Every essay — page 4
Pitch and tuning Intervals and chords Scales and modes Harmony and voice leading Rhythm and metre Timbre and acoustics Perception and the listener Instruments and their design Form and structure Series Objects Sounds Search
Intervals and chords
Two notes at once, why some of them beat, and the geometry of the ones that do not.
Two notes and a ratio, which is the whole of consonance
Sound two tones together and the pair either settles or does not. What decides it is the ratio of their frequencies, and the rule is that simpler ratios settle — which is two and a half thousand years old and still not quite an explanation.
Beats are arithmetic that anybody can hear
Two tones a few hertz apart swell and fade at exactly their difference. It is the most direct evidence available that the ear does sums on what reaches it, and it is how every instrument in the world gets tuned.
Roughness can be computed, and the answer looks like a scale
Feed two spectra into a model of how nearby frequencies interfere, sweep one past the other, and the curve that comes out has dips exactly where the consonant intervals are. Nobody put them there.
The note that is not there
A telephone reproduces nothing below about three hundred hertz, and a bass line down at eighty comes through it perfectly. The pitch that is heard is not a frequency present in the sound, and one nineteenth-century experiment settles what it is instead.
A third is rougher in the bass
Consonance is usually presented as a property an interval has. It is not. The same major third is muddy two octaves below middle C and clean two octaves above it, the ratio never changed, and the frequency where it stops being muddy can be solved for.
Three is the largest agreeable number
Take every chord of every size that can be built from the twelve, score each one for roughness and for the size of the whole numbers it needs, and ask how many are good on both counts. At two notes the answer is one. At three notes it is still one. At four it is eight, and the question stops having an answer.
The ear sorts into boxes, and the boxes are the theory
Slide one note slowly upward against another and the interval between them changes continuously. What a listener reports does not. It stays a minor third, stays a minor third, and then in the space of about twenty cents becomes a major third — and nothing in the sound corresponds to the moment of the change.
The ear makes its own sound, and it is not the missing fundamental
Play two loud tones and a third pitch appears that is in neither of them. The ear is not a passive analyser: it is nonlinear, it generates frequencies of its own, and it emits sound back out of the ear canal. None of which explains the missing fundamental — the products land in the wrong place, and finding out where they land is the experiment that made the residue theory necessary.
A spectrum chooses its own scale
The roughness curve's dips are always described as landing on the small whole numbers. They do not land on numbers. They land where partials coincide, and stretching a spectrum by seven per cent moves every one of them by exactly seven per cent — so the scale a set of intervals belongs to is a property of the instrument's spectrum rather than of arithmetic.
Roughness cannot choose a scale
Score all four hundred and sixty-two seven-note selections from the twelve for roughness and the answer at middle C is a mode of the diatonic set, first out of four hundred and sixty-two. Ask the same question an octave lower and the same selection ranks a hundred and forty-first. The model is not wrong; it is answering a question about frequencies, and a scale is not one.
A dissonance has to last
Roughness is a fluctuation, and a fluctuation needs cycles. A minor second at the bottom of a cello fluctuates thirty-three times a second, so a semiquaver holds four of them and a demisemiquaver holds two — which turns the counterpoint rule that a dissonance may pass if it is short into a number, and puts that number at about seventy milliseconds through most of the range, once the pairs beating too slowly to be roughness at all are taken out of the average.
Which harmonics carry the pitch
A missing fundamental is inferred from a pattern, and a pattern has to be legible before it can be matched. Counting how many harmonics of a note land in separate auditory filters prices the inference — and the answer at the bottom of a bass guitar's range is none of them.
The same chord is harsher when it is louder
Every roughness number so far was computed at a level nobody stated. Roughness is the product of two partial amplitudes, so it is quadratic in pressure, while loudness is compressive — which makes a minor third at middle C thirty-two thousand times rougher at fortissimo than at pianissimo and only twenty-five times louder. A chord has no single consonance to report.
The mode with no fifth
Six of the seven rotations have a perfect fifth above their own first degree and one does not, which is a structural disqualification rather than a preference. And the set's single tritone sits on a different pair of degrees in every rotation — on the fourth and seventh in Ionian, on the tonic itself in two others — which decides most of what each mode can do.
The third the model has no opinion about
A neutral third — halfway between major and minor, and a scale degree in most of the music between Morocco and Iran — is nothing at all on an ordinary roughness curve. It becomes a well at 347 cents, which is exactly 11:9, only for a spectrum whose ninth and eleventh partials are at least three times their natural strength. No instrument has that spectrum.
The inversion that cannot end a phrase
Three positions of one triad, three measurements, and the practice contradicted at every turn. The second inversion is the smoothest of the three by roughness, the best explained of the three by a virtual-pitch model, and the one that three centuries of practice will not let a phrase end on. What forbids it is a rule about a two-voice skeleton.
The root an ear supplies
A major triad's notes fit 4:5:6 with nothing missing and a fundamental two octaves below the bass. A minor triad's fit two different series with two different answers a major sixth apart, and the model cannot choose between them. The ambiguity theorists argued about for two centuries is a computable quantity, and the spectrum invented to remove it is one no object produces.
A chord is a register
The same three pitch classes are five times rougher at the bottom of a piano than in the middle, and the arrangement that minimises the roughness over a low bass turns out to be the bass's own fifth and sixth partials. The orchestration rule about low thirds is not a convention. It falls out of the width of a critical band, exactly.
The series is not a chord
The major triad is derived from the first six partials of the harmonic series in every textbook that derives it from anything, and the derivation works: the first six contain a major triad and nothing else. Take the first four instead and there is no third at all; take seven and there is a dominant seventh with a flat seventh thirty-one cents below any keyboard note; take sixteen and there are eight pitch classes. Six is the last stopping point that gives the answer, roughness prefers three, four or ten depending on the register, and no criterion in the arithmetic selects six over any of them.
The same distance, under two names
Four hundred cents is a major third or a diminished fourth, and on a keyboard nothing in the sound distinguishes them. An earlier essay was about the boundary between two categories; this is about two categories at one acoustic value, and the surprise is where the ambiguity comes from. In quarter-comma meantone a major third is 386 cents and a diminished fourth is 427 — two names, two pitches, forty-one cents apart. Equal temperament collapsed them, and what a listener now supplies from context used to be in the sound.
The series has three tops
How far up the harmonic series can an ear go? The question has three answers and they are an order of magnitude apart. Consecutive partials stop being separately resolvable somewhere around the eighth, and where exactly depends on the fundamental. They stop being a semitone apart at the seventeenth, at every fundamental, because the ratio does not know what it is measured in. And they stop being distinguishable in pitch at all between the thirty-fourth and the hundred and fortieth. Every claim about where the series runs out is a claim about which of the three was meant.
How many boxes an octave holds
An identification model of pitch is usually handed twelve categories, and nothing ever asked how many an octave can hold. There are two answers and they are a factor of forty apart. Resolution allows between 151 and 356 — a listener can tell that many pitches apart in a direct comparison. Naming one of them without a comparison is a different faculty and it runs out at six or seven, which is where every mode in every tradition compared here sits. Turkish theory names fifty-three commas to the octave and a makam uses seven of them, and the gap between those two numbers is the whole of the argument.
The chord that is not played at once
Every chord until now starts its notes at the same instant, and no figure ever set the asynchrony to anything else. A spread chord is not a defective simultaneity: at forty milliseconds a triad of half-second notes is still eighty-seven per cent simultaneous, so it carries almost all its roughness, and it stops being a chord at all only when the last note arrives after the first has finished. What none of this can explain is the one thing every keyboard player knows — that a chord is rolled upward. The masking asymmetry that ought to explain it is 2.4 decibels at a close voicing, which is not enough.
An interval is two errors
Two notes in succession are two pitch estimates, and what a listener judges is their difference — so a melodic interval is heard less finely than either of the notes in it. At a semiquaver the limen is nineteen cents, which lands inside a published range long quoted from the literature and never derived. Sounded together instead of one after the other, the same interval is judged eighteen times more finely.