Acoustics & Music Theory
why it sounds like that
Concept

Window — where it appears

A stretch of time over which a quantity is averaged or a decision is made. Almost every perceptual limit in this collection is one, and its length is usually a number of cycles of whatever is being integrated rather than a number of milliseconds.

Named by 2 essays across 2 fields — each of them below, with the objects they name alongside it.

How fast two keys can alternate before the finder stops following. The share of bars a moving key-finder names correctly, once its reading is shifted back by its own lag, against how many bars each key holds for. One line per window. Below a block of three bars the second key is never named at all — 2 of the sweep's readings report a single key for the whole passage — and above about twice the window the tracking is over ninety per cent. The lag itself is about half the window: 0 bars at a window of 3, 0 bars at a window of 4, 3 bars at a window of 8.

The alternation a key-finder cannot follow

Two keys sounding together are not in the key-finder's vocabulary, and an earlier essay ended by pointing at the other case and saying what was missing: a passage whose alternation rate can be varied while everything else is held still. Built, it gives a rule with three numbers in it — the second key is never named below a block of three bars, the tracking clears ninety per cent above twice the window, and the reading is late by half the window throughout.

harmony · Key-relations The same roughness, before and after the window it has to be heard through. The instantaneous roughness of an interval under a vibrato, and the same quantity after a running average of 59 milliseconds — the time a dissonance has to last to be heard as one, which is 4 cycles of this interval's own 68-hertz fluctuation rather than a number chosen for the figure. The mean is identical to every digit, 0.1487 against 0.1487, because a running average cannot change an average — so the earlier Jensen factor of 1.0 survives the window untouched and its prediction that the window would shrink it is wrong. What the window destroys is the depth: 0.30 of the mean becomes 0.23, which is 77 per cent. The roughness a vibrato adds is heard; the fact that it is moving is mostly not.

The mean survives the window

A roughness that moves has a mean, a depth and a rate — all three of which a listener could only have through a temporal window. Applying the window already to hand settles which of the three survives, and the answer refutes the guess: a running average cannot change an average, so the octave's factor of nineteen stands and the movement is what goes.

intervals · The voice

Named alongside it

The objects these essays reach for when they reach for this one.

ModulationAmbiguityBitonalityConsonanceCritical bandwidthKey-findingKrumhansl schmucklerPitch-class profileRoughnessSingingTemporal integrationTonic

All concepts