The collection

Every essay — page 13

Page 13 of 21, continuing through the fields in the same order.

Pitch and tuning Intervals and chords Scales and modes Harmony and voice leading Rhythm and metre Timbre and acoustics Perception and the listener Instruments and their design Form and structure Series Objects Sounds Search

Timbre and acoustics

What makes a clarinet a clarinet, and what a room does to it before it reaches an ear.

$The fluctuation stays; the rate goes. A unison of n voices with a spread of 15 cents, averaged over 5 draws. The depth of the amplitude fluctuation does not fall as voices are added — a choir is no steadier than a duet — but the fraction of that fluctuation in any single modulation component falls from 77 per cent at two voices to 24 at 32. Two voices make one beat and it can be counted; 16 make 120 and none of them is a rate. That is why a choir cannot be tuned by nulling anything.$

What a choir does that a soloist cannot

Two singers on one note produce one beat and it can be counted. Sixteen produce a hundred and twenty at once, and the amplitude still fluctuates by as much as it did — a choir is no steadier than a duet. What has gone is not the fluctuation but its rate: the modulation energy that sat in a single line at two voices is spread across a band at sixteen, with no line in it. That is the choral sound, and it is also why the just-intonation drift this site measured describes only ensembles that hold their pitch still.

A dynamic mark is an instruction about the spectrum. Six dynamic markings, given a hammer velocity each in a stated sequence of factors of two, with what the string then does. The level rises 35.1 decibels from pp to ff, which is the part everybody means. The contact time falls from 2.26 to 0.95 milliseconds, so the first null of the hammer's own pulse moves from partial 2.5 to partial 6.0 and the spectral centroid rises by 56 per cent. The partials between those two nulls are not quieter at pp; they are not there.

The mark that is not a level

There are six of them, they carry no units, and a performer has to turn one into a number before it means anything. What they instruct is not loudness. On a struck string a harder blow shortens the hammer's contact from 2.26 milliseconds to 0.95, which moves the first null of its own pulse from the third partial to the sixth: the partials between those are not quieter at pianissimo, they are gone. A fortissimo is a different sound, and the page has one word for both things it changes.

A note gets duller as it dies. Each partial of a string note against time, with the loss rising as the partial number to the power 1 — so the fundamental takes 6 seconds to fall sixty decibels and the 8th takes 0.75. The heavy line is the power-weighted centroid, falling from partial 1.77 toward the fundamental; it is halfway there after 0.15 seconds. A single-rate envelope would draw all of these as parallel lines and the centroid as a horizontal one, and a struck string does neither: what is left at the end of a long note is very nearly a sine.

The note that gets duller as it dies

Every envelope drawn so far is one curve applied to a whole sound, and no struck string behaves that way. A string loses energy to air, to internal friction and to the bridge, and all three losses rise with frequency — so a note with a six-second fundamental has a sixteenth partial that is gone in under half a second, and the sound moving toward the listener is a spectrum collapsing toward its own fundamental. Which means an instrument is identified twice: once by the fifty milliseconds of its attack, which the earlier essays measured, and again by how fast its colour drains, which they did not.

One instrument, five spectra. The first 12 partials of a bowed string at 5 pitches, each passed through the same fixed body response and normalised to its own loudest partial. The resonances stay where they are and the partials slide under them, so the pattern is different at every note: the power-weighted centroid runs from 1.02 to 1.71 across the compass and is not monotonic in pitch. A source with no body at all would give 2.35 at every pitch, which is the single number every roughness figure here uses for a string.

An instrument is not one timbre

Every roughness verdict so far uses one partial list per instrument, and a violin does not have one. Its body's resonances stay where they are while the fundamental moves, so the radiated spectrum is different at every pitch: the power-weighted centroid runs from 1.02 to 1.64 across the compass, and it is not monotonic. Which means the result that a spectrum chooses its own scale gives a different scale at every note on the same instrument — three minima in the dissonance curve at the bottom of a violin's range, two in the middle and four at the top.

How many intervals a duet is smooth at. Every ordered pairing of 5 radiators, with the number of wells in its dissonance curve over an octave from 262 hertz. Rows are the instrument underneath and columns the one above, so the grid is not symmetric about its diagonal and that asymmetry is the result. The count runs from 1 to 7 across the grid, and a cell and its mirror need not agree: a violin under a clarinet has 1 and a clarinet under a violin has 2. The fifth is a well in every one of the 25 pairings and no other interval is.

Which instrument is underneath

Every roughness curve so far compares two tones of the same timbre, which is a duet nobody plays. Give the two notes different instruments and the sum stops being symmetric: the same written interval, on the same two players, is up to five times rougher depending on which of them takes the lower note. From G3 upward the fifth is a well in all twenty-five pairings and no other interval is; below it, three pairings lose even that, and all three have a clarinet on top.

Six ways to put three players on three notes. The same chord — G3, B♭3, D4 — played by clarinet, oboe, voice in all 6 possible assignments, scored by the roughness each produces. Every bar is the same pitches and the same instruments; only who is on which note changes. The worst is 1.42 times the best, which is a factor a score can control and a chord symbol cannot express at all. Each row is labelled from the bottom note upward.

Which player on which note

An interval's roughness depends on which instrument is underneath, so the pair does not commute. Three players over three notes is the smallest thing that asymmetry has anywhere to go: six assignments, all of them the same chord, and across 450 of them the roughest averages half again the smoothest and reaches six times it. It is orchestration in the only form that can be computed here — not which chord, and not which voicing, but who is on which note.

How far equal temperament puts each interval's coincidence out. For each interval, the pair of partials it brings together and how many cents equal temperament mistunes that coincidence by. A fifth's third-against-second is out by 2 cents and a major third's fifth-against-fourth by 14 — so the same temperament that is inaudible on a fifth produces, at 220 hertz, a beat of 8.7 per second between two sections singing a third, with every singer in both of them perfectly in tune.

A section against another section

The choir has been treated as a unison, and no choir sings only unisons. Two sections an interval apart beat between partials rather than between fundamentals — the third brings the fifth partial of one against the fourth of the other — and equal temperament puts that coincidence fourteen cents out. So two sections singing a tempered third beat at nearly nine per second with every singer in both of them perfectly in tune, and the same temperament is inaudible on a fifth.

C4: the pulse computed and the pulse assumed. Above, the force the hammer delivers to the string at C4, integrated forward against the felt's nonlinear force and the string's returning corner, drawn against the half-sine of 1.60 milliseconds that every earlier figure assumed. The computed contact lasts 2.21 milliseconds and the corner comes home 4.6 times inside it. Below, the excitation each pulse gives to each partial. They agree at the bottom and part company higher up — worst at partial 6, by 34 decibels — because the assumed pulse has nulls the computed one does not.

The pulse that was assumed

Every figure until now low-passes the string's excitation with the spectrum of a half-sine, which is what a hammer would deliver against a rigid wall. An earlier essay said so and declined to do better. Doing better takes forty lines and refuses the prediction that came with it: the corner's round trips govern the spectrum as expected, and the contact time is governed by something else entirely — the mass ratio discovered one essay earlier.

What a trumpet mouthpiece does to the series. Each bore's modes before a mouthpiece is fitted and after, on the axis that says which harmonic each mode is: zero means the m-th mode sits at m times the spacing and is the m-th harmonic. Every shape starts near -0.14 and ends near 0.05. The cup holds 3.0 millilitres against a throat 3.7 mm across and pops at 642 hertz. What does not improve is the regularity: the spacing stays as uneven as the flare left it.

What the mouthpiece is actually for

A cup and a throat look like a comfort fitting and are a component. Put a real one on the front of a real bore in the horn equation and the whole mode series slides sideways by about a seventh of its own spacing — which is exactly the distance between a series whose second resonance is 1.85 times the spacing and one whose second resonance is the second harmonic. The flare decides whether the modes are evenly spaced; the mouthpiece decides which harmonic each one is.

The partial above which the returning corner has lost its phase. Up a piano, the lowest partial whose extra travel after one round trip to the near end exceeds a quarter of a cycle — above it, the component comes home somewhere other than where a corner needs it. The curve follows the inharmonicity coefficient, which is smallest in the tenor and rises both ways, so the corner survives best at A2 — to the 24th partial — and worst at A7, where only 5 partials are still in step. The earlier coupled model assumes a clean corner at every partial it uses.

The corner does not come back a corner

Stepping a hammer forward against the string's own returning wave showed that the coupling matters most in the bass. It assumed the wave that came back was the shape that left. On a stiff string it is not: partials travel at different speeds, and by the top octave of a piano the sixth partial is the first to arrive out of place. But a periodic wave can only see phase modulo a cycle, and counted that way twenty-one of forty-eight partials are still in step — which is why the returning wave is degraded rather than destroyed.

Trumpet at three dynamics, as a spectrum rather than a level. The radiated partials of a trumpet at 45, 70, 95 decibels, each normalised to its own strongest partial so that only the SHAPE is compared. A linear source would give three identical pictures. This one does not: the spectral centroid moves from partial 2.19 to 6.41, a factor of 2.92, because the excitation is nonlinear and blowing harder steepens the pressure front rather than scaling it. The tilt used is 3 decibels per octave of partial number per ten decibels of level, referred to 70 dB — a stipulated, ordinal number, not a measurement of any instrument.

A dynamic mark changes what a note is

Every spectrum until now is a shape with a level in front of it, so that playing ten decibels louder raises every partial by ten. That is true of exactly one instrument in an orchestra. Everybody else steepens their own spectrum as they lean on it, and a trumpet's centre of gravity moves from the second partial to the sixth across a dynamic range while an organ flue pipe's does not move at all.

7 figures $Which of the four terms is doing the removing, note by note. Each of three terms has a corner — a partial number above which it is the one taking the energy away — and the lowest corner at each pitch is the term that binds. The comb is flat at 8, because where the hammer lands is a fraction of the length and does not change with the note. The contact time's corner falls from 34 at A0 to 0.5 at A7. They cross at about E3, 165 hertz: below it the strike point decides the spectrum and above it the contact time does. The dispersion's corner is above both at every pitch on the instrument — 5.8 at the top against a contact corner of 0.5 — so that earlier term is real and is nowhere the binding one. That is a statement no one of them could make on its own.$

Four terms, and only one of them binds

Six earlier essays each computed one term of a piano's excitation spectrum and handed it to the next, and nobody had multiplied them. Multiplied, three of the four have a corner — a partial above which they are the term doing the removing — and putting the three corners on one axis says which is in charge at each pitch. Below E3 the strike point decides; above it the contact time does; and the dispersion, which is the newest and most laborious term, is nowhere the binding one.

The flare that makes a series harmonic, and how narrow it is. Every combination of a flare exponent and a station at which the flare begins, shaded by how far the bore's resonance series is from a harmonic series over partials 2 to 8, in cents. The best is 4.6 cents at an exponent of 1.00 beginning 43 per cent of the way along, against 127 cents for a plain cylinder, 21 for a plain cone and 26 for a Bessel horn of the exponent used everywhere else. Only 2.1 per cent of the surface is within five cents of the minimum, so the shape is forced rather than chosen — which is what three centuries of empirical brass design were finding.

The flare that makes a series harmonic

Every figure until now treats a partial as n times a fundamental, and the whole of brass instrument design is the business of making that true. A plain cylinder is 127 cents from a harmonic series and a plain cone is 21; the best flare found by sweeping is 4.6, and only two per cent of the swept surface comes within five cents of it. The shape is forced rather than chosen.

6 figures $Where each exciter's contact corner sits against its comb. The merger's four corners, drawn for three exciters. The comb is the strike point and is a horizontal line, because it is a fraction of the string and has no pitch in it. The contact corner is the exciter's, and it falls up the compass because the contact time is a fixed number of milliseconds against a shrinking period. Where they cross, the binding term changes. piano hammer crosses at E3; harpsichord plectrum crosses nowhere in the compass; dulcimer beater crosses at A5. So the crossing found earlier is not a fact about pianos. It is a fact about compliance: a felt hammer stays on the string for about 1.6 milliseconds and a plectrum for 0.05, and a difference of that size is a corner in a different place.$

The crossing belongs to the felt

On a piano the strike point decides the top of the spectrum below E3 and the hammer's contact decides it above. The merger's own bookkeeping asked whether that crossing is a fact about pianos or about hammers. A plectrum never crosses at all and a hard beater crosses two octaves higher, and the boundary is a contact time of about an eighth of a millisecond — ten times shorter than felt.

The bell and the cup, on one surface. Every combination of a flare exponent and a cup depth, shaded by how far the resonance series is from a harmonic series over partials 2 to 8, in cents. The pale line is the best flare for each cup — the ridge — and it runs diagonally: the exponent that suits the shallowest cup here is 0.93 and the one that suits the deepest is 0.70, a spread of 0.22. The ring marks the bell found earlier by sweeping the flare alone, at an exponent of 1.00 — which reaches 4.6 cents with nothing in front of it, and sits where the ring is, at 24.9 cents, once a catalogue mouthpiece is on it. It is on none of the ridge, and that is the whole finding: the two choices are not separable, and a bell optimised alone is not the bell an instrument wants.

The bell is tuned for the cup

Sweeping a brass bell's two flare parameters found a shape that makes the resonance series harmonic to four and a half cents. Bolt the mouthpiece that instrument is actually played with onto it and the series is twenty-five cents out — worse than a plain cone. The flare and the cup are not two independent choices, and the best bell for a maker to build is one that is deliberately wrong.

Intonation is a unison problem and nothing else. The roughness between two instruments on one note, against how far apart they are in cents, drawn for a unison and for the intervals beside it. A perfect unison is 0.0007 — the partials coincide and there is nothing to beat. Five cents apart it is 0.0465, 65 times as rough, and ten cents apart it is rougher than a major third played exactly. The mechanism is that partial n of a note mistuned by c cents is mistuned by c cents as well, which is n times as many hertz — so the top of the spectrum enters the critical band long before the fundamental does. The other curves are flat, because a third's roughness is set by which partials nearly coincide and a few cents does not change which.

Two players on one note

Six essays have put one instrument on each note of a chord, and the commonest thing an orchestrator actually does is put two on the same note. Two independent sources add in power, so the composite is neither of them — except that it nearly always is one of them, because the level at which ownership changes hands is rarely at zero. And a unison ten cents out is rougher than a major third dead in tune.

Who owns clarinet, oboe, voice at every balance. The composite of three players at 392 hertz belongs to whichever of them it is nearest in log-spectral distance, and here that is drawn over the whole plane of balances a conductor could set — the second and third players from 24 decibels below the first to 24 above. voice owns 79 per cent of the square. The three regions meet where all three distances are equal, which is the only balance at which the composite belongs to nobody: it is at -0.3 and -19.1 decibels, inside the square and therefore a balance an ensemble could actually be asked for. A trio has a colour of its own at one point, not over a region.

A section has a loudest member, not a colour

Two players on one note have a balance at which the composite belongs to neither, and that is what blending means. Three should have three such balances and no reason for them to agree — a trio with a rock-paper-scissors ownership would have no strongest member at all. Twenty trios, sixty pairwise comparisons, and not one disagreement: the possibility is real, arbitrary spectra do it once in twenty, and instruments never do.

Which pairs blend is a question about the note. The level at which a doubled pair's composite changes owner, drawn for all 15 pairs of 6 radiators over 2.6 octaves from 131 to 784 hertz. A pair blends when that level is inside the shaded band, which is the twenty-four decibels either way two players can manage; a curve outside it, or absent, is a pair one instrument owns at every balance. 6 of 15 pairs blend at the bottom of the range and 12 at the top. Every filter in this collection is fixed in frequency and the fundamental is not, so a radiator's shape is a function of pitch and so is everything computed from two of them — the blend ranking at the bottom and at the top disagree on 70 of 105 comparisons, which is more than half, so the order has turned over rather than merely shuffled.

The blend table has a row for every note

Eight earlier essays sound their instruments at one note, and one of them says why that cannot be innocent: every filter here is fixed in frequency and the fundamental is not. Swept over four octaves, the number of pairs that blend doubles from six to twelve, the ranking turns over rather than shuffles — seventy of a hundred and five comparisons swap — and a clarinet with an oboe goes from the best pair in the collection to the eleventh.

The bare bore does not care which valve is down. The distance in cents of partials 2 to 8 from the harmonic series that fits them best, at each valve combination of a B♭ trumpet, computed with the mouthpiece in place and again with the bore alone. The bare bore is flat — 0.78 cents from best to worst across the whole set — so the length changes nothing. With one cup serving all of them the same bore runs 19.53 to 24.83 cents, a spread of 5.30, because the cup's popping frequency stays at 642 hertz while the series underneath it drops.

One cup and seven lengths

A trumpet is seven tubes with one mouthpiece serving all of them, and the harmonicity of its resonance series is a different number in every position — 19.5 cents open, 24.8 with all three valves down. The bare bore is flat across the same seven lengths to within eight-tenths of a cent, so none of it is a length problem. It is the cup, standing still while the series walks past it, and pressing all three valves does to the series exactly what fitting a mouthpiece 56 per cent of the catalogue depth would do.

The top that falls while the note lasts

Four earlier essays have asked where the harmonic series stops, and all four answered with a number computed for a tone that never ends. A struck C3 has 152 audible partials at the strike and eight after two-thirds of a second, so the ear's own resolution limit governs the first ten per cent of the note and the decay governs the rest. Playing ten decibels louder buys the ear a further tenth of a second, and doubling its reign would take fifty-eight.

A struck note's two ends are the same for every loss law. The partial levels of a string spectrum struck at 80 decibels on 130.8 hertz, and what is left of it when the fundamental itself falls under the threshold of hearing, for three laws relating a partial's decay rate to its number. The left panel is every one of them: a loss law cannot change the spectrum at the instant of the strike, because no time has passed. The other three are every one of them too: whatever the law, the note ends with nothing above the threshold. So both ends of the slide are shared, and everything that distinguishes an exponent of 0.5 from an exponent of 1 from an exponent of 2 is in the middle.

The middle nobody could have guessed

A struck note has no steady state, only a slide from one spectrum to another — so the question is what the middle carries that the ends do not. The answer is exact rather than statistical: every loss law in the family leaves the strike with the same spectrum and ends in the same silence, so both endpoints carry precisely nothing about which of them it is. The whole difference is 41.3 decibels, and it peaks 0.38 seconds in, seven per cent of the way through the note.

The collapse belongs to the bass

Every envelope drawn until now has no pitch in it: the decay model counts partials rather than measuring them in hertz. Put a fundamental in and the collapse it describes shrinks monotonically up the keyboard, from 25.2 semitones of colour drain at A0 to 6.6 at C8, because a partial has to fit under twenty kilohertz to exist and the top note has four of them. Above C6 a struck note has fewer partials than the ear could have resolved, and there is nothing left for a collapse to take away.

Both notes of a fifth, and the coincidences going out. The highest partial still above the threshold of hearing for each note of a fifth struck at 80 decibels on 130.8 hertz, against time, with a 1/n spectrum and a loss rising as the partial number to the power 1. Both curves come down from off the top of the frame — the lower note starts with 152 partials and the upper with 102, because twenty kilohertz is a ceiling in frequency and not in partial number. The rings are the interval's partial coincidences at the moment they stop existing — successive multiples of one ratio, which go out from the top down: 12:8 at 0.47 s, then 9:6 at 0.64 s, then 6:4 at 1.04 s, then 3:2 at 2.14 s. The lowest, 3:2, is the last, and after it the two notes have no partial in common that either of them can still supply.

A fifth on a piano is not a fifth a second later

Nine essays draw one note in silence, and a listener is given a texture. Put two struck notes an interval apart and consonance comes apart into two quantities that had agreed while nothing moved: the partial coincidence that names the interval outlives the strike in exactly the order common-practice theory ranks its intervals, and the roughness that scores it reorders itself inside a third of a second, with the fifth overtaken by four intervals every treatise calls harsher.

The blend arrives before the note does

Nine essays on spectrum draw a steady state, and the strongest cue that two instruments are two instruments is that they do not start together. Two envelopes rising at different rates turn out to be a balance — the same dial an earlier essay swept — so the attack is that dial moved by the clock, and its whole travel is fixed at twenty times the log of the two attack times. It is six decibels for a clarinet with a violin against a crossing twelve to twenty-two decibels out, so one pair in ten changes hands during its own attack, and which one depends on a convention rather than on the instruments.