far the hammer is from that partial's node — for a contact 2.6 per cent of the speaking length wide, which is 16 mm on a 620 mm string. At the node exactly the partial is absent whatever the width, because a mode shape is odd about its own node and integrating an odd function symmetrically gives zero. Twenty decibels of suppression needs the hammer within 2.82 mm, and thirty needs 0.89 mm. The width itself barely matters in the musical range: its sinc reaches its first zero only at partial 77.

The hammer is not a point either

The comb of missing partials is computed throughout for a contact of no width, and a piano hammer is sixteen millimetres of felt on a string of six hundred. Integrating the mode shape across the felt turns out not to fill the null in: a mode is odd about its own node, so a symmetric contact centred on it gives an exact zero however wide it is. What destroys the null is being in the wrong place, and the tolerance is 2.8 millimetres for twenty decibels of suppression and 0.89 for thirty. The design decision found at the outset is a manufacturing tolerance.

instruments · Excitation point

Two clocks on one contact, and which of them runs out first. Two times that could end a hammer's contact with a string, across the compass. The flat line is the felt's own recoil, which this site models as a fixed 1.6 milliseconds at a stated force and which does not know what note is being played. The falling line is the string's: a mass m driving a string of impedance Z loses its momentum in m/2Z, which is 11.9 milliseconds at the bottom of the keyboard and 0.76 at the top. They cross at G3. Below the crossing the felt lets go first and above it the string gets there first, and over six octaves the two are within a factor of two of each other — so the contact time is a coupled quantity and not a property of the felt.

The hammer that is heavier than its string

Three earlier essays varied where the hammer lands, how long it stays and how wide it is, and the third named the fourth variable: the exciter's own mass. It inverts across one instrument — the hammer is lighter than the wire it hits at the bottom of a piano and thirteen times heavier at the top — and it turns the contact time into a quantity the string decides rather than the felt.

instruments · Excitation point

How much earlier an accent is heard, by mechanism. An accented note on an instrument with a 90 millisecond attack, drawn against how many decibels louder it is, with the three ways it can arrive early separated. A criterion tied to the note's own peak on an unchanging envelope gives exactly nothing. The same criterion on the shorter rise a harder-driven instrument has gives 5.3 milliseconds at 12 decibels. A criterion at a fixed level gives 23.0. Both together give 24.0, and the rise at that dynamic is 73 milliseconds rather than 90. The rise-shortening exponent is stipulated at 0.15 rather than measured, and the two upper curves would separate further if it were smaller.

Playing louder is playing earlier

An accent has two effects on when its note is heard and neither is a timing decision. A harder-driven instrument has a shorter attack, and a criterion set by the surrounding music is crossed sooner by a bigger rise — so a twelve-decibel accent on a bowed note is heard twenty-four milliseconds early with no change whatever in when the bow was put down. It is also the measurement that tells the two competing models apart.

perception · Perceptual-centre

C4: the pulse computed and the pulse assumed. Above, the force the hammer delivers to the string at C4, integrated forward against the felt's nonlinear force and the string's returning corner, drawn against the half-sine of 1.60 milliseconds that every earlier figure assumed. The computed contact lasts 2.21 milliseconds and the corner comes home 4.6 times inside it. Below, the excitation each pulse gives to each partial. They agree at the bottom and part company higher up — worst at partial 6, by 34 decibels — because the assumed pulse has nulls the computed one does not.

The pulse that was assumed

Every figure until now low-passes the string's excitation with the spectrum of a half-sine, which is what a hammer would deliver against a rigid wall. An earlier essay said so and declined to do better. Doing better takes forty lines and refuses the prediction that came with it: the corner's round trips govern the spectrum as expected, and the contact time is governed by something else entirely — the mass ratio discovered one essay earlier.

timbre · Excitation point

What the climb costs, in tonnes and in inharmonicity. The total string tension a piano frame carries at each historical standard, computed from the string scaling used here. Tension goes as the square of the pitch, so the climb from 392 to 465 hertz is a rise from 11.5 to 16.2 tonnes on one instrument. The same ratio runs the other way through inharmonicity, which is inversely proportional to tension: the same wire at 465 hertz has 29 per cent less of it than at 392, so its partials are that much closer to a true series.

What the climb was a search for

The four-hundred-year rise in the pitch standard is usually explained as a search for brilliance, and an earlier essay ended by asking whether that was even coherent: does raising a string's tension change its spectrum as well as its pitch? Mostly it does not. What changes the timbre is something else entirely, and it is a mechanism that applies to instruments with no strings at all — every filter in the chain is fixed in absolute frequency while the notes move against it, so raising the standard is not a brightening but a reshuffling, and some notes lose.

tuning · Pitch standard

The partial above which the returning corner has lost its phase. Up a piano, the lowest partial whose extra travel after one round trip to the near end exceeds a quarter of a cycle — above it, the component comes home somewhere other than where a corner needs it. The curve follows the inharmonicity coefficient, which is smallest in the tenor and rises both ways, so the corner survives best at A2 — to the 24th partial — and worst at A7, where only 5 partials are still in step. The earlier coupled model assumes a clean corner at every partial it uses.

The corner does not come back a corner

Stepping a hammer forward against the string's own returning wave showed that the coupling matters most in the bass. It assumed the wave that came back was the shape that left. On a stiff string it is not: partials travel at different speeds, and by the top octave of a piano the sixth partial is the first to arrive out of place. But a periodic wave can only see phase modulo a cycle, and counted that way twenty-one of forty-eight partials are still in step — which is why the returning wave is degraded rather than destroyed.

timbre · Excitation point

Trumpet at three dynamics, as a spectrum rather than a level. The radiated partials of a trumpet at 45, 70, 95 decibels, each normalised to its own strongest partial so that only the SHAPE is compared. A linear source would give three identical pictures. This one does not: the spectral centroid moves from partial 2.19 to 6.41, a factor of 2.92, because the excitation is nonlinear and blowing harder steepens the pressure front rather than scaling it. The tilt used is 3 decibels per octave of partial number per ten decibels of level, referred to 70 dB — a stipulated, ordinal number, not a measurement of any instrument.

A dynamic mark changes what a note is

Every spectrum until now is a shape with a level in front of it, so that playing ten decibels louder raises every partial by ten. That is true of exactly one instrument in an orchestra. Everybody else steepens their own spectrum as they lean on it, and a trumpet's centre of gravity moves from the second partial to the sixth across a dynamic range while an organ flue pipe's does not move at all.

timbre · Orchestration $Which of the four terms is doing the removing, note by note. Each of three terms has a corner — a partial number above which it is the one taking the energy away — and the lowest corner at each pitch is the term that binds. The comb is flat at 8, because where the hammer lands is a fraction of the length and does not change with the note. The contact time's corner falls from 34 at A0 to 0.5 at A7. They cross at about E3, 165 hertz: below it the strike point decides the spectrum and above it the contact time does. The dispersion's corner is above both at every pitch on the instrument — 5.8 at the top against a contact corner of 0.5 — so that earlier term is real and is nowhere the binding one. That is a statement no one of them could make on its own.$

Four terms, and only one of them binds

Six earlier essays each computed one term of a piano's excitation spectrum and handed it to the next, and nobody had multiplied them. Multiplied, three of the four have a corner — a partial above which they are the term doing the removing — and putting the three corners on one axis says which is in charge at each pitch. Below E3 the strike point decides; above it the contact time does; and the dispersion, which is the newest and most laborious term, is nowhere the binding one.

timbre · Excitation point $Where each exciter's contact corner sits against its comb. The merger's four corners, drawn for three exciters. The comb is the strike point and is a horizontal line, because it is a fraction of the string and has no pitch in it. The contact corner is the exciter's, and it falls up the compass because the contact time is a fixed number of milliseconds against a shrinking period. Where they cross, the binding term changes. piano hammer crosses at E3; harpsichord plectrum crosses nowhere in the compass; dulcimer beater crosses at A5. So the crossing found earlier is not a fact about pianos. It is a fact about compliance: a felt hammer stays on the string for about 1.6 milliseconds and a plectrum for 0.05, and a difference of that size is a corner in a different place.$

The crossing belongs to the felt

On a piano the strike point decides the top of the spectrum below E3 and the hammer's contact decides it above. The merger's own bookkeeping asked whether that crossing is a fact about pianos or about hammers. A plectrum never crosses at all and a hard beater crosses two octaves higher, and the boundary is a contact time of about an eighth of a millisecond — ten times shorter than felt.

timbre · Excitation point

Three instruments, three wires, and an order of magnitude between them. The inharmonicity coefficient of each instrument's own string design, across its own compass. At middle-of-the-keyboard C a piano's wire is 315 millimetres long and 1.02 thick and gives B = 1.5e-3; a harpsichord's at the same pitch is 355 millimetres and 0.30, and gives 8.1e-5 — a factor of 19. The harpsichord's line is nearly flat across four octaves because its scaling is Pythagorean: the length doubles for every octave down, exactly, until the case runs out. The piano's is a V, because its case runs out two octaves earlier and everything below the break is a compromise. Every column before now used the top line for all three instruments.

Three exciters and three wires

Every column drawn so far has run a plectrum and a beater on a piano's string, because a piano's was the only scaling to hand. A harpsichord's wire is an order of magnitude less stiff, for a reason that turns out to be the tensile strength of iron — and with all nine combinations computed, the crossing found before stays exactly where it was, on every wire.

instruments · Excitation point

The cue that settles it

Arbitrating between two grouping cues meant sweeping an exchange rate nobody could supply. The cue it had no term for at all is the one every account calls strongest, and its strength is computable: a struck string's partials start together to within a tenth of a millisecond against a threshold of twenty. Put that into the competition and three of five verdicts change, all the same way — and a bell becomes one sound.

perception · Auditory scene $A plucking point 50 millimetres from the nut, across a harpsichord's compass. The jacks stand in a rail and the rail is one object, so a register plucks at a fixed distance from the nut while the strings shorten by a factor of ten from the bass to the treble. At 50 millimetres that is one 36th of the string at C2 and one 3.5th at C6 — a plucking fraction that changes by a factor of 10.1 without the maker moving anything. The comb corner is one over that fraction and falls with it, from 36 to 3.5; the dispersion corner has the fraction under a cube root and falls only from 106 to 21. They never meet. Setting one over p equal to the cube root of two over three times the inharmonicity and the fraction gives a plucking point at p = √(1.5B), which on this instrument's iron wire is between 3.4 and 9.9 millimetres from the nut — nearer to it than any register a harpsichord has ever carried, the lute stop included. So the maker's one free choice is the binding term at every pitch and every register position, which is exactly what the piano's is not: on a piano the contact time takes the decision away above E3.$

What the second register is for

Nine earlier essays take the plucking fraction as given — an eighth, a sixth, a seventh — and a harpsichord's jacks stand in a rail, so what is given is a distance and the fraction is a consequence: 50 millimetres is one thirty-sixth of the string in the bass and one three-and-a-halfth in the treble. Engage two registers on one string and the amplitudes add exactly, the near one fills the far one's missing partials, the pair digs holes of its own that neither has, and the combination comes out louder and rounder than either — including the bright one.

instruments · Excitation point

All figures · What can be heard