Generator

Roughness across an octave

Sensory dissonance between two complex tones as the upper one is swept through an octave, computed by summing the roughness between every pair of their partials. Nothing here is placed by hand. The wells this spectrum produces sit on 4/3, on 3/2, on 5/3, found by scanning the curve rather than by marking them. And the tempered minor third sits 198 cents below the nearest well, and the tempered major third sits 98 cents below the nearest well, which is a real feature of this model and not a defect of the drawing.

Drawn above with its standard settings, which is almost never how an essay draws it: an essay states the numbers it is arguing about, so the figure a reader meets there is about that argument rather than about the drawing in general. Every option a placement passes is checked against the ones this function actually reads, because an option it does not read is silently ignored and the figure quietly draws what is above instead.

It makes a noise. 108 of its 110 placements carry sound, built from the same numbers as the drawing, offering these buttons: A 1-semitone interval, held, A harmonic tone, major third, A low C with all eight partials, A minor third at C4, quietly, A minor third at E1, quietly, A semitone in the bass, briefly, A semitone two octaves up, equally briefly, A stretched tone, at its own minimum and 75 more.

Called by 25 essays

the blast radius of changing it

Roughness can be computed, and the answer looks like a scale

Feed two spectra into a model of how nearby frequencies interfere, sweep one past the other, and the curve that comes out has dips exactly where the consonant intervals are. Nobody put them there.

intervals · Consonance

The critical band, measured in semitones. The width of the ear's frequency-analysis band at each pitch, converted from hertz into semitones. Two intervals drawn as horizontal lines cross the curves: below the crossing the interval fits inside one band and its notes are not resolved from each other, and above it they are.

A third is rougher in the bass

Consonance is usually presented as a property an interval has. It is not. The same major third is muddy two octaves below middle C and clean two octaves above it, the ratio never changed, and the frequency where it stops being muddy can be solved for.

intervals · Consonance

Chords as stacked intervals. Each of 4 chords — major, minor, diminished, augmented — drawn as the semitone distances above its root, with the nearest simple frequency ratio beside each note where the 5-limit table has one. Where the chords are triads they differ only in the size of the two stacked thirds, and that difference is the whole of their character.

Three notes at once, and why these three

A triad is two thirds stacked, and the four ways of stacking them behave completely differently. The difference is entirely in whether the resulting ratios are simple.

harmony · The triad

The ear sorts into boxes, and the boxes are the theory

Slide one note slowly upward against another and the interval between them changes continuously. What a listener reports does not. It stays a minor third, stays a minor third, and then in the space of about twenty cents becomes a major third — and nothing in the sound corresponds to the moment of the change.

intervals · Categorical-hearing

Roughness across an octave. Sensory dissonance between two complex tones as the upper one is swept through 19.02 semitones, computed by summing the roughness between every pair of their partials. Nothing here is placed by hand. The wells this spectrum produces sit on 7/5, on 11/7, on 5/3, on 9/5, on 11/5, on 7/3, on 13/5, found by scanning the curve rather than by marking them. The wells are where this spectrum's partials coincide, and for a spectrum with no even partials they are not where an octave-based scale would put them.

A scale without an octave, and the spectrum that asks for it

Every scale so far repeats at the 2:1. That looks like a law and it is a consequence — the octave fuses because every partial of the upper note lands on one of the lower. Take a spectrum with no even partials and the 2:1 stops doing that, while the 3:1 starts.

scales · Beyond twelve

Every delay, scored — a round and a tune that is not one. Mean Plomp-Levelt roughness of the simultaneities a tune makes against a copy of itself entering a whole number of bars later, for Frere Jacques and Twinkle, twinkle. The two do not overlap: the worst delay of the first is smoother than the best delay of the second. The model sees roughness and nothing else — no voice leading, no parallels, no distinction between a passing dissonance and a structural one.

A melody that can accompany itself

Whether a tune works as a round is decidable before anyone sings it. Score every simultaneity it makes against a delayed copy of itself, at every delay, with the roughness model already in use, and two nursery tunes separate completely — every delay of one is smoother than every delay of the other. What the scan does not do is pick out the entry the tradition uses, and that refusal is the most informative thing in it.

harmony · Voice-leading

Three spectra, and where each one's consonances fall. The positions of the roughness minima for 3 partial sets, over 12 semitones from the same fundamental, found by scanning each curve rather than by marking them. A harmonic tone — 498 cents at 3.1 per cent prominence, 702 cents at 37.1 per cent prominence, 884 cents at 6.2 per cent prominence. Partials stretched by 2.1 per octave — 533 cents at 3.7 per cent prominence, 751 cents at 40.1 per cent prominence, 947 cents at 7.3 per cent prominence. A bar's partials — 1, 2.76, 5.40, 8.93 — 694 cents at 5.6 per cent prominence, 870 cents at 14.2 per cent prominence, 982 cents at 1.0 per cent prominence, 1166 cents at 14.7 per cent prominence. The minima are computed by the same well-finder the dissonance curve uses, which requires a minimum to have one per cent of the curve's range on both sides of it before it counts.

A spectrum chooses its own scale

The roughness curve's dips are always described as landing on the small whole numbers. They do not land on numbers. They land where partials coincide, and stretching a spectrum by seven per cent moves every one of them by exactly seven per cent — so the scale a set of intervals belongs to is a property of the instrument's spectrum rather than of arithmetic.

intervals · Consonance

The least rough 7 notes of the twelve, at 262 Hz. Every 7-note selection from the twelve that contains C, scored for total Plomp–Levelt roughness at a root of 262 Hz, ranked. The best 8 are shown with the spread between them. The major scale ranks 5 of 462; the first selection that is a mode of the diatonic set ranks 1. Change the root and the ranking changes, because roughness is a fact about frequencies and a scale is not.

Roughness cannot choose a scale

Score all four hundred and sixty-two seven-note selections from the twelve for roughness and the answer at middle C is a mode of the diatonic set, first out of four hundred and sixty-two. Ask the same question an octave lower and the same selection ranks a hundred and forty-first. The model is not wrong; it is answering a question about frequencies, and a scale is not one.

intervals · Consonance

Cycles of roughness completed in 125 milliseconds. For each interval and each register, how many cycles of its own beating fit inside a note 125 milliseconds long. Cells at or above 4 cycles are the ones a listener has time to hear as rough; the pattern runs the opposite way from roughness itself, which is largest in the bass. A short dissonance low down is the case where the two disagree.

A dissonance has to last

Roughness is a fluctuation, and a fluctuation needs cycles. A minor second at the bottom of a cello fluctuates thirty-three times a second, so a semiquaver holds four of them and a demisemiquaver holds two — which turns the counterpoint rule that a dissonance may pass if it is short into a number, and puts that number at about seventy milliseconds through most of the range, once the pairs beating too slowly to be roughness at all are taken out of the average.

intervals · Consonance

Roughness and loudness of one interval against level. A minor third on C4 evaluated at every level from 20 to 100 dB SPL per note, with both quantities drawn relative to their own value at 60 dB. Roughness is the Plomp–Levelt sum over the partials that are above ISO 226's threshold at that level; loudness is the same partials in sones. Between 50 and 95 dB the interval grows 3.2 × 10⁴ times rougher and 24.9 times louder, so roughness grows like loudness raised to the power 3.2.

The same chord is harsher when it is louder

Every roughness number so far was computed at a level nobody stated. Roughness is the product of two partial amplitudes, so it is quadratic in pressure, while loudness is compressive — which makes a minor third at middle C thirty-two thousand times rougher at fortissimo than at pianissimo and only twenty-five times louder. A chord has no single consonance to report.

intervals · Consonance

The third the model has no opinion about

A neutral third — halfway between major and minor, and a scale degree in most of the music between Morocco and Iran — is nothing at all on an ordinary roughness curve. It becomes a well at 347 cents, which is exactly 11:9, only for a spectrum whose ninth and eleventh partials are at least three times their natural strength. No instrument has that spectrum.

intervals · Beyond twelve

The roughness curve for ideal bar. The partials are at 1 : 2.756 : 5.404 : 8.933 : 13.340 times the fundamental, which is not a harmonic series, so nothing about where the wells fall can be read off the small whole numbers. Sensory dissonance between two complex tones as the upper one is swept through 13.00 semitones, computed by summing the roughness between every pair of their partials. Nothing here is placed by hand. The wells this spectrum produces sit 7 cents below 3/2, 14 cents below 5/3, 13 cents above 7/4, found by scanning the curve rather than by marking them. The wells are where this spectrum's partials coincide, and for a spectrum with no even partials they are not where an octave-based scale would put them.

The spectrum that was supposed to explain the gamelan

Run the model that designed the Bohlen–Pierce scale on a bar's partials and it asks for a compressed pseudo-octave at 1166 cents and wells at 694 and 870. A measured slendro's degrees are at 231, 474, 717 and 955, and only one of the four is near anything the model wants. Sweep the partials and a spectrum wanting a 240-cent step can be found — sitting sixty per cent of the way up its own roughness curve, which is what a scale-level test says about the whole comparison.

timbre · Beyond twelve

The same intervals, played higher and higher. Sensory roughness for four fixed intervals as the pair is transposed up five octaves, computed from the same Plomp–Levelt model as the dissonance curve. Every one of them falls as it rises, and the small intervals fall furthest — so how consonant an interval is depends on where it is played, not only on what it is.

A chord is a register

The same three pitch classes are five times rougher at the bottom of a piano than in the middle, and the arrangement that minimises the roughness over a low bass turns out to be the bass's own fifth and sixth partials. The orchestration rule about low thirds is not a convention. It falls out of the width of a critical band, exactly.

intervals · The triad

One instrument, five spectra. The first 12 partials of a bowed string at 5 pitches, each passed through the same fixed body response and normalised to its own loudest partial. The resonances stay where they are and the partials slide under them, so the pattern is different at every note: the power-weighted centroid runs from 1.02 to 1.71 across the compass and is not monotonic in pitch. A source with no body at all would give 2.35 at every pitch, which is the single number every roughness figure here uses for a string.

An instrument is not one timbre

Every roughness verdict so far uses one partial list per instrument, and a violin does not have one. Its body's resonances stay where they are while the fundamental moves, so the radiated spectrum is different at every pitch: the power-weighted centroid runs from 1.02 to 1.64 across the compass, and it is not monotonic. Which means the result that a spectrum chooses its own scale gives a different scale at every note on the same instrument — three minima in the dissonance curve at the bottom of a violin's range, two in the middle and four at the top.

timbre · Spectrum

How many intervals a duet is smooth at. Every ordered pairing of 5 radiators, with the number of wells in its dissonance curve over an octave from 262 hertz. Rows are the instrument underneath and columns the one above, so the grid is not symmetric about its diagonal and that asymmetry is the result. The count runs from 1 to 7 across the grid, and a cell and its mirror need not agree: a violin under a clarinet has 1 and a clarinet under a violin has 2. The fifth is a well in every one of the 25 pairings and no other interval is.

Which instrument is underneath

Every roughness curve so far compares two tones of the same timbre, which is a duet nobody plays. Give the two notes different instruments and the sum stops being symmetric: the same written interval, on the same two players, is up to five times rougher depending on which of them takes the lower note. From G3 upward the fifth is a well in all twenty-five pairings and no other interval is; below it, three pairings lose even that, and all three have a clarinet on top.

timbre · Spectrum

One pair, 12 beat rates. Two notes at 220 hertz, 15 cents apart, drawn as the beat rate between each pair of partials. The fundamentals beat at 1.91 hertz and the k-th partials at k times that, so the series of rates is a straight line and it crosses 15 hertz at the 8th partial. Below the line the fluctuation is counted; above it the same physical fluctuation is heard as roughness. 1 per cent of this spectrum's energy is on the roughness side. The bars are drawn at each partial's own amplitude, so a spectrum with little energy high up crosses the line where nothing is listening.

Every partial beats at its own rate

Five earlier essays have drawn one beat rate per figure, and every one of them is the rate between two fundamentals. Two real notes beat between all of their partials at once, the k-th pair beats k times as fast, and somewhere up the spectrum the rate passes the point at which a beat stops being a beat — so a chorused note is a beat at the bottom of itself and a roughness at the top, simultaneously, with a crossover partial that is arithmetic.

tuning · Beating

A vibrato flattens the dissonance curve. Each interval twice: hollow is its roughness computed at the two notes' nominal frequencies, filled is the average of its roughness over a vibrato cycle of 50 cents at 6 hertz. They are not the same number, because roughness is a curved function of the frequency difference and the average of a curve is not the curve of the average. The largest effect is at octave, where the moving average is 19.3 times the still value — an interval sitting in a deep narrow minimum is smeared out of it. The smallest is at major seventh, where it is 0.95: an interval near a maximum is smeared out of that too. Vibrato pushes every interval toward the middle, and what it takes away from the consonances is much more than what it takes away from the dissonances.

A roughness with a rate of its own

Every roughness figure so far computes one number for a steady spectrum. Evaluate the same sum at every instant of a vibrato and there are three numbers instead — a mean, a depth and a rate — and the mean is not the roughness of the mean frequency. On an octave it is nineteen times it, because an octave sits in a deep narrow minimum and a vibrato smears it out of one.

intervals · The voice

How far out of tune an interval has to be before its beat is usable. An earlier essay produced a modulation index for every interval on a stated timbre; whether a fluctuation of that index at that rate can be detected is a published function of both. Running one against the other turns a table of decibels into a window in cents. The bar is the mistuning over which the beat is both deep enough to notice and at a rate a tuner can use — not so slow that a beat takes half a minute to complete, not so fast that it has stopped being a beat. the major third gives the widest window, 1.3 to 60.0 cents, and the minor sixth the narrowest, 0.8 to 38.9. The ordering is the opposite of the dip's: the octave has the shallowest dip on a string spectrum and the widest usable window, because its coincidence sits at a low partial and a given mistuning therefore produces a slower beat. Depth and rate pull opposite ways, and it is the rate that decides.

The beat a tuner can actually use

There is a modulation index for every interval on every timbre, and the published threshold for detecting a fluctuation is a function of exactly that and its rate. Running one against the other turns a table of decibels into a window in cents — and reverses the ordering, because the interval with the shallowest dip has the widest window.

intervals · Beating

one measured slendro is the scale least committed to a spectrum. Each scale drawn, placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of the same size, under 4 spectra. Low is smooth. Every one of them lands in the smoothest third under every spectrum, so the account that a spectrum chooses a scale survives as a statement about levels. What separates them is the length of each row's line, which is how much the answer moves when the instrument changes: one measured slendro spans 2.9 percentile points and Rast, Turkish theory spans 17.6, a factor of 6.0. The scale usually offered as the case for spectral matching is the one whose standing barely depends on the spectrum, and Rast, Turkish theory is the one that depends on it most.

The scale least committed to its own instrument

The essays on scales beyond twelve draw scales without spectra and spectra without scales, and none of them had put a tradition's own degrees through the roughness model. Doing it for six scales and five spectra says the account survives — every tradition lands between the eighth and the twenty-sixth percentile of random scales of its size, and under a pure tone not one of them does. But the scale whose standing moves least when the instrument changes is the gamelan's, at 2.9 percentile points, and the one that moves most is the five-limit diatonic at 17.4. The scale the argument is usually made about is the one it explains least.

scales · Beyond twelve

Both notes of a fifth, and the coincidences going out. The highest partial still above the threshold of hearing for each note of a fifth struck at 80 decibels on 130.8 hertz, against time, with a 1/n spectrum and a loss rising as the partial number to the power 1. Both curves come down from off the top of the frame — the lower note starts with 152 partials and the upper with 102, because twenty kilohertz is a ceiling in frequency and not in partial number. The rings are the interval's partial coincidences at the moment they stop existing — successive multiples of one ratio, which go out from the top down: 12:8 at 0.47 s, then 9:6 at 0.64 s, then 6:4 at 1.04 s, then 3:2 at 2.14 s. The lowest, 3:2, is the last, and after it the two notes have no partial in common that either of them can still supply.

A fifth on a piano is not a fifth a second later

Nine essays draw one note in silence, and a listener is given a texture. Put two struck notes an interval apart and consonance comes apart into two quantities that had agreed while nothing moved: the partial coincidence that names the interval outlives the strike in exactly the order common-practice theory ranks its intervals, and the roughness that scores it reorders itself inside a third of a second, with the fifth overtaken by four intervals every treatise calls harsher.

timbre · Harmonic series

Weighted by the pairs a melody sounds next to each other, every seven-note scale is rougher than most. Each scale placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of the same size, under 4 spectra, with each pair of its degrees weighted by how often the plainest melody its ascent and descent permit sounds the two — here the pairs a melody sounds next to each other. Low is smooth. Raga Bhupali: 40.3 to 56.8, spread 16.5; Raga Deshkar: 25.1 to 37.5, spread 12.4; one measured slendro: 31.8 to 44.5, spread 12.7; Rast, Arabic theory: 92.0 to 98.6, spread 6.6; Rast, Turkish theory: 91.8 to 97.8, spread 6.0; the diatonic major, tempered: 90.7 to 97.0, spread 6.3; the diatonic major, five-limit just: 91.8 to 97.8, spread 6.0.

The smoothness is in the skips

Traditional scales come out smoother than random scales of their size because every pair of their degrees is counted once. Count only the pairs a melody on the scale actually sounds next to each other, and every seven-note scale here is rougher than ninety per cent of random ones, under every spectrum, and under a pure tone as well. The smoothness is carried by the pairs a melody reaches by skipping — its thirds and above all its fifths, which are smoother than all but two random scales in two thousand. Counted by their own ascents and descents, the two ragas that share one set of notes stand in different places at last: Deshkar's skipped Re buys a smoother ascent and costs it the fifths.

scales · Beyond twelve

Weighted by the ring of the note before, a note every 0.6 seconds, Raga Deshkar moves least. Each scale placed by how smooth it is against 2000 random scales of its size under 4 instruments, each with its own spectrum and its own ring, with every pair of notes its plainest melody sounds weighted by how much of the earlier note is still sounding when the later one begins, a note every 0.6 seconds. Low is smooth. Raga Bhupali: plucked string, 6 s 53.6, long-ringing string, 12 s 35.8, blown note, 2 s hall 41.3, free bar, 4 s 58.5; spread 22.8; Raga Deshkar: plucked string, 6 s 39.0, long-ringing string, 12 s 25.9, blown note, 2 s hall 26.1, free bar, 4 s 42.0; spread 16.1; one measured slendro: plucked string, 6 s 42.9, long-ringing string, 12 s 27.8, blown note, 2 s hall 32.6, free bar, 4 s 46.4; spread 18.6; Rast, Arabic theory: plucked string, 6 s 92.0, long-ringing string, 12 s 65.2, blown note, 2 s hall 92.3, free bar, 4 s 96.1; spread 30.9; Rast, Turkish theory: plucked string, 6 s 88.0, long-ringing string, 12 s 58.1, blown note, 2 s hall 90.8, free bar, 4 s 93.6; spread 35.5; the diatonic major, tempered: plucked string, 6 s 84.8, long-ringing string, 12 s 54.2, blown note, 2 s hall 89.5, free bar, 4 s 91.3; spread 37.0; the diatonic major, five-limit just: plucked string, 6 s 87.7, long-ringing string, 12 s 56.7, blown note, 2 s hall 90.3, free bar, 4 s 92.9; spread 36.2.

A scale is committed to how long its instrument rings

A traditional scale's standing on the roughness model moves when the instrument changes, and that movement was read as a commitment to the instrument's spectrum. Weight every pair of notes a melody sounds by how much of the earlier note is still ringing when the later one begins, and the movement grows — the tempered diatonic's by 37 percentile points at a note every 0.6 seconds — but almost none of it is the spectrum. Put four instruments' rings on one spectrum and the scale moves 38.6 points; put four spectra under one ring and it moves 9.4. And the partials that make a fifth smooth are the first to stop sounding.

scales · Beyond twelve

The tempo moves it further than the touch does. One measured slendro, scored among random scales of its size under a free bar, 4 s, at five tempi and under each touch. Left to ring it runs from 29 at 0.15 seconds a note to 83 at 2.4 — a span of 54 percentile points, where the two touches differ by at most 17. So the scale is smoother than most of its size when the music is fast and rougher than most when it is slow, and how the bar is damped is the smaller decision. The two touches converge at the slow end because a bar that has died before its successor is sounding against nothing whatever the player does.

The tempo moves a scale further than the touch

A gamelan is played two ways on the same bars: a saron's are damped as the next is struck and a gendèr's ring over their resonators. That decision moves a slendro's standing among random scales of its size by up to seventeen percentile points, which is real. Over the tempo levels a piece actually moves through it moves by fifty-four — from the twenty-ninth percentile at a fast elaboration to the eighty-third at a slow one. The same five pitches on the same bars are a smoother-than-average scale and a rougher-than-average one, and which depends on how fast they are played.

scales · Beyond twelve

The scale's standing belongs to the ringing instrument. Where a measured slendro sits among random five-note scales, at three density ratios, scored three ways: the two instruments together, the fast ringing part on its own, and the slow damped part on its own. At one slow note to 2 fast ones the ensemble is at the 7th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 6th, and the damped part alone at the 95th; At one slow note to 4 fast ones the ensemble is at the 5th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 7th, and the damped part alone at the 95th; At one slow note to 8 fast ones the ensemble is at the 5th percentile, the ringing part alone at the 5th, and the damped part alone at the 95th. A low percentile is a scale smoother than most of its size. The damped part on its own is rougher than nineteen random scales in twenty, because it has almost no simultaneity for its intervals to be smooth in; the ensemble is at the ringing part's figure throughout. And the cross pairs, which are a quarter of the roughness, do not make the ensemble worse than either part alone.

The scale belongs to the ringing instrument

A gamelan plays two instruments on one scale at once — a saron damped at every stroke and a gendèr several times faster with its bars left to ring — and a quarter of the roughness a listener receives falls on pairs that cross between them, which no figure had computed. The cross pairs turn out to be no worse than either stream's own. What decides the scale's standing is the fast part: the ensemble sits at the sixth percentile among random five-note scales and so does the ringing instrument alone, while the damped one alone sits at the ninety-sixth.

scales · Beyond twelve

A wrong bar costs the same whichever instrument it is on. What moving one degree of a measured slendro by 10 cents, flat or sharp, adds to the roughness per second of a two-instrument texture — a ringing part at 0.15 s a note over a damped one four times slower — on the ringing instrument and on the damped one. The ensemble in tune scores 7.47. Degree 1 (0¢): ringing 0.142 flat and 0.202 sharp, damped 0.163 and 0.185, of which beating 0.178; Degree 2 (231¢): ringing 0.119 flat and 0.068 sharp, damped 0.096 and 0.090, of which beating 0.093; Degree 3 (474¢): ringing 0.106 flat and 0.021 sharp, damped 0.069 and 0.057, of which beating 0.063; Degree 5 (717¢): ringing 0.079 flat and 0.072 sharp, damped 0.075 and 0.078, of which beating 0.077; Degree 6 (955¢): ringing 0.023 flat and 0.018 sharp, damped 0.019 and 0.022, of which beating 0.020. Over all ten errors the ringing instrument's cost 0.85 and the damped one's 0.85, and the wrong bar beating against the other instrument's right one comes to 0.86 on either — as much as the whole, because the intervals the error changes add as often as they save. One error costs about 1.1% of the texture's roughness.

A wrong bar beats the same on either instrument

The ringing instrument carries a gamelan scale's standing, so a tuning error on it was predicted to cost more than the same error on the damped instrument. Put in the beating the model lacked, and the prediction fails: moved ten cents, a degree costs the same 0.85 summed over the scale on either instrument, because almost all of the cost is the wrong bar beating against the right one on the other instrument, and a beat belongs to both of the bars that make it. Moving a whole instrument costs exactly what its five degrees cost separately, and it takes nothing from the scale's standing.

scales · Beyond twelve

All figures · What can be heard